Tombo671

Welcome

Hello, Tombo671! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Mattg82 (talk) 15:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Modifying talk pages

Hi, if you want to start a new discussion on talk pages, please click on the "New section" button at the top of the screen. Please do don't delete other discussions already on the pages, thank you. Mattg82 (talk) 15:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

List of best-selling music artists

Please refrain from moving artists upwards on the list without providing a clear explanation at the Talk:List of best-selling music artists. Make sure you discuss the reliability of your sources before you edit the List of best-selling music artists. All sources must be highly reliable and the sales figures within must be supported by enough certified sales. The required percentages are posted at the top of Talk:List of best-selling music artists.--Harout72 (talk) 02:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Images at List of best-selling music artists

Please refrain from adding anymore images than we already have at List of best-selling music artists. We are to have seven images only, and they have to be by the top certified artists. The instructions for that is posted in each section. See the third line below images: Sections are to include maximum of seven images of the top certified artists/bands. Be advised that further similar edits will constitute disruptive editing.--Harout72 (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your source nothing writes about it

Your source nothing writes about it [1]. Please give a new source. Subtropical-man (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

What are you doing?

You've created a bit of a mess here. If you're unsure about moving/splitting articles then I really suggest you read some style guidelines or talk to other editors first. I also do not see a recent discussion pertaining to splitting this up, which you probably should have done first. You've created a bunch of redirects and double-redirects and you've incorrectly capitalized the word "Albums" in the article's title. You also did not move any of the categories over. If you're going to take the reins and do something this extensive then it's best if you do it in a way that does not require others to clean up after you.

• Janet Jackson discography
• Janet Jackson singles discography
• Janet jackson ALLbums Discgography (please remove mods)
• Janet jackson albums Discgography
• Janet jackson albums discography
• Janet Jackson Albums discography

This all needs to be corrected and I would even suggest merging them back together until a new consensus is reached to split. - eo (talk) 12:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

No worries. For now I've merged things back so that a new discussion can start and/or someone can add to the last split talk, which I see was last January, per the talk page. I'd suggest/encourage you to re-open the topic. I deleted the test pages and I kept your IRL additions that you did before the split. If this is going to be split then I think we all want it to be done correctly. - eo (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Janet Discography

Both look fine, but none of the chart positions are sourced, and still need tweaking. Like i said on the talk page, my procrastination is playing a big role in my failure to work on them but Mine are practically done. What I'll do is pretty much finish mine and submit them, mine have sourcing. — Gabe 19 ^{(talk contribs)} 21:54, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

I submitted and saved what I have so far at User:Gabe19/Janet Jackson singles discography and User:Gabe19/Janet Jackson albums discography. I still need to work on the singles intro section, but mine are sourced, (correctly as well I believe) and should be looked over for mistakes and what not. — Gabe 19 ^{(talk contribs)} 22:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

To be honest, (not a jerk) but mine are more complete, even though more works needs to be done. All of my chart peaks have sourcing and are complete. (to my knowledge) and sources such as this are not reliable for FA. and this is a dead one. — Gabe 19 ^{(talk contribs)} 14:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Another thing, where are you getting most of your peak positions? with this edit, you say it peaked at #6 in Australia, when in fact it never charted according to their official site. Same with this edit where you changed the peak positions, but not according to source 1 and 2. — Gabe 19 ^{(talk contribs)} 06:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Your welcome to email it to me, santististevangabriel@yahoo.com. Because we would have to add it as a source to the page. And what about the Canada peaks you added? I remember searching extensively through their database for her album/single peaks. — Gabe 19 ^{(talk contribs)} 12:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Janet Jackson discography

Could you explain why you have inserted No.10 for Australia for "Got 'til It's Gone" and supported it with Switzerland's Hitparade which doesn't support it? You have also inserted No.11 for France and No.17 for Germany in your next edit using the same exact source which again doesn't support those positions for "Got 'til It's Gone".--Harout72 (talk) 15:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

• I inserted the No.10 for Australia, No.11 for France, No.17 for Germany using the source you provided on my talk-page.
• I have removed your recent insertions of Japan certifications except for one. The one for Janet Jackson's Rhythm Nation 1814 cannot be found, and the Oricon page for Janet and All for You doesn't support certifications, it supports charts position. Let me know if I'm mistaken.
• I don't believe we need to split the page into two as it's nomally done with those artists with huge catalogs.--Harout72 (talk) 15:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Simply the Best (Tina Turner album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | note9 = Live, London 1986) (Alternate version
• {{Certification Table Entry|region=Australia|type=album|title=Simply the Best|artist=Tina Turner|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rihanna discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {cite web | url=http://ariacharts.com.au/chart/singles | title=ARIA Albums Chart | publisher=[ARIA]] | accessdate=December 9, 2013}}</ref>
• {cite web | url=http://ariacharts.com.au/chart/singles | title=ARIA Albums Chart | publisher=[ARIA]] | accessdate=Febuary, 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Falsifying sources

I see that you were prevented from adding a reference to top100.blogspot.com.au, and you then added the material anyway, falsely claiming that the information was found in another source. Do not do that: the filters are in place to prevent the addition of poorly-sourced material. If you bypass the filter by including false sources again, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 16:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Idiot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited That's the Way Love Goes (Janet Jackson song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Together Again (Janet Jackson song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Janet Jackson

An article that you have been involved in editing, Janet Jackson, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. wia (talk) 23:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tombo671. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tombo671. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)