Wikipedia:Peer review/2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict/archive1

I am asking this article be reviewed in order to get it to conform to NPOV or at least diminish the prevalence of NPOV debate.

Also, it would be good to address the heavy pro-Israeli POV of a lot of the sources and citations, and to help source many apparently orginal research comments.

--Cerejota 23:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly I think this event is still way too ongoing for a good peer review to be made at this time. The article is in a constant state of flux as events develop. --Cyde↔Weys 02:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then do we remove this tag? Or leave it so a constant peer review can happen? --Cerejota 16:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should remove it for now. BhaiSaab ^talk 19:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is a current event, therefore by definition the article will be unstable. New events are happening every day in this conflict, so even if the article were to be reviewed as excellent and up to FA standard one day, there would be more things to write the next day. This review should be put on hold until after events have stabilised - which I hope will be sooner rather than later! EuroSong ^talk 02:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]