Yajeepms
Reblocked indefinitely
editAbout a half hour after being unblocked by Edgar181, you decided to post this "WikiLove" message at the user talk page that led to your previous block. This kind of edit is completely and totally inappropriate, especially for someone who just came off a block for posting harassing/intimidating messages at that same user talk page. Since your disruptive behavior resumed almost immediately, I have restored an indefinite block on this account. As before, you can appeal the block using the unblock template, but note that you'll need a solid rationale; your previous unblock experience was a little disruptive and unproductive. only (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I disagree that my last unblock experience was "unproductive"; I quickly started work on another article almost straight away.
Yajeepms (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am trying to create an article, but was interrupted. I accept what I have done. As per Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, I
1) Admit to it.
2) Propose to improve articles.
3) Will not do it again.
4) I am here to promote Austria.
Decline reason:
GB fan'sSwpb's achievements continue to mount, as now 18 hours has become indefinite. We have plenty of editors willing and capable of editing Austrian related content in a neutral manner. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In your last unblock request, you pledged not to do it again. A half hour after an unblock, you were disruptive again. Why should we believe you this time that you won't "do it again"? only (talk) 13:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I was congratulating User: Swpb. I will not congratulate him again.
- There is absolutely no way that anyone would take your message to Swpb as anything positive. -- GB fan 15:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I clicked the send WikiLove button, therefore it is positive. I was congratulating him on suppressing Austrian culture on Wikipedia for under 18 hours, which is a fine achievement.
- How you add something does not make something positive. It is the message that is sent that makes things positive. Your message to Swpb was not positive at all. Based on your attitude, don't expect to get unblocked anytime soon. -- GB fan 16:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Yajeepms (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am very neutral. I accept what I have done. As per Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, I:
1) Admit to it.
2) Propose to improve articles.
3) Will not do it again.
4) I am here to promote Austria.
Decline reason:
You broke your committment in the last unblock almost instantly; you also seem to be very confused in this one. You "admit to it", then attempt justify the attack in the comments above. Since you're just repeating the same unblock request now, and you're just being nonsensical, I'm removing your ability to edit this page. Kuru (talk) 16:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- First of all, do not modify closed unblock requests. Secondly, reposting a nearly identical unblock request to the most recently declined one is not a sound strategy. We don't need an "Austria Promotion" account. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)