Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 September 7
September 7
edit- Roborovskihamsters (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned image, recently absent uploader, low quality image Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Blackitiodmax (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Blackitiodmax (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Blackitiodmax (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Blackitiodmax (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned images, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photos Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:01, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Stillchadic (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, image of non-notable singer Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Pastorparker (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Low quality Nv8200p talk 02:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribtion of user, photo of a band that based on summary provided, would not meet the requirements of WP:BAND Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Copyright violation as no evidence permission was granted to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Chriswaterman (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, very low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Squirtdito (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, low quality personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sonorwildman (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Heathcoteheat (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, image was used in a deleted article about the subject Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Carterhays (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, either a personal photo or a non-notable band image from myspace Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Kshitizsaxena (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- ThomasLafeuille (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Johnlatham (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic personal photo of absentee user on User Pages Nv8200p talk 02:35, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Andrew_Parodi (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Low quality Nv8200p talk 03:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 03:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 03:32, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- NickDCXfan (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 04:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 04:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'm the author. Feel free to delete it right away; it has no use anymore. —msikma (user, talk) 08:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Replaceable with a free image. Someone who bought it just needs to be found so they can take a picture of it. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- WP:Fair use image for That's the Way It Is (song) does not siginificantly increase readers understanding as it is only a screenshot of the preformer Million_Moments (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- MisterWiki (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, low quality due to image distortions, unsure if the distortions are purposeful or accidental. Jordan 1972 (talk) 13:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- MisterWiki (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, image distortions make it low quality, appears to be the same base image as Image:Composting in the Escuela Barreales.jpg Jordan 1972 (talk) 13:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hollywood9901 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, questionable PD-self license, there is a perfectly acceptable free image already in use on Al Santos; even if free, the watermarking on the image makes it less desirable for use. Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, likely used on a deleted article on business, given image edgeing likely lifted from a website. Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- NetherlandishYankee (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- NetherlandishYankee (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- NetherlandishYankee (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, low quality due to size of actual image compared to size of the file (ie lots of white space) Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- NetherlandishYankee (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, low quality due to size of actual image compared to size of the file (ie lots of white space) Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Davidreile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, based on uploader name, appears to be a self image Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Davidreile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, based on uploader name, appears to be a self image Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- AZaprudsky (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned image, sole contribtuion of user, either a personal photo or insufficent information to determine who it is. Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, text appears to be a non-notable [auto?]biography Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- TheLadiesChoice (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribtuion of user, insufficent info to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keyofapollo (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Aaron-conroy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribtuion of user, unencycloepdic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Samgibbons (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribtuion of user, questionable PD-self claim, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Star_fox12 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribtuion of user, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, useless. I've also tagged it as having no source. J Milburn (talk) 18:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- LedgeGriffo! (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, recently absent uplaoder, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Samuelle2004 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo -- I have deleted from the image page the user resume, and have also listed his user page, which had the same resume, on WP:MfD Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- MiracleMat (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- As a lot of people are talking about how disputed images should be sent to IfD rather than admins doing the obvious thing, I present this image. The catalogue covers are not discussed, the catalogues themselves are barely discussed and this massive image is simply used to decorate a 'timeline' section. Attempts to remove it from the article were met with contempt, tagging as having a disputed fair use rationale was reverted without comment. Of course, if I was to delete this, that would leave me the villain, so I offer to you a week of discussion which will no doubt get pile on angry 'keeps', as proof that the IfD process does not work. J Milburn (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, this image represents a SUBSTANTIAL amount of research, scanning and photo-retouching. As far as I know, these images exist no where else digitally. Also, since I got the assistance of the head archivist at the Edelbrock museum (who essentially speaks for the president), these catalog covers are not only used with permission, but I may be able to get permission to release this image as free. Would that carry any weight here? another note: What exactly is minimal usage? Does that mean it's only used once? How many images on wikipedia fail THAT???
- If Edelbrock releases one or more covers freely, then those covers could definitely be re-uploaded. Minimal usage means that we use as little copyrighted material as possible. Since this image, by definition, uses as many copyrighted covers as seem are available, it fails that criterion. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 17:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I guess I'll have to talk to Vic. I'll get the big man himself to authorize these covers as free and then re-upload it (as I'm sure that Mr. Milburn will win this round in his campaign against my stuff). And please don't block ME for a week for speaking ill of a admin.MiracleMat (talk) 15:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- If Edelbrock releases one or more covers freely, then those covers could definitely be re-uploaded. Minimal usage means that we use as little copyrighted material as possible. Since this image, by definition, uses as many copyrighted covers as seem are available, it fails that criterion. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 17:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, this image represents a SUBSTANTIAL amount of research, scanning and photo-retouching. As far as I know, these images exist no where else digitally. Also, since I got the assistance of the head archivist at the Edelbrock museum (who essentially speaks for the president), these catalog covers are not only used with permission, but I may be able to get permission to release this image as free. Would that carry any weight here? another note: What exactly is minimal usage? Does that mean it's only used once? How many images on wikipedia fail THAT???
Yes, delete. It fails WP:NFCC points 3 and especially 8; its presence certainly does not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic." —Bkell (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No way a passing mention of an issue in a list warrants images of all of these issues. Definitely doesn't meet WP:NFCC. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Princesstar69 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, useless. J Milburn (talk) 18:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Unused, likely unencyclopedic. Note deleted article Johanna Virtanen. —Bkell (talk) 18:28, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Unused, likely unencyclopedic. Note deleted article Susan Aho. —Bkell (talk) 18:32, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Unused, likely unencyclopedic. Note deleted article Mari Kaasinen. —Bkell (talk) 18:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Unused, unencyclopedic personal image. —Bkell (talk) 18:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Unused, unencyclopedic personal image. —Bkell (talk) 18:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Unused, unencyclopedic personal image. —Bkell (talk) 18:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)