Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 December 28
December 28
edit- Stephane Simard (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Very low resolution, we already have a Wikipedia logo so I see no real use for this. RichardΩ612 13:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hephaestos (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- I fail to see any use for this. Tagged 'GFDL Presumed'. RichardΩ612 13:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic. Used only in a deleted vanity article. Joyous! | Talk 16:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. The stamp image was uploaded not to illustrate the stamp itself (as per Wikipedia's fair use rationales), but the underlying subject, the iconic War Production Coordinating Committee poster, of which free examples already and copiously exist Pat Payne (talk) 16:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Image is useful and instructive for historical purposes. - Mafia Expert (talk) 12:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- speedy delete, we have Image:Rosie_the_Riveter.jpg, the use of a stamp is in serious breach of WP:FU #8 Fasach Nua (talk) 18:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Trulystand700 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This illustration does not seem like it will ever be fit for use in this encyclopedia, mainly because of its very poor production quality. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 17:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Perhaps also speedy delete as contrib from another sock of oft-blocked user. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation. DMacks (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Trulystand700 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Same as reason for IRT Third Avenue Line.jpg. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 17:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Perhaps also speedy delete as contrib from another sock of oft-blocked user. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation. DMacks (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Trulystand700 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Same as reason for IRT Third Avenue Line.jpg Larry V (talk | e-mail) 17:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Perhaps also speedy delete as contrib from another sock of oft-blocked user. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation. DMacks (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Poopsfriily (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic. Used originally in a vanity article, now deleted. Joyous! | Talk 19:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Grantmacdonald1 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic. Advertisement. Not used in any articles currently. Joyous! | Talk 20:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Used in vanity article. Orphaned and unencyclopedic Joyous! | Talk 20:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kradhaissem (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Used in deleted vanity article. Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Joyous! | Talk 20:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Prosthesis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic and orphaned. Used only in deleted article. Joyous! | Talk 20:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- CaptainCorin (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Vanity. Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Joyous! | Talk 20:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedic. Only used in deleted article, so orphaned, also. Joyous! | Talk 20:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, uncyclopedic. Joyous! | Talk 20:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Grantmacdonald1 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic. Advertisement. Joyous! | Talk 20:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Nanjakululu (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orpaned, not free webhosting B (talk) 23:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Jeffmilner (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Improper license, copyrighted software not PD, used on talk page illegally. ViperSnake151 23:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
I think it's ridiculous that you would think that because certain copyrights are applicable to the the software (which is released for FREE) that a small image of the software would be "illegal". In fact I was talking with one of the original Meetro programmers and they encouraged such use. Well whatever, it means nothing to me if you want to delete it.--Jeff (talk) 21:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- According to WP:FAIR, screenshots of programs are fine for "critical commentary". My problem is that the image is not being used in the article, only on its talk page. I would say delete, if the image is not put to encyclopedic use. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 01:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFCC#7 (use in an article). —Remember the dot (talk) 02:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)