Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 November 5
| < November 4 | November 6 > |
|---|
November 5
edit
- - uploaded by Gansettsoccer311 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely Copyright violation (school picture) Calliopejen1 01:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Gansettsoccer311 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Copyright violation? Calliopejen1 01:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Itchybowwow (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by JOSHUA120890 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Jimbob2720 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Roostyhorse (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible Copyright violation Calliopejen1 01:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - OR and commercial advertisement. Cumulus Clouds 15:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, unclear copyright status Calliopejen1 01:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Twilightgoddes (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Jjamieson1 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Isambard1000 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 01:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Achiwiki356 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, not particularly encyclopedic, certainly better sunset photos already exist on commons Calliopejen1 01:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unclear enc value, likely Copyright violation Calliopejen1 01:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Thejanshow (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unclear enc value Calliopejen1 01:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unclear enc value Calliopejen1 01:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by DasPlan100 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Copyright violation Calliopejen1 01:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mercedes430k (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely Copyright violation Calliopejen1 01:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Idolatrieartist (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Idolatrieartist (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- I do not believe that an artist's impression of a proposed interchange meets WP:NFCC#8 (significance). A link from the article to the web site that hosts this image, [1] or [2], should suffice. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- On the contrary, this image demonstrates the new design of the new interchange. These sort of images have been used to demonstrate new development on the Sydney rail system for some time, see Image:Macquarie_University_Station_Platform_Proposed.jpg,Image:Macquarie_Park_Station_Proposed.jpg,Image:Franklin Road Station Proposed.jpg. I have updated the image description to include a more detailed rationale/significance. Muzzamo 02:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:CRYSTAL. —Angr 19:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Rubbish. This image was of a CONFIRMED and UNDER CONSTRUCTION station. I'm going to re-add it because you were clearly wrong. Muzzamo 22:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- I agree - the station is NOT a crystal ball nor it is speculation. It is VERIFIABLE and DOCUMENTED. I don't think the reason for deletion by Angr was appropriate. --Pikablu0530 08:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Rubbish. This image was of a CONFIRMED and UNDER CONSTRUCTION station. I'm going to re-add it because you were clearly wrong. Muzzamo 22:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Julirsoe_Supremo (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Wannabe909 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Copyright violation Calliopejen1 02:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Lalin_dexter (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 02:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic as far as I can tell Calliopejen1 02:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Vierko9590 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 02:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by KanadierausDeutschland (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic as far as i can tell Calliopejen1 02:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 02:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic as far as i can tell Calliopejen1 02:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Jann_Scott (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Copyright violation Calliopejen1 02:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Jan_Willems (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic as far as i can tell (probably originally for userpage) Calliopejen1 02:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- User uploaded multiple screenshots for MINERVA (mod) licensed as free software. However, the uploader seems to have confused free as in beer with free as in freedom, as Minerva is not licensed under a free license, but is available free of charge. Thus, these images are non-free, and the MINERVA (mod) article only needs one screenshot WP:NFCC#3a. Also included in this nom are:
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Leohenrique0908 (notify | contribs).
--Phirazo 04:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
The uploader is just showing off the game... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.248.150.241 (talk) 22:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and deleted the images, as the licensing is wrong if the game is indeed not free as you say, Phirazo. The image that remains on the main article, however, does not have a fair use rationale, and I have tagged it as such. -- RG2 05:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- I fixed it. One screenshot is fine, and that one is actually from the author's webpage. --Phirazo 01:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- UE - image contains embedded URL of the uploader's business. This URL and the image itself has been the subject of an edit-war in Moto Guzzi article, resulting in the images and URL being removed and the page protected against IP-only editors Cheesy Mike 10:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic -- RG2 10:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic -- RG2 10:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- UE - image contains embedded URL of the uploader's business. This URL and the image itself has been the subject of an edit-war in Moto Guzzi article, resulting in the images and URL being removed and the page protected against IP-only editors Cheesy Mike 10:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- UE - image contains embedded URL of the uploader's business. This URL and the image itself has been the subject of an edit-war in Moto Guzzi article, resulting in the images and URL being removed and the page protected against IP-only editors Cheesy Mike 10:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- UE - image contains embedded URL of the uploader's business. This URL and the image itself has been the subject of an edit-war in Moto Guzzi article, resulting in the images and URL being removed and the page protected against IP-only editors Cheesy Mike 10:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic -- RG2 10:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by User talk:Jaakobou#Image:Image:Ariel Sharon by Latuff.jpg listed for deletion|User:Jaakobou (notify | contribs).
- Violation of Wikipedia is not propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind, commercial, political, religious, or otherwise ,and WP:NOT#WEBSPACE. Unencyclopedic - The image doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia. IZAK 12:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete IZAK 12:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as there are free Lafuff images to use instead. // Liftarn
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. IZAK 12:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletions. IZAK 12:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as I do not see what is the use of such image on Wikipedia. --JewBask 13:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Ghastly. There are plenty of alternatives. JFW | T@lk 14:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete There is absolutely no reason for this picture. Yossiea (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't plan to use this image, but I agree with the pro-Israel editor who put it up that it could (and perhaps should) be used somewhere in the project. PRtalk 16:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Propaganda.Guy Montag 16:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Probably libellous anyway. --Redaktor 16:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Propaganda that has no use on Wikipedia. --Mark (Mschel) 19:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, but not for the above reasons. The propaganda is the artist's, not the uploader's or the encyclopedia's, and the artist is notable enough for his own article, which is where the image is being used. If we have an article on a propagandist, it is defensible to use his propaganda to illustrate his article. However, the article does not have enough discussion of this particular image to satisfy WP:NFCC#8. —Angr 19:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I disagree with the nominator's reasons. By fair use principle, the image cannot be used in wikipedia as propagada. It may be used only to illustrate the artist. And IMO it is a very good illustration of sickness and brain damage of this artist. Accopmanied with good commentary it is quite informative. Nevertheless I afree that free images are available, so this one fails fair use rationale. `'Míkka 19:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Namely? Image:Forgiveness2.jpg is labeled as being "no rights reserved", but gives no indication why we should believe it's so. The link provided as the source is broken. —Angr 19:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- comment - (1) I fail to see the free images repeatedly mentioned for replacement. (2) being that it is a "counter-POV" to the peace-activist impression made by the hugging arab and israeli, i feel there is more than room to give a single example of this nature to his body of work, which is not peaceful at all; some would say anti-semitic (another recurring theme is that calling him that is because of inability to take criticism). (3) i believe there is a proper mention in the body of the article regarding his style of hateful work to world leaders, ariel sharon being the most prominent in volume of such material, but there is room to give more space to others also. JaakobouChalk Talk 20:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete If this (multiple!) "image" is offered for the purpose of illustrating the artist's content and style, I would support only a single representative image (with proper rights) plus an external link to a legitimate site that displays more. The existing format strikes me as excessive. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a free-of-charge gallery. -- Deborahjay 06:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep if this is out there, we are not censuring it.--יודל 12:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --YoavD 05:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Pelegisrael 05:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - For some reason, someone gave a link for this image in the hebrew wikipedia Village pump. Liransh 13:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- If I'm parsing the image page properly, one of our editors took 5 images and stitched them together to make this composite. Also, none of the 5 are still available at the original links, and the one I was able to find offers no evidence that it is legitimately available in the public domain. We need to operate on the assumption that the originals are all still under copyright. Since this is a stitched together image, it does not illustrate the original artist's style properly, individual images as the artist created them do. This image has no hope of meeting WP:NFCC#8 even with adequate commentary it would always be better replaced with separate images as the artist created them. (A more than sufficient quantity of such images is available on Commons.) Since it isn't in the public domain or under an adequate license, and can not meet WP:NFCC, deletion is correct. GRBerry 19:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- comment - 4 out of the five have been found with copyright free tags since this section was opened and have been uploaded on commons. the 5th one has been recently re-found on infomedia and i'm currently searching for a copyright free statement on it. therefore, beying that concerns regarding copyright were now answered, i'm suggesting to close this thread and keep the image up. also, the images are not used for propaganda purpouses, they are used to illustrate the work of a propagandist -- Carlos Latuff -- big difference. JaakobouChalk Talk 13:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, subject of deleted article (Chicken Fried Radio) —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 13:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Wintersdoor (notify | contribs).
- Not fully sure if it is truly PD-old as the authorship is unclear, so need comment.- Jusjih 14:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept. Pre-1923. Changed tag to PD-US. -Nv8200p talk 01:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, {{PD-self}} is almost certainly wrong. —Angr 18:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Lone Wolf Clan (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, {{GFDL-self}} is almost certainly wrong. —Angr 18:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- An image that appears to have been uploaded to be an article, but articles should be in text, not a picture with text in it. --Mark (Mschel) 19:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. —Remember the dot (talk) 19:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- CV - No fair use rationale, uploader is not Daniel Geduld and so does not own the rights to the image. Cumulus Clouds 20:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Already speedily deleted under WP:CSD#G10. IFD regular, please close. GRBerry 15:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Sourced to Image:KOTCScc.jpg, not PD as claimed. If relicensed appropriately, fails WP:NFCC#1. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 23:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
