The following Wikipedians are volunteer members of the Harmonious Editing Club. If you would like to join, include your name in the alphabetical list after agreeing to this (short) list of guidelines:
- Always aim to end edit wars by helping editors reach a compromise.
- Never revert more than once — always take it to the talk page.
- Avoid triggering edit wars — discuss major and/or controversial changes on the talk page beforehand.
- Request input from the wider community when necessary (e.g., at Peer review, Requests for comment, Requests for page protection, Village pump, etc.)
- Politely remind others not to make abusive remarks, keeping wikiquette and civility in mind at all times.
- Archive talk pages when they get too long or tangled.
- Be bold (not reckless) in editing
Userboxes
editIn order to flaunt your membership and to promote our project users have created userboxes which may be placed on your userpage:
This user is proud to be a member of the Harmonious Editing Club. |
= {{User HEC}} created by Fig
This user is a member of the Harmonious Editing Club. |
= {{User:Daduzi/HEC}} created by Daduzi
|
This user is a member of the Harmonious Editing Club. |
= {{User:Netmonger/HEC}} created by Netmonger
This user is proud to be a member of the Harmonious Editing Club. |
= {{User HEC 2}} created by Glove
Members
edit- 1Bookfan Talk
- A D Monroe III talk Really, it's the only way to be constructive.
- A Sprig of Fig & a lock of holly 17:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC) In the most sincere manner
- A the wikier from zh wikipedia
- AD64
- Abridged -- I like this idea. Abridged 19:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Addesso Wow, talking as a form of constructively and peacefully solving disputes. That is so . . . out-of-the-box, radical thinking! I'm in!
- Alarob (Rob C)
- Alex756 (glad to see there are voluntary associations forming on Wikipedia)
- Alexanderlime -- Count me! Alexanderlime (talk) 10:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Algotr
- Alx-pl D
- Alex Plank
- Ambush Commander(Talk)
- Aminullah
- Anchoress per DeathPhoenix :-))
- Andrewa
- Ardent †∈]] =D Diplomats unite! Harmony can thrive with a few dedicated people. Make the Wiki a better place!
- Arminius - happy to help with disputes
- Asbestos - Talk pages should always be used after a revert (except in the case of vandalism or trolls, of course)
- Ashibaka talk
- AvB
- Balablitz 23:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Bardofcornish 00:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC) sounds like a great way to promote wikilove!!
- Ben Aveling
- BenBurch 20:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC) I shall strive to live up to this in all my future edits. --BenBurch 20:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Benc
- Beth Wellington 23:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Sounds good to me.
- Bogdan
- BradMajors
- Brrk.3001 06:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Im in!
- Buddhipriya 03:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Bunty.Gill newbie@harmonious edits club
- CaroleHenson - so glad to have learned about this group!
- CaseyPenk - much appreciated! CaseyPenk (talk) 01:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- Catwhoorg
- Chairman S. Talk
- Chancemill
- Chazz88
- Chrisw80 - Good idea.
- Chriswaterguy Good principles. Happy to lend a hand if needed.
- Cjllw | TALK
- ClockworkSoul
- Comatose51
- Comaze
- Coppertwig Anyway, I try to stick to 1RR, and I believe in, you know, harmony and all that.
- CP/M
- Crypter 23:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC) I'm new but this sounds great
- Cyrillic Great Idea...let's join our hands knights of Wikipedia!
- Daduzi
- Damian111
- Dan100
- Davandron
- David Spalding Talk/Contribs Bringing Order to chaos can also mean bringing Collaboration to clashing and Consensus to contention
- David Strauss
- Deathphoenix - I've been doing this anyway, so why not sign up?
- Deebkie talk
- dewet|✉
- DonaldRichardSands - Joined August 9, 2011. Stated principles provide welcome guidance.
- Drenched Harmony rocks. Editing rocks too. Harmonious editing rocks especially hard.
- Driken
- DThomsen8 (talk) 15:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Durova 18:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Denni
- Dzonatas
- earthsound talk | contribs
- Eat me, I'm a red bean (discuss)(contribs) 12:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ed Poor - on probation for "tendentious editing" (oh, the shame, the shame!)
- Electrical Experiment (talk)
- Elipongo (Talk contribs) Don't know why I never noticed this club before, I already pretty much follow its guidelines!
- Elroch (Talk) I dream of the day that everyone co-operates to arrive at the truth rather than desperately defending their prejudices.
- Encephalon | ζ This is good.
- Ethnopunk Do we really have to lose our edits to morons?
- Euyyn - per Deathphoenix
- Evrenosogullari
- Exceedingly Rare (talk) 16:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Faizaguo (talk to me)
- Falphin
- Fishal
- Flammifer - I'm certainly interested in tackling and improving divisive issues !
- Flora_b_1
- Fredrik - the description above seems to apply to me
- Friday - Sounds good to me.
- Fridae'sDoom I don't like disputes.
- Fuzzform
- Gofigure41(talk)
- Giovanni33 (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC) I want to join too. Actually, I think this clubs stipulations should be made as policy for all.Giovanni33 (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Glenn Willen
- gracefool |☺ 05:29, 5 September 2004 (UTC) - this club needs to grow!
- Groove1279 - Because Wikipedia is about "WE" not "ME" ;)
- Guido den Broeder
- Guy Macon
- Harley Herbert Editing is better without arguing!
- I dream of horses (T) @
- Iirolaiho
- Ike9898
- ikkyu2 (talk)
- Ilyanep If I start to violate the above rules, please stick my ass in a freezer. :D
- Ingoolemo
- INic I'm only here 'cause I'm an evil, stinking troll in need of redemption
- Irmgard 17:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- J-V Heiskanen (as long as the above are going to be the final and only bylaws of this club)
- Jasy jatere
- JCarriker
- Jedi feline This sounds like a good idea, especially for music pages where there are genre disputes that could easily be resolved but aren't.
- Jehochman 15 August 2006
- Jet123
- JFW | T@lk
- JiMoThYTALK
- Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 18:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC) [I agree with the current aims and endeavor to follow them (which I think I generally have done in past edits). I was going to join a year back; no idea why I didn't.)
- John196920022001 An early experience on Wikipedia involved an edit war with an uncivil editor. Before I knew any better I contributed to that edit war. In researching incivility I found this club
- John Pritchard - that's what this is, wikipedia, isn't it? whew.
- Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit"
- Jondel 06:44, 15 August 2005 (UTC) - I heard this club is strictly restricted to good looking people only? :)
- Joshua — worth a try
- Jossi≈ t • @
- Junkie007 (talk) 16:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Kaal
- Kawaputra
- Keesiewonder talk -- I have trouble w/not reverting what I perceive as vandalism multiple times though ...
- Kevthegreat55 I'll do my best
- Kodama will try to be friendly...
- Kotare 07:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC) What a great concept, the guidelines of this club are well thought out and intelligent and if followed will tremendously reduce the amount of unproductive conflict on wikipedia.
- KrakatoaKatie and harmony are pretty good company...
- Laleena
- L'Aquatique I already subscribe to this mindset I might as well get the badge, right?
- LaNaranja
- Lihaas
- Lisapollison I also self-designate as a trial member, & aspire to full membership
- Lolinder Though I'm more often the oak than the willow, I'll strive to reverse my role.
- Loolylolly1997 5:25, 30 November 2007
- Lotje (talk) 05:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Lquilter self-designates as a trial member, & aspires to full membership
- Ludraman
- Luksuh 01:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Mac_Davis (talk · contribs) always wanted to be a prime number.
- Manscher
- Mark ✎
- User:Markworthen
- Marshman (I think I have passed through the early un-harmonious stage relatively unscathed)
- Matt Crypto 10:41, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- User:Mach2motocross
- Mbbradford -- Don't worry, this is not Esperanza
- Meelar
- Meristat 22:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- MONGO I need harmonizing...
- Monica Bremo 2:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Drink mint tea!
- Mooncrest
- Mr. Stradivarius
- Mtheletter
- Nadav (talk) 10:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Neigel von Teighen ready to put some harmony!
- Neutrality what Ruhrjung said.
- ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ 11:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Love to give it a shot..
- Nightstallion ナイトスタリオン ㇳ–ㇰ — — I'm in.
- NinaEliza (talk • contribs • logs) 20:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nobs
- Ombudsman
- Omphaloscope — ready to sing my part
- Paleorthid What Saxifrage said.
- Paul venter Harmonious editing sounds like an oxymoron, but let's show good faith!
- Pavithran|Talk - Good initiative! Keep it up guys!
- Pedant A lot of articles, I don't even edit, just add to the discussion what seems good or bad about it. I'll help on anything.
- Perl
- User:Philbuck222 01:19, 31 October 2007
- PhilKnight (talk) 23:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Pinkadelica (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- User:prof_tpms Let us make Wikipedia more fun to be with
- Pufferfish101
- Rafaelsfingers
- Randy
- Ravn, Strong support. ;)
- Rdsmith4 - Oh, why not. Is there a Category:Lost causes?
- Revived
- Richard Spread harmonious editing, join the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal!
- Rickyrab
- Royblumy
- Ruhrjung has been with you in the heart all the time (the deeds might be another matter)
- Rui Gabriel Correia Someone doesn't agree with you? Leave it. Someone else will disagree with them later and change it.
- Ruthfulbarbarity 03:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Rursus 100% agreed by prev speaker.
- Rycr 11:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sasawat
- Saxifrage Because the willow survives the storm that fells the oak.
- Schmiteye
- Seth Mahoney Yay! for harmony!
- SFrahm What a concept!
- Shack★Talk,I like it. And actually Harmonious editing was the purpose of Wikipedia, who like seeing Wikipedia quarrel endlessly? 08:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Shannon
- Shenhemu
- Shirahadasha 03:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC) What a great club!
- Shrigley
- Shruti14 Great idea!!
- Simon 19:33, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Sir james paul 12:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- User:Sir Richardson Proud to call myself a member.
- SlimVirgin I think the decision to self-limit on reverting is a good idea.
- Sm8900 . I think this club is one of the best idea that I have ever seen. I would like to helpo out if possible, with creating new resources, ideas, efforts, etc, if possible. thanks! ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 14:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- SmokeyJoe "Wikipedia is not here to make people sad. So we want to respond in a helpful and loving way." 21:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Smyth
- Sobar I never knew this club existed. I think this is great.
- Spalding
- Stephen B Streater while noting that agreement does not require compromise
- Stevertigo
- Strawberry Sara
- Subramanian talk -- Ahimsa, everyone!
- Jake Supeyman 22:15, 28 April 2008
- sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ]
- Superm401 | Talk
- T-dot ( talk contribs )
- TAS
- Tatteredpaper | (talk)
- The Founders Intent Just say, "Ummmmmmmmm...."
- The Placebo Effect
- The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake
- TheronJ Good idea
- TicketMan - Talk - contribs
- Timbo
- Toby Bartels
- Tony Sidaway
- T.PK Ready for some harmonizing!
- Tr1290 16:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Trade2tradewell If you want to improve your POV , be ready to listen to the other
- Trubadurix Sounds good
- Tuf-Kat
- Tumadoireacht
- Umofomia
- unomi The way it should be.
- Utcursch
- Visctrix
- WikiLen — learning how to have 1 revert work
- WikiprojectOWU
- WikiUser
- Wing Nut
- Wirelain∞ - We have cousins over at WP:CCD.
- WooyiTalk, Editor review 01:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Xinit
- Xiong Chiamiov
- Xuxalliope (talk · contribs)
- Yintaɳ
- Zappaz A tall order for a person with my character, but worth striving for!
- Ze miguel
- Zero