Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Hurricane Isabel

Hurricane Isabel

Main page

Articles

Hurricane Isabel

Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Canada - Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Delaware - Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Maryland and Washington, D.C. - Effects of Hurricane Isabel in New York and New England - Effects of Hurricane Isabel in New Jersey - Effects of Hurricane Isabel in North Carolina - Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Pennsylvania - Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia - Effects of Hurricane Isabel in West Virginia

The lead article, Hurricane Isabel, is a great featured article. Other featured articles include the effects in Delaware, Maryland and Washington, D.C., and North Carolina. All others are good articles, with the exception of Virginia, which is a current GA nominee likely to pass. All great work by Hurricanehink. The FT box will look as such. PhoenixTwo 03:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator. PhoenixTwo 03:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would have rather waited and nominated myself until the effects in Virginia passed its GA nomination, due to the fact the topic is very personal in that I literally did 99% of the work in the entire topic. Support, nonetheless. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: Isabel effects in Virginia is a GA now. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for the early nomination; I was waiting simply for the creation of the Virginia article. I didn't think its status would be a determining factor in the final result here. Once again, my apologies. PhoenixTwo 06:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support here as well, any idea if any of the others are close to FA status? Hurricanehink, do you still plan on imporving these to FA? Dalf | Talk 09:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I plan on getting Isabel in Virginia to FA eventually, but other than that I don't plan on getting the others to FA status. They're all rather short, and though length is not a requirement in FA's, I know some people would get annoyed by having so many short tropical cyclone articles on FAC. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Meh. We need all the ones we can get. Support, by the way. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 01:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hurricanehink seems to vomit GAs and these are obviously connected with no gap in the topic. Jay32183 20:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Hurricanehink is way too good at writing storm articles... --PresN 03:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This even covers the optional criteria for FTs of having the same layout between articles, well done. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 03:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support — wow. — Deckill er 05:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose since this appears to be part of Wikipedia's pro-hurricane agenda. (If it isn't obvious, support.) ShadowHalo 22:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted by Tompw 15:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]