Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 September 22

< September 21	September 23 >

September 22

Image:Flintfire-ketteringuniversity.jpg

Image:Flintfire-ketteringuniversity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabosstony (notify | contribs).

orpahned image, absent uploader, questionable enecycloepdic use as the article on the university makes no mention of the fire and the image does not do a great job of displaying the fire in the first place Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OlaPodrida2007Cover.jpg

Image:OlaPodrida2007Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Olapodrida (notify | contribs).

orphaned iamge, absent uplaoder, unsure what this is but given the term cover in the name I assume its an album cover, that said, it unlikely qualitifies as PD-self. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GravitasMianlogowiki.jpg

Image:GravitasMianlogowiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NAG21 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contribution of user, appears to be an advertising graphic for the business and was likley used on a deleted article. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Speed_Painting_Stages.jpg

Image:Speed_Painting_Stages.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Northpaul (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, questionable if the uploader owns the copyright given it is a collection of stills taken from (what I believe is) a video. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Map_cot_thumb2.jpg

Image:Map_cot_thumb2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Foordie (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, I believe this is a screen shot from a video game cut unsure, there have been previously deleted images which appear to have been similar based on the uploaders talk page; I question the PD-self license Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:S50001811.JPG

Image:S50001811.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tjhaf2007 (notify | contribs).

orpahned image, absent uploader, it is not the greatest quality so a move to commons is really not in order. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nick_Image_of_self.jpg

Image:Nick_Image_of_self.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Njam92 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal drawing Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Asdf158.jpg

Image:Asdf158.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tharidu1000 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, I question the PD-self licnese as I do not know how close you can get to the army to take a shot like that. A duplicate image was speedy deleted due to a non-commercial or educational use only licnese. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mixed_Puppy.jpg

Image:Mixed_Puppy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TwistedDoubt (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, recently absent uploader, cute but of low quality as not worth transfereing to commons Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Readworthy_logo.jpg

Image:Readworthy_logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Surya_Mittal (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, this logo was likely used on the AfD-ed article of the subject. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was:

- Delete - original version was uploaded with the note "promo photo of this band called murder mystery" with no mention of self made - given the information we have Isee that the image is not-free, has no fair-use rationale, has the incorrect licence and is orphaned - Peripitus (Talk) 12:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Murdermysteryband2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adamvelvetu (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, recently absent uploader, the image was removed from the article on the subject here but the image it was replaced with was deleted. This image depicts the members as they were in 2006 (according to the old image caption) and not reflective of the current makeup of the group - not sure it has an encyclopedic use within the article. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why would it not be "encyclopedic" to picture the band at some earlier point in time even though the members have since changed? Surely that would be historical information about the band. Incidentally, I'm taking the image at face value in terms of the claim that the photo was released in to the public domain by the uploader. Do you have some reason to doubt this? Otherwise, why not just put the picture back in the article with the original caption? Crypticfirefly (talk) 02:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't believe anywhere in my comments I indicated that I questioned the PD claim in the least. In regards to re-adding it back into the article, I do not think that the image should be added into the article because (a) in the info box it would be misleading when the makeup of the group has changed drastically (from memory, 2 of the 4 in the image are gone and a new member was added) (b) the article is not long enough to be capuring the images of old members of the group (c) I personally do not feel that the group is truly notable but not nominating it as I also believe it would survive an AfD discussion.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 10:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Sorry, I was merely making an incorrect inference about the image regarding its copyright status. As for the group, presumably if they are "notable" enough to be in Wikipedia, the past make-up of the group is relevant-- especially since according to the article they recorded two albums with those members. (I have no opinion on the notability of the group, though I notice that there seem to be two completely different bands with the identical name.) Crypticfirefly (talk) 02:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Robert_Mackellar.jpg

Image:Robert_Mackellar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrevilbreakfast (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, image was likley used on a deleted article on the subject (as per notes on uploaders talk page) Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image-PHO_0110b.jpg

Image:Image-PHO_0110b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mkorchia (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, questionable PD-self license as the photo credit is someone other then uploader (uploader appears to take credit for edititing) Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Redmarkseattle.jpg

Image:Redmarkseattle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Teqnotyn617 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality, image likely used on deleted article on image subject Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pibb Xtra.PNG

Image:Pibb Xtra.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AMFilmsInc (notify | contribs).

Two big reasons for deleting this image:

It is a user-made rendition of the Pibb Xtra logo, and isn't quite correct (see here). While it's a valiant attempt to make a PNG version of the Pibb logo, it's simply incorrect.
It's marked as PD, which is impossible. But this clearly violates Fair use as it misrepresents the logo.

Frankly, I think this should be speedied, but I'm not sure which criterion would apply here. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 06:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A443_at_Hallow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - license and source fixed - confirmed that this is cc-by-sa-2.0 - Peripitus (Talk) 04:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:A443_at_Hallow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bashereyre (notify | contribs).

author is not the same as uploader. this may be licensed CC because some (all?) photos on that site are, but he hasn't provided a link for verification Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See comment for image listed four further down.[1]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Hallow_C.E_Primary_School.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - license and source fixed - confirmed that it is cc-by-sa-2.0 - Peripitus (Talk) 04:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hallow_C.E_Primary_School.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bashereyre (notify | contribs).

author is not the same as uploader. this may be licensed CC because some (all?) photos on that site are, but he hasn't provided a link for verification Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See comment for image listed three further down. {http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/77306] Crypticfirefly (talk) 03:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Hallow_Church.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - license and source fixed - confirmed that it is cc-by-sa-2.0 - Peripitus (Talk) 04:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hallow_Church.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bashereyre (notify | contribs).

author is not the same as uploader. this may be licensed CC because some (all?) photos on that site are, but he hasn't provided a link for verification Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See comment for image listed two further down.[2] Crypticfirefly (talk) 03:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Hallow_Gren.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - license and source fixed - confirmed that it is licensed under CC-by-sa-2.0 - Peripitus (Talk) 04:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hallow_Gren.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bashereyre (notify | contribs).

author is not the same as uploader. this may be licensed CC because some (all?) photos on that site are, but he hasn't provided a link for verification Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See comment for image listed below.[3] Crypticfirefly (talk) 02:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Hallow_Pst_Office.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - licence fixed and source link added to image - confirmed that this is CC-by-Sa-2.0 licenced - Peripitus (Talk) 04:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hallow_Pst_Office.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bashereyre (notify | contribs).

author is not the same as uploader. this may be licensed CC because some (all?) photos on that site are, but he hasn't provided a link for verification Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- On the other hand, typing the title of the image into the search box on the photograph every grid square website pulls up just one hit: the image in question.[4] And it is correctly identified here by creator and the fact that it is under cc license. Crypticfirefly (talk) 02:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:ChairmanOfTheBoard.JPG

Image:ChairmanOfTheBoard.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wen Hsing (notify | contribs).

Nominated for deletion on commons, see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:David Miscavige ChairmanOfTheBoard.jpg. Nominator believes this is a screen-shot and I can see why. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Until the nominator can provide more than a vague notion that he thinks it's a screen-shot (from a non-free image?), there's no reason not to assume good-faith by the uploader that this is a clipping from a personal photograph, released under Creative Commons licence. AndroidCat (talk) 16:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Might the uploader be able to show us this personal photo this was taken from? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The commons discussion was closed as Keep. This discussion is now moot. AndroidCat (talk) 01:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. As duplicate of image at Commons, see Commons:Image:David Miscavige ChairmanOfTheBoard.jpg. Cirt (talk) 02:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ehehhgetr.gif

Image:Ehehhgetr.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Talkmale1 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 15:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy.jpg

Image:Guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:LukeTheSpook (notify | contribs).

Fake album art. Thus far, no album art has been confirmed for album in question. Using the image's source, Google, many other fakes can be found, including this one. — Travelling Tragition ^(Talk) 18:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]