Wikipedia:Featured article review/Restoration literature/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Dana boomer 13:31, 27 December 2010 [1].
Review commentary
editRestoration literature (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: Geogre, WikiProject Literature
I am nominating this featured article for review because I stumbled across it and was amazed to see how lacking it is in inline citations. There are a total of thirteen inline cites. Editors were advised of the issue nearly two years ago. Thus, the article badly fails criterion 2c. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:23, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kudos to the editor who pointed it out! Good work, that. Reading the FAR from four years ago, almost, leads me to believe two things: Standards are higher, and if some of the people involved said the same things today, they'd be laughed off the island.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Was this the one where I was told that I was unqualified to review articles unless I worked on an article of this "caliber" (deemed an "unlikely event")? Actually, I think that incident occurred later that year. WRT the article, it definitely needs citations per Wikipedia's fundamental style. It's quite comprehensive and reasonably well written; lack of citations is the big obstacle here. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 04:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
edit- The main featured article criteria of concern brought up in the review section was referencing. Dana boomer (talk) 01:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist: Per the comments made above. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.