The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
There's a lot of dubious and/or unsourced claims. In religion section needs to be overhauled, expanded and more. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Chiswick Chap: can you take this one? 750h+ 06:33, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Well I certainly don't want to be the only person responding to these things. However, there's very little wrong with this article; the religion section's main problem was the absurd over-sectioning into one-line items (something that happened long after the GAN), which I've fixed. I've lightly copy-edited it, removed a very small amount of uncited material, and added some needed sources. I think it's now perfectly serviceable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, with thanks to CChap. charlotte 👸♥ 06:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.