Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/2007 State of the Union Address

2007 State of the Union Address

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2020 at 15:45:48 (UTC)

Original – President George W. Bush with Senate President (U.S. Vice President) Dick Cheney and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during the 2007 State of the Union Address. 2007 marked the first time that a woman occupied the Speaker of the House chair.

Reason: "And tonight I have the high privilege and distinct honor of my own as the first president to begin the State of the Union message with these words: Madam Speaker."
Articles in which this image appears: 2007 State of the Union Address, Nancy Pelosi, State of the Union
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: United States Congress via National Archives and George W. Bush Presidential Library

Support as nominator – --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 15:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geoffroi 02:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – For the same reasons I opposed the Obama clip. Blah. – Sca (talk) 14:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – State of the Union Addresses are annual staged events. I don't see enough significance in the words "madam speaker" in a 50 minute video, not in the U.S. in 2007. I know it's a first, but still. Bammesk (talk) 02:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it not a good idea to have at least 1 FP to represent the State of the Union Address? This is my second attempt at this and I only nominated this one because Sca insisted that the previous one is boring. Yes, it is a staged event but it is still a very important characteristic of U.S. government. I still believe the quality of the Obama video was worthy of featuring. Maybe I should try the Obama one again now that the holiday season is over. BTW, these videos are not easy to get. Commons is the only place on the internet you can get these videos unedited, not watermarked and free of charge. They each cost me $25. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 02:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. I've not sat and watched it (I have little interest, to be brutally honest), so I AGF on quality. There's clear EV for a video of this speech on an article about this speech. I'm thrilled to hear that "Commons is the only place on the internet you can get these videos unedited, not watermarked and free of charge" - until it's mirrored everywhere and spreads, of course, but that's the point of Commons. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]