Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Muskox
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2023 at 00:13:10 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. A very similar image is FP on Commons, but this has higher EV.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Muskox
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good enough focus is beheld on most parts of the visible subject's body / wool / qiviut. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral due to artifacting in background - haven't seen this before. It's visible on the file description page. MER-C 16:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. I suspect the bokeh on the camera didn't play nice with the branches in the background, but I haven't seen that issue often with Canon. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: Very curious bokeh, something I wouldn't expect from a $2500 RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM lens... A second-rate or damaged filter, perchance? (Edit: some samples here: [1]) --Janke | Talk 15:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. I suspect the bokeh on the camera didn't play nice with the branches in the background, but I haven't seen that issue often with Canon. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 04:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)