Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Niagara1.jpg

Niagara1.jpg

Both the American and Canadian parts of Niagara Falls, viewed from Canada.

A panoramic picture of Niagara Falls, both the American and Canadian sides of it, seen from Canada. I think the picture's just gorgeous, and shows tremendous detail.

The picture appears in the Niagara Falls article, and it was filmed by User:Kurianperayil.

Nominate and support. - ekedolphin 03:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--K.C. Tang 03:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because of the following technical issues: tilted, curved horizon, stitching problem. --Janke | Talk 04:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - its all crazy tilty.--Deglr6328 04:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose apart from the tilt it is blown-out, blueish (maybe not the best time of the day to take a picture like this), a bit grainy and not very crisp at full res. --Dschwen 07:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why do so much work in creating this pic and then leave it sloping!! - Adrian Pingstone
Oppose Too Small! EKN 20:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)EKN[reply]
- It's a little bigger than that buddy, you have to click on it and make it bigger. Phoenix2 21:16, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too fuzzy, not the best time of day and the guy on the left makes it look odd. If you live in the area and could get a sharper picture and all definitely repost it. The idea is great. gren グレン 00:53, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted, blue, fuzzy, and there is an odd rainbowy/artefact effect in the trees in the background. Staxringold 14:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As above. It's useful for the article, but just not FPC material. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 19:20, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great concept, just not the best implementation. Its crooked, and could be cropped on either end. -Ravedave 03:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted ~ Veledan • Talk 17:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]