Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 July 6
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 July 6)
July 6
edit- Evolution7931 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary unfree web-page screenshot doesn't add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali (talk) 00:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep It looks like some OK articles link to it. Tcrow777 talk 08:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)- Delete But, on second thought, I agree with you. Tcrow777 talk 08:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sharkentile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree imae showing a family meeting. Doesn't add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text Abu badali (talk) 01:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sharkentile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover. The magazine issue and the cover story are mentioned, but the cover image itself doesn't add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text Abu badali (talk) 01:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sharkentile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover. The article mentions an interview from the magazine issue, but the cover image itself doesn't adds any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali (talk) 01:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Aharmon1973 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image of a magazine's cover. The articles mention that this singer was depicted on the cover, but the cover image itself doesn't add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text Abu badali (talk) 01:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sharkentile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image (claimed to be) of a magazine's cover. The articles mention that these people were depicted on the cover, but the cover image itself doesn't add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text Abu badali (talk) 01:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sharkentile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree picture showing two people meeting in some award occasion, doesn't add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text Abu badali (talk) 01:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sharkentile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-free screenshot showing 2 artist in a award cerimony, doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveued with text. Abu badali (talk) 01:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
KEEP Significant, non-repeatable event.
- Sharkentile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-free image of a book's cover used (in 2 diferent articles) solely to illustrate the information that a given singer wrote the introductory text for the book in question. Abu badali (talk) 01:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Paul venter (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Only information given is "Press-kit photo widely used" but that doesn't justify a GFDL license. No source, no information on who released the rights. Uploader has many copyright issues. — W.marsh 03:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Also, the subject is apparently alive, so this is in actuality a replaceable fair use image. -- But|seriously|folks 06:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Original research Nv8200p talk 03:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- delete This won't ever be used. Wrauscher 16:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Bdizzlefizzle (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 03:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan Nv8200p talk 03:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, No evidence uploade has right to relase under the GFDL, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, No evidence uploader has right to release under GFDL, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 03:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, probably an unencyclopedic personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 03:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Coburnpharr04 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Used only by permission, probably does not qualify as fair use. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep: significant, historical event. suggest the use of permissions provided by template:Non-free historic image.
- Strong Keep: significant importance and illustrates the cultural event that took place during Kennedy's administration. --XLR8TION 16:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The text, "Munoz met with Kennedy" is perfectly understandable without the image, making this a violation of WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 01:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, article deleted Coredesat 04:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, article deleted Coredesat 04:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Neverdream (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 06:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- SantoshMaurya (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Alprostadil.png obsoleted by Alprostadil.svg — Akiramenai 07:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sparrowman980 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No source. No fair use rationale. Fair use replaceable. (Listing here, as uploader is removing speedy tags.) — Rebelguys2 talk 08:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Simonleyshon (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic MER-C 09:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Jordanattheoldschool (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No encyclopedic value ~Matticus TC 10:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- copyright unknown, image used for vanity page — Janarius 13:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic image; creator now indefblocked for repeatedly creating nonsense articles for this image. ~Matticus TC 14:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Obsolete (same uploader also uploaded Image:MySoulPleadsForYousimonwebbesingle.JPG which is basically the same image and is not OR) BigrTex 15:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary, taking up server space, used solely to demonstrate the existence of a problem that was solved a year ago — Anthony Hit me up... 17:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, no context to determine encyclopedic value BigrTex 17:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, probably unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 20:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Aivazovsky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This non-free TV screenshot is not being used within the context of critical commentary about the program. Additionally, it does not significantly increase the reader's understanding in a way that words alone cannot. howcheng {chat} 23:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, Instrumental in describing the Soviet coup attempt of 1991. No free alternative of this moment at the fall of the coup could ever be available. Rationale needs improving though. -- Petri Krohn 01:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I don't see this image as instrumental -- Gorbachev is just being interviewed on TV. If we take the image out of the article, the reader's understanding is not really compromised at all. The source information is also rather lacking. Is this from a documentary? What is it called and when was it aired? Was it downloaded from somewhere or did the uploader do the screen capture himself? howcheng {chat} 02:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- In fact this is Gorbachev just released from captivity in the Crimea. What is important is his casual dress and unpreparedness to face the situation in Moscow. In short, he does not look "presidential", possibly bringing about his evential downfall. You can try to present this same information in text, but on Wikipedia that would be WP:NPOV and WP:OR. -- Petri Krohn 03:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- You're right, that would be OR. However, without cited statements to that effect, the image is superfluous. Like I said regarding Image:1991 coup yeltsin.jpg below, the article has to create a need for the image, which certainly isn't the case right now. Plus, we still have the problematic source information to deal with. howcheng {chat} 06:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- In fact this is Gorbachev just released from captivity in the Crimea. What is important is his casual dress and unpreparedness to face the situation in Moscow. In short, he does not look "presidential", possibly bringing about his evential downfall. You can try to present this same information in text, but on Wikipedia that would be WP:NPOV and WP:OR. -- Petri Krohn 03:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I don't see this image as instrumental -- Gorbachev is just being interviewed on TV. If we take the image out of the article, the reader's understanding is not really compromised at all. The source information is also rather lacking. Is this from a documentary? What is it called and when was it aired? Was it downloaded from somewhere or did the uploader do the screen capture himself? howcheng {chat} 02:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Krohn. Kuralyov 14:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No need to have this copyrighted image in the article to justify fair use. John Smith's 14:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Aivazovsky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This non-free TV screenshot is not being used within the context of critical commentary about the program. Additionally, it does not significantly increase the reader's understanding in a way that words alone cannot. howcheng {chat} 23:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- 'Keep. Kuralyov 14:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No need to have this copyrighted image in the article to justify fair use. John Smith's 14:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- PageantUpdater (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unfree image of living person, claimed to be being used to show the person "competing in this competition", but the image doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that can't be conveyed with free material (text or images) Abu badali (talk) 23:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- PageantUpdater (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary unfree image showing 5 Miss USA, claimed to be being used to depict the "historic event" that "four African-American delegates had made the top five". It doens't help in the readers comprehension of the article in a way that words alone can not. Abu badali (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- PageantUpdater (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image showing 10 Misses, doens't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali (talk) 23:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- PageantUpdater (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image showing a Miss being crowned, used to illustrate the information that she was crowned. Same case througly discussed in many nominations at June 18 and at a June 29 deletion review. Abu badali (talk) 23:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep as below on July 7 noms. – Quadell (talk) (random) 03:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Significant, non-repeatable event. Jeffpw 17:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- This same argument was used at the previous deletion discussions and at its subsequent deletion review. --Abu badali (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- PageantUpdater (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image showing a Miss takng "her first walk as the new Miss USA" (?), claimed to illustrate an "historic event". Not much different of the cases througly discussed in many nominations at June 18 and at a June 29 deletion review. Abu badali (talk) 23:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- PageantUpdater (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image from news agency Reuters, showing a Miss being crowned, used to illustrate the information that she was once crowned. Not much different of the cases througly discussed in many nominations at June 18 and at a June 29 deletion review. Abu badali (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep as below on July 7 noms. – Quadell (talk) (random) 03:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Significant, non-repeatable event. Jeffpw 17:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image showing a Miss being crowned, used to illustrate the information that she was once crowned. Not much different of the cases througly discussed in many nominations at June 18 and at a June 29 deletion review. Abu badali (talk) 00:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep as below on July 7 noms. – Quadell (talk) (random) 03:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Significant, non-repeatable event. Jeffpw 17:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)