Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/February 2015

< Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates | Good log
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Good log/February 2015)

Body Language

edit
edit | discuss
  Body Language
5 articles
 
  "Slow"
  "Red Blooded Woman"
  "Chocolate"
  Money Can't Buy
Contributor(s): WonderBoy1998

Hi. I am nominating this for the title of good topic because all articles relevant to the main topic have been covered and are good articles. The lead article for this topic is the article page of Kylie Minogue's ninth studio album Body Language. The sub-articles included are the three singles that were released from the album - Slow, Red Blooded Woman, and Chocolate - and the one-off promotional concert that was held in support of the album - Money Can't Buy. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nergaal: Does it look fine now? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments:
  • Daily Mail and IMDb are not at all reliable. Replace/remove all citations to those.
  • Check for instances of ′ or ″ (including references), which should be ' or " per MOS:QUOTEMARKS
  • "Entertainment.ie" should just read The Irish Times, and its owner is Irish Times Trust.
  • "Spin Media" → SpinMedia
  • Fix dead links
Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: Thanks for pointing those out. I have addressed all the issues now. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good work on those. These look better now, but I've noticed more:
  • The "M" should be capitalized for AllMusic
  • Setlist.fm and Birmingham Mail are also not reliable
I removed Setlist.fm But why is Birmingham Mail unreliable?
Something about it simply comes off dubious, though perhaps I should've used different phrasing at first Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: Being a tabloid newspaper doesn't mean its information is wrong. Just because it "comes off as dubious" doesn't make it dubious. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Even so, there are better UK papers, such as The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian. See what can be used in place. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: I tried searching but couldn't find any other sources. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I removed About.com. And the Hello magazine source is cited just to describe the album cover art. I doubt its reliability comes into question here. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I still wouldn't use that site Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: I removed it. It wasn't being used to cite anything consequential anyway. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
After another look-through, everything seems OK. I'll now support, and if I see anything else that needs fixing, will simply do so myself. Good work :). Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We're getting there, just needs more polishing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: Thanks. I've addressed these. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_and_good_topic_candidates/Good_log/February_2015&oldid=1000209871"