Keep like earlier The image was already for deletion. I spoke with Nv8200p over a long time and Nv8200p helped me get it in approvable shape. The cropping was done because it is fair use and fair use. The quality reduction was done because fair use requires a reduced quality. The unvandalized version of furverthttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Furvert&oldid=46280786 has a description that clarifies. To my knowledge Nv8200p is in charge of the images for deletion and Nv8200p previously decided it was acceptable. Psychonaut would it fully please you to have a high-qualty uncropped version? I will do the work of making another image if you can help with the vandalism from admin ContiE of the article furvert. Arights08:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it would fully please me to have a high-quality uncropped image, but only if it can be used under the GFDL or another permissive license. If the high-quality uncropped version of this image is not licensable for use on Wikipedia, then I suggest you find a different image. —Psychonaut08:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Illustrates the goatse.cx article - at least until it was taken off the article by User:Tomyumgoong. That is totally inappropriate, I have rolled back as I count that as vandalism.