< August 30 September 1 >

August 31

edit
Image:Jesuspwningwood.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cheezeman (notify | contribs).
Image:PopeRock.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cheezeman (notify | contribs).
Image:Neg 6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Michelle1 (notify | contribs).

[edit] Declaration of consent for all enquiries Due to the large number of ambiguous answers to enquiries concerning a permission of reuse for an image, text or similar (such as "I allow Wikipedia to reuse my photos") it is advisable to attach to your enquiry email a standard declaration of consent (and point to it in the email), which can be returned by the author/copyright owner in the email reply. The precedent below should be amended, as necessary, with the required additional information:

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ insert link ].

I agree to publish that work under the free license LICENSE [choose at least one from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Copyright_tags ].

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the image may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

DATE, NAME OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER

The WORK, LICENSE and DATE, NAME OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER need to be filled out for this to be acceptable. This also helps clarify to the owner what they are agreeing to. Ejfetters 08:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AdamsCropped.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Daskill (notify | contribs).
  • Claimed to be released into public domain, no evidence of this, appears to be fair use, also is just a cropped image of Neg 6.jpg - which has no reason to be uploaded twice. Replaceable with free use, or maybe documentation that its copyright holder released it? 74.204.40.46 04:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The image was uploaded by someone who works for Adams, and has obtained his permission to release it as such. Daskill 13:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • If this is true, this is a cropped version of a file already on Wikipedia - the file listed above. There is no need to crop an existing file and reload it, the original file should be sufficient. Do we have proof also that this is permitted by the copyright holder of the photo? If it truly is permissable, we should move it to Commons, not this one, but the original one. Ejfetters 20:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I cropped the image because the original was too big for the infobox. The original image was uploaded by User:Michelle1 who has proven that she works for Adams. Daskill 01:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Alyson Hau.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WildWorks (notify | contribs).
Image:GretzkyFA.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RasputinAXP (notify | contribs).
Image:New Jersey Devils FA.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bsroiaadn (notify | contribs).

X-Files Publicity Images

edit

Various studio publicity images, no verification they have been released for promotional use, same as discussed in prior listings for other TV publicity shots. Better replaced with screen caps. Ejfetters 07:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unused images

edit

Mike Rosoft 08:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these please

edit

Non-encyclopedic. Please delete these and all history as they have been uploaded in error. Mgillaus 09:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cindy Nelson - Singer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Furvus (notify | contribs).
also Image:Smaller Cindy.JPG

The Amazing Race screenshots

edit

These are non-free screenshots from The Amazing Race, all of them uploaded by the same user (see here for proof of notification). A non-free use rationale is given on the talk page of each image, but I feel that the images fail criteria 5 and 8 of the non-free content criteria, which require that non-free images be encyclopedic and "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". These images, for the most part, show people standing around, driving around, talking, or doing other trivial things. In no case are the events depicted specifically discussed in the article. Indeed, there is no reason to reason to mention this trivial information. Despite the fair use claim, I contend that these images are being used solely or primarily for a decorative purpose.

Please note that I have not nominated all non-free images in Category:The Amazing Race contestants as there are some that may require separate discussion (i.e. for which a stronger case for non-free use could be made). — Black Falcon (Talk) 17:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Georgereynolds.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sesmith (notify | contribs).
Image:Joeyftribbiani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tokttk (notify | contribs).
Image:Jamesmichaeltyler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Crumbworks (notify | contribs).
  • This publicity image again should be replaceable with fair use screenshot. Realize it was previously nominated, but with recent deletions of Star Trek and Dawson's Creek among other publicity images, felt renomination was in order. Can't we just get a screenshot? Ejfetters 20:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It should be deleted because of the "Courtesy NBC" watermark, which implies NBC has provided it directly to Wikipedia, when really it was provided to another site (CNN, I believe. [2]). As for replacing it with a screenshot, there's really no need to add a new image just for the sake of it. Brad 21:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Björk and Lars von Trier (Cannes Film Festival).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Luis María Benítez (notify | contribs).
  • Primary reason: this non-free image doesn't significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic of the article (fails WP:NFCC #8), because it does not contain any significant information that is not already in the text. The image is merely used as decoration. Secundary reason: very poor fair use rationale (if there is one at all). Ilse@ 20:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Pinochet-Thatcher.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cantus (notify | contribs).
Image:PA190099.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Deror avi (notify | contribs).
This can be decided at WP:PUI. -Nv8200p talk 20:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Pepe Le Pew.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SNIyer12 (notify | contribs).
  • First reason: image resolution is too high (1024 × 768 px), image should be maximally something like 300 px wide. Second reason: no fair use rationale. Reason for article Looney Tunes: Back in Action: appearance of charachter Pepé Le Pew is not critically discussed in the article and image one of many non-free images, it is superfluous. Ilse@ 23:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]