Your submission at Articles for creation: Tirlittan has been accepted

edit
 
Tirlittan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 15:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Oiva Paloheimo

edit

Hi Veeti Davidsson! After seeing your recent draft on Tirlittan, I decided to create a stub for Oiva Paloheimo. I'd welcome your help in expanding the article; I'm somewhat limited in adding to it since I am not fluent in Finnish. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Maila Paloheimo moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Maila Paloheimo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 17:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Maila Paloheimo

edit
 

Hello, Veeti Davidsson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maila Paloheimo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Veeti Davidsson! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! History DMZ (HQ) (wire) 20:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Ruben Oskar Auervaara

edit

You added Ruben Oskar Auervaara to list of fraudsters, which was great.

But I'm just curious about why you created a redirect Ruben Auervaara and piped the link as [[Ruben Auervaara|Ruben Oskar Auervaara]] when you could just as well have linked [[Ruben Oskar Auervaara]] directly. JIP | Talk 15:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Lapland (Tampere)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lapland (Tampere). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 11#Lapland (Tampere) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - Jay Talk 20:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Perho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caretaker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Citing sources

edit

Please don't use raw URLs in your references. Deb (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Also, please remember to use the present tense when adding Events to Date or Year articles - in keeping with all other entries on those pages. Deb (talk) 20:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
You are still doing this wrong. Please format references correctly and use the present tense. Deb (talk) 13:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia

edit

  Hi Veeti Davidsson! Thank you for your edits to Turku. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Tampere into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Adding photos to pages that already have plenty of photos

edit

I'm guessing there's some drive to add photos from Finland to Wikipedia; while that's fine in cases where an article is missing photos, please don't add photos indiscriminately where there are already plenty (or too many) photos, unless that photo adds something distinct to the topic (other than being from Finland). OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tenses

edit

As I've previously mentioned, the present tense is to be used when describing events in Day and Year articles. Deb (talk) 13:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive editing

edit

Making errors is forgiveable. Making them more than once is forgiveable. Repeatedly ignoring advice about entries for Day and Year articles and how to format sources is disruptive editing and you can be blocked for this. Deb (talk) 07:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaskinen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Latin names of Finnish cities and towns in the lead

edit

Latin names of Finnish cities and towns in the lead section fail MOS:LEADLANG. Please undo your additions so that somebody else won't have to. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 18:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Query

edit

Hi Veeti Davidsson. I'm Blablubbs, and I'm an administrator here on Wikipedia. I wanted to inquire about the relationship between your account and Abel111222 (talk · contribs). Do you operate both of these accounts, or do you have any other connection to Abel111222? Please do not edit further until you answer this message. Thank you.  --Blablubbs (talk) 21:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Frankenström

edit
 

The article Frankenström has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Veeti Davidsson. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Frankenstrom.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Frankenstrom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply