Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Roman bridge of Córdoba

Roman bridge of Córdoba

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2019 at 12:56:22 (UTC)

Original – Roman bridge of Córdoba

Reason: High EV and good quality
Articles in which this image appears: Roman bridge of Córdoba
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Rafesmar

Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 12:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is excellent. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.3% of all FPs} 13:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- By the way, I first reviewed this on my tablet. I opened the image, zoomed in as far as I could go, and looked around. Hm. It does look good, but those people are awfully blurry, and it's a bit grainy, isn't it. Then I realised I was zoomed in to about 16x full resolution, and that those people were absolutely tiny compared to the bridge, and that even at about 2-4x zoom in, it looked great. It's a spectacular picture, that one could upscale a fair ways without issue. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.3% of all FPs} 04:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 15:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @ImmortalWizard: You may want to put "The new" in a different colour or add a dash if you're going to be here a lot. I keep reading your votes as "Support the new", and sooner or later your vote's going to be assigned to the newest alt by mistake. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.3% of all FPs} 04:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Adam Cuerden: Changed. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 09:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks! And sorry about that. Just thought you'd want to know. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.3% of all FPs} 09:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wow, looks good to me. Mattximus (talk) 01:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can't think of a reason to take this photo on a day with grey clouds. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It's decent, but the superior angle for FP purposes would be from the other end, with the Mezquita and/or Alcazar and main part of town in the background. Also missing close to a third of the bridge, which affects encyclopaedic value. --jjron (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - almost, but not quite there. I agree with Charles and Jjron on this - a shot closer to sunset and from a different angle would be better (compare File:Pont du Gard BLS.jpg). MER-C 17:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]