User talk:VisitingPhilosopher/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation

Personal relationship skills, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CathMontgomery (talk) 10:51, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi VisitingPhilosopher, thankyou for your efforts! You may not be aware, but Wikipedia has a Manual of Style which articles should generally adhere to. Your new article seems to introduce some unusual organisation and formatting, to say the least. You may want to read WP:MOS, or compare your contribution with similar articles, before you make your next contribution. All the best for your future edits! Sionk (talk) 20:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Since your comment, I have made the suggested changes and I think the article looks much cleaner now, thanks for your insight.

I appreciate the Manual of Style link, in the article I have also attempted to adhere to 14 other policies too, please provide feedback on whether there are others, I have described my approach and shown how the article meets the policies >> here <<. Let me know any policies I have missed. Thank you very much. ♥ VisitingPhilosopher ♥ ^{talk ◊ contribs} 01:31, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Blimey, thanks for the 'Barnstar', totally unexpected and thoroughly undeserved :) Editors always welcome thankyou messages of course, but for the future I'd recommend you put barnstars etc. on their Talk pages - in that way they notice it quickly ...and more to the point so does everyone else too! All the best! Sionk (talk) 10:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Personal relationship skills/Archive 3

Talk:Personal relationship skills/Archive 3, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Personal relationship skills/Archive 3 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Personal relationship skills/Archive 3 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:58, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Personal relationship skills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

I have addressed the issue raised above. ♥ VisitingPhilosopher ♥ ^{talk ◊ contribs} 09:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Personal relationship skills at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Personal relationship skills/Archive 3

The MfD resulted in the page being moved to User:VisitingPhilosopher/Personal relationship skills. Cheers, WilyD 06:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Please elucidate if anyone, perchance, has help or links to any prior precedents on the dichotomy --advert vs. opinions attribution, as discussed ♥ VisitingPhilosopher ♥ ^{talk ◊ contribs} 20:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)