Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Super Smash Bros. series

Super Smash Bros. series

Main page	Articles
Super Smash Bros. (series)	Super Smash Bros. · Super Smash Bros. Melee · Super Smash Bros. Brawl

Nominating this for Featured topic...because it meets criteria. Lets start the nitpicking. :) --haha169 (talk) 16:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - None needed, these are all the articles Wikipedia has that are Smash related, and we have 50% featured, so it is all set to be added. The only question that remains is, what free use image do we want to use for the topic? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Judge - don't tell me you forgot about the taskforce? Go check it out! --haha169 (talk) 16:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that image copyright? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Click on it, and check its Wikimedia Commons profile. --haha169 (talk) 16:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sweeeet!! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I'm pretty clever to figure that out, eh? :P It took a bit of research, but I determined that a shape as simple as that couldn't be copyrighted. Only the smashball with all the rainbow-y things and random designs can be copyrighted. --haha169 (talk) 17:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, check out the Legend of Zelda FT for a precedent. --haha169 (talk) 17:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - This meets all the criteria, no key articles are left out. Absolutely no reason why this shouldn't become a featured topic. Artichoker^[talk] 16:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! --haha169 (talk) 16:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I've never been here before, but I've checked the criteria and everything seems fine. Nice to see this happen as the major contributor of Melee. Well done on Brawl, by the way. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 16:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, Ashnard! --haha169 (talk) 16:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hard to find a nit to pick- there's only three games and they're all there, and 50% FA, sounds like a support. --PresN (talk) 18:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. --haha169 (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support: It seems to fit all the criteria for a featured topic, and I can't see any problems at the moment. Deamon138 (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. --haha169 (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. and above. Zginder 2008-07-16T20:47Z (UTC)
- Thanks. --haha169 (talk) 05:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good Gary King (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. --haha169 (talk) 05:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question: The character pages got deleted? bibliomaniac 1 5 04:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- To my knowledge, there never was a character page. The only place where they mention the list of characters is in the series page. --haha169 (talk) 05:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Never was a character list, but there was an awesome looking template once. —Giggy 10:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, no need to thank me. Pagra shtak 07:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support because saying "oppose" would be impolite :) Just kidding. A lot of work went into those articles and it really shows. Powerslave (talk|cont.) 09:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —Giggy 10:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome. ;-) —Giggy 10:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Lol. :P --haha169 (talk) 17:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - nice work, the copyright thing is brilliance, I liked the old template with characters though :( but that aside, fantastic stuff - rst20xx (talk) 15:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Far be it from me to add the first oppose here; that, and I really can't see any reason to object anyway. -- Comandante {Talk} 23:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --I'm an Editor of the wiki^{[citation needed]} 23:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'Suport igordebraga ≠ 21:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per nom. Hooray for a new video game featured topic! Xnux the Echidna 02:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support good work Intothewoods29 (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meets all criteria TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 21:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good to me. Forte X (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Close as consensus to promote --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 22:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]