Wikipedia:Peer review/Last Exit to Springfield/archive1

Last Exit to Springfield

This article is currently close to becoming a GA, but I would like some constructive comments on how to get this article to FA status. Some specifics:

Is there enough in the production section? I got as much useful notable information out of the DVD commentary as I could, and since this episode is from 1993, there isn't a lot on the internet.
Is the review section too cluttered/messy?
Is the the Cultural references section too cluttered/messy/needed?
How is the general synopsis? Too short, long, too specific or not specific enough?
Is there any way I can lengthen the lead?

Feedback on those or any other issues would be MUCH appreciated. -- Scorpion 01:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of quick things:

If you're going for FA, you might get in trouble for having too many fair use images to illustrate the article. Each image should be used for "identification and critical commentary", Image:A Thousand Monkeys.png and Image:9f15.jpg are there just to illustrate the article.
I wouldn't quote IMDB and TV.com ratings - they are highly subjective self-self-selecting surveys and don't really indicate much.
Yes, I tink the "Reception" section might be a bit too crowded, try splitting it into paragraphs.
The "Production", "Cultural References" and "Reception" sections don't really flow naturally - they are like collections of disjoint bullet points without actually using the *s. I'm not sure how this can be improved myself, perhaps try looking at similar sections of articles in the "Media" section of WP:FA to see what tends to be acceptable. (Though I did not find any individual episodes there, so there probably isn't as much information to put in these sections as in other FA articles.)

--Konstable 22:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 20:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]