Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nuclear weapons/archive1
| Nuclear weapons | |
|---|---|
| |
| Nuclear weapons history | |
| Nuclear warfare | |
| Nuclear arms race | |
| Nuclear weapon design | |
| Nuclear explosion | |
| Nuclear testing | |
| Nuclear delivery | |
| Nuclear proliferation | |
| Nuclear countries | |
The nuclear weapons series is simply the best one I know of on Wikipedia. Category:Nuclear weapons has nearly a hundred articles and several subcategories, but there is also a clear and superb core, represented by the template User:Fastfission designed. The most important articles beyond the template are generally linked as main subarticles from sections, and many of them are quite substantial as well.
Nominate and support--ragesoss 19:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose
- At least three articles have no references whatsoever. Inline citations would be even better.
- Several display serious layout issues, notably Nuclear warfare.
- One is proteced, and one has a merger issue pending.
- Also obviously not peer reviewed (when doing so, make sure to mention your aim is not FA, though)
Circeus 20:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Conditional support. Get a least three references for each article. Once that's done you can change my vote to support.--HereToHelp 18:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Oppose per Circeus. Some of the articles completely lack reference. Other objections raised are also serious. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 08:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- Nomination was not promoted on 06:40, 29 April 2006 - rst20xx (talk) 13:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC)