tak pages leave a mesage

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Crocodile fat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xebulon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sorry about this.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Medical dowsing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Electromagnetic and Deltoid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

lol

edit

Sir or madam, you have made my fucking night. I drink a tall one in your honor. Many people have accused me of having Azeri sympathies (though you should know, many more have accused me of Armenian sympathies, considering I have revealed a personal bias in favor of the NKR) but few users have had the sack to accuse me of being a sockpuppet. Cheers, friend. --Golbez (talk) 04:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Here, enjoy the read: User:Golbez/Nagorno-Karabakh. The fundamental difference between the two is that while Azeri nationalists are more explicitly vandalistic about their edits (often just changing it to something along the lines of NKR IS AZERBAIJAN or something childish), Armenian nationalists tend to rely far more on sockpuppets. The Azeris have their meatpuppets, and the Armenians have their socks. I've been at this long enough to see the patterns, I've just been too lazy to execute based on my recognition. --Golbez (talk) 04:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

User:Mursel

edit

If you have any editwarring problems with this user, please let me know. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 05:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Armenians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese and Persians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments at NK article talk

edit

Please do not insert any comments into the text that I post. Make any comments below. Thanks. Grandmaster 10:04, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Smile!

edit
 
A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.2.116 (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dispute resolution survey

edit
 

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite


Hello Winterbliss. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.


You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Important information

edit

You should check here[1],[2], where I had earlier asked for EdJohnston to take a look at the edits/actions of numerous anon IPs. These anon IPs had canvassed a number of pro-Azeri/Turkish users asking for reversions. Some of this canvassing had resulted in edit wars/disruptive editing. EdJohnston apparently decided this issue was unimportant, took a short leave and left the issue for dead. I believe you should bring this information to the discussion and that if ANY editors are to be restricted then anon IPs should not be allowed to canvass for or edit in this area. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Melikdoms of Karabakh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Armenia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Nagorno-Karabakh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Umlauts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP:AE

edit

Hi. Please be aware of this report at WP:AE: [3]. Thanks. Grandmaster 20:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

April 2012

edit
 
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing for blatant bad faith and disruptive attempts to game an editing restriction. The first year of this block is made under the authority of WP:ARBAA2#Standard discretionary sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. T. Canens (talk) 21:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."