August 22

edit
Uploaded by Jamieli (notify | contribs). No source- Shizhao 03:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by 3bulletproof16 (notify | contribs). OB The image has been replaced by a better version. [1] No need to notify as I am the uploader. -- 3:16 04:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by 3bulletproof16 (notify | contribs). OB The image has been replaced by a better version. [2] No need to notify as I am the uploader. -- 3:16 04:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by 3bulletproof16 (notify | contribs). OB The image has been replaced by a better version. [3] No need to notify as I am the uploader. -- 3:16 04:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Random contributor (notify | contribs). OR, OB by Image:MTR.svgWwagner 14:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Alex Bakharev (notify | contribs). Book cover used not to discuss the book, but to illustrate the biographical article about the person depicted. I've tryied to remove the image and mark as orfud, but it comes back to the article.- Abu Badali 14:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article Anatoly Rybakov talk about his works, specifically talking about this particular book "The Novel of memoirs". This is the last of Rybalov's works. I don't think it violates WP:FU, Keep abakharev 14:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I wonder why exactly this cover was selected to illustrate the article when it mentions "Children of the Arbat" as this author's "most popular novel"... let me search for Children of the Arbat's cover on google images... oh, I can't see the author's face on the cover! Will it serve the same purpose?--Abu Badali 17:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody could argue that in a biographical article to highline an autobiography is more important. And yes, a more informative image may have a precedence over a less informative one. Anyway lets see what other people would say abakharev 01:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. This image would only be allowed in an article about the book itself or in a section of the author's article that specifically discussed the book. howcheng {chat} 16:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by InvictaHOG (notify | contribs). Duplication of hemosiderin.jpg, meant to upload to Commons! InvictaHOG 15:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Nishishei (notify | contribs). OR, AB, CV (Sinodefence reserves all rights on the website) John Smith's 17:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Nishishei (notify | contribs). OR, AB John Smith's 17:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Creativemf (notify | contribs). OR; AU. Was only used in an article that got deleted. Uploader snapped during and after the AfD process, started accusing everyone of racism and vandalizing/blanking content, and attempted to withdraw licensing consent from this image. The user wound up getting indefinitely blocked. Deleting the image would seem to be the prudent thing to do. Kickaha Ota 17:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Aidol (notify | contribs). CV - This comes from Time Magazine's site. It is not a screenshot, and is most likely an unfree image. It also lacks any fair use rationale. cholmes75 (chit chat) 18:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Daponisher (notify | contribs). OR, logo for "EBEARD Films" so either non-free or non-useful BigDT 23:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Daponisher (notify | contribs). OR, vanity pic?, image marked "(C) 2006 Eadd Kctc" BigDT 23:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Daponisher (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 23:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Daponisher (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 23:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Snowmanradio (notify | contribs). OR, photo of a record label (for you kids, records are kinda like big CDs). It is unlikely that this photo could be considered free. BigDT 23:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Guildindia (notify | contribs). OR, CV from [4] or somewhere similar (same photo, but retouched) BigDT 00:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]