This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Files for upload. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.
Hello, and thank you for your request. Please provide a link to a page proving the file's license. We need this to be able to upload the file. Generally, the webpage the file is on will have the license information on it. If an appropriate license link is not received within seven days, the request will be declined. Regards. HouseBlastertalk21:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Comment: As this is a non-free file, could you please complete the "non-free use rationale" below? See Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline for instructions. If a rationale isn't provided within seven days, the request will be declined. Thank you.
Hello, and thank you for your request. Please provide a link to a page proving the file's license. We need this to be able to upload the file. Generally, the webpage the file is on will have the license information on it. If an appropriate license link is not received within seven days, the request will be declined. Regards. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Article To Be Used On/Reason For Upload: Protiviti Wikipedia page, because the current logo posted on the Wikipedia has the former company tagline. The new tagline is "Global Business Consulting".
Hello, and thank you for your request. Please provide a link to a page proving the file's license. We need this to be able to upload the file. Generally, the webpage the file is on will have the license information on it. If an appropriate license link is not received within seven days, the request will be declined. Regards. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Perhaps I should have stated at User_talk:122.53.34.146 that asking for a fair use upload while the article is still in draftspace is practically pointless and as such should only be done when the draft has been accepted. Since the draft has been rejected in the meantime, fair use is not an option for the time being. I will leave this open fpr the unlikely case the rejection is overturned unti the hold expires or someone comes up with a link that proves the asserted license. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:50, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment: This request stilldoes not contain any evidence that the target image is licensed compatibly. Normally, a site's terms of service contain the copyright restrictions of content on that site. Note that content hosted elsewwhere is considered to be standard "all rights reserved" copyright unless there is evidence to the contrary. non-free content is only permitted in the article namespace. Since this is now the third request to have an image for usage on this particular draft uploaded without any sort of evidence of the asserted license, I will start declining new requests about this draft that do not contain any evidence of the respective asserted license as disruptive. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
File upload request declined. You've been asked to stop submitting requests without proof of licensing or fair use rationale. Do not submit an invalid request again. echidnaLives - talk - edits03:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Sm city sorsogon open.jpg
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This upload request has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for upload has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the submission text.
This image is of a cover of an audio recording, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher of the work or the artist(s) which produced the recording or cover artwork in question. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of such covers
solely to illustrate the audio recording in question,