Uyarafath

Welcome!

Hello, Uyarafath! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Uyarafath. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. James (^talk/_contribs) 15:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.coxandkings.com/promotion/3d-painting-tours/limnesh-augustine-profile-details.shtml. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Limnesh Augustine. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Limnesh Augustine, you may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Limnesh Augustine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Limnesh Augustine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

I read the talk page. I also read the content that speaks so glowingly of its subject: just like the message at the talk page, the article praises him with "renowned" and talk of his technical expertise. Please consider if you'd used such language in your dissertation and imagine what your committee's reaction would have been. Minus that content, nothing particularly significant about him appears; it's a matter of "no indication of significance", as plenty of people get in Guinness. Nyttend (talk) 16:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Limnesh Augustine. reddogsix (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Indian painters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Indian painters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 17:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Wind Tunnel facility IIT Kanpur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on National Wind Tunnel facility IIT Kanpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Muhandes (talk) 09:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

To Muhandes

Hi, Hope you are not knowing what is difference between company and national facility. If you are not sure, please don't tag for 'speedy deletion'. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Anuj Gupta

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anuj Gupta, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  FITINDIA  09:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists

The article Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References used only mention this organization. I cannot find anything better in my search for references. Holding off on AfD in hopes that someone can add more sources to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CNMall41 (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Jade Mya

Please refer to WP:PAID and make the required disclosure if appropriate. Thanks. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, @CNMall41: -Sure. If I get paid I must disclose it. That is my responsibility. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Based on what I found, I believe disclosure would be necessary. If I am wrong, please let me know. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, @CNMall41:. Whenever I get paid for contributing to Wikipedia, I disclose the details in the respective talk page. As of now, I am not paid anything to this particular article. If I get paid I will sure disclose it in the article talk page. I respect always Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you for your valuable replies. Looking forward to get more input from such experienced person to improve myself.Uyarafath (talk) 04:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Just seems strange that you uploaded a commercial image to a Wikipedia page and were not paid to do so. Especially since the original image appears to have been uploaded on Flickr only one day prior, by a person who is the founder of a marketing company that advertises Wikipedia editing as a service. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, @CNMall41: - You are 100% correct. I was asked from a person to create an encyclopedic content with neutral view about Jade Mya. But, I haven't been paid by anyone and even from the person who requested me. So if I get paid, immediately I will disclose it. Whenever I am requested to make encyclopedic content on any subject and if I get paid I disclose it. You may visit these talk page Talk:Comparison of authentication solutions Talk:Elliott Michael Smith where I disclosed. I am always ensuring neutrality and notability and I never make any content for promotional for anyone. If any such, people like you always help me to correct. Thank youUyarafath (talk) 06:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Okay. Sorry to sound accusatory. It just seems strange that "a person" asked you to create an article and you are not being paid, despite the fact that the image uploader is the founder of a marketing firm that sells Wikipedia editing services - not to mention you have disclosed being a paid editor for a few other pages. There is nothing wrong with having a COI as long as you edit from a neutral point of view; however, having a financial interest that you do NOT disclose is against Wikimedia's TOU. My main concern is the possibility of paid edits that have not been disclosed. Also, I am not sure if what you said about being asked to create a page still constitutes a conflict of interest or not. I will likely just bring it up at WP:COIN to get an opinion as I don't know for sure. Thanks for the clarification. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, @CNMall41: - Okay. Got it. The person who asked me to create this article is running a marketing company. I clarify, I am an individual, not employed in any such marketing company. I am informed I will get paid if page sustains from the person. Thank you so much for all your information and guidance my dear friend. Also please visit to my user page where I declared COI. Is it fine? please correct if anything.Uyarafath (talk) 05:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 18:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Anuj Gupta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anuj Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuj Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jupitus Smart 09:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Adda52rummy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adda52rummy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adda52rummy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jupitus Smart 09:54, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of D.S. Kothari Fellowship

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on D.S. Kothari Fellowship, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Adda52 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adda52 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adda52 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 17:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Final warning

Although you have disclosed your paid editing for some articles, your editing here is very very problematic as you've been adding false tags and have even removed speedy deletion nominations on articles you've created. In addition, the poor quality paid articles are creating unnecessary work for other editors. Any further disruptive behavior in any form will result in your editing privileges being completely withdrawn. —SpacemanSpiff 12:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

• Also, do you have any alternate accounts like Batwoman3366?—SpacemanSpiff 13:01, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi User:SpacemanSpiff, What happened? What is wrong with me? I have stopped my paid service after the COIN discussions. Suddenly why are you giving warning? Did I edit anything after COIN discussion?. I deleted 'speedy deletion nomination' but that was sometime back not now. After understanding the guidelines I haven't deleted anything.I do follow Wikipedia guidelines only. Please correct me if anything wrong. I again inform you guys that I am not doing any paid editing currently, voluntarily I contribute proper encyclopedic articles only after COIN discussions. Please go through my recent logs, if anything wrong kindly mention it. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 16:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

And I didn't have any alternate accounts. It is the only one account I am using. I never hide my face and identity for anything. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

I did not see the COIN discussion prior to my note here, but your disruption on here has been very very problematic and is a time sink for volunteer editors. —SpacemanSpiff 02:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UrbanClap (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UrbanClap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Uyarafath, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jade Mya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jade Mya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Mya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew Edward Zagula

The article Matthew Edward Zagula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Highly advertorial - I don't see anything to make him notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 14:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Jade Mya

I don't understand this. You were contracted to do it earlier and now you're claiming you aren't, after the afd and now that you're wasting more community time on the draft. THere's something not right about this. —SpacemanSpiff 14:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jade Mya (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jade Mya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Elliott Michael Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliott Michael Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliott Michael Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 00:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uyarafath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I stopped all such paid contribution some time back. So, If Wiki team wishes to unblock me then it will be great. So, I can continue to contribute to my article Bypass transition which is one of the important topic in Fluid mechanicsUyarafath (talk) 14:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is utterly unconvincing. Given your violations which continued (after you were warned) for more than a year, you'll have to work massively harder to convince us to ever trust you again. Yamla (talk) 14:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uyarafath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, Yamla, I could not get your point. As I have been blocked, how can I work massively harder to convince you? the article, Bypass transition is in strand. It will be one of the important article in fluid mechanics. Already one volunteer mentioned that the article is 'too technical'. So, I have to work more so readers can understand about the topic. For that, I should be unblocked. After unblocking, if you guys find that I again promoting advertisement, you can block me immediately. What is difficult in that. So unblock me to continue my article Bypass transition. Thank you Uyarafath (talk) 13:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per the explanation at [1] it is not in Wikipedia's interest to allow you to continue. Your response to the charges indicates you don't understand the problem. EdJohnston (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MfD nomination of Draft:Jade Mya

Draft:Jade Mya, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jade Mya and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Jade Mya during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request (July 2018)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Uyarafath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi admins, I request again to unblock me to edit in Wikipedia. Seriously I do feel very bad and shame that I have been blocked for inappropriately using Wikipedia to earn some pocket money. Yes. I really feel bad. My last request to unblock also was declined. I understand wikipedia doesn't want me to contribute that further made me feel embarrassed. I swear here that I won't use Wikipedia for such paid advertisement purpose again and only will contribute notable information voluntarily which is useful to the community. I started an article 'Bypass transition' which is an important fluid dynamics topic but since I have been blocked I couldn't further contribute to that article. Actually I am a fluid dynamics graduate and i would like to contribute more on this field particularly in 'Bypass transition'. Kindly unblock me so I can start adding information under the topic 'Bypass transition'. I again inform the admins that I will not misuse the Wikipedia for my earnings. I don't know what else I should say so that I will be unblocked. Thank youUyarafath (talk) 13:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblocked per the conditions below. Welcome back. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• As the blocking administrator, I am willing to unblock on the condition that if you create any new articles, they must be through the WP:AFC process. Additionally if any more promotional articles are created by you, your account will be blocked again without warning. If you agree to this, you can reply here. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Hi TonyBallioni, I agree completely. It is great to have a positive response from you. Yes. I must go through the WP:AFC process for my new article. I will never use the WP for advertisement and for earning purpose. Thank you so muchUyarafath (talk) 14:18, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks a lot TonyBallioni. Uyarafath (talk) 14:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
      • Not a problem, and just for the sake of clarity, the requirement to use AFC applies to all articles you want to create going forward. If you have six months without any issues, we can talk then about removing the restrictions. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
        • Sure.Uyarafath (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of John Adrain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Adrain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Adrain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 16:19, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Comparison of authentication solutions moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Comparison of authentication solutions, is too promotional to remain published. Ideally, the list should only contain notable subjects that already have their own article, or are at least mentioned in another article. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can improve the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready to be reconsidered, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Newslinger talk 23:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Comparison of authentication solutions concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Comparison of authentication solutions, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Anuj Gupta

Hello, Uyarafath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anuj Gupta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anuj Gupta

Hello, Uyarafath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anuj Gupta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)