Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 August 31

< August 30	September 1 >

August 31

Image:Los Alamos Commute 001.jpg

Image:Los Alamos Commute 001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PoliticianTexas (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, uploader has been blocked indefinitely as sock puppet. Uncia (talk) 00:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Los Alamos Commute 002.jpg

Image:Los Alamos Commute 002.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PoliticianTexas (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, uploader has been blocked indefinitely as sock puppet. Uncia (talk) 00:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Los Alamos Commute 003.jpg

Image:Los Alamos Commute 003.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PoliticianTexas (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, uploader has been blocked indefinitely as sock puppet. Uncia (talk) 00:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Los Alamos Commute 012.jpg

Image:Los Alamos Commute 012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PoliticianTexas (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, uploader has been blocked indefinitely as sock puppet. Uncia (talk) 00:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EMMGym EVHS.jpg

Image:EMMGym EVHS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Martinez07 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned image, uploader is blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. Also possible copyright violation: uploader has history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming them to be his own work, and this image looks very good and is probably a professional photo. Uncia (talk) 02:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image is only 640x480 pixels and so is unlikely to be the uploader's original photograph. --Uncia (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails NFCC#8. The image is not needed to understand the article. -Nv8200p talk 22:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:National Nine News Darwin opener.png

Image:National Nine News Darwin opener.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bidgee (notify | contribs).

Non-free screenshot of the opening screen of a news show, used in the article on a TV station. Purely decorative, fails NFCC#8. The visual design of this particular news show is not discussed in the article and therefore not in need of illustration. It doesn't seem to be in any way remarkable either. See parallel nomination of Image:National_Nine_News_Darwin.png, which was an alternative for the same purpose. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The opener is not used by the Nine network in other stations that it owns and is unique to NTD. It's not used as decorative look. The Admin's actions have been questioned for being anti fair-use. Bidgee (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Identifies the show. More than purely decorative. meets the criteria for fair use. DGG (talk) 20:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. "Purely decorative" is in the eye of the beholder, and I fail to see how the nominator's personal opinion on that point is relevant. This looks like a valid fair-use picture to me. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Palin with kitty.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was:

- Moot - the image is on commons now and the local copy has been deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 07:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Palin with kitty.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calliopejen1 (notify | contribs).

This is listed as a "joke". I'm sorry, to that I say: "What's the joke?" I don't think this sort of image is worthy of an encyclopedia. Maybe if someone can explain to me the funny part, I would change my mind. -- Yekrats (talk) 10:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's in response to a silly discussion on Talk:Sarah Palin. I don't care particularly if it's deleted, but we have any number of similar joke images created under similar circumstances. Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the image is free, and it's fine. Kelly ^hi! 20:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP This forum is to discuss licenses, not content. This image is used on a Talkpage, much as images of sayings etc are featured on user talkpages, with such usages quite plainly allowed on WP. $\sim$ Justmeherenow ( ) 20:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm assuming the underlying picture is free, but if the subject of the picture asked for it to be taken down, then per personality rights I think we would have to do so. It's unlikely, but should we really be keeping such pictures even if we think they are harmless? Carcharoth (talk) 04:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't see any way a faked photo can be used to help build an encyclopedia, and there's already way too much shenanigans going on regarding Palin. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 04:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was:

Kept.  It is a meritous argument that this image depicts a defunct band, not four seperate individuals.  With the band effectively "dead", the dead person principle applies, albeit imperfectly.  Amatulic's argument is without merit. WilyD 13:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fenix TX 2001.jpg

Image:Fenix TX 2001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HarryCane (notify | contribs).

Policy does not allow for fair-use images of living people - per NFCC#1 a replacement can be made Peripitus (Talk) 12:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Difficult to get free images of a band as a whole once it has disbanded. Pictures of the individuals can be obtained as they are still living, but the band is effectively "dead" unless they reform. In other words, NFCC#1 would apply to articles about the individual, but in this case not to the article about the band. There is a possibility that people may have free pictures of this band somewhere in their photo albums, and attempts should be made to get the picture released under a free license, but failing that, fair-use or nothing (or linking to an external site) is the only alternative. For full disclosure, I came across this discussion while reviewing the images on User:Future Perfect at Sunrise/Historic fur list. Carcharoth (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I accept Carcharoth's rationale.DGG (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This might be an arguable case if the visual presentation of their line-up contained some more original, unique elements that really told us something about the band and its style. But as it is, it's just some guys in everyday apparel standing around, and the only piece of information we get from it is essentially that of a set of individual portraits. Replaceable with a sentence of text that names them, combined with free images of each. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Only replaceable if it is free images of each at the time they were in the band, not free images of them at some later point. And there is still the point that there is an entity ("the band") that is separate from them as individuals. I'm trying to think of other examples of "group" entities where pictures of the individual elements are not a sufficient replacement for a picture of the group as a whole (though, as you say, a text description replacement may well be enough). I'm well aware that this will probably get deleted under NFCC#8 or the text clause of NFCC#1, but I want people to move away from misinterpreting NFCC#1 for group entites. Groups and buildings "live" and "die" just as much as individuals do. When a building is demolished, or a band breaks up, there are legitimate arguments to be made that the "entity" no longer exists and it is no longer possible to go and get a "free" picture of the group any more. Having said that, in the case of existing bands, a free image of the existing band is probably enough. We should also encourage linking to external sites that host images. Not to the picture itself (I think that is called hotlinking or deeplinking or something) but to a website on the history of the band, showing a picture of what the band looked like. Carcharoth (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Bottom line, an article of a band should contain a picture of the band, if such a picture exists. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was:

Kept.  As above, image depicts a defunct band, not a collection of living individuals. Context and use is important in evaluating nonfree image use. WilyD 13:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fenix TX 1999.jpg

Image:Fenix TX 1999.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HarryCane (notify | contribs).

Fair use image of living people - fails NFCC#1 as the image is clearly replaceable Peripitus (Talk) 12:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Difficult to get free images of a band as a whole once it has disbanded (in this case, it is an earlier make-up of the band). Pictures of the individuals can be obtained as they are still living, but the band is effectively "dead" unless they reform. In other words, NFCC#1 would apply to articles about the individual, but in this case not to the article about the band. There is a possibility that people may have free pictures of this band somewhere in their photo albums, and attempts should be made to get the picture released under a free license, but failing that, fair-use or nothing (or linking to an external site) is the only alternative. For full disclosure, I came across this discussion while reviewing the images on User:Future Perfect at Sunrise/Historic fur list. Carcharoth (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I accept Carcharoth's rationale.DGG (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per my rationale in the case above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:36, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Response per my response in the case above. :-) Carcharoth (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Per the precedent set in the above two discussions that an image of a group (in an article about that group) is not replaceable by individual images of the group members. -Nv8200p talk 16:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dream Theater 1995.jpg

Image:Dream Theater 1995.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gargaj (notify | contribs).

per WP:NFCC#1 this image is replaceable with a free alternate. Wikipedia does not host fair-use images of living people in this way Peripitus (Talk) 12:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Difficult to get free images of a band's former line-up as a whole once a member has left. Pictures of the individuals can be obtained as they are still living, but that "line-up" of the band is effectively "dead" unless the former member rejoins. In other words, NFCC#1 would apply to articles about the individual (this image should not be used in Derek Sherinian), but in this case not to the article about the band. There is a possibility that people may have free pictures of this band when Derek Sherinian was a member, somewhere in their photo albums, and attempts should be made to get the picture released under a free license, but failing that, fair-use or nothing (or linking to an external site) is the only alternative if we want to illustrate what the previous line-ups of the bands were. For full disclosure, I came across this discussion while reviewing the images on User:Future Perfect at Sunrise/Historic fur list. Carcharoth (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I accept Carcharoth's rationale.DGG (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article already has this and this as group free images. All the one being discussed here shows is that Derek Sherinian was really part of the band - unless the 1995 hairstyles are peculiarly notable this can be easily conveyed with text. - Peripitus (Talk) 21:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to link to an external site that has this picture though. Can we do that? One of the things about long-running bands is the change in appearance and composition over the years. While pictures are not technically necessary to describe that, it is one of the best ways of doing so. BTW, Image:DT1988.jpg seems to have been missed. Has anyone written to the copyright holders to see if they will release the images under a free license? Carcharoth (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Carcharoth says it all: "pictures are not technically necessary to describe that." Period. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:37, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Carcharoth's conclusive clause: "...it is one of the best ways of doing so". ~Amatulić (talk) 23:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Los Alamos Commute 004.jpg

Image:Los Alamos Commute 004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PoliticianTexas (notify | contribs).

Orphaned image, low quality, uploader has been blocked indefinitely as sock puppet Uncia (talk) 13:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kaltemap.jpg

Image:Kaltemap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Judgesurreal777 (notify | contribs).

Purely illustrative use of unfree image, no encyclopedic value. Sandstein 15:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EVHS FIELD.jpg

Image:EVHS FIELD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thomasalazar (notify | contribs).

Orphaned image; uploader is blocked indefinitely for being a sock puppet; possible copyright violation because images are only 640x480 pixels and have no metadata and so are unlikely to be uploader's original photos; uploader has history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming they are his own work. Uncia (talk) 15:23, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EVHS Gym.jpg

Image:EVHS Gym.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Martinez07 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned image; uploader is blocked indefinitely for being a sock puppet; possible copyright violation because images are only 640x480 pixels and have no metadata and so are unlikely to be uploader's original photos; uploader has history of uploading copyrighted images and claiming they are his own work. Uncia (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hunterintense.jpg

Image:Hunterintense.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lee_haber8 (notify | contribs).

Unused unensyclopedic image (was used in an article speedy deleted a couple of years ago. Sherool (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Huntersnowman.jpg

Image:Huntersnowman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lee_haber8 (notify | contribs).

Unused unensyclopedic image (was used in an article speedy deleted a couple of years ago). Sherool (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hunconvoy.jpg

Image:Hunconvoy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Agent87 (notify | contribs).

Not used, the asertion that it's released into the public domain also seems dubious, the source website says (at least on the English version):

“

”

So merely linking to the website does not explain the PD tag. Sherool (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hummel02.gif

Image:Hummel02.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hailey_C._Shannon (notify | contribs).

Not used, not 100% sure since it just users initials, but I think this migh be related to Maria Innocentia Hummel, according to that article she died in 1946, meaning it won't lapse into public domain untill 2016 (at least not in the US)... Sherool (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IMGP0547.JPG

Image:IMGP0547.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rmg2028 (notify | contribs).

Not used, appears to be releated to a bio article speedy deleted back in 2006. Sherool (talk) 16:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IMGP0765.JPG

Image:IMGP0765.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rmg2028 (notify | contribs).

Not used, appears to be releated to a bio article speedy deleted back in 2006. Sherool (talk) 16:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Indent-sample-dyk-firefox.jpg

Image:Indent-sample-dyk-firefox.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jengod (notify | contribs).

Unused Wikipedia screensot, also I guess technicaly it should have been labeled as GFDL, but seems rater pointles to keep around. Sherool (talk) 16:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Indexpicaa.jpg

Image:Indexpicaa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cypo (notify | contribs).

Not used, impossible to verify copyright status from the provided source info. Sherool (talk) 16:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ipren.jpg

Image:Ipren.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Blackcurrent (notify | contribs).

Not used, tagged as PD because it's a "free wallpaper", but that's hardly enough to legaly consider it public domain. Sherool (talk) 16:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jeffrey.jpg

Image:Jeffrey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Francis_Lee (notify | contribs).

Not used, probably a personal photo, at least I can find no attempt to make use of it anywhere. Sherool (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jenny_Elliott.jpg

Image:Jenny_Elliott.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alexor (notify | contribs).

Not used, can't find any info on the source websit to support the PD tag. Sherool (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JoeBaldwinPhotoForUserPage.jpg

Image:JoeBaldwinPhotoForUserPage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JoeBaldwin (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 17:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jnburnett.jpg

Image:Jnburnett.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xflickrx (notify | contribs).

Not used, very vague source info only says it's from "an architecture firm". Aparenlty tagged as public doman since it was publicly released, wich is generaly not the case. Sherool (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Guardado 3 1600x1200.jpg

Image:Guardado 3 1600x1200.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dnvlgm (notify | contribs).

Probable copyright violation. Apparently clipped from http://www.football-wallpapers.com/andres-guardado-wallpaper-3/ (Photo Credits: AP Photo/Claudio Cruz) William Avery (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Emonwallpaper.jpg

Image:Emonwallpaper.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Qwerty_211 (notify | contribs).

Not used, watermarked, and very likely a copyvio. Sherool (talk) 18:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Myami_Real_7.jpg

Image:Myami_Real_7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lilani22 (notify | contribs).

Not used, uploader asserts that ths is something (s)he created him/herself, but if you zoom in it's faily obvious that it's scanned from a printed source, it's also (badly) photoshopped (look at her lower arm on the right side). Sherool (talk) 19:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BaghdadiMahmudi.jpg

Image:BaghdadiMahmudi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Phase4 (notify | contribs).

I believe this fails the following criteria from the guidelines on the use of non free content as I see no reason a free alternative could not be created.

"No free equivalent. Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. .." Anonymous101 (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The current image was uploaded by Alwad7. It is for Alwad7 to explain whether it is a free content image or not.PJHaseldine (talk) 21:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the current image may not be the same non-free image the tagging on the page applies to, but that just mean it's unsourced and untagged. Unless source information can be purt forth to prove that this is free content it still needs to be delted, either for the reasons listed by the nominator, or for simply beeing unsourced and unverifiable. --Sherool (talk) 16:14, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Free Content , Released And Approved By The Personnel and The Government " since He's a Political Figure " And Considered as His Official Portrait in The Media ,Press , No Official Owner Of The Picture , What i Mean is No Copyrights Nation Wide --In Allah We Trust (talk) 02:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the Image anyway ?. --In Allah We Trust (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DJ_TakeOver.jpg

Image:DJ_TakeOver.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Djtakeover (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, questionable Pd claim -- appears to be image cut from some other source given partial text at bottom left Jordan 1972 (talk) 20:44, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Now_Or_Never.jpg

Image:Now_Or_Never.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Djtakeover (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, questionable PD claim as it states it is an ablum cover. Jordan 1972 (talk) 20:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Erection_in_Boxer_Shorts.jpg

Image:Erection_in_Boxer_Shorts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Davidphogan74 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, unlikely an encyclopedic use, was removed from article it was added to quickly Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yoke_front_boxers_with_elastic_sides.jpg

Image:Yoke_front_boxers_with_elastic_sides.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Boxersshorts (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality and unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:24, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Balloon_seat_relaxed_as_wearer_stands.jpg

Image:Balloon_seat_relaxed_as_wearer_stands.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Boxersshorts (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, lowquality and unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrryabn.jpg

Image:Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrryabn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danielofficial (notify | contribs).

currently orphaned image as I removed it from article Boxer shorts -- it is extreamly low quality and there are other better quality images already in the article and also available on Boxer briefs. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vwshorts05.jpg

Image:Vwshorts05.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marioscido (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, unsure of any encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:42, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fallbackyard.jpg

Image:Fallbackyard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BlueGlowGuardian (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Short_hair.jpg

Image:Short_hair.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gfarkwort (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, unencycloepdic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image kept. Uploader still around and put it on his user page. -Nv8200p talk 23:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bio_pic_2-1-08.jpg

Image:Bio_pic_2-1-08.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Caughtbarehanded (notify | contribs).

The image page is basially a biographical article written about the image subject. There are several nobility claims made, but I do not believe the subject would pass WP:BIO. The uploaders only contributions are to this image article page and it is very likely the subject and user are the same person. The image is not used anywhere. The text could be userfied, but that would likely fail at an MfD. Not quite sure how to proceed here - speedy, prod, Ifd??? Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSCF0217.JPG

Image:DSCF0217.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Michaol_Ston3 (notify | contribs).

Another image article page... I also believe this to be a non-notable subject and the image is not in use anywhere else. The user's contibutions only deal with this image page. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Isaac_Juliao_Portrait_2007.JPG

Image:Isaac_Juliao_Portrait_2007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Isaacjuliao (notify | contribs).

Another image article page... I also believe this to be a non-notable subject and the image is not in use anywhere else. The user's contibutions only deal with this image page and copying the text to his user space. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sean_Guess.jpg

Image:Sean_Guess.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Seanny11 (notify | contribs).

Another image article page... I also believe this to be a non-notable subject and the image is not in use anywhere else. The user's contibutions only deal with this image page. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Queer-pash-canberra.jpg

Image:Queer-pash-canberra.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pinkie_Snarq (notify | contribs).

orpahend image, absent uplaoder, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JvWIK.jpg

Image:JvWIK.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Udrie (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:23, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SHINNSUCKS.JPG

Image:SHINNSUCKS.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Emocidal_Queer (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, likely copyright violation as image is a user edited screen shot Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Senorita_Rae.jpg

Image:Senorita_Rae.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Surfd91 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contirbution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Plants_Asilomar_State_Beach.JPG

Image:Plants_Asilomar_State_Beach.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Intothewoods29 (notify | contribs).

User request; Replaced. O sama K 23:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CanarsieCrossover.jpg

Image:CanarsieCrossover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by EddieSegoura (notify | contribs).

Unnecessary orphaned (not to mention a horrible) picture of a crossover by an absent uploader. What is on Railroad switch will suffice. « ₣M₣ » 23:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)