Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Animal (album)/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Animal (album)/archive1)

Animal

edit
edit | discuss
  Animal
6 articles
 
  "Tik Tok"
  "Your Love Is My Drug"
  "Blah Blah Blah"
  "Take It Off"
  "Dirty Picture"

Why am i nominating this? Well, i have worked my butt off on these articles and have personally written each one. All the articles are good articles and i watch and monitor them daily to maintain their original passing standards. So with the support of my fellow editors, I would like to promote this topic to a good topic. Please leave your comments below and thank you :) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 21:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I actually never thought of that. Im leaning towards 'no because the version from Kesha's album, is a different version that was released as a single. Although it is a GA as well im gunna oppose the addition. If others disagree i will gladly add it. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 21:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I used it because its the highest quality picture of her that shows her face. If you would like to suggest another image please do. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 22:28, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this or this. I suggest the current for a topic related to her (like her discography). Tbh®tchTalk © Happy Holidays 22:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
She looks beyond drunk in both lol. Ive changed the image, will this suffice? :) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 22:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
support - lol, actually in all. OK with that. I support it, well done CK. Tbh®tchTalk © Happy Holidays 22:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cannibal is its own album and will have its own good topic. Cropping the image will disrupt articles that the image is used in. Dirty picture is not from her album, its a song on a specific deluxe edition and differs from the single released. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 23:24, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is what the Cannibal intro says: The EP is a follow up companion to her previous record, Animal. Originally the record was set to only be released as a deluxe edition of Animal, but was instead sold and released as both an EP and a deluxe edition of Animal. As for the extra song,Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Like a Virgin/archive1 has a somewhat similar discussion. Nergaal (talk) 02:00, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ive added the song but im still opposing this for now. I may just do "Animal + Cannibal" and merge the two once i can nominate Cannibal, it wasnt included due to WP:RECENTISM. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 02:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just to note that Cannibal can be added now (it would have until Feb 19 to get to GA) and I don't think having a separate Cannibal topic would make sense since A & C seem so well linked together. Nergaal (talk) 02:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I should easily be able to GA it by then. As well as We R Who We R and what ever other singles she releases. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 02:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, I oppose the addition of Cannibal. They are two completely different in terms of era, and is better suited as a separate GT. CK, don't add it. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sweet, now I know you will antithesize any opinion I have. Anyways, if you read through wp:FP? you will see among the recommendations: Conversely, a topic should not be excessively sub-divided; an all-encompassing topic of five articles is better than two topics of three each. These recommendations were created a long time before music topics were first nominated, and they were made by the people who created this whole process (and presumably have/had a better idea of what topics should be like). Nergaal (talk) 07:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't be absurd Nergaal. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Crop the image and upload it to the Commons under a separate title, not over the existing one. That will solve that problem. Just remember to attribute it as a modification of the current image. Courcelles 23:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you,   Done - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 00:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  Done and i dont think it requires any clean up after the redirect. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 17:31, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It needed some cleanup- for housekeeping reasons we don't generally leave featured content candidate redirects around, so I updated everything (talk pages of the articles, FTC page, and incoming links) to point here directly and deleted the redirect. Courcelles 17:56, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that, thank you very much :) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 17:58, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support A great effort from Lakeshade. Good job! Novice7 | Talk 06:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Cannibal could be included but does not have to be. All songs on the main album version that have articles need to be GA. Deluxe versions can, but are not required to, be included. Zginder 2010-12-19T21:39Z (UTC)
  • Support, and I don't think Cannibal should be included at all. The fact that it's sold along Animal doesn't change the fact that it's a new separate body of work. Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_and_good_topic_candidates/Animal_(album)/archive1&oldid=1138450442"