Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Beautiful Demoiselle
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2010 at 06:40:10 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality and EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Beautiful Demoiselle
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
- Creator
- Richard Bartz
- Support set as nominator --Nergaal (talk) 06:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I think these two pictures should have different nominations. They are from different creators and have both the chance of promotion. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:21, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Does it really matter? Voters could say yay to both, one of them or none of them. Nergaal (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not so, only one picture can be promoted in a given nomination. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Fine, then take the first as the original and the second as an alt. Nergaal (talk) 17:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Two are sometimes promoted in one; as "male and female", these wouldn't make a bad set, though I admit two separate nominations would probably be best. Nominations like this often cause confusion/lead to problems. J Milburn (talk) 12:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Removed second altogether. Nergaal (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Two are sometimes promoted in one; as "male and female", these wouldn't make a bad set, though I admit two separate nominations would probably be best. Nominations like this often cause confusion/lead to problems. J Milburn (talk) 12:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Does it really matter? Voters could say yay to both, one of them or none of them. Nergaal (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Stunning! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 23:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Colorful.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Why aren't people voting on this? What is it missing? Nergaal (talk) 06:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- The opposes and discussion at the German FPC give a clue: [1]. Along the same lines as Purpy Pupple's comment, the head is slightly unsharp. Maedin\talk 20:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support good picture! It seems that the head and thorax are less sharp than the wing, but meh, it's good enough. Nice and encyclopedic. Purpy Pupple (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support. J Milburn (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Beautiful Demoiselle Calopteryx virgo.jpg --Jujutacular talk 15:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)