Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

edit

Uncontroversial technical requests

edit

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

edit

Contested technical requests

edit
Likely not uncontroversial. Please cite sources. 162 etc. (talk) 04:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Tulunad" had 2,84,000 search hits
[1]
"Tulu Nadu" had 1,40,000 search hits
[2]
Tulu wikipedia uses ತುಳುನಾಡ್ [3]
  • ತುಳುನಾಡ್ = Tulunad
  • ತುಳು ನಾಡು = Tulu Nadu
മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 05:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@മംഗലാപുരം, we need sources that meet WP:RS, particularly ones that are independent of the subject in order to verify which title is the WP:COMMONNAME, typically search hits are a starting point for research, but not authoritative so thusly not sufficient for this. Wiki sources are also not sufficient. In this case, a discussion would be the best way to proceed, as if enough interested editors agree with the logic as to which title should be used, sources may not always be necessary (but they will most likely be needed anyways). ASUKITE 16:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Biruitorul Based on the above, this will need a discussion to move forward. If you wish, click the "discuss" button above, fill in your rationale and submit, or you can remove this thread if you change your mind. ASUKITE 21:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

edit