Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Gwen Stefani albums/archive1
Gwen Stefani albums
edit
The list acting as the main article for this was delisted as a FL over 2 months ago. Waiting to see improvment seemed preferable to delisting, but very little improvment has been made, and no indications that anyone plans to work it back up to FL, so the topic no longer meets GT criteria.YobMod 12:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - erm the criteria say "If any of the criteria are no longer met, or any constituents lose quality status, such topics will be eligible for a topic removal nomination after a grace period. The grace period will be three months for a demotion of an article" so this topic actually has until June 18. You're right that nothing has been done and hence it looks unlikely that anything will be done but it's far from impossible that the article could get up to standard between then and now. So I think we should wait the 3 more weeks - rst20xx (talk) 13:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oki. If you want to remove the nom and wait, it is fine with me. I am pretty certain that previous GTRs have been started with "by the time the GTR process finishes, the grace period will be over" (eg, here, which i think applies here too (many GTRs have run for more than 3 weeks, and FL take 2 weeks). Even the most simple fixes suggested by the FL delisting were not attempted, so it seemed an obvious case of not getting to FL in time - but i don't want people to complain it was out of process! Thanks for the reminder :-) 17:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah that's a good point though round here processes should theoretically run for
ten days...oh wait 2 weeks, if everyone's in agreement, as I would expect to be the case here. Having said that things have been a bit sluggish round here lately so I don't really know any more, just so long as it's not actually demoted before June 18 then I don't think anyone can complain and I suppose opening it earlier draws more attention to it whilst there is still time for someone to come along and decide to fix it up - rst20xx (talk) 19:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah that's a good point though round here processes should theoretically run for
- Oki. If you want to remove the nom and wait, it is fine with me. I am pretty certain that previous GTRs have been started with "by the time the GTR process finishes, the grace period will be over" (eg, here, which i think applies here too (many GTRs have run for more than 3 weeks, and FL take 2 weeks). Even the most simple fixes suggested by the FL delisting were not attempted, so it seemed an obvious case of not getting to FL in time - but i don't want people to complain it was out of process! Thanks for the reminder :-) 17:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- ...Delist - per Yobmod - rst20xx (talk) 19:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - it's now June 18 hence the topic's retention has ended - rst20xx (talk) 10:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Whelp, delist then. --PresN 14:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delist - per Yobmod. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delist - I'm back from an extended wikibreak and will be working on the lead article. However, it should be delisted in the meantime. There's a lot to do. -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 00:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Close with consensus to delist - rst20xx (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)