Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 September 18
September 22
edit- Un-sourced
- Original research image.
- Not notable to any articles.
Image was randomly uploaded by this user, who is basically only preoccupied with random pov/vandalism edits in one main article. Image is unverifiable and seeing as how he uploaded it to blank over other material and vandalize, I suspect it to be a copywrite infringment, but I don't know for sure. Either way, the image/map doesn't even fit the definition of what it represents and is original research from an obscure editor whose contributions have consisted of nothing more than blind reverts and borderline vandalism.Taharqa 01:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
September 18
edit- TotoBaggins (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Joke image.
- Joke image. This image was at the Science Reference Desk and... well, it may belong in WP:BJAODN... Nimur 01:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Move too Uncyclopedia or to Userspace not a bad joke image. It would be good in an article over there. --S.dedalus 03:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Mislabeled unfree screenshot, as pointed out by another user on the description page. CrazyLegsKC 01:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Gshostwannab (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Gshostwannab (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OtherPerson (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No evidence that this image has been released into the public domain. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- You mean, aside from the PD tag that the uploader put on it? --Wtshymanski 19:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Rcbutcher#Image:8inchHowitzerMk1Battery1917.jpg listed for deletion|Rcbutcher]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:Rcbutcher|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/Rcbutcher|contribs]]). - uploaded by [[User talk:
- It is redundant and is not linked by any page. I originally uploaded it but a better image of the same subject exists on Commons :Image:British 39th Siege Battery RGA Somme 1916.jpg Rcbutcher 05:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic Jackaranga 05:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per UE. — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 13:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic Jackaranga 05:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, UE and OR. -- Chris B • talk 18:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned image- Sebvdv 07:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets galleried images
editOf note: all of these images have had their rationales changed to no longer reflect what I have quoted below. However, the images are still used as a galleried decoration in the linked article and the rationales they now show still do not explain how its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Used in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets in a gallery with four other non-free images under the following non-free rationales: (a) "The image is itself a subject of discussion in the article or used in the infobox thereof." It is not. (b) "The image on the cover is significant because it was made by a famous artist." If this is true, there is no discussion of it on the article page. Further, there is no discussion of this galleried image on the article's page at all. Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image is decoration and provides no understanding of the topic to the reader and can be replaced with nothing to serve as similar encyclopedic content to the reader. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 13:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Used in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets in a gallery with four other non-free images under the following non-free rationales: (a) "The image is itself a subject of discussion in the article or used in the infobox thereof." It is not. (b) "The image on the cover is significant because it was made by a famous artist." If this is true, there is no discussion of it on the article page. Further, there is no discussion of this galleried image on the article's page at all. Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image is decoration and provides no understanding of the topic to the reader and can be replaced with nothing to serve as similar encyclopedic content to the reader. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 13:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Used in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets in a gallery with four other non-free images under the following non-free rationales: (a) "The image is itself a subject of discussion in the article or used in the infobox thereof." It is not. (b) "The image on the cover is significant because it was made by a famous artist." If this is true, there is no discussion of it on the article page. Further, there is no discussion of this galleried image on the article's page at all. Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image is decoration and provides no understanding of the topic to the reader and can be replaced with nothing to serve as similar encyclopedic content to the reader. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 13:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Used in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets in a gallery with four other non-free images under the following non-free rationales: (a) "The image is itself a subject of discussion in the article or used in the infobox thereof." It is not. (b) "The image on the cover is significant because it was made by a famous artist." If this is true, there is no discussion of it on the article page. Further, there is no discussion of this galleried image on the article's page at all. Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image is decoration and provides no understanding of the topic to the reader and can be replaced with nothing to serve as similar encyclopedic content to the reader. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 13:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Used in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets in a gallery with four other non-free images under the following non-free rationales: (a) "The image is itself a subject of discussion in the article or used in the infobox thereof." It is not. (b) "The image on the cover is significant because it was made by a famous artist." If this is true, there is no discussion of it on the article page. Further, there is no discussion of this galleried image on the article's page at all. Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image is decoration and provides no understanding of the topic to the reader and can be replaced with nothing to serve as similar encyclopedic content to the reader. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 13:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Apparent non-free image, with GNU Free Documentation License applied, but no proof image was uploaded by creator, apparent copyright violation Ejfetters 14:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Campstriker (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, and {{Norightsreserved}} tag seems unlikely. The absence of a copyright notice on the source website does not mean its material is uncopyrighted. —Angr 14:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned and unencyclopedic. —Angr 14:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Watermarked, unused image.- The Evil Spartan 17:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Replaceable non-free image of living actor. Ejfetters 18:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- That is a ground for speedy deletion. Please tag such images with {{subst:rfu2}} (or {{subst:rfu}} if they were uploaded before 13 July 2006) rather than bringing them here. —Angr 18:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, ok, thanks for the info, I will do that from now on. Ejfetters 18:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- That is a ground for speedy deletion. Please tag such images with {{subst:rfu2}} (or {{subst:rfu}} if they were uploaded before 13 July 2006) rather than bringing them here. —Angr 18:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Absent uploader. No source/license listed here. Apparently painted in 1911 but artist died in 1942. No evidence given that it meets {{PD-US}} standards. Was deleted from Commons for this reason (see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Przysiega Kosciuszki.jpg). howcheng {chat} 20:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned. Oli Filth (talk) 21:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's not enough reason.--OsamaK 22:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- No permission OsamaK 22:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- No permission OsamaK 22:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Possibly copyright vio? Copy of copywritten work. Page used in already has an image that is sufficient, this image is redundant. Ejfetters 00:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)