Previously used in Incarceration, with the caption "Tullianum, the first modern prison, built in 250 BCE", but I can't tell what it's supposed to be a picture of. I asked about this a year ago on the article's talk page, but the only response I got was from Tass-AJ, who also couldn't make heads or tails of it. So I've just removed it from the article, and now it's unused. —Bkell (talk) 01:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Content dispute about a user-created map purporting to show the ethnic composition of the Balkans in antiquity. Two competing versions have been uploaded; the disputed part is where to assign the region of Macedonia. However, both versions agree on a common, mistaken premise, namely, that there were only three or four significant ethnic groups to be shown (Thracians, Illyrians, Greeks, possibly Macedonians), and that there are clearly delinable boundaries between them. No chance this image, in either version, is ever going to be used in articles, since we already have better and more detailed ethnic maps. --Fut.Perf.☼07:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Argument 1: this portrait image of a living person is considered to be replaceable, according to the unacceptable use of images example #10. Its replaceability was disputed before. The argument that it is hard to photograph the person is a slippery slope for all non-free portraits of living people. Argument 2: the photo holds no particular historical significance as mentioned in the fair use rationale, it is interchangeable with any other portrait of the person. Argument 3: the image's fair use rationale contains no good purpose of use description. – Ilse@10:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Images with a similar problem, also nominated for deletion:
likely copyvio, sourced to collection of papers at a library. we should be able to get a verifiably free image of him because of his birth/death dates. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
