Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/The Legend of Zelda titles/addition1
The Legend of Zelda titles (1st supplementary nomination)
editThis topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/The Legend of Zelda titles for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Note that this also removes previous article in the topic The Legend of Zelda
Renominating this per this discussion. Gary King (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Always nice to see another one of your productions, Gary. That said, I'm curious as to where the Zelda books fit into this ... IIRC, there were some graphic novels and even some plain novels written in the storyline and sanctioned by the games' producers. JKBrooks85 (talk) 08:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment/Support - per the discussion, I assume you meant this to be a supplementary nomination? After all, the existing topic hasn't been demoted or anything! Anyway, to explain what this nom is about... the current lead article from this topic, The Legend of Zelda, has been demoted from GA, but Gary and I think that the recently FLed List of The Legend of Zelda media would be a better lead, because this is similar to how band topics use discography articles as the lead for albums topics, etc, etc. The topic will not cover the Zelda books and so on, as it didn't before, but the scope-narrowing to focus on just titles is precedented, again with the discography analogy. Also unrelatedly this topic should be expanded to add the PRed The Legend of Zelda: Spirit Tracks, a game not yet released - rst20xx (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support igordebraga ≠ 18:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support The list is a better lead article for this type of topic, and scope reduction to just titles is fine.YobMod 15:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Though at some point, it should be fleshed out in the guidelines if both such articles, like the main Zelda article and the list of zelda titles must be included. I think we should probably soon move to require both to be present. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 04:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 15:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)