Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 November 6
< November 5 | November 7 > |
---|
November 6
edit- Uploaded by Salseheaven (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, YAPP Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 00:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - That's just gross man..... Spawn Man 03:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Ajb1300 (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, YAPP Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 00:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Ajb1300 (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, resizing of duplicate image, YAPP Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 00:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete A duplicate image, not needed. Hello32020 00:56, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per OR, UE, AB. Hello32020 00:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per OR, AB. Hello32020 00:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
OR, OB. Image contains incorrect date in title and is discolored. Obsoleted by image:Dark_Abstraction.jpg. Justin Foote 01:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not deletable, it's on Commons. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Elliotcarter212 (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, YAPP Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by JerseyShoreCommunications (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, YAPP Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Not deleted (this is a Commons image and cannot be deleted here). howcheng {chat} 00:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Uploaded: 08:44, 11 August 2006 . . Richiex (Commons user)
- DELETE - reason: UE - Image is too graphic and non-objective. It is essentially amateur porn, and inappropriate in use for a NPOV article on the subject. A more medically themed image would be more appropriate. Erielhonan talk | contribs 仕方が無い 03:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- KEEP Has a purpose, is not pornographic at all. Scienceman123 talk 03:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Could you explain the purpose of the image in more detail? The rationale of your position isn't clear to me. Erielhonan talk | contribs 仕方が無い 03:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. While graphic, it does show what the article describes. Can you begrudge it for that? Also, I would like to know what alternative you propose. eszetttalk 08:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- I would suggest either a) not replacing it. It's not exactly necessary. Or if it is deemed necessary b) a photo of a more clinical nature, like the picture of feces, that at least shows some clinical data (the size of the stool is indicated). I'd compare semen2.jpg (an amateur porn money shot pic of someone's cum on the floor) in this case to a picture of feces on the sidewalk: it's vulgar and not encyclopedic. Cum in a clear specimen cup with ml markings would be a possible analogous image? And one that I would find much less objectionable in the article it's used in. Erielhonan talk | contribs 仕方が無い 09:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. "Pornography" - The explicit depiction of sexual subject matter, especially with the sole intention of sexually exciting the viewer (from Wiktionary). So it is indeed porn, and it is in my opinion likely to be amateur. In my further opinion, this is not reason enough to delete the image. Next, images can be themed in the real world, but in Wikipedia (this is my opinion, again), images do not have themes, they have content (in fact, now that I think about it, I think that's true for images everywhere). I assume by "objective" you mean "not influenced by the emotions or prejudices", since the other two relevant definitions are met. Well, the image could be said to be prejudiced, since it is of human semen, but unless you want to make a single image containing separate shots of various species' semen, including that of humans, I suggest you quit while you're ahead. Emotions don't influence the current image in any way. Please post an example of a medically-themed image of semen on my talk page, or failing that a medically-themed image of a substance representing semen. Then I may agree with you, but at the present time I don't see how an image of anything can be "themed". --207.216.10.77 09:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I am reletivly new to this, but this image is tagged as a Commons image, would it not need to be deleted there?--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 12:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Wikipedia is Not Censored. ~ PHDrillSergeant...§ 18:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Too graphic? Nonsense. It answers the question: What is the appearance of semen? The answer is well within the purpose of an encyclopedia. Issues surrounding human sexuality produce irrational thinking and emotions. (A "medically themed" semen photograph would be what? Semen on a piece of gauze? Semen in a vial?) --151.200.238.201 12:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep = This has been voted on time after time on the semen talk page. Consensus has been for keeping, and then some clueless person who has not seen it before comes in and asks for deletion yet again. For some reason people think that somehow a picture os semen is pornographic or obscene. It is a bodily fluid, nothing more. The issue has been decided for keep numerous times before, why revisit it yet again? Atom 10:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unencyclopedic, not referenced in any articles. Michaelbusch 04:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic, not referenced in any articles. Michaelbusch 04:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Duplicate of above. Michaelbusch 04:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tajik-afghan (notify | contribs). CV - Listed as being released under GFDL, but no evidence given for that. -- cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Tagged changed to promophoto -Nv8200p talk 16:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tajik-afghan (notify | contribs). CV - Listed as being released under GFDL, but no evidence given for that. -- cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Now tagged as Promophoto -Nv8200p talk 16:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tajik-afghan (notify | contribs). OR -- cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tajik-afghan (notify | contribs). OR -- cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Added to article Burhanuddin Rabbani -Nv8200p talk 16:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tajik-afghan (notify | contribs). OR -- cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tajik-afghan (notify | contribs). CV - Listed as being released under GFDL, but no evidence given for that. -- cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Tag changed to fairusein -Nv8200p talk 16:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tajik-afghan (notify | contribs). CV - Tagged as a copyrighted image that requires attribution. No such attribution is given, and the website it comes from doesn't list attribution as a term of distribution anyway. -- cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Tag chnaged to promo -Nv8200p talk 16:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Montrose Patriot (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, unencyclopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 17:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Dragnazi (notify | contribs). No source other than uploader's own speculation on Image talk:SatanicCult.jpg -- they're now claiming that the image was taken by Gerry Adams! [1]. Uploader keeps blanking the "nsd" template, claiming that their speculation about the source is adequate. Not to mention the POV filename -- Demiurge 17:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- KEEP While the image and the filename seems somewhat gruesome or unadequated on good taste basis, I think there is no other reasons to delete this image according to Wikipedia policies. There are hundreds of other photographs in Wikipedia or Wikipedia Commons where the real source can be put in doubt, relying only on the good faith of the uploader. Technically, the tag and the claim on the source are apparently right, so the image should remain there, unless we have the very photographer stating his copyright over the picture.
BlackPea 07:51, 11 November 2006 (EST)
- Comment: User's only edits are concerning this IfD and to their own user page. "Hundreds of other photographs" is meaningless -- precedent doesn't apply to them unless they've survived an AfD themselves. Also the uploader specifically admits that they don't know who took the photo. Demiurge 12:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Diane Bandy (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, unencyclopedic Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Cornflakes4eva (notify | contribs). orphaned, sole contribution by uploader, low quality Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Alakazou1978 (notify | contribs). orphaned, duplicate to Image:Taxila Pakistan juillet 2004.JPG Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Happily deranged (notify | contribs). orphaned, sole contribution by uploader, low quality Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by The Silk (notify | contribs). orphaned, sole contribution of uploader, questionable licensing Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by BENJAS SR (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, user image Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- This is on Commons. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by BENJAS SR (notify | contribs). orphaned, absent uploader, photo has copyright watermark, not PD Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by BENJAS SR (notify | contribs). orpahned, absent uploader, copyright watermarked image; not PD Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by 293.xx.xxx.xx (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by WestchesterGuy (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Never be good enough (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Never be good enough (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Never be good enough (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- I find it a bit ingenious that you would have first tagged this (and other images) as a replaceable tag and then three minutes later you remove the images all together and nominate them; see [2]. There is no need to pull the images out of the pages before the nomination. The image page does not track the deletion and what needs to be done is review the uploaders contributions and see where they have used the image. If the images are determined as keepable and acceptable fair use (including this album cover) they will have to be re-inserted. It is easier to delete the images later rather then have to find where they were originally and re-insert them.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Never be good enough (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Eacz12 (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by 293.xx.xxx.xx (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by 293.xx.xxx.xx (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by 293.xx.xxx.xx (notify | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Wiki righter (notify | contribs). No copyright -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Reldridge78 (notify | contribs). No copyright. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Reldridge78 (notify | contribs). No copyright. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Reldridge78 (notify | contribs). No copyright. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Reldridge78 (notify | contribs). No copyright. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:1964Mustang.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs). Fails first fair use criterion. -- Roguegeek (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Rescind nom - apparently this is on Commons. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Rescind nom - apparently this is on Commons. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Rescind nom - apparently this is on Commons. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Rescind nom - apparently this is on Commons. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)