Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Seasons of 30 Rock/archive1

Seasons of 30 Rock

5 articles

I am nominating this topic for removal because 30 Rock (season 3) should have been a featured list by 14 August for the topic to remain comprehensive - and it is not - rst20xx (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I cannot see where season 3 ever went up for FLC. Could it be that the only problem is that they need to be cleaned and nominated real quickly? I mean, I'd hate to have to remove it just because the editors moved on and it was never nominated. I haven't looked at the page thoroughly, so I don't even know if it meets the FL criteria, but I did notice that it was never nominated. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If someone is willing to quickly bring the article up to speed and nominate it, I personally would have no problem with letting that run through - rst20xx (talk) 21:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remove. Way past its retention period, and no work currently ongoing to improve the article. Is templated, indicating significant work is needed, rather than it simply needing a FL nom.Yob Mod 15:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can try to bring this list up to snuff. Give me a couple days to try? Staxringold _talk^contribs 16:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine by me, take a crack - rst20xx (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok folks, have listed Season 3 at FLC. Staxringold _talk^contribs 19:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - 30 Rock (season 3) is no longer the only issue here. As of four days ago, 30 Rock (season 4) should have been added to the topic, following a completed peer review - rst20xx (talk) 23:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update on Season 3. Now a Featured List. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:20, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it? As far as I can tell, the FLC is still going on... not saying it won't be promoted, just that I can't see that it has been yet :S rst20xx (talk) 22:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But is says so in Portal:Featured content. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, will it was added by The Rambling Man in this edit on the 10th, but if you look at the FLC, there has clearly been action since then, and indeed the FLC is still listed at WP:FLC. I think this was probably then a mistake by The Rambling Man, but I can now see why you thought it had been promoted - rst20xx (talk) 22:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it was a mistake – you'll see that it's not in the promoted log for this month. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the FLC still ongoing? It looks stalled: Nearly a month open and there are a lot of points still needing addressing, and no edits to the article in a week. With the peer review also still needed, this topic needs delisting and renominating in the future.Yob Mod 13:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This FTR has been open a very long time now, but I'm inclined to wait until the FLC closes, and then take things from there - rst20xx (talk) 23:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oki doke. I thought FLC was still on a 10 day or 2 week schedule, unless there are too few reviewers, but that no longer seems to apply. The season 4 list also needs a lot of work before even bothering with a PR.Yob Mod 12:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, the FLC looks to finally be near completion (3 supports, 2 weaker/conditional supports waiting for the copyeditor review that Ottava has now done, 0 oppose). Staxringold _talk^contribs 06:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delist~~. Stax is doing a good job in addressing the problems I keep bringing up at the season 3 FLC, but even if that passes FLC, season 4 is nowhere near respectible even as an audited info. It has started airing and there will be info about initial ratings, production, cast, even some reception by now. None of which is present on that page. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 10:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the currently listed date at FTC retention for season 4. How can that list possibly satisfy 3c until the season is completed? Every other similar issue gives plenty of time, 2010-01-27 for DJ Hero. Or, more accurately, "From the airing of the finale of Degrassi: The Next Generation (season 9), Seasons of Degrassi: The Next Generation will have 3 months to meet criterion 3.a." That's the whole reason I haven't been working on season 4, I thought it had 3 months from the finale to keep the topic. I mean worst case it dies and I renominate and get an easy FT credit, but I'd really like to save the bugger. Staxringold _talk^contribs 06:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that it is past the retention and needs peer reviewing and adding to the topic per 3c, as an audited item ineligible for featured status. The three months from the finale you are referring to, is to get season 4 to FL. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 08:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well poop Ok, I'll work up Season 4 and re-FT it then. Staxringold _talk^contribs 13:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looking much better already :) rst20xx (talk) 02:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. If you delist the topic oh well, I get a new FT credit come season end, but what all is needed to keep the topic right now? (in terms of a peer review or whatever) Staxringold _talk^contribs 05:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, just a listing on peer review for season 4, with all concerns addressed, and season 3 needs to be promoted to FL. My inclination, despite how long this has taken already, is to wait for the PR to finish, because I don't see the point in demoting a topic if it's only going to be re-promoted again pretty much immediately. And then it's up to you as to what you give yourself credit for, because you'll have done no more work if this gets demoted then repromoted than if this simply gets saved - rst20xx (talk) 13:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mebbe I'll take contributor credit... W/e. I'll roll with whatever you do. Staxringold _talk^contribs 13:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Season 4 is now listed at peer review. Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note 30 Rock (season 3) has been promoted to FL status (the bot hasn't run yet, but you can check the log). Dabomb87 (talk) 16:43, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've now struck my delist opinion above (I am assuming that any additional PR-identified problems will fixed). Great work by Staxringold!YobMod 11:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

<3 Thanks! Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Striking delist, just a couple of things at the peer review that spill over onto the episode list, but great work in all this. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I copy/pasted the table to kill the copy vios. Staxringold _talk^contribs 17:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Good work. I made some superficial changes, but I'm now happy to keep this topic. The only other thing I'd add is that it would be nice to have the S1 and S2 viewing figures as well. But change is unlikely to happen overnight! Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updating seasons 1 and 2 is definitely an eventual goal, but right now I'm mostly trolling for featured credits and that's a more thankless job. :) 30 Rock (season 4), episodes from that season, the MLB Awards FT, and 2009 World Series are my current projects. Staxringold _talk^contribs 18:59, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Close as keep - the PR has finished, so this topic is back up to standards. Well done to Staxringold - rst20xx (talk) 13:22, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]