Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pasture day moth caterpillar.jpg
- Reason
- High quality shot of this vividly coloured caterpillar in it's natural habitat - has plenty of enc value and is technically very good.
- Articles this image appears in
- Pasture Day Moth
- Creator
- Fir0002
- Support Original or Alternative, Oppose Alt Edit 1 Fir0002 08:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support Both are good, I lean towards Alternative 1. faithless (speak) 08:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Once again, you've shown us that you really are a good photographer. I Support the Original and Strongly Support Alternative 1. Hang on...Fir, is this caterpillar 4cm long as stated on the image description page? -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 10:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah it is - I guess I'd have an error margin of 5mm, so I'd say it's in the range of 38-43mm. It's not fully grown (they get up to 6cm) yet but it's getting pretty close --Fir0002 22:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support alternate same quality, and you can see the caterpillar better. Clegs (talk) 15:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support alternative 1 - more of the 'pillar is seen, thus better enc. --Janke | Talk 16:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support both - Though the alternative is slightly better, both stand out as some of Wikipedia's best work. TheOtherSiguy (talk) 02:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support Alt 1 Edit 1 - The color temperature in the original is too high. (Too warm) pschemp | talk 17:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Dirt is brown, not grey/blue - the original Alternative 1 is the correct temperature from the photographer's perspective. --Fir0002 22:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support Alt1, nice shot. Oppose alt1 edit, gotta believe the eye witness. --Dschwen 04:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support "alt 1 edit 2" Samsara (talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Pasture day moth caterpillar02.jpg MER-C 03:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
