Your submission at Articles for creation: Prince Asare (October 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 07:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Xceedbeats! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 07:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Prince Asare

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Prince Asare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Xceedbeats

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Xceedbeats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Xceedbeats/Sample page

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Xceedbeats/Sample page, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Prince K. Asare

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Prince K. Asare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 13:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Please the article i posted consist of a profile of myself and it does not infringe on anybody's right. please help me by removing the speedily deletion on my page. thank you) --Prince K. Asare (talk) 13:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia; as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:
The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Sir. instead of deleting the page can you vividly give a guide as to how I should post an article to avoid deletion? Prince K. Asare (talk) 14:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but it is not a social media site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles. Writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.
Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social media sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

" Wikipedians have individual user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to work on the encyclopedia. Limited autobiographical information is allowed, but user pages do not serve as personal webpages, blogs, or repositories for large amounts of material irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you want to post your résumé or make a personal webpage, please use one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet service provider. The focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration. Humorous pages that refer to Wikipedia in some way may be created in an appropriate namespace. Personal web pages are often speedily deleted under criterion U5. Wikipedia articles use formal English and are not written in Internet posting style."

You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction, as well as Wikipedia's plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
In addition, this page is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have just deleted the content of User:Prince K. Asare, per WP:FAKEARTICLE. This comes after having to delete similar content posted at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. I'd have to suggest that the next attempt to use Wikipedia as self-promotional social media should result in an indefinite block, per WP:NOTHERE. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Sir, Please i had no intentions of doing anything fraudulent on Wikipedia. the issue is that i didn't have much knowledge about posting an article and also i didn't read your guidelines well. please i will request that you unblock mu account so that i can do things the write say and submit a proper article. thank you Prince K. Asare (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Prince K. Asare (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia strongly discourages the creation of autobiographical articles. And can you tell us which published reliable sources you would be citing to establish that an article on you met the relevant Wikipedia notability guidelines? AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Okay Sir. i have published reliable sources to proved that the article i posted was real Prince K. Asare (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm not asking for citations to prove the article was 'real'. I'm asking that you provide verifiable evidence that you have been discussed in detail in published reliable sources to the extent that you meet our notability guidelines. Actual evidence. Verifiable citations. Not mere assertions that such evidence exists. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Okay. here is a few: (https://legalanchorghana.com/lawyer/mr-prince-asare/)
https://gbaportal.org/locator/lawyers/2567 Prince K. Asare (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Firstly, we require independent sources (e.g. articles in the mass media, relevant specialist journals etc), not links to your employers. And secondly, all the links provide is evidence that you are indeed a lawyer. Which isn't in of itself notable, in Wikipedia's terms. Wikipedia is an online encyclopaedia. It isn't social media. We don't have articles on people who pass bar exams. We have articles on people who have come to public attention to the extent that we (not the subject themselves) can write properly-sourced biographies on them. Articles that explain why the individual concerned is worth writing about. We are not a provider of free advertising. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the explanation Prince K. Asare (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply