Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (58)-Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (72)-4.jpg
Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2012 at 12:07:56 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality, very illustrative, nice scenery. Recently featured on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
Parque Generalísimo Francisco de Miranda(Spanish wiki),Caracas, Parque del Este, Roberto Burle Marx.
Note: The article appears on the article of Parque del Este, but that page is rather poor in english, so I added the link to the article in spanish too. It also appears in the article of Caracas but don't think it counts since it was added 2 days ago. If I have to renominate later, no problem.
- FP category for this image
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Panorama
- Creator
- Paolo Costa
- Support as nominator --Paolo Costa 12:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I removed the image from Caracas, as it is over-illustrated already and the image was badly formatted. The best bet for this image is in Parque del Este, which as you say could use some expansion. Jujutacular talk 14:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment No problem. Even though I still think the article of Caracas could really use images like this one, since the ones it has don't have good quality. This park is also a very very important landmark of the city, it is huge. --Paolo Costa 16:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I would say it is a problem when a decent picture gets removed and bunch of crap gets left in there. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed lots of crap there, but what really matters is if the park is more significant than the other parts of the city illustrated in the article. I don't know Caracas, but I would imagine that is more important than this green space. --Elekhh (talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Exactly why the image should not have been removed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- I won't stop it from being put back in but at the very least it needs to be formatted correctly. It was covering text. Jujutacular talk 13:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Exactly why the image should not have been removed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed lots of crap there, but what really matters is if the park is more significant than the other parts of the city illustrated in the article. I don't know Caracas, but I would imagine that is more important than this green space. --Elekhh (talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support very good EV for Parque del Este and nice image. Indeed two years ago it was expected that articles are more substantial, but recently I saw many images promoted while illustrating stubs, so it wouldn't be fair to abstain on that ground. --Elekhh (talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Added to the article about the landscape architect Roberto Burle Marx, although of limited EV. Also added some good sources to the article. --Elekhh (talk) 09:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Elekhh --Paolo Costa 01:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support Meets the criteria. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Please fix the magenta white balance tinge. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed --Paolo Costa 04:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support JJ Harrison (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support Per above. Impressive picture, has EV, meets criteria, deserves promotion. Dusty777 (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Promoted File:Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (58)-Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (72)-4.jpg --Jujutacular talk 13:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)