Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Lime Butterfly Papilio demoleus.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2019 at 14:46:06 (UTC)

Lime Butterfly Papilio demoleus, Bangalore, India

Reason: not as good as other image mentioned on talk page File:Common Lime Butterfly Papilio demoleus by Kadavoor.JPG
Articles this image appears in: none
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Lime Butterfly Papilio demoleus.jpg
Nominator: Charlesjsharp (talk)

Delist — Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - although this contains the same information as File:Common Lime Butterfly Papilio demoleus by Kadavoor.JPG, that image is not used in the article. I agree one of the two images should be delisted, but the case for delisting this specific image is not clear. Maybe you should edit this nomination or withdraw/create another along the lines of the "most valued review" process. (We don't need a new type of nomination permanently, once we clear out the existing duplicates we should be fine with new nomination, if successful delist the old FP.) MER-C 19:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MVR does not apply at FP. I have switched the image in the article. This one is clearly inferior and should I believe be delisted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delist now that the better one is in the main page. Mattximus (talk) 13:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I may be biased given that I've taken the picture but I strongly believe this is better than the proposed one by Kadavoor. The composition is more appealing, wing details are better preserved, it is less tightly cropped and does not have a distracting twig behind its back. --Muhammad(talk) 15:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jee's high quality image has the wings all in focus, whereas forewing is blurred in this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
While that may be true, we should not keep since it is not in any article, which means it should be delisted per featured nomination rules, no? Mattximus (talk) 16:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mattximus, it is used in this article: Valley of Flowers National Park. Bammesk (talk) 01:21, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It was being used in the article till after this delist nom was created when the nominator decided to remove it 🙄 -- Muhammad(talk) 04:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've also removed image from Valley of Flowers NP article as the image description says taken in Bangalore. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Although there is no consensus to delist the image, it's unused and therefore can't retain its featured status. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]