August 29

Withdraw nomination. Image added to article -Nv8200p talk 14:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by FourX (notify | contribs). CV, AU - the image license grant is unclear, I was unable to find it online, and the uploader appears to be ...missing? (see contribs) KWH 04:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think the photographer, Masuod Alinaqian, had made this image Public Domain. Arad 18:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
is Masuod the uploader, FourX? That is what is unclear.... if you happen to know him, maybe you can ask him to email a permission grant to 'permissions AT wikimedia.org' as described at WP:COPYREQ, with regards to this image. KWH 07:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jimfbleak (notify | contribs). Near duplicate of Image:Myrtlewarbler35.jpg. Both were cropped from the USFWS image database. OR and LQ Kevin_b_er 06:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jimfbleak (notify | contribs). Particularly low quality. Its from the USFWS image library. I had found this image previously in the database, and the uploaded cropping of the image is actually a really tiny portion of the full image. This makes the image rather low quality, and is eclipsed by the much nicer images at Grey-crowned_Crane. Kevin_b_er 06:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Zorbo69 (notify | contribs). Someone's personal pictures. They aren't particular encyclopedic really. They are orphans, and the uploader is absent with only those two images in visible contributions. Kevin_b_er 06:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Majestictorment (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic. Was likely part of a vanity article, Coleen watson, sometime in 2005. Uploader is absent. Image is an orphan. Kevin_b_er 06:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Djmutex (notify | contribs). AB, OR, OB by Image:Futura sample.png. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Djmutex (notify | contribs). AB, OR, OB by Image:Frutiger sample.svg on Commons. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Djmutex (notify | contribs). AB, OR, OB by Image:Bodoni sample.svg on Commons. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by DavidLevinson (notify | contribs). OR, OB by Image:Eisenhower Interstate System.svg on Commons. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Gianfranco (notify | contribs). Unsourced, OR, OB by Image:FBaracca 1.jpg on Commons. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Magnus Manske (notify | contribs). OR, OB by high res version on Commons. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Topory (notify | contribs). AB, OR, OB by high res version on Commons. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by MJR (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) AP photo used to illustrate the subject of the photo, not fair use WP:FAIR#Counterexamples #5 BigDT 11:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Whitfield_Larrabee (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) Screenshot of MSNBC broadcast to illustrate the subject of the broadcast BigDT 11:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Daniel_Polehn (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) Media photo, not fair use per WP:FAIR#Counterexamples #5 BigDT 11:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Durin (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) Screenshot of "The Today Show" used to illustrate the subject of the screenshot. BigDT 11:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you're concerned about a fair use violation in this case; Kristi's TV appearance was the only one I'm aware of, and was the capstone of a media frenzy over her fall. I'll add the fair use rationale to the image. --Durin 12:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • TV screenshots generally constitute "fair use" if they are used for an article about the TV network/show itself. This image, though, is used purely to provide a photo of the girl and it is even cropped such that the network logo isn't shown and it just looks like a photo. As is, I don't think it comes close to qualifying as fair use. If the entire screenshot were shown such that the NBC logo is clearly visible and the image were in that section of the article, rather than at the top right where we normally put infoboxes and indentification photos, then, personally, I would consider that to be fair use. But as it is, I don't think it could possibly qualify. BigDT 23:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by E333l (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) Reuters photo used to illustrate subject of the photo, not fair use WP:FAIR#Counterexamples #5 BigDT 12:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by TreveX (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) Reuters photo used to illustrate the subject of the photo, not fair use WP:FAIR#Counterexamples #5 BigDT 12:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jsugumar (notify | contribs). Very poorly-photoshopped image not used in any article, and hard to imagine what it might be appropriate for...?
Uploaded by Mets (notify | contribs). Nonfree photo of existing subject (Albany, NY skyline). Free alternative can easily be created, therefore not fair use per WP:FUC ccwaters 13:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Mark83 (notify | contribs). OB, OR Mark83 13:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Sportskido8 (notify | contribs). OR and CV - Orphaned recreation featuring a copyrighted logo. cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Sportskido8 (notify | contribs). OR and CV - Orphaned recreation featuring a copyrighted logo. cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jimbo Wales (notify | contribs). Orphaned—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 14:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not deleted. Uploaded processed version Image:StewartBrandArsElectronica.jpg over this and deleted the duplicate instead. howcheng {chat} 18:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Breathejustice (notify | contribs). UE Although the map looks useful, it is a complete invention that has no historical background and is being used to push a nationalist, POV agenda. For example, it shows most of Japan being a mainland colony, which was simply never the case. I believe such a contested map could never be properly used on wikipedia, as it will only cause more disputes. So I believe it should be deleted. John Smith's 15:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image has been speedy deleted as patent nonsense and a complete fabrication, no historical date to back it up. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 15:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Bruin rrss23 (notify | contribs). Low quality, obsolete, in GIF format. Replaced by Image:FlashGet.png which fixes all three problems. Cynical 22:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Hammersfan (notify | contribs). existing subject that can be easily photographed, therefore not fair use ccwaters 22:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it cannot be easily photographed, because half of the stadium was demolished immediately after the 1996 Olympic Games. The stadium no longer exists in this form. Hammersfan 30/08/06, 12.05 BST
I'd definitely keep it, then. DS 13:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not deleted but removed from all articles except Centennial Olympic Stadium. howcheng {chat} 18:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by MJHankel (notify | contribs). existing subject that can be easily photographed, therefore not fair use ccwaters 22:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by tsca (notify | contribs). CV (see commons:commons:Derivative works), OR Kotepho 00:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]