Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 May 21
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 May 21)
May 21
edit- Jackguzman20031 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- no evidence that this is GFDL licesned, watermark violation if it is, unencylopedic, orphan, absent uploader hbdragon88 00:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Carolinagurl99 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, absent uploader, personal picture hbdragon88 00:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Pobol 2006 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic, personal picture, absent uploader hbdragon88 00:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- BatteryIncluded (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unsure of an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, possible Copyright violation Coredesat 01:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Grumpyyoungman01 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- The consensus on this article talk page is that the image as it stands is useless for its designed purpose. - Grumpyyoungman01 07:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ephodslabs (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 11:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Halfling64 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 11:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, likely mistagged as PD and should be non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, likely mistagged as PD and should be non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, likely mistagged as PD and should be non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unsure of an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unsure of an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned pdf, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, appears to be original research User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, unsure of an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Moved to commons, safe to delete. -- Cat chi? 13:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribtuion of uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Checkpoint303 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, GFDL-presumed tagged, should be possbile to create a cleanly licensed version User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sameer Joshi (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, GFDL-presumed license User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, GFDL-presumed tagged, should be possbile to create a cleanly licensed version User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, GFDL-presumed tagged, should be possbile to create a cleanly licensed version User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Cutealoeplant (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Cutealoeplant (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Morningtheftnyc (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned image (article was deleted) — Closenplay 14:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- PassionoftheDamon (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This non-free screenshot, used in 2 articles, does not increase the reader's understanding of either subject in a way that words alone cannot, thus failing WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 17:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Strongly disagree. Pic demonstrates Irvin's and, more generally, the '87 Hurricanes, flamboyance in a way that words alone cannot.-PassionoftheDamon 16:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- How does it show their flamboyance? He's just running with the ball! howcheng {chat} 18:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with the nom, it adds very little to the article. Delete. --Iamunknown 17:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Marine_69-71 (notify | contribs).- uploaded by
No evidence to support the claim that this image was created by NASA. Abu badali (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Withdraw. Evidence was found. Image is really from NASA (thus, PD). Good work! --Abu badali (talk) 13:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)- Keep - found a NASA source for the image (and a better version of the same image). Megapixie 13:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Withdrawn: Good work! --Abu badali (talk) 13:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Image is probably OK to use, but not totally sure. Regardless, it has been replaced by the PD Image:Washington Bartlett.jpg. howcheng {chat} 18:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Tagged as GFDL, but description implies {{permission}} Abu badali (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Corrected back to GFDL tag as used with the ok of the BBC - have removed ifd tag Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Without a ticket in ORTS it's extremely difficult to be sure that they understand that it's being released under the GFDL. Per you comments - it would appear to have been released by permission. If you asked them if you could put it on a T-Shirt and sell the T-shirt - do you think they would have said yes ? Megapixie 13:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know - but that's not what I asked for - I expressly asked for and got permission to use on the Wiki! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unfortunately that's what GFDL implies (admittedly you'd have to print the entire text of the license on the back of the t-shirt). They may have thought you meant just on wikipedia - however GFDL means that anyone could use the image anywhere for any purpose - including commercially. Megapixie 13:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay to save wasting a day having pedantic arguments over the release as already given - I have re-emailed the BBC with a formal note of release - ok? I also think a picture of AMelia on a -shirt would be a fine thing! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Make sure the reply is sent to "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org", and then ask some user with OTRS access (like User:Jkelly) to add the OTRS ticket number to the image description page. Thanks for the cooperation. --Abu badali (talk) 14:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay to save wasting a day having pedantic arguments over the release as already given - I have re-emailed the BBC with a formal note of release - ok? I also think a picture of AMelia on a -shirt would be a fine thing! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unfortunately that's what GFDL implies (admittedly you'd have to print the entire text of the license on the back of the t-shirt). They may have thought you meant just on wikipedia - however GFDL means that anyone could use the image anywhere for any purpose - including commercially. Megapixie 13:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know - but that's not what I asked for - I expressly asked for and got permission to use on the Wiki! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unnecessary unfree image of a book's cover, aparently being used to illustrate the (living) person depicted on the cover Abu badali (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - it illustrates the subject and the writer of the book - rather ridiculous to suggest that this is unnecessary.
- Why do you mean by "subject"? The living person or the book cover? --Abu badali (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - not being used in a fair use context per WP:NFCC #1 - living person - we could take a picture that would serve the same effect. No fair use rationale provided.
- Keep. The woman in the picture was fired from a union job (with a for-cause termination clause) for THAT PICTURE. Then she wrote a book about it. Then we wrote about her book. Image is irreplaceable because of her job firing and the notoriety surrounding it. -N 21:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. It doesn't say anywhere in the article that she was fired for this exact picture. You would have a good argument for keeping the image if that were the case. However, it says, "Delta Air Lines objected to photographs and commentary on her blog." Which photographs? Don't know, but it sounds like more than one. howcheng {chat} 06:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- There were other photos but they were very similar in nature, just mild risque posing in an airplane. The author chose this photo as an iconic representation of this and chose this as the cover of her book. Any alternative to this photo would still be non-free. -N 19:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- If there is no concensus here it should be kept - this matter should now be finalised Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Unfortunately consensus cannot override policy, especially when it comes to image licensing. howcheng {chat} 21:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- If there is no concensus here it should be kept - this matter should now be finalised Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, image is a replaceable fair use image. --Iamunknown 21:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep We have no article on the book specifically, only this article on the author. However, this is I think okay for fair use, as the image is used to illustrate an article discussing the book in question. —Gaff ταλκ 18:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Object to deletion I object to the deletion of this image. The subject was fired for blogging and for a few photos on her blog. The photo on the book cover is indeed iconic of those few blog photos. After she was fired she wrote the book based on her blog (the title of the book is the title of her blog). In short, the photo is the ideal image to illustrate the subject - "subject" being person, blog, and photos. To restore the image, would it merely be a matter of adding an appropriate caption to the image to give its relevance to the article? Can't we err on the side of constructiveness? The case that the image is legally unacceptable has not been made by the above discussion. The deletion is strange indeed. I note that the article in question has a history of intense spam and vandalism...I am suspicious. Bdushaw 17:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Tagged as GFLD, but description implies {{permission}}- Abu badali (talk) 19:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Corrected the tag to GFDL as used with the ok of the bbc - have also remoived ifd tag as a result Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please, do not remove the ifd tag. This is not how this process works. Also, consider reading WP:COPYREQ. Asking permission to use an image on Wikipedia is not the same as asking it to be released under the GFDL. --Abu badali (talk) 13:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: As before - without an ORTS tickets it's difficult to be sure that they understand what they are releasing (i.e. commercial rights). Megapixie 13:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay to save wasting a day having pedantic arguments over the release as already given - I have re-emailed the BBC with a formal note of release - ok? Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Gingerblokey (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- unnecessary unfree screenshot doesn't appear to add any noteworthy information that isn't already covered with text. Abu badali (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
*Keep - it shows the girl hosting the programme - clearly a picture adds something that text doesn't. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned. No licensing tags; possibly copyvio. — Ford MF 19:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
tagged as gfdl, but description implies {{permission}} Abu badali (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sorted: it should be a GFDL tag as it was so - have changed it now - have removed ifd tag as now sorted Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Again, please do not remove the ifd tag. The discussion is still going on and others may be interested in reading it. It seems you asked for a Wikipedia-only permission, and not gfdl licensing, what's not acceptable. --Abu badali (talk) 13:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay to save wasting a day having pedantic arguments over the release as already given - I have re-emailed the creator of the picture with a formal note of release - ok? Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- OTRS permission has been confirmed and the image marked as such. MECU≈talk 14:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Withdrawn: Permission sent to OTRS. Good work! --Abu badali (talk) 19:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Reply received 23 May 2007
editI grant permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the images entitled "Invasion-3481.jpg" and "Invasion-3486.jpg" under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
-JON MORROW Director, "INVASION OF THE PINES"
- Orphan and nearly identical high resolution image available on the Commons at Image:GEN Colin Powell.JPG — Madmedea 19:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- n.b. blue link points to Commons. --Iamunknown 21:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- copyright info is unknow. Abu badali (talk) 19:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned image. No licensing info. Probable copyright violation. — Ford MF 20:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Small, low-quality copy of Commons:Image:John Bigler painting.jpg. howcheng {chat} 20:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Lovesomebunny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned image uploaded as advertising for user's website. — Ford MF 20:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned because Image:Thomas Kennedy.png made this image obsolete. PNG crusade bot 20:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, no context to determine where it could be used appropriately BigrTex 21:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- speedy delete looks like a vandalism or attack picture. -N 17:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, low quality Iamunknown 21:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Low quality -- small, pixelated. Replaced by better quality Image:Peter H. Burnett.jpg. howcheng {chat} 23:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)