Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/09
- 2016
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 September 2016
Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Having semi-protected Eggheads (TV series) yesterday the vandalism has moved to Make Me an Egghead, together with an abusive message on my talk page. Nigej (talk) 09:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman ✈ 15:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See page history has been vandalized so much it needs protection from IPs. VarunFEB2003 13:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 14:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- @NeilN: It's not only 1 user number of IP's vandalizing it, ClueBot NG's working a lot see the history! VarunFEB2003 14:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- @VarunFEB2003: I did. Not enough to merit regular semi-protection let alone indefinite semi-protection. If the rate of disruption increases, then please re-report. --NeilN talk to me 15:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- @NeilN: It's not only 1 user number of IP's vandalizing it, ClueBot NG's working a lot see the history! VarunFEB2003 14:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Drudge Report (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Two week semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced content by IP-hopping unregistered editor(s), despite attempt to resolve through discussion. Two recent one-week stints of semi-protection for the same problem (here, here). --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 16:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 17:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 19:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unsourced/poorly sourced additions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I usually would decline a request with an edit history similar to this one because unsourced additions are relatively infrequent (1 or 2 a week); yet, I understand the frustration of having to continuously deal with edits that are consistently bad. I'm protecting for a short time. Airplaneman ✈ 16:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent violations of the policies on living persons. livelikemusic talk! 15:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
List of Tokyo DisneySea attractions
List of Tokyo DisneySea attractions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism resumed a few hours after previous semi-protection was lifted. Scott Roy Atwood (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent and high level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 03:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an anonymous user and some instances of IP vandalism after protection expired on August 22, 2016. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 04:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Major developments about the brand in the media. Prone to disruption/vandalism. Request protection for a week. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 10:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Gap9551 (talk) 15:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant target of long term block evading IP hopping dog article/rapper vandal. SagaciousPhil - Chat 03:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was recently unprotected. Has started facing too much of vandalism. VarunFEB2003 13:32, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Question: What do you think, KrakatoaKatie? NeilN talk to me 14:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ugh. It was worth a shot, but I don't think we can leave it unprotected. We might try PC for a bit. Katietalk 14:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An IP has deleted the infobox three times without any discernible reason since yesterday. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This is Edit of The King of Fighters 2000 Philippine Movie as Hoaxes By IP Sock of User:Taiki0409. LG-Gunther : Talk 02:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Got dynamic IPs continually adding dodgy health information in this drug & downplaying the serious potential harms. Alexbrn (talk) 06:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 10:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 12:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Until consensus can be reached on talk page. Lack of input in discussions at WT:NFL has prevented consensus from being reached for months now, so edit warring rages on. Lizard (talk) 17:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. @Lizard the Wizard: I'm seeing one editor reverting against many. NeilN talk to me 17:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Turns out that Manning954 is a sock of a banned user; Bbb23 did the checkusering and blocking in this situation. Nyttend (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP users changing the year range in the Television section of the article for Hale's role on Pretty Little Liars (from "2010-present" to "2010-2017" or something similar). Recently, it was announced that the TV series was ending on Freeform, with the finale airing in 2017, but to change the year(s) Hale was involved in the show from "2010-present" to "2010-2017" is premature, per WP:CRYSTAL. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing event, high level of vandalism predicted. 189.122.87.152 (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Declined. I see why you might predict it, but so far, so good. There has been some IP vandalism, but also some positive changes from IPs. Yaris678 (talk) 22:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 22:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 07:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., if there are BLP violations introduced by registered users those should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
User:Awais Azad target pages
- Wafaa Khalifa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- DeCODED Sexes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Draft:Wafaa Khalifa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Draft:DeCODED Sexes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Wafaa khalifa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Draft:Wafaa khalifa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Create protection: Favorite creation targets of a blocked sockpuppeteer - editing on these articles has occurred very recently, resulting in two SPIs just yesterday. MSJapan (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- I'm thinking it best to
Declined this request. Not because there's something necessarily wrong with it, but because it looks like you're describing a perfect Honeypot (computing) — if the user's giving away his own sockpuppets by recreating these pages, I'm not thinking it's a good idea to protect the pages and thus prevent him from self-identifying his sockpuppets for us. I'm not pretending to make this a "final answer"; leave a response here (and ping me), or chat with me at my talk page, and I'll consider your words, or if another admin wants to protect them, I'll not complain. Nyttend (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has been the subject of a slow moving campaign by what seems to be one user on multiple IPs, to add unsourced content about the subject. A discussion has been open on the talk page but the IP seems unwilling to enrage in discussion beyond repeated assertions that their additions are true. I'm hoping a semi-prot will encourage them to do more than a drive-by revert and a token "it's true" on the talk page. . CrowCaw 21:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: – Edit war between two (or more) anons. —teb728 t c 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 864,000,000 milliseconds, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 00:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting extended pending changes protection to this article. The Gun Laws portion of the article has been removed several times over the last month and appears contentious. Pending changes would preserve article integrity. -- Dane2007 talk 02:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Not unprotected. Please explain why you want to keep that content on the article's talk page and engage in a discussion with the other users. Yaris678 (talk) 11:45, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. حزل (talk) 19:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs are changing the value for the population. This seems to be linked to the recent presidentail election in that country. McSly (talk) 21:42, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent POV editing and vandalism by multiple IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 22:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:59, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors randomly modifying the subjects name to include the word "And" or adding "...And Peggy" to the infobox. -- Dane2007 talk 23:48, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 month NeilN talk to me 00:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
02 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 Week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 1 week given that one of the major recent contributors is an IP, and this will also lock them out. If disruption continues, a longer period can be tried out. Vanamonde (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 18:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Extremely high level of IP vandalism. Oshwah declined on the 29th August, something I find inexplicable, given that at that point, there were 10 different IP editors who had vandalised the page 25 times between them last month alone; in fact the entire first page of edit history is nothing but vandalism and reverting vandalism. Almost as if to prove my point, the page has been vandalised 8 times today alone by 5 different IP editors. I therefore ask that a different admin look at semi-protecting this page. I'll also assume good faith and presume that Oshwah was veering on the side of new admin caution that day. :) jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 1 month given that it's the first protection. If this resumes, longer might be considered. Vanamonde (talk) 19:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, Vanamonde! Yes, definitely needed protection. For the record, jcc, yes I was siding with caution. I thought the edits had stopped which is why I thought it shouldn't be protected. Looking now, this is a clear case where it is needed. I apologize; I'm still learning! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP refusing to respect WP:BRD. Number 57 10:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: Logged-in user not ready to drop the stick and not coming up with any good reason than WP:OSE. 14.141.141.26 (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined BRD isn't a policy (but 3RR is!)
If you revert twice, then you are no longer following the BRD cycle.
This looks like a content dispute between two users and I don't think semi-protection is appropriate. Airplaneman ✈ 14:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Now and then, a few IP users make stupid edits (like misinterpreting sources; recently an IP user changed growth rate of Hinduism from 16.8% to -0.7%. -0.7% was change in percentage of Hinduism from 80.5% to 79.8%. Although percentage declined, the number of Hindus increased showing positive growth rate of 16.8%; same info is mentioned in the source in the end which these stupid IPs don't care to see properly.) which are not easily tracked since the article is a long one. Please semi-protect this page for at least one week. Vibhss (talk) 11:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. the page has, like, zero IP edits. I am happy to semi later if silly stuff starts happening. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thomas Samuel (Designer of the new Standard Mark of India) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of Indefinitely, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of Indefinitely, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP's disruptively editing the page, seems to be one person using multiple IP's. I requested this page to be protected on Tuesday but the result was that users were blocked, but this hasn't helped as the vandal came back. I'm asking for Indefinite because this has been going on since February. Class455 (talk) 15:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Wasn't necessarily declined, the result was "
User(s) blocked.". Class455 (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Class455, I have semi-protected this for a month given that there is certainly disruptive editing going on by multiple IPs, and yet it is not a clear cut case of vandalism, and there have also been several constructive edits there from IPs in the past. I would suggest trying to open a discussion with this editor, and explaining to them why their edits are inappropriate. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 16:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Vanamonde93 we've tried (me and other editors), but the person won't co'operate. Class455 (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Class455: I understand that this can be frustrating, but when I look at the talk page of the article and those of the IPs, there does not seem to be much evidence of discussion: just a bunch of warnings. Moreover, there have been recent constructive contributions by IPs, and I'd rather not shut those out unless I have to. If the disruption continues despite an attempt to discuss this, another request would be seen quite differently. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Vanamonde93 I was considering pending changes, but this would still involve reverting edits, and would cause slight disruption (seeing edits constantly being rejected). If they send in an edit request, we will discover why the IP wants to keep making this change. Class455 (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Class455: I understand that this can be frustrating, but when I look at the talk page of the article and those of the IPs, there does not seem to be much evidence of discussion: just a bunch of warnings. Moreover, there have been recent constructive contributions by IPs, and I'd rather not shut those out unless I have to. If the disruption continues despite an attempt to discuss this, another request would be seen quite differently. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Vanamonde93 we've tried (me and other editors), but the person won't co'operate. Class455 (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This is module is used on over 3100 articles. There should be some level of protection for it, as an IP has just tried to make undiscussed changes to the module. Starting with semi, before going to full. . Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Note: I've never edited in the "module" space before! There's a first time for everything. Airplaneman ✈ 17:24, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 17:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 17:42, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Move protection: Persistent moving of article.VictoriaGraysonTalk 14:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Pending changes protection is a good idea as well.VictoriaGraysonTalk 14:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism by multiple IPs. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Indefinitely in view of the fact that vandalism started up immediately after previous protections expired. Vanamonde (talk) 16:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marianna251TALK 16:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie – Music from the Movie and More... (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This and other related articles being targeted by a group to add various unrelated music genres. Ravensfire (talk) 02:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 13:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting page protection for a week. Subject is involved in a political scandal and hence the edits on his page have increased. There have been several attempts to add uncited and un-encyclopedic material on his page. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Over the course of the past few months several IPs and perhaps sockpuppets/alternative accounts have been adding unsourced information. There have also been copyright violation issues since November 2015. Myself and other editors have gone out of our way to revert these additions but whoever is adding them appears to keep returning with other IPs and accounts. In short, an indefinite protection on this page is required. Zerotalk 12:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I'll try PC first in case some keen IPs drop by Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Too many IP trolls and socks the last few days. Meters (talk) 03:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 13:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Looks to have died down. NeilN talk to me 09:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:SPA editors bombing the page after the (paid) creator was indeffed. . Toddst1 (talk) 05:24, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Toddst1, all unblocked editors would not be affected by semi-protection. NeilN talk to me 09:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: "Disallow adding {{persondata}}" abuse filter already added, no reason to create again. Eyesnore 02:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I do not see any evidence that the template gets repeteadly recreated.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of the words "don't play". May be a sock/block evasion as in the past?. -- Dane2007 talk 03:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: [1]. Lizard (talk) 04:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 09:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:SPA bombing after article under discussion was indeffed . Toddst1 (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, I only see one sock on this page. Their behavior is borderline for me, but they should either be blocked or left posting what they want, I do not currently see any reason to protect the page.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- My bad, there are two editors, but they are both extended confirmed anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term protection ended a week ago. Massive vandalism today. Schools in this geographic area have an extensive history of vandalism. . John from Idegon (talk) 23:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Edgar181. NeilN talk to me 02:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruption by block evading ip hopper. Sro23 (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by NeilN (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 01:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism involving inserting slurs (e.g. "gee bag" and variants). Mostly this has been done by anonymous IP addresses, but two registered users have also vandalised the page. Autarch (talk) 01:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Xymmax: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 00:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 01:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Filipz123 immediately started after protection expired. Sro23 (talk) 00:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Jane Austen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection with Admin watchlist: This is the second request for page protection on a contentious article complicated by multiple experienced editors and administrators participating. In theory a full protection does not fully apply here since the participants include administrators who are now editing over and against an open RFC in which they are participating. I am now requesting that the protection status of the page remain at its current protection level since it is already protected, though one neutral administrator may put the main page on administrator watchlist to ensure that no editor and especially no participating administrator edit the main page while the RFC is still open, and in which administrators are participating. I shall notify all four of these editors on their Talk pages to wait the normal 30-day period for the RFC process to run its course until it is closed, and then follow the close instructions as indicated by the closing RFC editor. This is a special request being made with some reluctance only because this is the second time that the main page there has gone through a full melt-down with massive section blanking. Requesting here that a neutral administrator watchlist the Jane Austen main page while the RFC is in progress. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not taking administrative action here, but I encourage the reviewing admin to dismiss this request. Fountains-of-Paris doesn't seem to know what page protection is for. They want editors to completely stop editing the page while they run an RFC on citation style, and they are reverting multiple people at this time. --Laser brain (talk) 17:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- The article sections which are being section blanked have included the edits of multiple participating editors who have edited the article main page such as Tim riley and J Milburn. Their edits are also subject to this section blanking being done without consensus on the Talk page. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Fountains-of-Paris appears to have taken ownership of Jane Austen, and not in the positive sense of stewardship. There are significant problems in the article. On two occasions when someone has tried to fix them (first Victoriaearle, then me—in each case with the agreement of other editors), FoP has reverted and requested page protection. See his RfPP from 22 August; pinging Iridescent and Ritchie333, who responded to that request. SarahSV (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- No ownership here of any kind, and over the past several months I have been very open to nearly everyone who wanted to edit the GA article since it went through the GA process with Tim riley months ago. The current issues with Sarah appear to have started with Ling and Victoria lighting a fuse for CITEVAR during the FA nomination of the article two weeks ago apparently with the intention of ending the FA nomination, which Laser then did end and close. All of these editors have been asked to make their edits and enhancements either off-line or in their sandboxes, and then to offer them as regular normal process contributions when ready while the CITEVAR issue was being addressed. This had been offered when they requested it, and then they rejected it immediately followed with large section blanking of the article main body, last week done by Victoria and yesterday done by Sarah. Of course editors can contribute to enhancing and improving the article in the normal process of editing, that would be in the spirit of the late Wadewitz the original author from many years ago. But not section blanking over and over again, especially when an RFC has been opened by me last week to prevent this very issue from re-occurring. Since the section blanking has now recurred, this time by an administrator, I have requested the special watchlist oversight of this article by a neutral administrator until the normal RFC process runs its normal course to completion. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 18:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Semi-protection is not the answer for a such a content dispute; what good would it do? I've tangentially followed this dispute since the last RFPP report and honestly don't think that this is the right place to bring it. And what good would a neutral admin watching the page do? If I were the neutral admin, what would my response be? Revert any edits made? Revert to what? I'd encourage everyone to slow down here. I know how disheartening it can be when you spend many hours making an article "better" only to be disagreed with by (an)other, equally passionate editor(s). It's tough, but RFPP won't make it any easier. Airplaneman ✈ 19:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Endorse decline, FWIW. --NeilN talk to me 19:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Airplaneman beat me to it by three minutes. This is not Requests for Admin Watchlisting. Katietalk 19:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Endorse decline, FWIW. --NeilN talk to me 19:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps adding same unsourced, unexplained edits, plus trade mark symbols without explanation and has been reverted by three different editors. Warned on Talk page several times and not answered. . David J Johnson (talk) 19:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated (see deletion discussion). nyuszika7h (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 22:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA disruption from Pennsylvania, multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 19:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by fresh IP accounts; likely socks (SPI is ongoing). Alexbrn (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator JzG. NeilN talk to me 22:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistently recreated hoax biography. General Ization Talk 22:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Jesse Viviano. NeilN talk to me 22:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – long-term persistent recreation of unsourced BLP against AFD to merge, IP and SPA accounts. Widefox; talk 22:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 22:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Infinite Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 83.31.150.181 (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined If you wall off a sandbox, what, then, is its purpose? Airplaneman ✈ 15:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Asian-based IPs repeatedly promoting Taiwan's Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park and refusing to discuss on talk page. TJRC (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. ~20 vandal edits in the last two days. —Laoris (talk) 21:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
03 September 2016
Semi-protection: Numerous unsolicited vandalism and incorrect edits that are factually incorrect. Koconder (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined @Koconder: The problem here is something semi-protection won't solve for very long, as a soon-to-be autoconfirmed user (User:MarcCerr) is responsible for the edits I believe you're referring to. I'd suggest speaking with MarcCerr to let them know what's going on. Also paging User:Velella, who has been involved in editing this article. Airplaneman ✈ 14:58, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing genre vandalism. Ravensfire (talk) 18:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Maelbros (or similar vandal). KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Conspiracy theories of the United States presidential election, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Request full page protection until the current AfD has been closed. This article has been the subject of highly contentious editing including attempts to blank most of it and persistent resistance to efforts to restore material deleted under highly controversial circumstances. See the talk page and related ANI discussion. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:28, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Quite the dispute we have here. Airplaneman ✈ 16:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Not to sound ungrateful but you protected a recently "blanked" version - so the the version they're voting on at AfD is neither the one editors wanting to "keep" wanted or editors wanting to "delete" didn't. Can you restore it or maybe unprotect it so others can until the vote's ended? I think the requestor's goal was that we vote on a stable version. James J. Lambden (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm, Airplaneman says he'll be unavailable for a while. Can someone step in? James J. Lambden (talk) 17:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yea, unfortunately I'm heading out. Relevant discussion. Airplaneman ✈ 17:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sigh. So much WP:WRONGVERSION. jps (talk) 17:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yea, unfortunately I'm heading out. Relevant discussion. Airplaneman ✈ 17:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm, Airplaneman says he'll be unavailable for a while. Can someone step in? James J. Lambden (talk) 17:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Not to sound ungrateful but you protected a recently "blanked" version - so the the version they're voting on at AfD is neither the one editors wanting to "keep" wanted or editors wanting to "delete" didn't. Can you restore it or maybe unprotect it so others can until the vote's ended? I think the requestor's goal was that we vote on a stable version. James J. Lambden (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A week semi should be enough to spoil the fun op an IP-hopping vandal. The Banner talk 17:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 17:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war over inclusion of Universal Animation Studios in template. ViperSnake151 Talk 17:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 18:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term block evasion using lots of different IPs by User:Parkchiqmu, a user that have been blocked because of persistent disruptive editing although have been warned many times. IPs ranges mainly from 115 which also can be seen here → suspected sockpuppet of Parkchiqmu. Two IPs have been blocked recently [2],[3] but the user still making disruptive editing. Molecule Extraction (talk) 09:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by various IPs has resumed as soon as the previous protection expired. David Biddulph (talk) 12:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: I'm the bot operator of User:GreenC bot which runs under AWB thus the bot is halted whenever someone posts on the bot's talk page. The notice at the top of the page says this, but it has become an invitation for IP editors who think it would be clever to cause the bot to halt for no good reason.[4][5] They can always post on my talk page as described at the top of the page. If indefinite is too long this current job will take up to 8 weeks to complete (assuming the bot isn't halted too much). GreenC 16:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite/Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 333-blue 23:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 03:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- An additional page: [6]. 333-blue 07:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 06:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much of confusing vandalism. Fooled me up to but Sro23 corrected me! . VarunFEB2003 13:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Semi-protected for a week. MER-C 13:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A total messed-up article by some unregistered and unconfirmed users. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 01:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 02:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 06:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being used as a sandbox again. Not even a used IP, so could the page be permanently protected?. Also perhaps a rangeblock, since the edits are being done by a specific IP set (203.87.129.xxx) ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 06:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:41, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Done by Nakon Vanamonde (talk) 06:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – disruption resumed immediately after protection expired. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – immediate resumption after expiration. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- India at the 2012 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- India at the Olympics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending changes protection: Both pages are semi-protected and still users keep adding the unconfirmed news. Request to upgrade the protection to pending changes. Coderzombie (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Level 2 is higher, but 1 is lower. 333-blue 23:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Per 333-blue NeilN talk to me 00:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Drive by and new IP POV-pushing. Protect a while until they settle down. Montanabw(talk) 22:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined @Montanabw: It looks like a content dispute that semiprotection won't solve. Seeing as it looks like 1 user vs many, I'm not inclined to full protect quite yet; if reversion keeps happening, a block may be in order. Airplaneman ✈ 00:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism BLP violations, in the form of repeated unsourced and apparently erroneous death notices. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The article has been protected for three weeks, but was reverted to the version with an unsubstantiated death notice. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Done by Nakon Vanamonde (talk) 05:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same vandal appears to be back immediately after the previous protection period expired. MeowMoon (talk) 05:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.:
Pending-changes protected Indefinitely, because there have been a number of previous protections, and the vandalism keeps restarting. If a number of constructive changes come in from new users, we can reconsider the PC protection. Vanamonde (talk) 06:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of disruptive editing, by way of adding in unsourced or poorly sourced content that contradicts reliable sources and multiple Wikipedia policies. livelikemusic talk! 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection - there's a sock at it again which has this article as a perennial target. I'll be gonig to the blacklist as well to try to avoid figuring out every iteration of the title. MSJapan (talk) 03:30, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sock puppetry by disruptive IP editor. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:33, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 03:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: continuous and persistent unsourced addition from different IPs. Bluewavedragon (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I do not know exactly where to go with the request.
Anonymous introduces false information. Removes confirmed by sources information. Threatened on my talk page.Murza-Zade (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 00:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 00:58, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As usual, vandalism on this article in September (the month the Air Show is held). Couple of weeks should be enough going by precedent. . AddWittyNameHere (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Madchester. NeilN talk to me 00:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent block evasion by User:Kurzon. Sro23 (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent soapboxing by IP-hopping unregistered editor, unsupportedly labeling NTSB as "neo-prohibitionist" despite repeated cautions and reversions by other editors. . TJRC (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- clarification: I should have labelled this "content-dispute/edit-warring" or "disruptive editing"; opinions may vary on whether it rises to the level of "vandalism". TJRC (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of disruptive edits by IPs since around June of this year; such disruption has recently increased. IPs typically refute arguments brought up on the article's talk page and resort to edit warring rather than detailed discussion. –Matthew - (talk) 04:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined This appears to fundamentally be a content dispute, and there is not much evidence of bad faith on either side. If the edit-war resumes then full-protection might be an option: but if your complaint is that that IP is edit-warring instead of discussing things, then WP:ANEW might be a more appropriate venue. Vanamonde (talk) 16:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another round of drive-by IP vandalism with hate speech in edit summaries to boot. Montanabw(talk) 21:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 22:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Oath2order (talk) 23:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--regentspark (comment) 00:02, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
04 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:52, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:19, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 19:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP footballer being vandalised after scoring winning goal on extra time. Qed237 (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A while after the protection expired they were back, using a different IPv4, IPv6 or newly registered new every time. Longer protection is needed. Same as on Sephardi Jews, which was protected yeserday for a month. I am at a loss why these guys keep coming back for the not to important reason of changing population numbers. Debresser (talk) 19:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Of concern is a couple of recent changes made by IPv6 users to the date of his death, which occurred last year. [7][8] I recall this flip-flopping of dates shortly after he died, for a few weeks, since the sources were differing on the date itself, but afterward (and for the last 11 months+), this part of the article stayed pretty stable, leaving his death date on August 29, 2015. (The relevant topic on the talk page is at Talk:Wayne Dyer#What date did Dyer die, August 29 or 30, 2015?). MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Harassment by IP editors. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-stop disruptive edits by IP-hoppers. Wario-Man (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. High profile individual. Numerous temporary semi-protections over the years have been ineffective. Disruptive edits/vandalism only resume upon expiration of the temporary protections. — Maile (talk) 13:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be the target of someone associated with this college, after their username was blocked they seem to now be using a floating IP, has not responded to messages or being blocked. 331dot (talk) 12:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 17:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent promotional edits, now by multiple WP:SPA users. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This is an infrequent vandalism target here, I think PC1 will do it here hmmm. :/. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 14:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not than infrequent. NeilN talk to me 17:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since new outbreaks are making headlines, there has begun a spate of edits with bad or no sourcing, trying to stick in every scrap of news that comes along. — Gorthian (talk) 06:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is a mix of well-intentioned edits from new accounts, and occasional tests: not enough genuinely disruptive activity, in my view, to protect right now. Vanamonde (talk) 07:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since new outbreaks are making headlines, there has begun a spate of edits without good sourcing, trying to stick in every scrap of news that comes along. — Gorthian (talk) 06:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There haven't been unsourced additions of a problematic nature on this page that I can see. Vanamonde (talk) 07:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. There is only one user involved: if more turn up, protection may be reconsidered. Vanamonde (talk) 07:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only edits are unsourced relationship status changes. Please consider at least a one-month semi-protection, based on edit history. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 08:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury (talk | contribs) 08:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: One IP was blocked for deleting info w/o explaination, now a second is doing the same. Please restore content? Jim1138 (talk) 09:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP vandal adding unsourced, silly content to "FanPack". KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:46, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined @KATMAKROFAN: Looks like it's one problematic user: 184.97.174.74 (talk · contribs). Please warn users on their talk pages when you see this kind of editing to provide clear instruction. Edit summary explanations are nice but often awkward and easy to overlook. For continual disrpution, warnings also provide evidence that direct intervention hasn't worked and that blocking is necessary. As it stands, I'll warn the IP user in question on their talk page about these edits and encourage you to do the same in the future. I'm declining this request because 1) I believe there was insufficient communication of why the edits were wrong 2) page protection isn't the best way to ward off vandalism involving only one user and 3) it seems like the IP has moved on. Please let me know if the IP continues and I'll be glad to issue a short-term block. Airplaneman ✈ 04:19, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has not been a constructive edit from a new user or anon IP in months, it's just a steady stream of drive-by vandals and a waste of editor time reverting them. Montanabw(talk) 06:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Let's try 3 months, see if they go away. Article has not been protected for many years, so I hesitate to jump to indefinite protection. Vanamonde (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP vio by IP-hopping anon IP who removes one of two WP:RS cites for a disputed birth date (that given by a sports team that hired the subject), leaving unexplained POV choice of the other date. No discussion despite being told about WP:BRD procedure. Whenever an article involves someone on the TV shows The Bachelor or The Bachelorette, these type of hit-and-run fannish edits often flare up. --Tenebrae (talk) 06:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent trading news or something like that. Too much vandalism by new editors and ips. A couple of days protection semi would be enough. Lourdes 14:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Jauerback. (3 days) Airplaneman ✈ 15:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: I just changed it to full protection as soon as I started warning vandals, the BLP violations started again. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 07:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of false cast members and character names by few members, who are clearly WP:NOTHERE to edit constructively. I have reported them, especially JoannaPaul for WP:AIV, but I want protection on this article also. —IB [ Poke ] 20:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Airplaneman. Already semi-protected: full protection would lock the bunch of you out, and I don't see the disruption as being severe enough for that right now. One of the users is blocked: another was already warned, and I've warned the third. Vanamonde (talk) 06:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since new outbreaks are making headlines, there has begun a spate of edits without any sourcing, adding numbers to the case counts, trying to stick in every scrap of news that comes along. — Gorthian (talk) 06:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Edit warring to remove trats of sourced content and add unsourced. 2601:188:1:AEA0:19F6:B75D:5103:599C (talk) 00:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IPs are edit warring over a word, Told both to take it to the talkpage and was simply reverted by of the IP warrers, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 02:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Airplaneman –Davey2010Talk 04:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 333-blue 02:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:52, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Hill (basketball) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 03:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users vandals returned to add the date of birth of the artist. See contributions. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 148.101.61.71 (talk) 04:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Had to ignore 3RR because of vandal. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 23:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Troll (again). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 03:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Troll (again). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 03:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Drbogdan (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 03:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
List of Vice Presidents of the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) List of United States Republican Party presidential tickets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) List of United States Democratic Party presidential tickets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) User:Seneca Quayle/PI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2-week semi-protection-persistent IP vandalism from 67.81.195.86. This user has been blocked 3 times for essentially the same reason: inserting problematic images without discussion and after repeated warnings. The 3rd block is now expired, and I fear he may begin vandalizing again, creating more work for me and others. These pages are some of his favorites to vandalize. We can't semi-protect all of the other pages just because of him, but by taking care of these, we may finally be able to discourage him. Display name 99 (talk) 18:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Display name 99: This request has been formatted the old way. I have attempted to fix the request using the new formatting.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 19:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- India at the 2012 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- India at the Olympics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending changes protected (level 2) for 3 months: The page is semi-protected but the users are still adding unconfirmed news. Please increase the protection. Coderzombie (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined PC level 2 is not permitted on English Wikipedia NeilN talk to me 19:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Coderzombie: if you decide to make another RFC just like me, but you have to explain more than me, though. 333-blue 03:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:19F6:B75D:5103:599C (talk) 23:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 23:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent long-term vandalism by Canadian IPs, adding deliberate errors in titles, book isbn's, publication dates, hiding bad edits inside ostensibly constructive edits. Page has been protected before. Keri (talk) 23:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I think PC protection would work well with this article. Some constructive changes by IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 23:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article has been protected three times since May. Every time protection runs out the vandalism (by both IPs and new users) returns. Permanent PC1 still allows useful contributions while robbing vandals of visibility. I might add that CGPGrey has egged-on this behavior on his podcast (the subject of the article) so this behavior isn't going to stop anytime soon. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 23:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article has been vandalized seven times in the past four years. Every time protection runs out the vandalism returns. Permanent PC1 still allows useful contributions while robbing vandals of visibility. The subject's career is going to continue to attract vandals so it won't end anytime soon. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 23:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP using page for cybersex. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 22:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The history does not justify longer semi-protection at this time. MelanieN (talk) 22:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Refer to logs and Cat Creek, Montana's history. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 22:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected.. The article is already under semi-protection and move protection until March 2017. There was one disruptive move made in July by an autoconfirmed user, who has since been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 22:46, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoaxer thinks zoo is closed. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 22:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite current PC protection it is being vandalized @NeilN: Now should we go for semi again. That IP's edits had gone live I could see them while logged out also. PC has been unsuccessful here. VarunFEB2003 15:58, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined So far as I can tell, there has been only one instance of vandalism since the PC protection was applied, and that, after all, is what pending changes is for: that edit never went live. If the vandalism becomes persistent enough (again) that it becomes more of a nuisance to reviewers, then maybe semi-protection will be worthwhile. Vanamonde (talk) 18:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think his children learned how to vandalize their father's article... KATMAKROFAN (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: As soon as the protection expired they were back, using a different IPv4, IPv6 or newly registered new every time. Longer protection is needed. I am at a loss why these guys keep coming back for the not too important reason of changing population numbers. Any ideas what to do with this case? Debresser (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
05 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous harassing stalker engaged in edit warring in this page. Has already violated WP:3RR. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 13:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- FleetCommand, what the hell are you doing? What I asked you was a second opinion, not assistance in starting a full-scale edit war! Haven't the number of blocks in your block log taught you not to engage in mutual counter-reverting? I told you I need to clear my mind so as to start a talk page discussion. Couldn't you wait until then?
- Best regards,
- Codename Lisa (talk) 13:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @FleetCommand:. Compulsory ping. Codename Lisa (talk) 13:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- You said you needed more evidence to prove this the same guy that chases you around Wikipedia. I only made a revert just to make him accuse me of meat puppetry as he always does and as no one else ever has. That's your similarity evidence. And please get back on the messenger. This method of communication is very uncomfortable. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 13:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- No need for protection. Provided that Codename Lisa starts the above referred to discussion rather than practicing WP:OWN and insisting everyone but her must engage in discussion, I will stand down. Otherwise, you should probably block me and place the entire wikipedia under full-protection. 2601:5C2:201:9CD:B44A:F209:FDBC:AE06 (talk) 13:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- You have violated WP:3RR. This means that if a fourth person arrives and announces his disagreement with a revert, you will just counter-revert. You have by now proven that you don't even know how to discuss. Want me to prove it with another revert? FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 13:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected one week by Bbb23. Katietalk 20:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent block evasion by the UPN vandal. Sro23 (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained removal of sourced content multiple time by multiple IPs. GSS (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition by IPs of unsourced, non-WP:NPOV, unencyclopedic political commentary, with attempts to revert characterized as "vandalism"; see, e.g., [9]. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Topic has seen significantly increasing levels of disruptive activity from IP and new users in recent months. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 02:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 09:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of an unsourced living person - caste claims require self-identification. Sitush (talk) 12:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- For now
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I have also watchlisted the page. --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Borcker IP socks again. McGeddon (talk) 13:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. It could probably have been longer, but there seems no need for ECP. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection (<24 hours): Higher than usual level of IP vandalism. Tevildo (talk) 18:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- The page has been protected by Widr. Tevildo (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Done (for the bot) -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 18:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 18:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: This is a commonly edited article by IPs, and often their edits get reverted (most recently for spam) and it is likely to remain this way as it is a household name in places where HP is popular like South Asia. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There were a couple of disruptive IP edits yesterday, which I think takes it a bit above the threshold for PC (which is generally, but not always, isolated disruptive edits over an extended period). If there are still problems after the week is up, pop back here and we'll look at pending changes. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection, I would make it a month (I can't do is per WP:INVOLVED). Anon adding tendentious material to the lede of an article on a quack therapy. Anon is at 3RR today. Material was originally added by a WP:SPA (which would also be caught by semi protection as the user was not autoconfirmed). Guy (Help!) 08:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Anon is now at 4 reverts. Investigation shows the content he's pushing to be sourced from an OMICS Group journal and other worthless sources, so this is clearly POV-pushing. Guy (Help!) 08:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 08:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The Person concerned has complained that govt agencies are rewriting her page. . Chirag (talk) 07:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, only three edits in a month, can be just reverted if not appropriate.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Nothing but new users' vandalism since this came off a one-year semi. Meters (talk) 10:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)--
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Boing! said Zebedee. Katietalk 12:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Long term semi: Looking at the history, pending changes has been an unnecessary time sink, as all or nearly all activity since it was instituted on 05AUG have been unconstructive edits and reversion. TimothyJosephWood 11:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left pending changes in place, so when semi expires PC will kick back in. Katietalk 12:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite/long term semi-protection: An anonymous editor has been adding a poorly sourced nickname to the page for months now. Admin EdJohnston protected the page in July until September 4, and the anon is already back at it. Please see my post to the edit-warring noticeboard for more information. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 04:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 09:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit warring to make this an article, despite several reverts by different editors. Has been invited to discuss on talk page but hasn't done so. Boleyn (talk) 06:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 09:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Aggressive POV pushing, violations of WP:NPOV and WP:IRS. The vandal Fixmark2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who was blocked for disruptive editing, renaming WWII to "Great Rape of Germany" and claiming that every car was "ripped off" from another one, while all credible sources paint a different picture and don't support his marginal views, has created two sockpuppets (Heavyrevy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 37.73.204.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)) and is waging an endless edit war in the aforementioned article, trying to promote his personal POV, remove redirects for no reason, and restore his edits that are neither correct nor supported by any credible evidence ([10], [11], [12]). Blocking him doesn't solve the issue, as he is still coming back under a different name and from a different IP address; the only "reliable sources" that he uses are a copy/paste from the website of some car dealer and a copy/paste of the same article after it was vandalized by him, i. e. his own words, which is clearly against WP:IRS and WP:NPOV. FullertonCA (talk) 10:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has never been protected so start off at 1 month. NeilN talk to me 10:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long slow persistent vandalism on this article. . Ridernyc (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. RioHondo (talk) 18:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MeowMoon (talk) 03:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:05, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs WP:GENREWARRING adding unsourced genres to the article. Dr. K. 22:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or pending-changes protection: IPs keep claiming he's dead. —DangerousJXD (talk) 04:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 05:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism fromdisruptive dynamic IP (first adress already blocked so block evasion). Please see if rangeblock is possible. Qed237 (talk) 16:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e056:1d00::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 17:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
@NeilN: sockpuppet has returned in the form of User:192.136.205.149 Lemonade51 (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Lemonade51, blocked. --NeilN talk to me 21:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Intermittent IP sockpuppetry in violation of blocks. Fairly slow-burning, though, hence the recommendation of PC instead of semi. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 00:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: Article was created in late July and has been already been protected four times. Protection came off two days ago and has already been subject to disruptive IP editing.LM2000 (talk) 17:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2602:306:bcae:b570::/64 blocked 3 months NeilN talk to me 19:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Outling the band has broken up without providing a citation. Karst (talk) 22:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
06 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP is repeatedly "splitting" an oscar category in the article, to create 6 wins out of five: [13]. This is fully explained atTalk:Doctor_Zhivago_(film)#Art_Direction.2FSet_Decoration. I would say that this is closer to vandalism than a content dispute because the official oscar site is crystal clear that the art direction and set direction are two components of the same category. The IP just keps reverting and refuses to discuss on the talk page. Betty Logan (talk) 16:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ordinarily I would point to WP:ANEW or WP:AIV but there's a second IP in the mix, making one revert. NeilN talk to me 18:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent attacks by socks of LTA IP vandal 2607:FB90:122A:8B1D:3D79:E9C8:390B:5B58 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Dr. K. 19:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from various IPs. The article is being changed to include non-neutral language such as "terorist", and most recently "[they] murder children". GhostOfNoMeme (talk) 20:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IP, protect this again. It obviously should not be kept without protection... Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 23:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman ✈ 14:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:BC62:BFD6:7849:F056 (talk) 13:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by Widr--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Mexican IP user. Areaseven (talk) 15:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by Widr (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Looks like the IP has been hopping, so I've
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Airplaneman ✈ 16:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 16:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After ND lost to Texas, IPs have been replacing the president and provost with the a Texas player's name. See page history for more. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thomas Jefferson High School (Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:BC62:BFD6:7849:F056 (talk) 03:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Disruption looks to have died down. NeilN talk to me 11:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IPs seem to be adding unconstructive inaccurate edits recently, it maybe one person. I am hoping a two week page protection will send them away. . Govvy (talk) 10:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Govvy, you need to explain how recent edits are inaccurate as they seem consistent with Chipping Barnet NeilN talk to me 11:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- The club moved to the Hive Stadium in Edgware, they train there and operate from there. The club use to be in Chipping Barnet but are no longer there. Three different IPs have made edits saying the club is in Barnet still when they are not. Govvy (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request. VarunFEB2003 12:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: VarunFEB2003, you've made similar requests before. Please explain how this meets WP:UPROT? "User pages and subpages can be protected upon a simple request from the user, as long as a need exists—pages in userspace should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected." NeilN talk to me 12:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- @NeilN: these are the only 2 pages I want protected as they contain lot of code which I don't want to be edited by new users. VarunFEB2003 12:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: Taken to this page's talk page. NeilN talk to me 12:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request. VarunFEB2003 12:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – this page other user everyday change, i want protect this page. K.S.RisvyTalk me 07:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 11:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Create protection recently expired, shortly after which this was recreated again. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 09:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered users. Requesting permanent semi-protection without expiration. Rizhopper (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 11:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered users. Requesting permanent semi-protection without expiration. Rizhopper (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 11:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – It seems that defamatory content is being added by unregistered users [14] and either the subject or some one close to the subject is complaining [15]. I recommend semi-protection for an extended period while we try to clean up and develop proper content. . Kautilya3 (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like disruptive editing has picked up since yesterday's declined request. Airplaneman ✈ 14:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive editing. XXN, 15:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see some instances of unsourced additions that could be considered WP:BLP violations. The rate of editing is relatively slow and I think pending changes will allow for better edit filtering. Airplaneman ✈ 15:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:BC62:BFD6:7849:F056 (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since editor stopped actively editing, the only contributions IP editors have made to the page have been grave-dancing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 14:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by related IP addresses in 67.44.208.0/22 - August 31 to September 5, 2016. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has a long history of edit warring by throwaway SPAs and anon IPs, who keep inserting a large amount of unsourced POV claims. The edits are months or sometimes even years apart, going back to 2009, depending on how long their edits have remained in the article. The disruption continues as of last week. I seem to be the only person who watches this article. We need permanent pending changes to prevent periodic and ongoing vandalism and disruption. Temporary won't help. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 14:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Page self-protected to admins only. No policy basis for such. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've left a note and emailed Jakec. --NeilN talk to me 12:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Jakec has
Unprotected the page. Katietalk 13:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced information. . Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Editor(s) from a number of IP addresses continually altering player's statistics (to make them appear falsely positive). Macosal (talk) 06:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Macosal, consider also warning the IP. NeilN talk to me 11:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent overwriting of dab to say one entry 'is the son no one knows about' or similar wording. Boleyn (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Request for 30 days. Too many disruptive edits for weeks now. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 07:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. The company is phasing out its services. Request the protection for 30 days. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 15:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Omni Flames (talk) 22:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Neutralitytalk 04:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:BC62:BFD6:7849:F056 (talk) 02:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extreme addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 01:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 21:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined for now. Might pick up later in the week, but no edits in last 15 hours. Katietalk 21:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopping vandal. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined. It seems to have calmed down. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inbound attacks of LTA IPsocks of 2607:FB90:122A:8B1D:3D79:E9C8:390B:5B58 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Dr. K. 22:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
07 September 2016
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3. A User (contribs) 02:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 03:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3 Although there are other methods of enforcement, page protection is the easiest and most effective option. A User (contribs) 21:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No, it isn't. Over the past six months I don't see any disruption that semi wouldn't prevent — MusikAnimal talk 21:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced material (and likely copyvios) by dynamic IP. . SummerPhDv2.0 13:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @SummerPhDv2.0: In the future, consider posting directly on the various IPs' talk pages as well to point them towards the article talk page discussion. Airplaneman ✈ 16:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Anonymous editors ("IPs") keep adding commercial/unreliable sources over and over again since March 2015 --Usien6 msg • his 14:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Perhaps a week of temp protection... Three times recreated within the last two days. Lourdes 15:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 03:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Whilst the ARB motion is clear, the remedies say that it may be enforced by various methods, of which PP is one. However, looking at the edit history of this specific article, I don't believe that protection is necessary in this case at this time. GedUK 12:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 03:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Whilst the ARB motion is clear, the remedies say that it may be enforced by various methods, of which PP is one. However, looking at the edit history of this specific article, I don't believe that protection is necessary in this case at this time. GedUK 12:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 03:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Whilst the ARB motion is clear, the remedies say that it may be enforced by various methods, of which PP is one. However, looking at the edit history of this specific article, I don't believe that protection is necessary in this case at this time. GedUK 12:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 15:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 15:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 15:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 15:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection An anonymous editor insists on deleting content that multiple users agree should not be deleted. The page should be semi-protected until the anonymous editor learns to listen to other users and that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. – PeeJay 22:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @PeeJay2K3: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 11:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 18:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 03:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Whilst the ARB motion is clear, the remedies say that it may be enforced by various methods, of which PP is one. However, looking at the edit history of this specific article, I don't believe that protection is necessary in this case at this time. GedUK 12:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Until election as Donald Trumps talk page is protected. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 11:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article itself is semi-protected, but I don't see any recent disruption on the article's talk page to warrant a need for protection at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse by IPs range from 60 that persistently adding arms foreign suppliers with random countries without giving any valid references. The IPs also doing the same to Royal Brunei Armed Forces article and I suggest both articles should be protected for a definite of time from further disruptions. Molecule Extraction (talk) 10:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two edits have been made to the page over the last few days, with the previous edits made in July 2016. There doesn't seem to be a high volume of disruptive editing to justify protection at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: How about if you grant pending change protection instead? Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Molecule Extraction - Sure, that sounds reasonable enough.
Done - for three weeks. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Oshwah! :) Molecule Extraction (talk) 14:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Molecule Extraction - Sure, that sounds reasonable enough.
- @Oshwah: How about if you grant pending change protection instead? Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors cannot keep up with IP-hopping vandal. Request 1 week of semi-protection to discourage. —hike395 (talk) 12:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 12:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The "Filipino GTA" hoax still goes on despite this page being locked down before for the exact same reason. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 00:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own userspace. If others have their user page protected for this reason, then why can't I? Also to prevent IP's from vandalising my user page. . Class455 (talk) 12:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: The draft Draft:Astrodatabank shows notability of the subject, but cannot be accepted due to the creation protection. Joseph2302 18:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Paging RHaworth to the produce aisle. Katietalk 20:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Done As he hasn't turned up after a couple of days, I've unprotected. @Joseph2302: for info GedUK 12:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long term issues with disruption, including fancruft. Has previously been protected for up to 3 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Nothing that couldn't be handled by reverting. Widr (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously semi'd for 6 months and the problem has returned - addition of unsourced items in the list and deviations from how the source describes certain groups. Sitush (talk) 07:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last protection was made in January 2016, and I don't see a high volume of disruption to justify protection at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Think the protection should be extended for a year considering the edit history throughout the years. Also, see protection logs. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 09:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Long-term issues including IP's continuously adding uncited content and modifies other nformation, does not provide edit summary. Esw01407 (talk) 01:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. NeilN talk to me 02:43, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)- Corrected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 05:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Page should be under 500/30 restriction. An IP is repeatedly inserting material and edit-warring to keep it in. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 19:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Long-term vandalism and unsourced content continuously being added by various sets of IP ranges. 172.56.42.147 (talk) 23:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic ip. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:42, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. There are apparently concerns about COI, promotional editing, and accuracy. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#EOMA-68. clpo13(talk) 18:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Looks less like an edit war and more just reversion of problematic edits from one particular user. They have been warned — MusikAnimal talk 23:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same as Talk Talk. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Users appear to be discussing with each other. If the edit warring resumes please report to WP:ANEW — MusikAnimal talk 23:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same as Talk Talk. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Same, report to WP:ANEW if the two users resume edit warring — MusikAnimal talk 23:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Long-term vandalism and unsourced content continuously being added by various sets of IP ranges; the last protection was by KrakatoaKatie for one month. 172.56.42.147 (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Plain old edit warring. I've warned one party and I think the other ought to know better, but both editors appear to have broken 3RR. clpo13(talk) 03:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined No disruption since discussion began — MusikAnimal talk 21:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please semi protect this page due persistent vandalism. People keep on adding their own name in the list or keep on vandalizing the article (like this, this, this, this, this, and this. Thanks . Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 19:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Troll. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – *Big Brother 1 (UK)
- Big Brother 1 (UK) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Big Brother 3 (UK) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Big Brother 10 (UK) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Big Brother 15 (UK) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Could I ask that PC be applied to all these articles, Some IP seems to have an obsession with changing names to incorrect ones and despite being warne etc they've just come back under a new IP and continued from where they've left off, The vandalism hasn't occurred on all of the BB articles yet just those above, Thanks,. –Davey2010Talk 13:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2a02:c7d:36a5:ca00::/64 blocked 2 weeks. NeilN talk to me 18:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 16:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued adding of unsourced judges, perhaps protection until 2017 would be appropriate?. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 21:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
08 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Scandal section (with newspaper ref) removal, claiming it's wrong. Tuanminh01 (talk) 11:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock continues to vandalize page through IP and new accounts. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant cast removals, cast re-ordering and incorrect format changes. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various anonymous editors apparently disagree with the picture currently used and have been reverting against what looks to be consensus. clpo13(talk) 20:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protect this article for 6 months - addition of unsourced content and removal of sourced content- high level of IP vandalism ktrtrs (talk) 08:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting upgrade from pending changes to indefinite semi-protection due to persistent vandalism for several months. -- Dane2007 talk 17:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wow, the article history is almost solely vandalism and reverts. I've left the indef pending changes on the page; let's see how it is in 1 year's time. Airplaneman ✈ 19:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism to the article. Requesting a one week semi-protection, or at least through 12 September due to persistent vandalism.Ppt1973 (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:58, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Keeps being vandalised by an IP editor using various IPs, dating back to April. CodeCat (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)-->
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 13:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- That's not going to work. They'll just come back with another IP. CodeCat (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced rumours to a BLP. Qed237 (talk) 11:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Looks official to me. Katietalk 13:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Tempoary semi-protection: Repeated removal of flags from article (vandalism) by one autoconfirmed and two IPs - likely same person. Jim1138 (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a content dispute. I understand one party has been blocked for edit warring and it's highly possible that they're editing anonymously. I'll make a post on the talk page and notify involved users to attempt mediation. Airplaneman ✈ 16:57, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: As Donald Trumps Talk page is protected this Talk page should be protected until election is over to prevent BLP issues and violations of 1RR. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 11:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Could you explain what has changed since the last request was declined yesterday? MikeLynch (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extreme disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors of currently-airing reality competition series, by way of adding in unsourced or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 12:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:29, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism from different IP practically every day adding an unsourced "husband" to the character. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Refer to history; vandalism throughout past week, especially in the last 24 hours. —MelbourneStar☆talk 14:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 15:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 15:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent removal of sourced content by various IP addresses. I am personally involved content-wise, else would protect myself. Vanamonde (talk) 04:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive activities. ViperSnake151 Talk 07:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —cyberpowerChat:Online 10:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated thrice in the past three days. A week or less protection should suffice. Lourdes 04:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated twice in the past three days. Combined with Baloch rukhsani, which has also been recreated thrice in the past three days (and is reported above), a week or less protection should suffice here. Lourdes 04:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: I'm unsure who protected the page, so I'm listing it on this page. Please unprotect and redirect it to IPhone 7. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Done, courtesy ping for @Kelapstick: -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- I am guessing I protected that at some point in the past, no worries. --kelapstick(bainuu) 09:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page appears to be a magnet for IP editors and newly-registered editors who make their first and only edit here, usually in incomprehensibly poor English. PamD 17:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – requesting temporary semi-protection due to recent wave of vandalism, addition of unsourced content and most probably an imaginative plot as the film hasn't released yet. - Managerarc™ talk 23:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Question: Can I have a second opinion? There are many edits by IPs, but many appear to be content-related, some are constructive, and not a large amount of disruption. Protecting would lock out those that are trying to constructively edit. I'm leaning to decline but I'd like to have a second look by someone else. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:58, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: I would apply a brief semi-protection here, because though the edits are in good faith, the edits are causing disruption. Many of them are plot related, and the movie has not been released, so these are by definition OR. Vanamonde (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Done - 72 hours. Thanks for the input, Vanamonde :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: I would apply a brief semi-protection here, because though the edits are in good faith, the edits are causing disruption. Many of them are plot related, and the movie has not been released, so these are by definition OR. Vanamonde (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I was being stalked on multiple articles in Chinese wikipedia (see the discussion there), now this IP user followed me here and kept reverting my edits. Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and revision removal due to links. 46.130.151.96 (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined A few copyright violations on September 4 and 5, no disruption since, and over a year of no activity prior to it — MusikAnimal talk 22:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: I have always asked for temporary, but am asking for indefinite here. This article has been subject (in waves) to intense promotional pressure from editors affiliated with the organization, as you can see in the header of the Talk page. This has included socking, etc. There is an IP editor who showed up today who is making the same edits that past editors made. Can we please indefinitely semi-protect? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Indefinitely. I would not usually jump to indef, but the promotional activity seems to have been going on for long enough, and is severe enough, that it is justified in this case. Vanamonde (talk) 05:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 22:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3 Although there are other methods of enforcement, page protection is the easiest and most effective option. A User (contribs) 21:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Literally 3 non-bot edits in 2016, and all contributors to this page are already extended-confirmed — MusikAnimal talk 22:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3 Although there are other methods of enforcement, page protection is the easiest and most effective option. A User (contribs) 21:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined In 2016, the only edits from users who aren't extended confirmed were constructive. If others want to play the blanket "you can't edit this page" game such as this, I'm not going to fight them... I however am not playing that game and refuse to protect pages merely because other related topics had at some point in the past experienced considerable disruption. This page has not, therefore it should remain open — MusikAnimal talk 21:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3 Although there are other methods of enforcement, page protection is the easiest and most effective option. A User (contribs) 21:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Same as before. We aren't "required" to apply protection, much less extended confirmed, and here we've had but a handful of edits over the past year. This by any standard does not qualify for page protection — MusikAnimal talk 21:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3 Although there are other methods of enforcement, page protection is the easiest and most effective option. A User (contribs) 21:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Same as above. Very little editing activity, protection serves no preventive advantage — MusikAnimal talk 21:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3 Although there are other methods of enforcement, page protection is the easiest and most effective option. A User (contribs) 21:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined There was single disruptive edit over the past year, which I've now reverted — MusikAnimal talk 21:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 01:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Some long-term anon vandalism, however there has been some constructive IP contributions. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit rate is a little high for PC. Katietalk 01:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 03:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 03:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. A User (contribs) 04:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 12:43, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: Persistent disruption and BLP violations by IP editors since the last 6-month semi-protection expired on 4 September 2016. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I suspect some block evasion as well. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3 Although there are other methods of enforcement, page protection is the easiest and most effective option. A User (contribs) 21:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:42, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extended confirmed wouldn't seem to help here. Even six months semi is excessive for the disruption I'm seeing here, but okay... — MusikAnimal talk 22:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
09 September 2016
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lots of IP quickly reverting edits and corrections. TropicAces (talk) 11:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)tropicAces
Declined I'm seeing good edits as well as bad; I don't think that protection should be applied just because there's a high IP edit rate and some of the edits are questionable. Airplaneman ✈ 17:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of AFD template by unregistered editors. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Plenty of vandals (all socks of an UnderArmourKid, it appears) seem to like blanking the page and replacing it with "NASCAR'S Biggest mistake.", among others. NFLisAwesome (ZappaOMati) 19:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Oshwah. No need for full. NeilN talk to me 20:38, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- James River High School (Chesterfield County, Virginia) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of unsourced complaining about some event at the school by shifting IPs. John from Idegon (talk) 05:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Disruption seems to have died down. NeilN talk to me 16:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Very visible template. IP editors won't contribute anything super important. Marvellous Spider-Man 15:01, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also not a template NeilN talk to me 15:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Consistent level of edits to the article for the past week. 15:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined No indication of consistent disruptive editing. NeilN talk to me 15:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple sources are hinting that the subject may come out of retirement, but no official announcements. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Now official. NeilN talk to me 14:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Consistent level of edits to the article for the past week. Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – all the changes misrepresent the sources. Please protect the article until the editions could be reviewed. Dmtrij FAE (talk) 14:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 14:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP hopper. CLCStudent (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 209.255.166.0/24 blocked 1 week NeilN talk to me 14:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continuous to and fro editing re her upcoming loss of number 1 ranking. Rankings will not change until September 12 but multiple IPs are attempting to incorrectly update her current ranking from No. 1 to No 2. Meters (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP user keeps adding a CSD tag to this article when there is already an AfD in process for it. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 07:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Page deleted. NeilN talk to me 13:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistantly vandalized by specific ip user . Kostas20142 (talk) 11:39, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. By another admin. NeilN talk to me 14:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Author is repeatedly removing speedy deletion tags obstructing the deletion process. A User (contribs) 12:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. By another admin. NeilN talk to me 13:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism in short period. Kostas20142 (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This obscure page should be indefinitely semi protected, as it is constant place of nationalistic battleground reverts. Or at least for a very long time, as we cannot constantly ask for protection. Axiomus (talk) 12:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 17:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP and new account BLP vios. Widefox; talk 14:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 17:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:01, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Easy vandalism magnet for obvious reasons. WNYY98 (talk) 03:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: I'm inclined ot semiprotect articles such as this one indefinitely. This one exhibits all the signs of chronic vandalism but isn't edited too frequently. In the past year, the article has been edited a little over 100 times, with the majority of those edits being vandalism and vandalism reverts. Yet, the article has only ever been protected over short chunks of time. Does the editing history of the article put it under the category "not enough activity to justify protection"? With such a high percentage of vandalism, I'm not sure pending changes would do much good. I feel that I may be on the more liberal side when it comes to applying protection to articles and would appreciate others' thoughts on this matter before making a decision. Airplaneman ✈ 04:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: To me, it looks like a perfect pending changes candidate. These can be applied indefinitely as far as I am concerned.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of copyvio content by various IP addresses. Appears to have been an issue since 2014. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 06:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Can we get either auto-confirmed or semi protection on this article till Sep 12? It's a BLP of a player who will likely become #1 on Monday when sourced rankings come out on Monday morning. Every anon IP and new user seems to want to edit it prematurely... and it's going to get worse if she wins on Saturday. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Serious BLP violations and blanking, clearly by editors related to the subject or to John Naisbitt University which also needs protection. This appears to be revenge editing based on partisan sources. I rewrote the material in both articles covering the problems with Jovanovic to use much better sources earlier. Doug Weller talk 13:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary read-only-protection: High level of vandalism from both sides due to the ongoing Kashmir conflict. I can't find the last good version without material removed, perhaps you can. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection. User:Kentansg has twice attempted to {{db-author}} this article after other editors had added to it. User:75.104.66.199 has deleted a section relating to well-sourced but embarrassing allegations of scientific misconduct, a corresponding sentence in the lead, and a corresponding category. I have just re-added them all, from before the recent edit by User:Materialscientist. The article was recently discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Straus. Narky Blert (talk) 00:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, the article is being actively edited, and there is (almost) no discussion at the talk page. User:Kentansg is the article creator, and they should be best involved in the discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A long, long history of adding unsourced content regarding the numbers of non-Hispanic whites by IPs – support pending changes. MB298 (talk) 03:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued vandalism by the same IP address. MasterMind5991 (talk) 05:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @MasterMind5991: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Volvo image vandal. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Anna Frodesiak. (1 year) Airplaneman ✈ 04:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism and addition of unsourced content. Lizard (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of vandalism to the article. 109.152.122.22 (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I'm seeing a lot of editing but not a lot of obvious vandalism. If I'm wrong, please provide diffs and explain. Airplaneman ✈ 19:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - Lots of reverting to an edit the user made, which goes against information provided/available.Dohvahkiin (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined. The disruption seems to have stopped. Yaris678 (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- It hasn't. He did it again.Dohvahkiin (talk) 23:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of AnnalesSchool (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) edit-warring again at the article. Dr. K. 22:52, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Agree that semi-protection is needed; possibly indefinite but would suggest at least a year since this article has been an ongoing target by socks. -- Dane2007 talk 01:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – As soon as page got umprotected socks started edit-warring their usual comments. Dr. K. 22:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Agree that semi-protection is needed; possibly indefinite but would suggest at least a year since this article has been an ongoing target by socks. -- Dane2007 talk 01:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm hesitant to protect for much longer than this, for it's a talk page after all. Airplaneman ✈ 04:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High traffic page that attracts vandalism and disruptive editing on a near daily basis. It has been protected in the past for this very reason. DarkKnight2149 00:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism . Denniss (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection applied by KGirlTrucker81. Yaris678 (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, deletion of sources and sourced content by a hopping IP. The article was protected for 7 days in early August for the same behavior by the same hopping 2a02:c7d:*:* IP, but the user has returned, ignoring restoration of content by multiple editors. An invitation to discuss any concerns on Talk:Manipur has been ignored by the IP since early August. Requesting a temporary semi-protection for 1 month, a bit longer than last time. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 21:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by dank meme spammers. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 22:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
10 September 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annki777 (talk) 12:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MikeLynch (talk) 12:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. We can't say if the IP vandalizer in the article will go back to vandalize it again. Look at the article history on how it was vandalized by several IP users. Just to be sure that it will not be vandalized it again, please grant the indefinite Semi-protection. ~Manila's PogingJuan 13:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism isn't all that frequent, but it's definitely there. I do see some good faith additions by IPs and new users so I'd like to keep that as an option through Pending Changes. Airplaneman ✈ 14:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annki777 (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman ✈ 14:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit war. The Banner talk 07:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Looks like a case of edit warring where only one of the parties involved is unregistered/new. Semi-protecting would give an impression of favouring one party over the other. MikeLynch (talk) 09:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 14 days, considering the release will be expanded next week?. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 07:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I would suggest Assuming good faith and explaining why exactly you think this is linkspam (because, prima facie, it doesn't look like there's an explicit bad intention). Of course, if it continues, and in bad faith, feel free to report. MikeLynch (talk) 09:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption to BLP making his debut for Arsenal at the moment. Qed237 (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Linked to by Template:BotTask (see link); may be misused for editing tests. NasssaNser 01:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- I am inclined to decline this, the page has never been created, but I may misunderstand some details, so leaving this as a comment.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: Then, on that page, please click "What links here". NasssaNser 07:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- I understand this, but we do not protect pages pre-emptively.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor. NasssaNser 07:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- I understand this, but we do not protect pages pre-emptively.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: Then, on that page, please click "What links here". NasssaNser 07:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A vandal is using multiple IPs to spam the article with nonsense revolving around unrelated mobile games, despite having been reverted several times by DangerousJXD. The vandal even did the same to DangerousJXD's userpage once ([16], [17]). DarkKnight2149 05:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 10:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 14 days?. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 06:31, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 10:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Due to persistent, long-term IP and new user vandalism on almost a daily basis. Prior attempts at short-term, semi-protection have proven ineffective. X4n6 (talk) 03:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @X4n6: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended semi-protection: See above. Request revised per bot. X4n6 (talk) 06:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 09:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A certain IP user (184.100.90.255) continues to vandalise the article by adding "Taylor Majeres" (who I imagine is the user himself) as a member of the collective. I reckon semi-protection for about 2 weeks would help. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 05:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 06:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 08:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP vandalism. One or another variant of a complaint about a named individual has had to be reverted more than 10 times since 31 August 2016. Would a 10-day duration wear out this abuser's patience?. —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 07:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MikeLynch (talk) 09:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is a country and is subjected to persistent vandalism by unconfirmed users. — LeoFrank Talk 15:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- For the First Time in Forever: A Frozen Sing-Along Celebration (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, long-term disruptive editing and vandalism by a variety of IP editors. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 00:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 06:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., not a good editing pattern for pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP (45.118.244.18). Since the IP is expected to change, request you to protect the page instead of just blocking the user. The user seems to be removing genuine information from this article. Since the vandalism is persistent, but slow, request a long term protection for the article. — LeoFrank Talk 15:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Agreed, looks like long term abuse. Hopefully 1 month will give the article some rest. Airplaneman ✈ 04:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: vandalism, including persistant removal of speedy deletion tags. TheKaphox (talk) 22:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Will explain on talk page. NeilN talk to me 22:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism/warring. I made a request for this just a few days ago, but the IP was just blocked instead. I predicted that it wouldn't help, and indeed, they're just back with another IP now. CodeCat (talk) 23:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection - persistent repeated IP vandalism. Markhh (talk) 03:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Three creates is my rule of thumb. NeilN talk to me 20:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:38, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 17:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 20:41, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repetitive attempts by IP 71.87.252.109 to force in an unsourced edit regarding Howser's influence on a so-called YouTube star. Drmargi (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)-->
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 20:39, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and poor edits by anonymous editors are now continuous. Presumably this will continue until November. Protecting from anonymous editors until after the election would be good. Tarl N. (discuss) 23:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
11 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 15:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short semi is probably warranted for this talk page. Constant off topic numerology nonsense by a range of IPs. Majora (talk) 19:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite / Temporary semi-protection: Page was page protect for a long period of time until it was lifted not too long ago. This player gets a high amount of media attention and is subject to ongoing vandalism on his page; especially today as he is making his debut for his new club. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 20:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuous and persistent disruptive editing with unsourced addition from different IPs even after the first Semi-protection imposed and expired so, please extend the protection longer. Bluewavedragon (talk) 11:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined There has been only one edit since the page was unprotected. I have warned the user: if disruption continues, please report this again, and protection may be considered. Vanamonde (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 17:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 17:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs tend to add unverified claims about the oldest dog or their own personal dogs. 331dot (talk) 15:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 16:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content from multiple IPs, ignoring comment in article and repeated requests to not add information without a source. Cwmxii (talk) 15:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ―Mandruss ☎ 16:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism taking place. Article already lost GA status once due to heavy disruptions. Editors unable to monitor the article. Urgent action required.--Øystein.Eide (talk) 13:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 16:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 16:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Despite this article being only a few weeks old it has already received a large amount of vandalism JoshMuirWikipedia (talk) 13:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Drbogdan (talk) 16:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another Gaelic warrior in the ring to fight the long standing consensus that the English language uses English names instead of Irish names. Editwar looming / content dispute. The Banner talk 09:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, this is just one IP. Please warn them, and, if they continue, they should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 11:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The ip edited the page without consensus. [18], [19] and [20]. Panam2014 (talk) 12:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oh please. This user makes a large deletion on the page without consensus, and keeps reverting me when I impose common practice on WP. Also, he harasses me on my talk page with irrelevant user warning templates. I have explicitly made a section for resolving the dispute on the talk page, but he hasn't written anything there yet. Ignore his proposal.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.63.3.167 (talk) 12:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Do not reverse the roles . This is fort the IP to have a consensus to change the page and add the controversial infobox. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- It's terrible that you resort to blatant lies to defend your case. You made the first action, a deletion in [21] without any prior discussion. The infobox contains key informations, and is thus of large importance to the article. You need consensus to make these deletions. I reverted you and encouraged you to discuss this at the talk page, because you need the consensus of the WP community to make deletions of this scale. Also, you shouldn't spam my talk page because you're offended, it's not constructive and will certainly not defend your case. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 12:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Do not reverse the roles . It's terrible that you resort to blatant lies to defend your case. You made the first action, an add of an infobox [22] without any prior discussion. You need consensus to make these deletions. I reverted you and encouraged you to discuss this at the talk page but you continued your pov pushing and edit warring. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Listen, have you heard about causality? You know, the thing about cause and effect. You made your deletion without consensus the 14th of August 2016. I reverted you my first time today. Do you really believe you're going to fool anybody here? --80.63.3.167 (talk) 12:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- You provoked the edit warring because you added the infobox. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- The infobox was there before you and I had this little edit war. Then you decided to remove this important part of the article without consensus. It's not okay. That's why you should argue for your case at the talk page. By arguing, I mean real arguments for the deletion - not baseless ad hominem accusations. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 13:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is a lie. There are no infobox before the edit warring. You could'nt add an infobox without consensus. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Your edit tells otherwise. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 13:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- The infobox was there before you and I had this little edit war. Then you decided to remove this important part of the article without consensus. It's not okay. That's why you should argue for your case at the talk page. By arguing, I mean real arguments for the deletion - not baseless ad hominem accusations. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 13:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- You provoked the edit warring because you added the infobox. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Listen, have you heard about causality? You know, the thing about cause and effect. You made your deletion without consensus the 14th of August 2016. I reverted you my first time today. Do you really believe you're going to fool anybody here? --80.63.3.167 (talk) 12:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Do not reverse the roles . It's terrible that you resort to blatant lies to defend your case. You made the first action, an add of an infobox [22] without any prior discussion. You need consensus to make these deletions. I reverted you and encouraged you to discuss this at the talk page but you continued your pov pushing and edit warring. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- It's terrible that you resort to blatant lies to defend your case. You made the first action, a deletion in [21] without any prior discussion. The infobox contains key informations, and is thus of large importance to the article. You need consensus to make these deletions. I reverted you and encouraged you to discuss this at the talk page, because you need the consensus of the WP community to make deletions of this scale. Also, you shouldn't spam my talk page because you're offended, it's not constructive and will certainly not defend your case. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 12:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Do not reverse the roles . This is fort the IP to have a consensus to change the page and add the controversial infobox. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Content dispute. Please do not continue to war over the text; take the disagreement to the talkpage instead. If the disruption continues, the page will be full-protected, and you are both flirting with an edit-warring block in any case. Vanamonde (talk) 13:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note for you: Panam2014 is threatening to continue edit warring tomorrow: [23]. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 13:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is in my right because tomorrow, there are no RR1. And it is innacceptable to edit the page without consensus. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- First of all, the rule's not about "tomorrow" but 24h. Secondly, judging by your threat to continue edit warring, you seem more interested in fighting me instead of presenting arguments for your case like any other mature person. You should calm down. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 13:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Tomorrow in 24h. Secondly, judging by your threat to continue edit warring, you seem more interested in fighting me instead of presenting arguments for your case like any other mature person. You should calm down. I haven't time to lose with a pov pusher. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- When did I issue a threat like yours? Diff? --80.63.3.167 (talk) 13:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Tomorrow in 24h. Secondly, judging by your threat to continue edit warring, you seem more interested in fighting me instead of presenting arguments for your case like any other mature person. You should calm down. I haven't time to lose with a pov pusher. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- First of all, the rule's not about "tomorrow" but 24h. Secondly, judging by your threat to continue edit warring, you seem more interested in fighting me instead of presenting arguments for your case like any other mature person. You should calm down. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 13:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is in my right because tomorrow, there are no RR1. And it is innacceptable to edit the page without consensus. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93, Panam2014, 80.63.3.167, and Ymblanter: Pinging everyone involved (Ym was messaged) Both Panam and the IP can be blocked right now per the community sanctions written here. I suggest both of you should reach consensus before any more reverting. Also Panam, that's gaming the system. Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- I was not aware of the restrictions. I thought the 3RR applied here . I demand a return to the ante bellium version. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Both of you: this is not the place to dispute the content, or make demands with respect to it. Dat Guy, I am aware of that restriction, but it is a little fuzzy with respect to IPs involved in good faith disputes. Therefore, to make it absolutely clear, if either of you makes any further reverts at any point before consensus is reached on the talk page with respect to this dispute, you will be blocked for edit-warring. Take the dispute to the talk page, and pursue it there; not here. Vanamonde (talk) 13:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93: Wikipedia does not work that way. The pre- war edition version included no infobox . So while waiting to find a consensus , remove the infobox . --Panam2014 (talk) 13:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Both of you: this is not the place to dispute the content, or make demands with respect to it. Dat Guy, I am aware of that restriction, but it is a little fuzzy with respect to IPs involved in good faith disputes. Therefore, to make it absolutely clear, if either of you makes any further reverts at any point before consensus is reached on the talk page with respect to this dispute, you will be blocked for edit-warring. Take the dispute to the talk page, and pursue it there; not here. Vanamonde (talk) 13:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- I was not aware of the restrictions. I thought the 3RR applied here . I demand a return to the ante bellium version. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note for you: Panam2014 is threatening to continue edit warring tomorrow: [23]. --80.63.3.167 (talk) 13:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Enough of this here. NeilN talk to me 14:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 12:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent genre warring from IP, likely block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet (talk) 15:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Airplaneman ✈ 01:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annki777 (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined @Annki777: You've made at least 3 requests for page protection in the past few days that claimed vandalism when there was little to none. These claims are misleading. Please review the protection policy for the guidelines for protection. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 01:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring over an announcement by one of the members. Karst (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I see some reasonably good faith contributions. Seems like things have developed since then to clarify the issue. Airplaneman ✈ 01:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by user "BySomalilander" and removing sourced valuable information. - Farmaajo 20:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Curious that the request comes from an account, Murreyhan, with only four edits to its credit. I don't think BySomalilander is the problematic editor here. —C.Fred (talk) 22:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If both parties take the matter to the talk page, no protection or blocks should be necessary. —C.Fred (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Considering it's today's featured article, I'd like to protect cautiously. It does look like there has been a steady stream of vandalism, some of which has taken a while to revert. 3 hours surely won't be enough to catch all of the vandalism, but maybe it will help while many are asleep. Airplaneman ✈ 04:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP-hopping editor in Edinburgh is engaged in edit warring. No point in blocking the IP addresses, need to protect the page long enough to force a conversation on the talk page. Tarl N. (discuss) 04:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nohomersryan (talk) 04:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User also given final warning. Airplaneman ✈ 05:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Gestrid (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent IP vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Article created by sockpuppet, no need for this article to be created again. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 01:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bradon1222 and User:EvergreenFir/socks#Care_Bears_vandal_.28Brandon1222.29_-_Lexington.2C_SC. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Rizzal Hopper (talk) 18:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism since at least mid-August. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The1337gamer (talk) 10:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Tito Dutta (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock puppetry, block evading sock, page blanking, sock IPs. Semi-protect this page to save our time. Please don't say "Declined, not enough vandalism". Marvellous Spider-Man 17:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Influx of IP vandals. Nymf (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 20:47, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption – IP's constantly adding unsourced content and being generally disruptive with their editions. LLArrow (talk) 21:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption – IP's constantly adding unsourced content and being generally disruptive with their editions. LLArrow (talk) 21:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
semi-protection: - per vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
12 September 2016
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sro23 (talk) 20:25, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by sock puppet. CLCStudent (talk) 20:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page name is obviously an attack and should be RevDel'd if possible. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandal is at it again. Need my talk page locked down for the time being please. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Upcoming children's film, which makes it an obvious target. The past two weeks has been almost nothing but daily vandalism. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I realize it won't be released until March 2017, but I feel that applying a long-term protection that would last until then is a bit heavy-handed. Let's start with 2 months. Airplaneman ✈ 20:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs making nonsense edits. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 20:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism. The page isn't one that really should expect or need frequent changes, so the burden of edit-protected requests should be low. It's not a particularly high rate of vandalism, but it's such an obvious target for them. It's also the sort of thing which could make negative headlines if someone misses an attack: "Wikipedia can't even do basic math!" is the sort of headline tabloid editors love (without letting little details like truth or balance get in their way…). Murph9000 (talk) 16:26, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Noting that the vandalism has been happening for more than a year. Expiration of a previous 3-month semi-protection resulted in resumption of the vandalism. — Maile (talk) 16:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Repeated blanking due to apparent sock puppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramsham12345 for more details. Also consider indefinite semi-protection of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin G Lokapure (notice the difference in 'k'), also due to repeated blanking, including recently by socks of Ramsham12345. Perhaps also consider salting Sachin G Loapure and Sachin G Lokapure (plus possibly close variants) in view of repeated history of attempted recreation by socks of Ramsham12345. Nsk92 (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Done Indef both AFDs, SALTed both pages. Cheers, Airplaneman ✈ 19:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 19:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Pending-edit protection is not preventing or discouraging an anonymous vandal using a morphing-ip to editwar about trying to insert inane trivia into the article.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:25, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 19:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from unregistered user(s). SaltySeas (talk) 18:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Copyvios and blanking. clpo13(talk) 19:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Done by Jac16888. I re-added move protection btw. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism from IP hopper. CLCStudent (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently a number of POV edits by IPs that are reverted with no effort by the IPs to engage on the article's discussion page. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Favonian. until Sep. 26. Airplaneman ✈ 19:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as Sock of User:Cow cleaner 5000. LG-Gunther : Talk 04:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Unless more socks show up, protection isn't justified. Katietalk 11:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 13:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection - Persistent vandalism by unsigned and non-autoconfirmed users. Parsley Man (talk) 14:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:44, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Please make it permanent semi-protection as it was previously protected for three months but vandalism has persisted requiring repeated corrections. Josephus37 (talk) 15:05, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I cannot justify indefinite semi-protection for an article with one disruptive edit in the last 10 days. Katietalk 15:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 15:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. An IP-hopping editor has for a long time been repeatedly adding disparaging opinions about this organization to the article. It had to be protected in the past to stop it, but it has returned. Deli nk (talk) 13:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 13:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – excessive vandalism from multiple IPs. Minima© (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:44, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Getting daily rants from Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/The_UPN_Vandal lately. McGeddon (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
New York City mayoral election, 2017 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: An IP individual, likely the supposed candidate, consistently adds irrelevant information, non-valid sources, and the like, and has been doing so for several weeks. ALPolitico (talk) 04:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Uncletomwood (talk) 08:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 13:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Apparently some HS football player is claiming on his Twitter that he's going to be suspended for "solidarity with Colin Kaepernick" and social media has picked it up. There's no other attribution other than what this kid says thus far, and yet there's already been an IPv6 adding the statement (via mobile edit) to the article. MSJapan (talk) 03:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Note also pages are not protected preemptively — MusikAnimal talk 04:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Also note there has been only a single addition/revert. Full protection is not appropriate for situations like this (they are for edit warring primarily) and even partial protection is not justified. Suggest close. Added to my watchlist. John from Idegon (talk) 04:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent fandom warring. . — Confession0791 talk 07:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary seri-protection: High level of IP and new user account vandalism/addition of unreliable sources and edit warring. RioHondo (talk) 10:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring over names (see talk page discussion) plus a lot of unsourced changes. AussieLegend (✉) 03:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde (talk) 07:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Repeatedly edited to include sexual references to the article subject.*Treker (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:05, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recently deceased. High traffic from IPs edit warring over which pronoun to use in article. Fuebaey (talk) 04:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marvellous Spider-Man 04:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Different IPs in the last few days have continuously been making an edit to the same end, and reverted by User:Karst and me with explanation. Hopefully the edit attempts die down again in a month. --Eddyspeeder (talk) 18:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Instead, I made this edit. Airplaneman ✈ 01:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created Edits as Sock of User:Cow cleaner 5000. LG-Gunther : Talk 04:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde (talk) 07:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content removal. George Ho (talk) 22:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:19, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 02:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. May require lots of rev-deletion as well for infantile WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:1:AEA0:9825:2A41:2ECE:E32B (talk) 03:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the main article page was semi-protected, at least a couple of users (not autoconfirmed, since they used the edit request option for semi-protected articles) continue to request material be added that is unsourced and violates BLP policies [24][25]. Both of the diffs I cited I reverted on account of BLP violations. This needs to stop, and I'm hoping having this semi-protected for a day or two will cool down these users. MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:16, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP editor keeps insisting there's a new member of the band, somebody not mentioned at all in the media. Binksternet (talk) 01:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Near constant vandalism re nationality (American-German, changed by vandals to German-American). Will be reporting vandal as well. See [26], [27]. Quis separabit? 19:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Blocked user editing via IP. Kansas Bear (talk) 00:19, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Blocked user editing via IP. Kansas Bear (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Most likely an old sock friend of mine playing games. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 00:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. I strongly considered pending changes, but taking a closer look at the edit history for the past 14 months, I did not see a single constructive new/IP user contribution. In this case, I think the time saved with semi-protection is worth its more restricted access level. Airplaneman ✈ 01:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of COPYVIO material by dynamic IPs. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 01:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:26, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent disruption and block evasion by User:Nate Speed. Sro23 (talk) 01:22, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent disruption and block evasion by User:Nate Speed. Sro23 (talk) 01:22, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of sock-puppet IP vandalism, related to the case and investigation above. The IP was blocked in June, and article protected until 9 September, but now restarted the same disruptive activity. The article should be protected to prevent any disruptive IP editing and edit-war. Crovata (talk) 22:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please salt page as it has been repeatedly recreated (8 times now). -- Dane2007 talk 22:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, mostly from IP's, after page was unprotected. Blue Adventure (talk) 22:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute with IP who flat out refuses to go into meaningful discussion about the contested rankings. The Banner talk 16:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined IP is using talk page NeilN talk to me 16:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 21:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 21:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP's. Some decision he made in the Swansea v Chelsea game (maybe awarding a goal when Gary Cahill was fouled) has angered these IP's, but this is not the place to take this out on. Class455 (talk) 21:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of socks of John Daker as of recently. -- Dane2007 talk 21:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in recent months, sock IP made 11th revert in less than 24 hours (needs block), see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PavelStaykov. Crovata (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
13 September 2016
- List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2016) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Protection expired on the 10th, and Atomic Meltdown immediately returned to socking here and here. Protection needs to be longer. Nymf (talk) 15:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked the /64 for one month, since he's used that one since at least mid-August. No objection to protection over that, though. Katietalk 17:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion/sock puppetry by Atomic Meltdown on all those 2602:306:381e:4cf0:* IPs. Nymf (talk) 15:44, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked the /64 one month. Katietalk 17:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Account-hopping sock is continually re-creating this page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations. Saqib (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Saqib, please read our protection policy. There's no recent or persistent problem. NeilN talk to me 14:44, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. MikeLynch (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected.. MikeLynch (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Full Protection Slow motion edit warring. jps (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., sorry, meant this.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: -- incessant IP vandalism (see [28]). Quis separabit? 16:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit-warring by IPs and unconfirmed accounts on a WP:BLP. MPS1992 (talk) 17:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Likelihood of WP:MULTIPLE accounts. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Edgar181. NeilN talk to me 14:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the last few days. It might be useful to keep an eye on Weekend at Bernie's II as well. Daß Wölf (talk) 14:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page recreated by a vandal who is trying to out an admin. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP cruft and addition of mis-representation against sourced content started the moment the last protection expired. —IB [ Poke ] 09:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined This appears to be a content dispute, in which the IP addresses are not paying attention to the sources. Warn them about verifiability, and report to ANEW if disruption persists. Vanamonde (talk) 10:23, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93:, check the history, the same IP is probably using multiple addresses to make the same change. —IB [ Poke ] 11:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, fair enough. Enough of the earlier IPs have received warnings for me to protect; however, please remember that this is not vandalism. Unsourced content is a problem, but a different problem.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, fair enough. Enough of the earlier IPs have received warnings for me to protect; however, please remember that this is not vandalism. Unsourced content is a problem, but a different problem.
- @Vanamonde93:, check the history, the same IP is probably using multiple addresses to make the same change. —IB [ Poke ] 11:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RazerText me 10:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- GB fan 10:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandals. Stephenb (Talk) 12:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: 3 months full-protection for discouraging vandalism and edit warring. Also check if this current edit is passable with wiki-policies and guidelines, before protecting it.
Declined There is no vandalism occurring on this page, and the only disruptive editing is by the IP address who reported this. I am reading this as an attempt to get the page locked at the version preferred by the IP. Vanamonde (talk) 04:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunate, I have updated the faulty article and this is the response - disruptive editing. The request was a mere attempt to avoid disruptive editing and it was extended in this request to check where the disruption stands in regards to wiki-guidelines and check if the edit is passable. IP-editors aren't disruptors and shouldn't be out-rightly discriminated for using available community resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.211.93 (talk) 05:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Update: Investopedia links made all the problems, I didn't know. Now I know.
- Unfortunate, I have updated the faulty article and this is the response - disruptive editing. The request was a mere attempt to avoid disruptive editing and it was extended in this request to check where the disruption stands in regards to wiki-guidelines and check if the edit is passable. IP-editors aren't disruptors and shouldn't be out-rightly discriminated for using available community resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.211.93 (talk) 05:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated namecrufting. The last substantial edit to this article, other than the addition and removal of these two unreferenced YouTubers was in February 2012. A few minor maintenance edits by registered users, but no content added in 4.5 years. Just repeatedly dealing with unreferenced non notable individuals. The same 2 unreferenced non notable individuals. If you cannot protect, could you please forward a request to wherever it should go for the creation of an edit filter for Quire+this article? That would stop the problem too. John from Idegon (talk) 05:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.9 (talk) 02:31, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.9 (talk) 02:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.9 (talk) 02:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: 24.146.193.10 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) repeatedly re-added content that violates WP:RSSELF, refuse to explain his edit at the talk page of WikiProject Mathematics despite being asked so twice. Please protect the article for 1-2 weeks. bender235 (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 03:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: 24.146.193.10 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) repeatedly re-added content that violates WP:RSSELF, refuse to explain his edit at the talk page of WikiProject Mathematics despite being asked so twice. Please protect the article for 1-2 weeks. bender235 (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 03:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: 24.146.193.10 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) repeatedly re-added content that violates WP:RSSELF, refuse to explain his edit at the talk page of WikiProject Mathematics despite being asked so twice. Please protect the article for 1-2 weeks. bender235 (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 03:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 02:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 03:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An editor recently popped up trying to add POV-style info about the company banning its userbase, etc, using bad sourcing (youtube videos), and appealing to popular opinion as a reliable source. After a little back and forth of being directed to WP:RS, WP:SPS and WP:VG/S and so on, they've started blanking acceptably sourced info like this in anger. Eik Corell (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Eik Corell, you want WP:ANEW, WP:ANI, or WP:AIV. Also, there's zero discussion on the talk page. NeilN talk to me 22:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Only 2 obvious reverts of IP contributions in the last 12 months. High level? Murph9000 (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Shhhhwwww!!, what are you looking at? NeilN talk to me 22:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal repeatedly posting seemingly-nonsensical article links here as they have done on other user talk pages - someone using a particular IP has done almost-identical edits over more than one day on separate pages even though they had already received a Level 4 Warning. I deleted the links from my user talk, and they have persisted in their bad behavior. I do have a separate IP-talk page set up if someone comes along and needs to make a meaningful contribution there. Shearonink (talk) 00:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by another admin. Airplaneman ✈ 01:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 01:43, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 months. NeilN talk to me 01:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: High level of IP vandalism, rival businesses and vandals frequently make nonsense edits. PRCarma (talk) 20:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @PRCarma: Also, your edits to the article have introduced a promotional tone into the article, which is problematic. Airplaneman ✈ 20:11, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism that I have been reverting. These vandalisms are small and may be missed unless someone compares the diff for each IP edit. I have been reverting these pieces of vandalism a few times, and think it is frequent enough to warrant protection. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Constant disruption -- Multiple editors making disruptive edits constantly. Page is already under semi-pro, which expires tomorrow. I recommend a weeks long full protect to let users calm down concerning this particular, hot topic article. Thank you, LLArrow (talk) 22:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) The article talk page seems strangely quiet. Murph9000 (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article does still seem volatile, so I've extended the semi protection past the premiere date of Sep. 14. I think full protection is overkill; I realize there is a bit of disruption, and if that continues, I think blocks are the way to go. Airplaneman ✈ 23:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: persistent vandalism by IPs and newly created inappropriate username editors (JuneForayFan) (see [29]) regarding whether the actress (aged 99) is retired. She is and has had no new credits since 2014. Maybe her spirit is willing, but the flesh ......... See here also. Quis separabit? 16:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hey, can we get some action here. It started again. Quis separabit? 23:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- @[email protected]: Is there a source that says that she is retired? Airplaneman ✈ 23:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hey, can we get some action here. It started again. Quis separabit? 23:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Airplaneman: Yes, there's this one: http://en.mediamass.net/people/june-foray/retirement.html (which may or may not be acceptable) and there's also IMDb and her last credit was in 2014. In the acting biz, if you're not working, you're not working, especially when you're 99 years old, God Bless Her. How about a compromise -- if she goes back to work we can update the infobox. SIMPLE AS THAT. Quis separabit? 00:25, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- @[email protected]: I honestly see this more as a content dispute. If attempts at discussion continue to fail, I'm inclined to issue a full protection of the page. I can't quite grasp the validity of your argument that she must be retired because she's old and she hasn't had a credit in two years. The mediamass site you linked to me only speaks of rumors of retirement, and it looks like the page has been updated to say that the rumors were false. Unless there's a source stating that she's retired, I don't see how your edits aren't just as problematic as you claim JuneForayFan's are. If I'm missing something, please let me know. Best, Airplaneman ✈ 01:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- @[email protected]: Muffed ping Airplaneman ✈ 02:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Airplaneman: Yes, there's this one: http://en.mediamass.net/people/june-foray/retirement.html (which may or may not be acceptable) and there's also IMDb and her last credit was in 2014. In the acting biz, if you're not working, you're not working, especially when you're 99 years old, God Bless Her. How about a compromise -- if she goes back to work we can update the infobox. SIMPLE AS THAT. Quis separabit? 00:25, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I'm gonna go ahead and decline this for now. Please, please discuss this if it continues to be an issue. Otherwise, a full protection may be in order. All the best, Airplaneman ✈ 19:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Additions regarding her pneumonia have been reverted twice and seem likely to occur again; discussion is underway on the talk page. 331dot (talk) 16:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done I'm going to decline this for now. WP:1RR should help. NeilN talk to me 18:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting pretty tired of all this Harambe stuff. It's been going on since the incident and we've shoveled enough gorilla shit to be zookeepers. John from Idegon (talk) 23:05, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many various IPs vandalizing . --allthefoxes (Talk) 23:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content as of the past few days/hours (a boxer who has recently had a high-profile fight). Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:19, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
14 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 13:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of recent IP vandalism/BLP violations. Deli nk (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 14:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism running rampant. Atsme📞📧 15:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP and new account vandalism for the past few days. Altamel (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:25, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption – IP's being disruptive with their editions. LLArrow (talk) 08:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined This appears to be a content dispute (though a singularly strange one, confined for some reason to the color of a certain panel?) and certainly not vandalism. If the dispute continues, full protection might be applied: but I suggest you sort it out on the talk page first. Vanamonde (talk) 09:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 12:25, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP deletion of content despite hidden note. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 13:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- List of submissions to the 89th Academy Awards for Best Foreign Language Film (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Lots of unsourced additions by IP hopping account. Warned on their talkpage, but evades the issue with change of IP address. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be the target of a blocked user, who uses a floating IP and at least one username. 331dot (talk) 10:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 12:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: edit warring and addition of unsourced content to a BLP. Opencooper (talk) 05:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Both the account and the IP have been blocked. Opencooper: report back here if disruption persists, especially if there is evidence of IP hopping. Vanamonde (talk) 05:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice, will do. Opencooper (talk) 05:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hollyckuhno (talk) 07:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Due to addition of unsourced content. This is not vandalism. Vanamonde (talk) 09:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant promotional adding of non notable person to list. Tried using multiple IPs, then a new account, now back to an IP. Jevansen (talk) 07:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See talk page. Constant edit warring for a couple of days now. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Mass creation of attack articles by User:Shiaco & User:XbiaoX & User:Lucie part
- Jr5a means (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jr5a is likely talk look like ninja (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jr5o (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jr5p (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jr5A (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jr5i (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Staid is Jr5a (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Suck dick is Jr5a (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Suck is Jr5a (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jr5a is unfunny (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jr5a is pointless (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jr5a in failure (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite creation protection: Similar to Jr5a is dumbass; already protected. 208.54.5.241 (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined We can deal with this in other ways. Will work on it — MusikAnimal talk 01:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet target. See James Coburn for further examples. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 05:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tuanminh01 (talk) 06:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lot of IP addresses adding content regarding the likely cancellation of the show. Not bad faith, but it's getting disruptive. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent sockpuppetry/vandalism/BLP violations. 208.54.5.241 (talk) 23:44, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I.P. Is edit-warring with registered users. There is a disussion taking place on the talk page, which they've started, but won't continue. Protection from I.P.s or newly registered users is requested at least until a consensus cant be built. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 14:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. And the IP's edits are not vandalism, Corkythehornetfan. NeilN talk to me 14:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- By now it is plain disruptive editing. The IP does not engage in meaningful discussion but keeps removing sourced content. See Talk:Baylor University#Why a ranking of 701+ is not a useful ranking. IP claims a prior discussion came to consensus, but such a discussion is nowhere to be found. He (I assume) also claims that ten of thousands of universities have the 701+ ranking. But it is already the given sources that proves that it is a false claim. This won't stop unless the article is protected (or the IP blocked). The Banner talk 17:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- "Consider the edit warring noticeboard" will accomplish the second option. I've made it clear to the IP what will happen if the edit warring persists. --NeilN talk to me 17:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism/reversion – I.P. is edit-warring with registered users. A discussion took place on the talk page however they will not respond to it. Protection from I.P.s or newly registered users is requested as this has occured with multiple IPs is currently only one however 85.96.56.233. Lalichii (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 18:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-changing vandal repeatedly inserting bogus info. Mdrnpndr (talk) 18:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism. Karst (talk) 20:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. While it's not under constant, heavy attack, come on. Major props to User:AlexiusHoratius and User:Ymblanter, the admins who took WP:AGF to an extraordinary degree by supposing that anonymous editors could constructively contribute here and putting it under pending-changes protection accordingly. Predictably, it shows up on the p-c list once every few hours to once every few days and these edits are pretty much always junk that badly needs to be quickly reverted; I've removed several names of real people recently. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 20:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- I still do not see from the editing history why it should be protected, but since I was trouted I am not going to take any action.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: The last time a reviewer let a pending edit stand was back in May; since then, the listing at pending changes has just made it a sort of manually semiprotected page since new and anon users never do anything good there. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 20:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @RunnyAmiga: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I don't think the edit rate justifies semi, and PC is doing exactly what it's supposed to do. Remember that only logged-in users see unreviewed edits and that WP:RD2 is available for egregious BLP stuff. Katietalk 21:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another target for socks of User:Stylized as "stylized" currently; formerly "stylizeD". ‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Article title is similar to that of Facebook and has suffered many of the same attacks that page did before it got protected. Indef-semi as a preventive measure, if you will please. Thank you,. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 01:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty heavy IP vandalism recently. WikiPuppies bark dig 22:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 01:21, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism that will undoubtedly continue as the NFL season goes on. Lizard (talk) 23:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 01:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Newly created article at Heiko bleher doesn't seem speediable (past versions at the old title were copyvios, which this isn't; there was no AfD or user block) but can't be moved here due to protection. McGeddon (talk) 11:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Randykitty? Katietalk 13:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Several versions of the article were deleted as G11 (spam), being overly promotional. I protected it because of the persistent attempts to create this either as a copyvio or as an overly promotional puff piece. Somehow I'm not surprised that it now has been re-created with a slightly different orthography... I think it would be good if another admin had a fresh look at the current article. If it is acceptable (i.e., not a copyvio and not deemed overly promotional), I have no problem if someone would unprotect it. However, should the current version be deemed G11, again, I'd recommend salting this orthography, too. I have no opinion on the current version, but do note that it has been created by a single-purpose account. If kept, I hope somebody will watchlist it to prevent it becoming the same puff-piece that it has been before. --Randykitty (talk) 15:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Done; page moved by Diannaa. I suppose that should count as a review. -- The Voidwalker Discuss 23:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- I checked and this version is clear of copy vio and the article is not blatantly promotional (it has been deleted as G11 in the past). There's a lot of citations, but the ones I checked did not mention Heiko Bleher directly (many of the articles are about the various species that bear the Bleher family name). I'd like someone else to assess for notability, as I am not very good at that, but otherwise this version looks okay to me. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
15 September 2016
- Invasion of Poland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Soviet invasion of Poland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I have answered questions and made statements on the TALK-side of these articles. My answers and statements have been vandalized by another user by removing my text and adding his own, without any reason given what so ever. He then requested the page protected with his vandalized version, and got it. I request that the page turns unprotected and that his vandalism is stopped (my comments returned). The admin who protected the page has protected his page, so I can not contact him.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 10:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Why decline when you agree with me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TutterMouse (talk • contribs) 14:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uptick in school IP vandalism recently. McGeddon (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP users keep adding un-sourced and outright false information to the page and are vandalizing it. Temporary semi-protection was lifted yesterday, vandalism and false information was already posted this morning. Real tlhingan (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: repeated IP edit warring over charter flights (insertion/removal of visible comments). Widefox; talk 13:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: repeated removal of AFD template by IP and new accounts - assumed socks - 7 days would see out the AFD - Arjayay (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing by anons despite pending changes, has happened several times today. Entranced98 (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - MrX 16:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Never mind. It was just protected by Widr.- MrX 16:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 17:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Problem with user Otakrem after a long discussion lasting three months, after it was reported Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1 after that there have been discussions with other users 1, ask the write lock for the user Otakrem on the page tigrayans
the problem is a war of senseless changes in section1 Notable Ethiopian Tigrayan people of which you complain of the sources that are authoritative sources, ask the page restore, of The Voidwalker 1 with Axumite kings, who has tried to mediate with the words Wikipedia: Accuracy disputes
and to warn Otakrem do not change more paragraph Notable Ethiopian Tigrayan people but to change it just proving the opposite Sennaitgebremariam (talk) 07:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- SennaitGebremariam, I am not the only one changing the Tigrayan article. Infact I am disagrement with some other editors. Right now I am not focused on Tigrayan article. However, I think I explained to you, that all you ahve to do is provide sources stating that the Aksumite kings claimed to be Tigrayans or Tigrinyas or Amharas? That is the same requirement that Soupforone had for living and deceased Eritrean Tigrinyas for their respective articles. Please do not feel that I am focused on you with this regard, it's only a case of making sure we have conformity(Continuety)with the way wikipedia edits things.Otakrem (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Katietalk 10:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs (probably same person) repeatedly trying to introduce non-neutral and unreferenced information. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 12:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doug Weller talk 13:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we please have protection on this article again? Still getting ip hoppers and I don't see them stopping in the near future. Although this set geolocates outside of California, I'm pretty sure it's the same editor as did this weird edit. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sigh, another possible IP hopping situation, maybe a sock - in any case, adding text not in the source. Doug Weller talk 13:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- And yet another sock. Doug Weller talk 14:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tuanminh01 (talk) 02:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marvellous Spider-Man 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Rizzal Hopper (talk) 07:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/s continue to disruptively edit said page. —MelbourneStar☆talk 09:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 10:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days. Please take the opportunity to reach consensus on the talk page. , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of AfD template. Adam9007 (talk) 23:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by Oshwah (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) Airplaneman ✈ 01:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection was supposed to last until 2025 but seems to have been lost for some reason. (In case you don't know, Essjay was formerly an arbitrator who was later outed for lying about his credentials, see Essjay controversy). Everymorning (talk) 02:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected There seems to be something in the page history about not wanting it on the list of "indefinitely protected pages," so I gave it 20 years. Vanamonde (talk) 04:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing regarding the subject's name, mostly from IPs. The subject recently disclosed that he was in the process of legally changing his name, but confirmation of said change has not yet been presented. Prefall 18:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Question: @Prefall: Looks done to me? [30] NeilN talk to me 22:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- @NeilN: Yahoo only cites the podcast, which does not confirm if it was approved. From the podcast, the subject stated "[...] when this airs, you know, hopefully everything is approved [...]". In review of the podcast, this Wrestling Observer article stated "As of now, it isn’t known if the attempt was successful. He still goes by “The Big Guy” on Twitter and is still being advertised under that name for his wrestling appearances going forward." Prefall 23:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruptive IP edits. Zaostao (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I completely understand why you asked for protection, but I'm seeing quite a few useful IP contributions as well. I think the best chance for this article to grow while he is still in the limelight, and also have a better way of dealing with disruptive edits, is pending changes. Airplaneman ✈ 01:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 21:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of driveby IP disruption from advocacy editors - David Gerard (talk) 22:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Djadjko (talk) 00:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Looking at the past 500 edits (~2 years) of edits, it's almost entirely vandalism and reverts. I did not identify any useful contribution from a new or IP user (though I'm sure there are a couple if I combed through the history line by line). Airplaneman ✈ 01:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: New user and IP vandalism, the usual. Lizard (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 01:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent block evasion by User:Wattsj528. Sro23 (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article appears to have attracted new editors trying to remove negative content because of this FB post by the subject asking for it to be made positive. KylieTastic (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The history of the page shows lots of vandalism continuing to be reverted. -- Dane2007 talk 21:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Too much for PC NeilN talk to me 22:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of Sockpuppets. —IB [ Poke ] 12:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Vanamonde93: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Huh, interesting. Edit didn't save, I think, dodgy internet. Done now. Vanamonde (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disputes over production companies. ViperSnake151 Talk 17:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP sockpuppet target. Please see James Coburn for further examples . ‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 17:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has recently been ambushed with IP vandalism. DPH1110 (talk) 19:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 22:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
16 September 2016
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I'm not sure why but lately the article has been getting a lot of IP vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 15:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Instant resumption after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Un-Salt: and replace with new stub from Draft:The Smiley Company 2 (Protecting admin may be busy elsewhere) -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- DGG? --NeilN talk to me 23:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- There are two versions: Draft:The Smiley Company and Draft:The Smiley Company 2, The first makes a claim about a living individual, that he invented the Smiley symbol, without any attempt to provide sourcing outside their own website and without mention that the claim is significantly disputed and is, as I understand it, a minority view. The version 2 implies it, by saying what is technically true, that the founder of the company licenses the trademark, , but without mentioning that his claim to have the right to do so is a minority view. I will unprotect when someone write a NPOV article. DGG ( talk ) 01:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please feel free to edit the draft. I'm no longer interested in this topic and am moving onto other areas of the 'pedia. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 06:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined (procedural) tutterMouse (talk) 12:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. 333-blue 03:10, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done: It was pointed out to me that PC should not be applied to the Wikipedia namespace, which is something I knew, and forgot. I'm going to let somebody else decide whether or not semi-protection should be applied. Vanamonde (talk) 11:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Done Vanamonde (talk) 11:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (Although the irony of applying pending changes to the pending changes page would be delicious. And nutritious.) Katietalk 12:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Constant disruption -- IP's constantly adding disruptive/unsourced information. Please consider extended coverage. LLArrow (talk) 03:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined There appear to be two IPs adding unsourced content, but other IPs making constructive changes. I have therefore warned those two IPs, and left it at that for now. While there is certainly disruption, the content being added and removed is not particularly damaging. If disruption continues from those IPs, a block might be in order: if there is evidence of IP hopping, please come back here. Vanamonde (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Scooby-Doo! WrestleMania Mystery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Temporary semi-protection: Less than two days after the previous three-month semi-protection, the same group of IP hoppers that originally caused the page to be protected began disruptively editing the page again. Katniss ♥ 15:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I would normally wait a little longer after a previous protection expired, but I see no reason to mess around here. Katietalk 14:11, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mdrnpndr (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Jean-Claude Juncker (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Full protection: Persistent vandalism, defamatory comments contrary to WP:BLP. Lamberhurst (talk) 12:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Could this page be protected for a while (maybe 15 days) to prevent edit warring and WP:OWN behaviour by User:Lysimachi who somehow has no intention to reply on the article talk page but will continue to revert to enforce their version of the page. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent (and odd) blanking by various IPs with the aim of removing Italian involvement in the production of the film. Examples: [31], [32],[33], [34], [35], [36]. Cavarrone 06:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is weird, but certainly qualifies as disruptive. Vanamonde (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Some muppet's been moving my userpage around overnight. There's no reason anybody other than an admin executing a name change, or me rearranging my pages, should ever do that. Cabayi (talk) 06:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Done I don't think this protects any sub-pages of your user-page: if you want those protected also, let me know. Vanamonde (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from an IP hopper. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MusikAnimal.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from an IP hopper. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Oshwah.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from an IP hopper. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MusikAnimal.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tuanminh01 (talk) 09:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In view of the occasional good-faith contributions from new editors, longer semi-protection did not seem entirely appropriate. Vanamonde (talk) 10:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three days of sattamaster.in spam. McGeddon (talk) 10:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP editor does not like sourced material and so keeps reverting what’s there, but does not provide any source beyond own opinion. Strebe (talk) 01:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism. Lizard (talk) 06:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 4 days. . Nairspecht (talk) (work) 07:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gestrid (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Looks to have died down NeilN talk to me 22:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widefox; talk 20:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 22:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Some level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 23:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 23:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: Loe level but persistent IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 23:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 23:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 03:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Philippine Atheists and Agnostics Society (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Please protect this page, it has been vandalized too many times since its inception. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hapimarissa (talk • contribs) 20:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've added the page to my watchlist and will continue to monitor. If the situation were to change in the near future, I would semi-protect the page. —C.Fred (talk) 20:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism from IPs. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 00:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected. Looks like semi will do, the problems seem to be coming from IP's -- seeing no grounds for 30/500, though ping me if I'm missing something? Courcelles (talk) 01:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent disruption and block evasion by User:Gstigler. Sro23 (talk) 00:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: various IP users have been engaged in an edit war for the past six months and have recently become much more active. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- I see Darwinforth protected the page but it's been reverted by a bot, presumably due to the protection being related to "biography of a living person" rather than "TV show". –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Darwinforth did not actually protect the page. —C.Fred (talk) 21:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP adding incorrect information and edit-warring persistantly for a week now. BabelStone (talk) 23:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent spamming by an IP editor under a variety of IP addresses. Article was semi-protected for 6 months back in March; as soon as the semi-protection expired, the spamming started up again. DH85868993 (talk) 23:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 00:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a persistent editor with an infinite assortment of IP addresses. Article has been repeatedly protected, only for the editor to return immediately after expiration. Seems sadly necessary to drop an indef. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of content by multiple IPs, likely same person. Jim1138 (talk) 17:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2602:304:7830:859::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 18:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of content by multiple IPs, likely same person. See James Cameron above. Jim1138 (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2602:304:7830:859::/64 blocked 2 weeks NeilN talk to me 18:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP users keep adding un-sourced and outright false information to the page and are vandalizing it. Jeremyblass (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The title of the article has been discussed recently. It was renamed without consensus; it reverted back to just the person's name. Recently, I started the RM, but this page may need this type of protection. George Ho (talk) 18:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I believe editors will adhere to proper processes here. NeilN talk to me 18:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Perennial IP vandalism. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 20:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 22:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- J. Cole (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Currently under attack from genre warriors ignoring repeated attempts at discussing unsourced additions. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 20:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gestrid (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: High level of vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 20:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Numerous IP socks re-adding the same blog-sourced content and making strange derogatory edits. Jergling (talk) 20:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes: History of vandalism in bursts or intallments. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: I requested semi-protection for this yesterday, but that was an accident. I meant to ask for this page to be fully protected, as it used to be before this protection was lost in a move. It should be fully protected for a very long time (20 years, the time it's currently semi protected for, should do it). Everymorning (talk) 20:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 22:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
temporary semi protection - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article being targeted by IP hoppers and newly-registered user accounts (looks like it's coming from a school computer lab (Poudre School District R-1)). Dawnseeker2000 20:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Badly translated section of irrelevant original research, repeatedly added by what looks like an individual using a smallish range of Ukrainian IP addresses. Talk page behavior includes claims of censorship, accusing other editors of not being smart enough to understand the pearls of wisdom being offered, and tone-deaf attempts at wikilawyering. Just plain Bill (talk) 21:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy vandalism from various IPs. -NottNott|talk 21:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
17 September 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 208.54.5.128 (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 09:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. nyuszika7h (talk) 09:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 12:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent recreation of a repeatedly deleted article. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GB fan. Vanamonde (talk) 17:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Different IPs keep adding essay-like and unlinked passages to the lead. [37], [38], [39] I'm sure they are well intentioned but we cannot have the top of this highly visible article (over 4,000 per day) looking like the efforts of a school student. : Noyster (talk), 10:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 11:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Launchballer 11:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 11:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. Dat GuyTalkContribs 12:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 12:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and blatant vandalism by IP editors. One IP editor is currently making disruptive edits to this page, and when other editors revert it, the IP user reverts the revert again. Also, disruptive IP edits are being displayed on the page for days, and it takes quite a long time to revert it all. WikiPancake ✉ 📖 02:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I can't see evidence of more than one disruptive IP user, who has been blocked. If disruption resumes and there is evidence of IP hopping, please report back. Vanamonde (talk) 05:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Create Protection: Article has been deleted 3 times, yet still recreated. Repeatedly recreated A7 article. Yoshi24517Chat Online 03:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Request withdrawn Never mind, not A7 article. Will come back if recreated after deletion. Yoshi24517Chat Online 03:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC
Withdrawn by requestor (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 06:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Vugar Ismailov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Salt (protect against re-creation). Persistent sock-puppetry and attempts at re-creation by socks. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AynuraJafarova and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vugar Ismailov. Also, please salt Vugar Elman Ismailov, Vugar E. Ismailov and V. E. Ismailov, just in case, as the socks have proved quite persistent and may try that next. Nsk92 (talk) 08:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've indefinitely protected the page and its talk page; I'll get started on the other suggested article names momentarily. Incidentally, thanks for the post here, if I had not followed up I wouldn't have known about the other accounts needing 86-ing. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Done (for the bot) Katietalk 12:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a lot of vandalism for no apparent reason Joel.Miles925 18:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Socking/edit warring too. 73.96.115.3 (talk) 00:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As the school year starts students will be studying about animals like this and hence I would not be surprised to see this page becoming a target for vandals. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute between IPs, perhaps some socking involved. Dat GuyTalkContribs 08:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – To allow template editors 811867 transclusions . Mlpearc (open channel) 02:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, seemingly due to a high school production of the musical. CaptainPedge | Talk 01:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Her talk page is now being attacked by IP vandalism after her mainspace is protected. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 20:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- What? One IP edit more than a week ago that added a copy of the article as an edit request. Meters (talk) 21:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Shhhhwwww!!, please put more thought into your requests here. This is not a suggestion. NeilN talk to me 22:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- And, PC does not apply in talk pages. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 23:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption – Vandalism/disruptive edits completely out of control from IP's and unconfirms. LLArrow (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Since Vanamonde93 declined the previous report this morning, there have been no disruptive IP edits. This is a content dispute, which I suggest you all solve before edit warring blocks get handed out. Katietalk 00:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – (edit-warring). MPS1992 (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. IP was edit warring on multiple articles. MPS1992, please let me know if socks show up. NeilN talk to me 22:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Has been going on for a long time, and oftentimes it takes days until it is reverted. --1990'sguy (talk) 00:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes and/or Semi-protection: Or however a patrolling admin sees fit... This page has gone threw so much vandalism and unsourced content added by various IP ranges; something major has to happen in regards to protecting it... Previous protection was from September 2 through September 9, and the disruption immediately resumed after the expiry of that protection. 208.54.5.128 (talk) 03:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by administrator: Drmies. 208.54.5.128 (talk) 03:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term school vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kenny Loggins vandal. Sro23 (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
18 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, please bring it here again if vandalism continues.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent personal attacks and insults by multiple IP users. Perhaps I was not clear on my first demand, I would like the insults to stop in talk page too (and edit summaries). --Launebee (talk) 08:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I'm not shutting out your opponents from the discussion. And your claims of sexism are based on thin evidence. NeilN talk to me 10:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
My main claim was not sexism but strong personnal attacks 'like being called "Lameadee the vandalist" and saying that I "hate Science Po" in a summary, saying I am a "dishonest editor", writing things like "You're just lying at this point.", "clearly you are a vandal", "Consider this your warning."' And he continues to call me "a troll", a "disruptive editor" (I talked about disruptive editing, insults and sexism, but never qualified him of anything). You can understand I don’t like being countinuously publicly insulted. --Launebee (talk) 11:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- I understand that and posted a note to the talk page after I declined your request. If the attacks continue, please let me or another admin know. --NeilN talk to me 11:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Launebee (talk) 11:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Could you just let a message on his page, for him to understand that his comments on me are not acceptable and that he would face consequences if he continues? --Launebee (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- This was done. --NeilN talk to me 16:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection severe edit war over content by registered editors, including possible (as in, alleged) socking; discussion on TP has degenerated into an equally massive edit-war including the repeated refactoring of each others' comment and removal of large sections of text. Suggest a short blast of TFP to clear heads. Muffled Pocketed 13:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Blocked disruptive user for sockpuppetry. If CheckUser comes back negative (and it won't, because he's admitted to it) and the disruption resumes, let us know. Katietalk 13:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- He's only 'admitted' to one account. The CU is also for the 'CowardlyAbyssinian' account which he denies, I believe. The request for protection was due to the fact that BOTH parties were as bad as each other; this result does not necessarilly reflect that. See what I mean? Muffled Pocketed 13:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 212.235.77.210 (talk) 11:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 13:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent disruptive edits. Essex-1799 (talk) 12:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 13:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and BLP violations. Extended semi-protection would be beneficial here. Not too frequent, but very derogatory in nature: so PC1 might also be helpful. . Vanamonde (talk) 14:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – on the balance of probabilities, June 2017 seems about right. ⁓ Hello71 12:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I'm not sure that this is appropriate, but I'm at a loss for how to proceed. I'm involved in a content dispute with an IP that has devolved into a slow-motion edit war as the IP absolutely refuses to discuss their edits on the talk page - I'm literally the only person posting on the talk page. The only way that I can see to resolve this is to semi-protect the page, forcing the IP to use the talk page. (Because we have various IPs refusing to edit collaboratively, I've tagged it as persistent disruptive editing.) -- Irn (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated unexplained unsourced disruptive editing by IPs (probably the same user, using different IPs, as the content is the same). The user(s) don't explain their edits on the talk page. Apuldram (talk) 16:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered users. Requiem II (talk) 07:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mjs1991 (talk) 00:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Please move Draft:The Girl and the Dreamcatcher to this page, and delete The Girl and the Dreamcatcher (band). Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected I'm not comfortable deleting the other article; suggest a merge or histmerge. Katietalk 12:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anon in California has been adding a tool to the list against the posted requirement: that the tool have an article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 02:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Question: Qed237, latest edits okay? NeilN talk to me 02:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- @NeilN: No. The edits were not accordding to the source and I am not sure how the editor can add goals without saying that the editor has played a match. Qed237 (talk) 10:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 10:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Required to Accept AFC Submission Draft:Ramakrishnan Murthy. LorTalk 09:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Marvellous Spider-Man 09:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism, even from the first day that the article was created. –Matthew - (talk) 19:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP's. . Class455 (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Recent and extended history of vandalism. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 06:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., seems too infrequent for semi, let us try pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 07:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sciences Po (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Sciences Po (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent advertising and disruptive editing and personal attacks my multiple IP users. I explained the issue there and User:Robert McClenon advised to request a semi-protection. Here is what I explained:
The Sciences Po page was a pure advertisement page. I tried to put it in an encyclopedical form and was personnaly attacked for it (saying that I carry out a personal vendetta against Science Po). The user admitted using several IP adresses.
Now, they are trying to put back the advertisement style and remove the banner. For example, they insist putting in the lede, without any source, sentences like: "Beyond its academics, Sciences Po is well known for its international outlook." "The Institute also maintains a robust sport programme and competes against other grand écoles in the Île-de-France." "Sciences Po and its innovative curriculum would inspire and serve as the model for the London School of Economics." (the article says part of the inspiration, not the model and innovative) "Almost every member of the French diplomatic corp since the Fifth Republic, and roughly half of ENA’s cohort each year are also graduates." Etc.
I tried to prevent it, but now I face strong personal attacks like being called "Lameadee the vandalist" and saying that I "hate Science Po" in a summary, saying I am a "dishonest editor", implying that I have to be a Science Po alumni to edit the page, writing things like "You're just lying at this point.", "clearly you are a vandal", "Consider this your warning." And the user implies that because he spent time on his advertisement, nobody must touch it.
I claim that there is also sexism here. I know for sure that I never wrote anywhere that I was a woman, so sentences like "she was lying about the citations she was using" or "she is a dishonest editor", is an attack on me as a woman (it’s easy to say that women lie and are dishonest). And it’s untolerable.
Launebee (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Kudpung. On article NeilN talk to me 02:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For talk page NeilN talk to me 02:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent image-related vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 02:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – June is enough, when the tournament ends. 333-blue 01:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Its already protected + you put this in the wrong section! VarunFEB2003 08:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Done; I agree there's no reason for the protection to remain in place after the competition ends (I've given it until a week after the final to allow cooling-off time). VarunFEB2003, for about the thousandth time will you please actually read things before you shoot your mouth off; there was absolutely nothing wrong with this request. As per the many warnings you regularly remove from your talkpage your repeated incompetent interventions on admin pages are well beyond the disruption line. ‑ Iridescent 08:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Salting: Repeatedly recreated. 96.237.25.200 (talk) 21:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Iitca too, please? 96.237.25.200 (talk) 21:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Three creates is my rule of thumb NeilN talk to me 02:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Justin15w (talk) 00:14, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Content dispute NeilN talk to me 02:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Explosion just occurred here, articles centering around recent events always see a huge increase in vandalism. Joel.Miles925 01:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MB298 (talk) 03:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 05:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism for some time now. Harryhenry1 (talk) 04:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:05, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:43, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Yamakkusa (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 96 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 03:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 04:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flurry of vandalism. They just lost a game, apparently, so it should die down in a day or two. Grayfell (talk) 04:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A week semi-protection will be enough to spoil the fun of an IP-hopping vandal. The Banner talk 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in removing Tonka movie even despite talk page discussion. Spshu (talk) 18:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass vandalism. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 20:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator C.Fred. NeilN talk to me 02:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs kept deleting sourced info. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator DMacks. NeilN talk to me 02:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 months NeilN talk to me 02:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Several people probably close to the subject of the page, constantly try to remove the information already published in Globe and mail and Bloomberg because that info might harm Mr. Mizrahi's business. . Masterofthename (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Masterofthename, do not use this board to request your preferred version be fully protected. Also, please read WP:AGF and WP:NOTVAND. NeilN talk to me 14:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive tense-changing (present to past). KATMAKROFAN (talk) 23:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: On this draft, seems to have coverage in RS for that person. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 18:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- @JzG:--Ymblanter (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The article is essentially unchanged since the last request a month ago, and the problem is exactly the same: the current article is pretty much word for word the one that was deleted, so it's a WP:CSD#G4. It needs to go to WP:DRV. And I hope it does not get undeleted: this is blatant promotion. The first version was created by a user now banned for spamming, so was the second, identical copy. I suspect someone is paying to get this article created. Guy (Help!) 09:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- @JzG: There's a draft version which still a pending AFC submission, It's still not promotion I think. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 15:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- You're right, it's G4 not G11. Slip of the mouse. Guy (Help!) 21:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- @JzG: There's a draft version which still a pending AFC submission, It's still not promotion I think. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 15:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The article is essentially unchanged since the last request a month ago, and the problem is exactly the same: the current article is pretty much word for word the one that was deleted, so it's a WP:CSD#G4. It needs to go to WP:DRV. And I hope it does not get undeleted: this is blatant promotion. The first version was created by a user now banned for spamming, so was the second, identical copy. I suspect someone is paying to get this article created. Guy (Help!) 09:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined (procedural) Katietalk 12:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
19 September 2016
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Hopping IPs calling him an anti-semite, [40], [41], etc. Nymf (talk) 15:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2601:188:1:AEA0:30F8:873F:7608:6364 (talk) 20:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of defamatory content by various IPs. General Ization Talk 20:44, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP vios and edit warring. Wikidemon (talk) 00:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC) An IP / SPA editor has attempted 5 times now in quick succession[42][43][44][45][46] to add weakly sourced and poorly worded accusations about this biographical subject that he is behind the "Birther" accusations that US President Barack Obama is not an American citizen, apparently in support of Donald Trump's false claims to that effect. I have reverted on BLP grounds and attempted to warn the editor, but this does not seem to be working. - Wikidemon (talk) 00:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Of course everything is sourced, and the one doing edit warring and adding zero to the article is Wikidemon. 2604:2000:E883:8200:D843:6A02:9EFE:240D (talk) 00:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Also, it looks like a sock account, or at least an experienced editor who is fast to get into gaming / battle / tendentious mode. Up to 5RR or 6RR now. This material _must_ be deleted on BLP grounds. Thanks - Wikidemon (talk) 03:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on the article of late Japanese voice actress Miyu Matsuki. See contributions 1, 2 and 3. 148.0.121.180 (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:44, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Children playing - again. Perhaps they could concentrate on their school work if they can't edit here. Velella Velella Talk 15:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 11:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @KrakatoaKatie: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Katietalk 20:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP 200.110.156.205 is a sock-puppet by User:PavelStaykov, doesn't know or intentionally ignores WP:BOLD. Crovata (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP's. . Class455 (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Resumption of IP vandalism as seen in prior protections. UW Dawgs (talk) 18:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC) -->
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Ongoing apparent hoax/joke team member being added by IPs periodically, per Talk:Odense_Boldklub#Shanta_Ronaldo. McGeddon (talk) 22:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please warn the user, and report back here if disruption persists. Vanamonde (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued resume of behavior of previous sock-puppet, that has caused the page's multiple protections. livelikemusic talk! 22:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Indefinitely. Vanamonde (talk) 17:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry by socks of Paulydee (talk · contribs). -- Dane2007 talk 23:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry by socks of Paulydee (talk · contribs). -- Dane2007 talk 23:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 23:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Production of Avengers: Infinity War and the untitled Avengers sequel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More good-intentioned IPs editing over pronouns. There was discussion and a direct request from the living person to use "she/her". See Talk:Amandla Stenberg. . EvergreenFir (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Besides, it hasn't been discussed lately, and we don't know if her opinion has changed since she said to leave it. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Most of the edit history is vandalism by anons and reverts. Redtigerxyz Talk 16:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Redtigerxyz: I'm assuming you meant semi-protection in the request: full protection is very rarely used, and would lock you out, too. In view of the fact that some of the editing is in good faith, and that it is not very frequent, I have applied PC instead of semi. Vanamonde (talk) 17:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.189 (talk) 20:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.189 (talk) 20:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.231 (talk) 01:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.189 (talk) 17:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 10:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. - üser:Altenmann >t 20:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC) -->
User(s) blocked. 2A02:2450:10D0:B58:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous editor has blanked or otherwise vandalized the page repeatedly in the last few hours, threatens to "have friends all over the world do the same". Request 48 hours semi-protection. —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 13:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 14:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 14:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 15:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Massive vandalism and strange editing from a particular set of IP addresses.Another way is to go for blocking the IP's. ARUNEEK (talk) 18:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by a sock IP. Mar4d (talk) 20:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
I do not have a WIKI account but I would request Admins to FULLY Protect the page (or still better BAN COMPLETELY this User Mar4d) ONLY AFTER proof-reading it and seeing to it that every claim (of incidents / organizations / figures handed out there) is referenced by unbiased (non-paki and non-chinese) sources. mar4d, who requests protection for this page, has been banned several times (along with fellow vandal User:TopGun), and has come back after much begging, having spent more than half a year in wilderness after what was initially a lifetime ban by User:Bbb23. He and TopGun have openly flouted basic norms of WIKI, indulged in unexplained re-reverts, often put in lies and fabricated claims, and they add a litany of falsities, and say "it a work in progress" (when asked for supporting refs). And that he was indulging in that on this very page as seen here [[47]] They esp TopGun around 4.5 years ago used to indiscriminately add "Separatist/Independence Movements" to India's article left and right [[48]] One of the edits these two lowblooded vandals were trying to push through was this [[49]]. Please see for yourself how many of those said movements were properly sourced. There were about a half a dozen other editors then including some non-Indians who reverted these two vandals but they are not n this article any more. While asserting something on WIKI cannot change the truth on the ground, and the truth is what matters more than anything else, I would like WIKI admins to prevent this from happening any further. WIKI may not be the only source for people looking up information on India, but is certainly one of the foremost sources, and almost among the best one can hope to get on the Net. It would be grossly unfair to WIKI itself more than any other that such lies and fabrications and exaggerations (unsourced) are allowed to remain. 59.92.144.62 (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator SarekOfVulcan. Vanamonde (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. LovelyLillith (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/block evasion. 73.96.114.189 (talk) 20:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 23:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I'm asking for this article to be semi-protected temporary because of introducing incorrect information by an IP hopping user. Mona778 (talk) 23:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That Guy with the Glasses (3rd nomination). SSTflyer 05:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- SSTFlyer: We don't protect pages preemptively, and the last revert of the redirect was in June. Why does this need to be protected? Vanamonde (talk) 05:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93: Multiple administrators supported protection at the AfD discussion. The article has been repeatedly recreated. SSTflyer 10:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected indefinitely. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism from multiple IPs. Surprised this isn't already protected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Please see: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Gabriella~four.3-6. 73.96.114.189 (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 11:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Separatist movements of Pakistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Separatist movements of India (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Banned user (CosmicEmperor ) editing this article. Same goes for Separatist movements of India. SMS Talk 20:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism from anons and non-autoconfirmed editors over the last two days. Entranced98 (talk) 11:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Performing intentional (looks like) disruptive changes by IPs. Charles Turing (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – genre vandalism. Karst (talk) 07:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Current article vandalism Jim1138 (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- The article has been the site of vandalism and disagreements. See [50]. This is usual for these type of attacks, therefore it should be protected for a week. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 08:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- There's also edit-warring going on and some edits have been biased both in favour of the militants and against them. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 09:56, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given it's a current event, I've only protected it for a couple days at this stage. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not just vandalism, but some strange edits. Holy Goo (talk) 14:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Not, strictly speaking, vandalism. Potentially factual errors, with no evidence of malice (indeed, plenty of evidence of IPs trying to be constructive), and actual disruption not severe enough to warrant protection, IMO. Vanamonde (talk) 06:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sock puppetry and POV. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/F2xe7kp9. ⑉Dstone66 ⑆(talk)⑇(contribs)⑈ 16:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 17:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 10:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Zeitgeist sock targets
- Talk:Post-scarcity economy (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Technological utopianism (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:9/11 Truth movement (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by the Zeitgeist Movement socks. Sro23 (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: OK, this article has been harassed enough lately by drive-by IP's adding unreferenced personal life gossip info. (I mean, who cares about the dating lives of teenagers?!... Other teenagers, I guess...) Anyway, it's time to semi this one, please! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 10:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I suggest a quite long semi or PC here, due to the extreme rant and threats made at User talk:68.107.60.119 (which I reverted as a WP:SOAPBOX).
IT IS NOW MY FULL TIME JOB TO ACCOMPLISH THIS GOAL.
,THERE WILL BE MANY CONTINUED DISRUPTIONS…
, andPrepare to War With Us.
Note also the WP:PERSONAL in there. Murph9000 (talk) 22:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If disruption continues after the semi expires please let me know NeilN talk to me 10:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Johnlyh77 (talk) 06:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Additions of problematic and unsourced content, which I would nonetheless not describe as vandalism. Vanamonde (talk) 06:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper (and possible sock) repeatedly removing properly sourced content, see page history. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Fangusu again. Grayfell (talk) 06:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 06:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 14:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for disruptive editing. This does not seem to be vandalism, but a content dispute that's gone a little off the rails. Vanamonde (talk) 06:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Steady vandalism over long periods of time. Another viable solution may be to make a /64 IPV6 range-block on the IP address range that is editing this article, if need be. 73.96.114.189 (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Recently protected by administrator: Oshwah. 73.96.113.78 (talk) 04:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP user. -- Dane2007 talk 23:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalizing the page. Jerod Lycett (talk) 00:56, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: or Pending changes level 2 protection High level of IP and new user vandalism. Requesting either semi-protection or Pending changes protection. The article had over 50 vandalism edits starting at 20:56, September 18, 2016 through 23:17, September 18, 2016 before I was able to restore a non-vandalized version of the article. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 03:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Due to the vandalism edits taking place I changed my proposal for either semi-protection or pending changes level 2 protection because a lot of the accounts that are not IP addresses are vandalizing the page at a rapid rate might be an auto-confirmed user by the software. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 03:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
20 September 2016
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry from User:Sanjana67 using IP. Case page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sanjana67/Archive#19_September_2016. Seruapain (talk) 05:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected I'm not comfortable with applying WP:30/500, but I will semi protect. I'm also going to leave this request for another admin to look over. This admin is free to modify or remove the protection on the article (just let me know if you do). :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: This request is not closed. Asking for a second pair of eyes to review WP:30/500. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- There's only been one autoconfirmed account used here, so I don't think it rises to 30/500 yet. Katietalk 11:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Agree strongly. --NeilN talk to me 13:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- There's only been one autoconfirmed account used here, so I don't think it rises to 30/500 yet. Katietalk 11:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 23:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Editors insist on including the subject's nickname in the article which is irrelevant and has been removed multiple times. Dkendr (talk) 17:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Dkendr, content dispute and not a BLP vio. NeilN talk to me 17:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Content disputes: Historical Revisionism. Neoryder (talk) 17:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Yes, use the talk page. NeilN talk to me 17:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated neologism/made-up page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Secondary sources repeatedly deleted, User do not understand that specialists use different names for the region. Fakirbakir (talk) 15:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Content dispute NeilN talk to me 15:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from several throw away and one auto confirmed editor . Amortias (T)(C) 18:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Anna Frodesiak. NeilN talk to me 19:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent anonymous BLP violations due to Brad Pitt-Angelina Jolie break up. GcSwRhIc (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism going on since yesterday. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page protection just came off and the vandals returned. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- List of Chinese submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: IP jumping account keeps adding unsourced info to this article. Linked to the 2023 Summer Youth Olympics, above. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 16:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 months NeilN talk to me 17:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- List of Hong Kong submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: IP jumping account keeps adding unsourced info to this article. Linked to the 2023 Summer Youth Olympics, above. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 16:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 months NeilN talk to me 17:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – School-based vandalism to page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs have consistently been vandalising this over the past 24 hours. ~ KN2731 {talk} 13:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors seem to be back at it. Once protection expired it looks like it will start all over again. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸(talk) 13:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More addition of unsourced information from IPS after release of latest protection. . Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. David Biddulph (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, in the form of promotional, copyright violation and soapboxing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 month. NeilN talk to me 15:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 03:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection Hoax sites are reporting his death, so the page is being continually updated with this misinformation. Greenman (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 13:32, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Non notable autobiography, removal of speedy templates, likely sock puppeting. 2601:188:1:AEA0:30F8:873F:7608:6364 (talk) 04:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Page deleted NeilN talk to me 04:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Page re-created by another sock. 2601:188:1:AEA0:30F8:873F:7608:6364 (talk) 05:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP interference and continual reversion of corrections. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 05:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary creation protection: Repeatedly created. May gain notability soon, so suggesting temporary protection. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Done -- Page deleted for A7 and G11, salted for one week. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated disruption by LTA IP ("Best-known for" IP) for the past 9+ days. Notifying Doug Weller as well. -- Softlavender (talk) 09:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- On my watchlist, reverted a talk page attack and blocked one. Doug Weller talk 10:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 22:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 03:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.38 (talk) 00:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Under attack from socks. Extended confirmed is better to prevent socks to farm edits, become sleepers, and then be used. 96.237.16.56 (talk) 01:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 03:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disputed edits in Hermine's photo. N-C16 (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Content dispute. NeilN talk to me 02:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Fancruft insertions. Has previously been protected for up to 3 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor removing tags without discussions - left messages on IP talk page and article talk page with no response. Ravensfire (talk) 17:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. NeilN talk to me 02:45, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 02:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and some cases of IP vandalism. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 03:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Justin15w (talk) 04:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – This BLP attracts vandals like flies to honey. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 04:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Two edits to the page and a discussion on the talk page asking you what your concerns are to which you haven't responded is hardly sufficient rationale for protection. 207.161.217.209 (talk) 02:08, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 02:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.115.3 (talk) 02:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 02:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistently unsourced changes/additions to the 'Plot' section by IP editors (many of which appear to be just made up...). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of information not supported by sources, by unsigned users. Parsley Man (talk) 23:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs, discussion on talk page. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To force discussion. NeilN talk to me 03:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term IP vandalism, however there has been some constructive IP additions. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 02:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP vandalism/disruptive editing for no apparent reason. One IP address in particular has made a staggering amount of incorrect vandalising-like edits, making the edit summary page incredibly hard to work through and revert. ThirdWard (talk) 12:44, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: vandalism of the upcoming soundtrack list - It seems that the page has been badly vandalised since late August. We've just had to deal with this on the FNaF Subreddit. I'm going to try to undo the edits according to the source provided for the list. --Kizzycocoa (talk) 21:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Kizzycocoa: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed! --Kizzycocoa (talk) 21:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kizzycocoa, you may want to check latest edits. NeilN talk to me 02:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Launchballer 21:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi protection: Constant POV pushing along with edit warring and socking. 73.96.113.38 (talk) 01:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article keeps getting deleted when it should not be. Name13013 (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Nominated for deletion, and full protection is inappropriate during AFD. Katietalk 20:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Chris1834 Talk 01:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP edit warring over pointless, inaccurate, and, in some cases, moronic edits like the one where the IPs acting in tandem feel it necessary to add parentheses to the parents' names in case it's not clear that Thomas Farley was his father and Mary Anne Farley his mother (see [51], [52], [53], [54]). Quis separabit? 01:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Someguy1221. NeilN talk to me 02:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: On this draft, seems to have coverage in RS for that person. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 18:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- @JzG:--Ymblanter (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The article is essentially unchanged since the last request a month ago, and the problem is exactly the same: the current article is pretty much word for word the one that was deleted, so it's a WP:CSD#G4. It needs to go to WP:DRV. And I hope it does not get undeleted: this is blatant promotion. The first version was created by a user now banned for spamming, so was the second, identical copy. I suspect someone is paying to get this article created. Guy (Help!) 09:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined (procedural) Katietalk 12:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- It can't be exactly word for word from what was delete. The AfD was on 2 February 2016. Since then, new news stories has came out about the subject this summer (ie [[55]], [[56]], [[57]], and [[58]]). Here [[59]] is a copy of the deleted page. If you look, you'll see that it is much different than the draft, especially since it includes the new news stories -- something that the deleted version could not have had. Because of that, it can't be WP:CSD#G4. Yeah, the first two copies were blatant spam but that doesn't mean the subject is forbidden from obtaining an entry in the encyclopedia. The requirements for an entry is that a subject must meet the notability guideline from reliable sources, which this one does. CerealKillerYum (talk) 22:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated BLP vandalism returned when recent semi-protection expired. Deli nk (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman ✈ 20:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP genre warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP genre warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP genre warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Please see: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Gabriella~four.3-6. 73.96.114.189 (talk) 17:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Sock account blocked by CFred, and I just blocked the IP. Vanamonde (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of sockpuppets making bizarre and unexplained test edits. . Sro23 (talk) 22:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of back and forth nuisance IP anon / socking for last several days. Change a letter or two, etc. Dual Freq (talk) 23:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Same socks as Lockheed C-130 Hercules above. --Dual Freq (talk) 23:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Please see: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Gabriella~four.3-6. 73.96.114.189 (talk) 17:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Sock account blocked by CFred, and I just blocked the IP. Vanamonde (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on the article of late Japanese voice actress Miyu Matsuki. See contributions 1, 2 and 3. 148.0.121.180 (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:44, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 19:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 11:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @KrakatoaKatie: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Katietalk 20:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Children playing - again. Perhaps they could concentrate on their school work if they can't edit here. Velella Velella Talk 15:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Hopping IPs calling him an anti-semite, [60], [61], etc. Nymf (talk) 15:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP 200.110.156.205 is a sock-puppet by User:PavelStaykov, doesn't know or intentionally ignores WP:BOLD. Crovata (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP's. . Class455 (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Resumption of IP vandalism as seen in prior protections. UW Dawgs (talk) 18:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC) -->
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 18:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2601:188:1:AEA0:30F8:873F:7608:6364 (talk) 20:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
21 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated mindless vandalism by IPs since article appeared on front page. Echoedmyron (talk) 21:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Apparent spillover from multiple articles on Idaho school districts, all of which may require protection. See my recent edit history. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- This isn't a content dispute. No one is talking....just repeated re insertion of promo material and unreferenced BLP content about the criminal conduct of a former employee. John from Idegon (talk) 04:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Drmies deleted the Idaho school district articles as copyright violations. This one is still undergoing disruption from related accounts. 2601:188:1:AEA0:9CA8:8C33:3D8F:7E65 (talk) 04:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Widr. NeilN talk to me 16:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject apparently has just passed away, large amount of vandalism from IPs. Might need protection for a few days. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment. Yes please. Article subject died in an overnight single-car accident, some inaccuracies were initially reported so I expect some back&forth vandal-edits at least on the manner of death. Also I just now reverted a vandal-edit. Shearonink (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Copyright violations and promotional editing. clpo13(talk) 16:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 months NeilN talk to me 16:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – per continued issue about Pat Smear as discussed here: [62]. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism two IPs same person Jim1138 (talk) 07:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – It's been several months since the allegations thrown at her about a scandalous video allegedly involving the subject first emerged, yet it still rages on as anons keep on adding it to the page. To top it all off, the subject is a minor and as such gossip like this would be borderline child abuse. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Done by Nick. Guy (Help!) 14:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated changes of pronouns for a recently-deceased trans person by different IPs, plus edit warring over details over cause of death. EdChem (talk) 14:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Guy (Help!) 14:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping spammer. Deli nk (talk) 14:43, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Guy (Help!) 14:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of content and adding spam. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 23:45, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and other non-encyclopedic additions. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 00:26, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Just in case Brangelina fanboys start vandalizing... KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.54 (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Longterm semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from both vandalism-only accounts and vandal ips that showed up almost immediately after the page's page protection expired.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: Hold on this. The recent disruption was because the article was a TFA. Let's see if disruption continues. NeilN talk to me 14:29, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Looks quiet. NeilN talk to me 23:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by anonymous vandal using multiple IPs. This person continues to remove content and citations without any explanation, switching between more than 5 different IP addresses. When myself or others undo this vandalism, with in days or hours the vandal removes the content and citations again. The article was protected for three weeks (ending August 17) and the vandalism started again and has continued.--Kfg12 (talk) 18:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection. This article has been under nonstop attack from two sides: a group of people who work there and are probably adding reams of promotional edits as part of their jobs, and a group of people who really, really don't like the company's founder, Felipe Luna. (For that matter, Luna has almost certainly edited here under more than one identity.) It's just been a perpetual stream of promo edits, attack edits, and reverts since the article, which still doesn't have a talk page, was created just over a month ago. (See also the excellent roundup at the COI noticeboard that User:TimBuck2 put together.) RunnyAmiga ※ talk 21:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, it was just speedy deleted by User:Courcelles. I guess that's one way to solve this. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 22:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- RunnyAmiga: I'm also running down some socks. Courcelles (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done. Just a notice for the bot. MelanieN (talk) 00:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- RunnyAmiga: I'm also running down some socks. Courcelles (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 01:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 03:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: per my request on my subpage. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 01:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, check history. CutOffTies (talk) 02:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP and newly registered user vandalism. Page is a redirect, but since the main article (Killing of Harambe) is protected this one gets the vandals instead. GreenC 02:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 03:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- User:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga/About (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga/Modifiedinb (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: User request against vandalism. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: After four-day semi-protection expired, IP is back to edit-warring, with what looks like pointy deletion of uncontroversial content. Just plain Bill (talk) 00:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 00:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: On this draft, seems to have coverage in RS for that person. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 18:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- The article is essentially unchanged since the last request a month ago, and the problem is exactly the same: the current article is pretty much word for word the one that was deleted, so it's a WP:CSD#G4. It needs to go to WP:DRV. And I hope it does not get undeleted: this is blatant promotion. The first version was created by a user now banned for spamming, so was the second, identical copy. I suspect someone is paying to get this article created. Guy (Help!) 09:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- RFPP|d (procedural) Katietalk 12:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- It can't be exactly word for word from what was delete. The AfD was on 2 February 2016. Since then, new news stories has came out about the subject this summer (ie [[63]], [[64]], [[65]], and [[66]]). Here [[67]] is a copy of the deleted page. If you look, you'll see that it is much different than the draft, especially since it includes the new news stories -- something that the deleted version could not have had. Because of that, it can't be WP:CSD#G4. Yeah, the first two copies were blatant spam but that doesn't mean the subject is forbidden from obtaining an entry in the encyclopedia. The requirements for an entry is that a subject must meet the notability guideline from reliable sources, which this one does. CerealKillerYum (talk) 22:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Not unprotected Word for word doesn't matter, and an AFD cannot be so easily overturned without consensus. Please use WP:DRV rather than unarchiving this request. Courcelles (talk) 15:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 17:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 17:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Poorly sourced and vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of disruption. Qed237 (talk) 23:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.MelanieN (talk) 00:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing on BLP. Qed237 (talk) 23:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article has needed protection repeatedly.MelanieN (talk) 00:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPv6 user(s) involved. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Eleven vandalism attempts from four anonymous IPs in less than 36 hours, from 18:00 19 September to 22:24 20 September. The most recent added the text "nice meme", which makes me wonder if the editors are responding to something off-wiki. Cnilep (talk) 23:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This article has been targeted for some time, by IPs claiming the subject murdered Kurt Cobain. Normally it is a simple revert, but it was last in the article for 5 days unnoticed. As a clear BLP issue, page protection is warranted. freshacconci talk to me 21:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 21:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page was semi-protected for a day. After it was lifted, major edit war broke out between unconfirmed users with ugly language being thrown around. This is too hot a topic to be left unprotected. (And, the page gets 70,000 views per day at the moment.). Kautilya3 (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
22 September 2016
full protection: Failure to reach consensus on basic WP requirements (see talk page). Keith-264 (talk) 07:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, it is currently fully protected, and the protection expires today. Please come back if the edit-warring resumes.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: vandalism – IPs/new users There has been repeated removal of all content mentioning the referenced fact that the subject of the bio was a transgender man by IP editors and transient accounts with no discussion in Talk. This has been happening for months. Jerilyn Franz (talk) 11:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism is being noticed, as a result of current events. . Sport and politics (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Beat me to it - support this. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:50, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring over names and home towns etc. AussieLegend (✉) 09:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:09, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent disruptive edit. Especially changing box office figures. This has been occurring since a long time now. Essex-1799 (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 03:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by Paul Erik. Vanamonde (talk) 06:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit Warring. AIRcorn (talk) 09:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent and disruptive vandalism by IP address users. StannisIBaratheonFOHN (talk) 11:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protection: Repeatedly recreated after CSD A7 action. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 03:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MPS1992 (talk) 08:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPv6 hopping vandal comes back every few days to add different genres to infobox. -- ferret (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:50, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 2 weeks by Sergecross73. tutterMouse (talk) 07:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:31, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism throughout the last few hours. --GouramiWatcherTalk 21:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 10 days by Oshwah. tutterMouse (talk) 07:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Schoolchildren. 2601:188:1:AEA0:9CA8:8C33:3D8F:7E65 (talk) 13:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In view of the fact that IPs are also making most of the constructive edits to the page. Vanamonde (talk) 06:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted per CSD G11 three times in September 2016. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been protected three times in three weeks, and vandalism started right up again. Probably needs a longer duration this time. agtx 03:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:09, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 05:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 08:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism. Alumnum (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unconstructive, misplaced edits by new users who incorrectly think this is where to ask about creating pages. Everymorning (talk) 04:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done. I'm always reluctant to protect talk pages, and in particular this one. These questions are coming from some of our most clueless newbies; let's guide them elsewhere and not just lock them out. Instead I added some better instructions, in a way that I think newbies might see them, and I hatted a thread called "can't create a page why?" which was just attracting the same question over and over. MelanieN (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing with unsourced material, needing incessant reverts (some airline fanboys really want their preferred carrier be on top of whatever metric, but they don't understand the need for neutral, simultaneous comparisons and unbiased sources. Not vandalism as it is made in good faith, but it is causing the article to be difficult to maintain.) --Marc Lacoste (talk) 08:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 08:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – removal of sourced content and replacement with promotional content, some of which is unsourced, by IP editor. Neutralitytalk 04:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is already under indefinite Pending Changes protection, but recently the disruption has been too frequent for PC to work well. The PC protection should kick back in after the semi expires. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption -- IP's and unconfirms constantly changing/adding unsourced content. Article recently came out of protection, I recommend extended coverage. LLArrow (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This is a problem article. There is persistent low-level vandalism and, because of the language issues, it's also near impossible for en:WP to monitor or check this. I have no solutions, but semi protection might at least reduce the vandalism. . Andy Dingley (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – one year. EdJohnston (talk) 23:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A spate of promotional vandalism. Launchballer 17:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent removal of CSD tag by IP's. Likely socks of the creator. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done Page deleted. NeilN talk to me 17:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sro23 (talk) 21:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
23 September 2016
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism High level of IP vandalism. BlaccCrab (talk) 17:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Of 108 edits over the last 50 days, only 31 were constructive (12 from IP/new editors). 41 edits were identified as vandalism, and 36 were vandalism reverts. Of the 29 edits over the last 10 days, no edits were constructive; all were vandalism or reversions of such. —Laoris (talk) 18:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Mr. Luckey is receiving a lot of press coverage today for his association with an alt-right "shitposting" group[68]. Considering the topic and the misplaced "enthusiasm" already displayed by few IP editors, temp semi protect might be a very good idea. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 19:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- And a note: amount of vandalism and BLP violations is increasing dramatically now. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 21:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:22, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 14:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Page was unprotected, and there's already daily vandalism again. MSJapan (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 20:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Page could be a target of vandalism due to Shooting of Keith Lamont Scott. Page has had the chief's name replaced with that of a disgraced officer who resigned nine years ago. Made note of it in talk page with citations. Brandon (talk) 08:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, we do not protect pages pre-emptively. Please feel free to bring it here if actual vandalism starts.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- List of awards and nominations received by Family Guy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent block evasion by User:Atomic Meltdown. Sro23 (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, we do not protect pages against a single IP (who in fact has never been even warned).--Ymblanter (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: vandalism. Wagemut (talk) 12:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, we do not protect pages against a single user. Action should be sought against this user, please follow the dispute resolution procedures.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Redirect that is being changed repeatedly into an article with no information in it. . Killer Moff (talk) 15:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., this will take care of IPs, but you still need to deal with the autoconfirmed user.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent hoaxing by IPs. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kenny Loggins vandal. Indefinite semi-protection requested on this redirect page. If a topic can ever be made of this song then a registered account can write the article. Binksternet (talk) 16:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Also, the similar redirect Almost Over You should be protected for the same reason. These two redirects should not be made available for IP editors to create a new article (since new articles should only be created by registered users), and they certainly should not be available for more hoaxing by the Kenny Loggins vandal. Binksternet (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I only protect one redirect, we do not protect pages pre-emptively. Feel free to bring it here if disruptive editing starts.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated additions of defamatory content by a couple of IPs. Echoedmyron (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Still happening. Echoedmyron (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Redirect that is being changed repeatedly into an article with no information in it. . Killer Moff (talk) 15:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., this will take care of IPs, but you still need to deal with the autoconfirmed user.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent hoaxing by IPs. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kenny Loggins vandal. Indefinite semi-protection requested on this redirect page. If a topic can ever be made of this song then a registered account can write the article. Binksternet (talk) 16:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Also, the similar redirect Almost Over You should be protected for the same reason. These two redirects should not be made available for IP editors to create a new article (since new articles should only be created by registered users), and they certainly should not be available for more hoaxing by the Kenny Loggins vandal. Binksternet (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I only protect one redirect, we do not protect pages pre-emptively. Feel free to bring it here if disruptive editing starts.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated additions of defamatory content by a couple of IPs. Echoedmyron (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Still happening. Echoedmyron (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Sro23's user and talk pages
- User:Sro23 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User talk:Sro23 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 22:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. TM 12:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of poorly sourced claims by multiple IP's. Mlpearc (open channel) 13:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High-level of violation on a BLP article. livelikemusic talk! 13:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High-level of violation on a BLP article. livelikemusic talk! 13:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of promotional content. Two registered accounts have been blocked, but IPs remain active. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption by multiple IPs. Qed237 (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced content; in this case, it is the anagrams that come from the titles, which require sources. While the anagram may be obvious, many editors ignore the notes and add them without sources. This issue also occurred for Season 1, all the way from Sep '15 to May '16. Alex|The|Whovian? 09:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The user is vandalizing the article, although there's no consensus on the talk page. Kouhi (talk) 11:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined. This is clearly a content dispute, the IP talk page is a redlink, and both of you clearly overstepped WP:3RR. Just stop reverting and start discussing. If the IP proves to be non-responsive but continues reverting, use dispute resolution avenues.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 12:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Three slightly-different IPs have tried removing the AfD template from this article since it went up yesterday. McGeddon (talk) 12:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined. This is a clearly legitimate protection request, however, I believe, that protection in this case is not the best solution. The article is AfDed and is on its way to deletion, however, an IP can still save it by adding reliable sources (e.g. in Urdu) there. And removal of an AfD template can be reverted in one click and has indeed been so far done by three different editors.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent removal of sourced info by a biased IP editor. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined. This is just one IP. Please warn them (they have a redlink talk page), and, if they continue without any reasonable response, report them to 3RRN or AIV.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Past protections never helped. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – Indefinite. EdJohnston (talk) 15:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Karst (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 03:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by multiple IP addresses. CLCStudent (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in infobox. TonyIsTheWoman (talk) 21:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of BLP violations as a result of recent news at Wells Fargo. Needs semi protection. Bahooka (talk) 21:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IPs seem to think its funny to keep adding a dead pig to the casualties dection of the info box. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 23:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppets of User:Fangusu making block appeals on my talk page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 03:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Fangusu. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Indian rap god" promo spam. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Kudpung. — MusikAnimal talk 03:38, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism, with a recent spree of disruptive edits; no reason template should be edited anyway. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fuortu (talk) 00:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since this was listed under "recent deaths", this article have attracted numerous amount of vandalisms. Donnie Park (talk) 00:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – POV editing, with unresolved talk page discussion. – S. Rich (talk) 01:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- And, of course, reversion to the article prior to the addition of potential BLPVIO. Cheers, Muffled Pocketed 05:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see anything egregious in the current revision, so it will be left as-is — MusikAnimal talk 03:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I think this may be a good idea considering this just recently happened and I think we don't need IP editors vandalising and/or inserting false claims. Requesting this go until around Sunday, where I hope things die down. Past that I would recommend leaving it at pending changes protection. MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 02:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Tried to request RPP too. Too much POV and poorly sourced edits. Examples: [69], [70], Special:Contributions/67.138.115.226. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
{{RFPP|d}}
Doesn't look that out of hand — MusikAnimal talk 03:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)- @MusikAnimal: Been a few more BLP vios today. Mind taking a look again? EvergreenFir (talk) 04:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Only been two unconstructive edits since my decline, but I suppose that's enough... To be fair, the disruptive edits are buried in with the good ones given the edit rate is so high. Hopefully things will have cooled off come tomorrow — MusikAnimal talk 04:38, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two acts of vandalism within two days. Evking22 (talk) 02:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Being whitewashed by an IP and two new accounts. Jim1138 (talk) 04:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most recent unconfirmed edit doesn't look particularly unconstructive — MusikAnimal talk 03:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 06:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Section persistently blanked by COI accounts. Ton of COI promotional editing in general. Citobun (talk) 08:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent removal of the well sourced Russia section. Yintan 09:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — MusikAnimal talk 04:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive and vandalism-like editing. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite creation protection: Creation protection required on this article too. See Sobrr. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, don't bother if you don't want to. I've created the Sobrr article, and now any new ones can be deleted by A10. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:31, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Requests for creation protections should mention "Creation protection" instead of "Full protection". Thank you. NasssaNserand his edits 10:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Looks like this is not needed — MusikAnimal talk 04:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs/new users. Marianna251TALK 10:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constantly being used for editing tests in the past 6 months. NasssaNserand his edits 10:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 04:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Someone is trying to make large changes without discussion. See recent history and attempt to start discussion on article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 10:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 04:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP edits after temp protection expired. Aloha27 talk 13:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon repeatedly adding unsourced info even after being warned. Sitush (talk) 14:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: After the previous year-long semi-protection ended two days ago, a group of IP hoppers began disruptively editing the page again. Katniss ♥ 14:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent hoaxing by IPs. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Kenny Loggins vandal. Binksternet (talk) 16:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Immediate and continued vandalism after previous semi-protection expired. Lizard (talk) 16:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Have also opened a thread at ANI about related vandalism to multiple articles. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Borcker socks restoring an AfD'd redirect. McGeddon (talk) 21:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – by IP hopping vandal. Sro23 (talk) 02:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 02:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.A085TO (Talk) 07:05, 23 September (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 03:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection/pending changes: There could be potential vandalism by IP users so its best to do so. 108.162.176.163 (talk) 04:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MusikAnimal.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection/pending changes:
Recent edits have been largely unhelpful additions with WP:BLP issues.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 06:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – excessive vandalism from ips and new users. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 08:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The only IP edits this article has gotten in the past year are people watching last year's Big Bang Theory episode where characters discuss the wording of the first sentence of the Mexican standoff Wikipedia article, and editing the article to reflect the joke. McGeddon (talk) 08:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes, the article is edited too infrequently for semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by anon editors. The page is under the purview of ARBIP 1RR restriction. SMS Talk 09:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 10:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Title protection: User:MeKinkya and an associated ip have recreated the page 3 or 4 times after it was speedied. A picture of a dead fish (talk) 10:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
24 September 2016
Semi-protection: Editing by sock of banned User:Vote (X) for Change. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change. In this diff a familiar theme of creating confusion about the role of mean solar time. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:10, 24 September 2016 (UTC) -->
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:52, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Removal of semi-protection. The article was semi-protected in 2010 and I see no reason to believe that the article continues to be at risk of heavy and persistent vandalism by unregistered users. (Note: The protecting administrator does not appear to be active and is listed at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians.) 207.161.217.209 (talk) 06:07, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:26, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected Let's see what happens. Katietalk 17:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: The article hasn't been edited since the protection. I believe that it could be tested with unprotection for a while?. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected Katietalk 17:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 17:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit warring with no consensus for the added material. Existing discussions at Talk:Drew_Pinsky#Comments on Hillary Clinton's health and Talk:Hillary Clinton/Archive 40#Dr. Drew. This is latest article to attempt to bypass the prior consensus on other articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of the article wrote a controversial tweet. Requesting short-term protection as BLP violations (calling them a racist) have been added off and on since by IP and new accounts. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: repeated recreation of non-encyclopedic material from a redirect. Ymblanter (talk) 09:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Also ¿Quién quiere ser millonario? (Argentina), same problem--Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Jo-Jo Eumerus.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Dr. Drew On Call (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) temporary semi-protection due to silly season' - please semi-protect until the elections are over. IP-hopper edit warring in content that pinsky was fired because of his comments about Clinton. Jytdog (talk) 16:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- List of territorial entities where French is an official language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Top Model
- America's Next Top Model (cycle 12) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Australia's Next Top Model (cycle 5) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Australia's Next Top Model (cycle 9) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Austria's Next Topmodel (cycle 1) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Austria's Next Topmodel (cycle 7) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Top Model (Norway cycle 4) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 14:39, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP hopping editor continually adding poorly sourced rants. Vanamonde (talk) 15:15, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:16, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:31, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Appears to be sockpuppetry by User:Paulydee via IP. -- Dane2007 talk 02:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection for say 1 month. IP editor who is obvious sock of Skullballoons (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Skullballoons/Archive) is making endless meaningless changes. Jytdog (talk) 03:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, this is one IP and they did not show up for 30h. If they reappear and continue reverting, pls bring them to 3RRN or AIV.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – mixture of disruptive/vandalism/BLP. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 07:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, and addition of speculative information regarding the event which has yet to be confirmed by organisers. IP/anon editors showing no understanding of policies. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 16:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection. ~Manila's PogingJuan 10:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Candidate whose party failed to make the ballot and does not seem to understand formatting for these types of articles repeatedly makes nonconstructive edits, and has for quite some time. ALPolitico (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – -. LouisAragon (talk) 15:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- See also, regarding the massive extent of activities of these socks, this ANI section; [71] - LouisAragon (talk) 17:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Doug Weller.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent school vandalism. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IPs and seldom used accounts repeatedly inserting details about Crutcher's past criminal record, which isn't relevant to the subject of the article and is being used to besmirch him days after his death. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined I agree that there are a lot of edits that are besmirching and undue, but not all of them are coming from IP/new users, and there is an overall productive trend in the article's editing history. Responding on the talk page thread about criminal record to suggest a hidden comment addressing some of the problematic edits. Airplaneman ✈ 05:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Oshwah.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Appears to be sockpuppetry by User:Paulydee via IP. -- Dane2007 talk 02:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We're getting ready for the MLB postseason I see... – Muboshgu (talk) 04:11, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by IP of block editor Kdchan (talk · contribs) after expiration of previous semi-protection. . —Farix (t | c) 23:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 4 different IP vandalism in 3 days. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Move protection: Page-move vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Evking22 (talk) 23:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 05:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism after recent release from protection. Last protected by administrator Airplaneman. 73.96.113.108 (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Appreciate the vigilance, but the viewership of the article is down and there's only been one vandal. I would like to keep it unprotected for now, but it's on my watchlist. Airplaneman ✈ 04:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has seen a lot of disruptive editing and addition of puffery. I had previously tried to remove it and ended up being threatened (See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive915#Possible_veiled_threat_by_IP_editor_on_my_user_talk_page). This page was later edited to an NPOV version by Jytdog. It seems now that the same editor (who had threatened me) is coming back to return it to the previous state of puffery. I suggest a temporary semi-protection of a month or two. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:23, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP replacing agreed and sourced text against long consensus. Velella Velella Talk 22:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 05:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnie Park (talk) 23:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Since the beginng of the school semester, this page has been vadalized numerous times by IP and user accounts especialy created for vandalism. It would be a good idea to put a semi-protection not only on IPs but on new users for a certain cooling period. Pierre cb (talk) 00:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to add a politically-tinged term ("Ballghazi") as an alternate name for Defllategate. It was a political dig at the time which has gone nowhere, but someone from Houston is ip-hopping and repeatedly adding the statement, claiming no need for discussion. Tarl N. (discuss) 22:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent changes from Kuk to Kek even if the discussion about this issue is still ongoing on the talk page; Furthermore, several meme-related disruptions. Khruner (talk) 23:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:15, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recent persistent vandalism from multiple IPs that is sometimes standing for almost a day before getting reverted. Air.light (talk) 22:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 05:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of scam phone numbers to this article and others in the software category. -- Dane2007 talk 21:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of scam phone numbers to this article and others in the software category. -- Dane2007 talk 21:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MER-C 05:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of scam phone numbers to this article and others in the software category. -- Dane2007 talk 21:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MER-C 05:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of scam phone numbers to this article and others in the software category. -- Dane2007 talk 21:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of scam phone numbers to this article and others in the software category. -- Dane2007 talk 21:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MER-C 05:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unsourced BLP additions by IP editor. -- Gestrid (talk) 04:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 05:10, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: High level of spamming from new editor whose article is at AFD. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 02:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC1 clearly seems to be ineffective here, as users are still submitting vandalism as pending changes requests, wasting our (reviewers) time. Lets have a go at upping the protection to Semi Protection and see how that goes. Class455 (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 04:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 03:52, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Near daily IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 03:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's football season again! Airplaneman ✈ 04:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been repeatedly and consistently vandalized whenever it has been unprotected. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 03:57, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 04:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP (s) trying to vandalise the page. Those jets are not active in Indian Air Force they are trying to add these. Spartacus! t@lk 04:00, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 04:23, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP(s) try to vandalise the page. Spartacus! t@lk 04:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month in view of long-term issues, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 02:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Widr., who semi-protected for what looks like 3 days. Neutralitytalk 02:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Permanent Edit Review: Newcomer to the page, but I see large amounts of vandalism. Usually adding towns that are in other states.--JJBers Public (talk) 17:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 02:39, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
25 September 2016
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High potential for vandalism, since it is one of the most disliked videos on Youtube. Evking22 (talk) 16:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 16:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Katie, we apparently crossed, and I protected in the meanwhile - the article was protected for 2 month until Sep 20, and after the protection expired there were at least two bad edits (I did not chek again). I therefore thought it would be a good idea to protect the article for 6 months. Could you please have a look; if you still think it should not be protected I will remove the protection. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: No problem - it was a borderline for me, so let's go with your decision. :-) Katietalk 16:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: No problem - it was a borderline for me, so let's go with your decision. :-) Katietalk 16:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Katie, we apparently crossed, and I protected in the meanwhile - the article was protected for 2 month until Sep 20, and after the protection expired there were at least two bad edits (I did not chek again). I therefore thought it would be a good idea to protect the article for 6 months. Could you please have a look; if you still think it should not be protected I will remove the protection. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There are endless unsourced cast changes, and cast rearrangements - the same reason for the previous pp. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 years. EdJohnston (talk) 20:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Return of a sock of User: Vote (X) for Change. Once again denegrating UTC and exaggerating the importance of GMT. Diff. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change. This page had to be protected before for the same reason: [72]. Jc3s5h (talk) 18:45, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- See Special:Permalink/741077832#Who is 73.96.113.63/73.96.114.82?. Don't feed the trolls. They just come back for more. 79.79.52.55 (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- In view of the troll's promise to keep it up, I request permanent semi-protection. Jc3s5h (talk) 19:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep what up? This is a matter for the article talk page. The only person who ever complains is Jc3s5h, who thinks he owns these articles. 79.79.52.55 (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – Indef. EdJohnston (talk) 20:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- In view of the troll's promise to keep it up, I request permanent semi-protection. Jc3s5h (talk) 19:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple Anon Users vandalism.vandalism Mr.User200 (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 16:41, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The editor using multiple IPs is back with the same car-related vandalism the page has been previously protected for. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 20:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. A member of Florida's secondary, Tabor's page is under heavy attack by unfunny fans of Tennessee coach Butch Jones. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 20:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 20:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry and WP:BLP violations. The protection should be applied through the US election. - MrX 12:16, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing a need for ECP here. Maybe semi, but ECP is overkill. Anyone want to pitch in here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrakatoaKatie (talk • contribs)
- (edit conflict) I am not convinced there is a pressing need for EC protection here. Since there is obvious disruptive editing by IP addresses, I have semi-protected this past the date of the US election. However, I think a second opinion might be useful here, so I'm not marking this done: and should another admin feel the need for EC protection, please apply it without feeling the need to consult me. Vanamonde (talk) 16:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 7 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Concur with Vanamonde93 and close. Favonian (talk) 16:45, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated insertion of unnecessary trivia and BLPVIO (children, etc, unsourced) by anonynous account. Muffled Pocketed 14:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sockpuppetry by Bigshowandkane64. Katietalk 16:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Puppeteer noted!Many thanks, Muffled Pocketed 16:42, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protection - Once this is deleted could I ask this be salted please?, This has already been created and deleted twice and was CSD'd as a hoax (Google brings up no such programme - The "Middle East Special was by the UK Top Gear, Thanks, . –Davey2010Talk 14:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely.. And yet again deleted as blatant hoax. Thank you, Davey2010. Bishonen | talk 15:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- No worries Bishonen and thank you for salting it :). –Davey2010Talk 17:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Apparently this chap made some inflammatory comments, and the page has been receiving some grief for it. Requesting semi-protection for a new user (via IRC) who is having trouble understanding the RPP interface. Primefac (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:34, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Top Model
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 16:34, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 12:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 16:34, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Can was please get partial protection on this page limiting it to registered users only? Already we have vandalism like this, this and this from IPs. —МандичкаYO 😜 18:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:41, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Jose Fernandez recently died and this page is highly visible article. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 14:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Seconded. There's already been plenty of vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.30.101.226 (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Done by Widr. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 15:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: It seems like I have chosen wrong protection yesterday, Sept. 24. I forgot that my user page, with full protection, cannot be edited by myself. Please grant my user page the semi-protection, instead of the full page, so I can also edit. Thank you!. ~Manila's PogingJuan 15:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.182 (talk) 16:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.182 (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Constant edit warring. . Fuortu (talk) 00:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Page still needs protecting, continual addition of BLP policy violations. --Hillbillyholiday talk 13:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP blanking. — Film Fan 11:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Tito Dutta (talk) 14:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs Accireioj (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated IP-hopping, unsourced changes to sourced material, and additions of WP:Undue weight, by an editor who was repeatedly warned for this type of behavior. Despite concerns expressed on the article talk page, the editor keeps making these type of changes. Instead of signing in and commenting, the editor has chosen to continue to IP hop and edit war. Right now, it is a slow edit war, but it needs to stop nevertheless. I ask that the article be semi-protected for at least two months, which will likely lead the editor to at least sign in and take his case to the talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
And as for what ties Rafe87 to the IPs, other than the same type of editing, see this discussion where Rafe87 admits to being a 177. IP range. The IP hopper at the Gay sexual practices article has a 177. IP range (well, it's just one of the ranges that Rafe87 uses; 177.40.231.23 and 177.42.183.110 are among the Rafe87 IPs I've noted reverting at the article). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 08:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Update: More evidence is seen here; the editor has suddenly edited under his registered account after months of only editing as IPs. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Anyone can see my edits - the ones you keep removing - are sourced and that I'm not engaging in any edit warring. I made some edits, all of which extensively sourced, and then you arbitrarily reverted then, and that's it. I'm not doing anything to deserve your callousness and accusations, and I never tried to use the IP to escape accountability for my actions, since I have from the beginning admitted it was me, as you helpfully admit. Anyway, I've called on arbitration to weigh in on this matter. I humbly ask the moderators to delay their decision on protecting the page until arbitration is exhausted. Rafe87 (talk) 10:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Additions being sourced do not mean they should stay. If you would take the time to learn this site's rules instead of always trying to do what you want and edit warring, you would know that. And as for IP hopping, your IP hopping is problematic because you are clearly trying to evade scrutiny and avoid discussion when you do it and because you are not just the 177. IP range. You use other IP ranges too, whether you admit to it or not. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only three hours after the protection ended, the IP vandal was back. The Banner talk 08:16, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:13, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite creation protection: This appears to be simply a recreation of the already salted The Psycho Series, minus the "The." Do we really need to take it to Afd? . Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: heavy IP vandalism of late (see [73]). Quis separabit? 21:23, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Probable SPI is back at it. M.O. is to make edits like this this, sometimes across multiple articles and with both IP and new accounts. Temp semi until they settle down. Montanabw(talk) 23:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same old Top Model abuse from an IPv6 range. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 01:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sports figure is subject of speculation concerning a team change[74], change to associated team is repeatedly being made prematurely and without any announcement by the subject or his agent. Please protect for a few days to allow the dust to settle. General Ization Talk 01:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Top Model IP range abuse again. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 01:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 01:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And persistant BLP vios. I had edited once during a large line of revert-revert-revert and then there is another reversion of a vandalistic edit on that article 3 hours after my edit. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Either that or restore indefinate pending changes (no pending changes at the moment). Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Edit war/vandalism due to the recent "Irish Slavery" myth-meme being passed around as fact. It has been going on since June 2016 from time to time. It is heating heat up again with October/Halloween approachingCaptainStegge (talk) 18:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:42, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.182 (talk) 18:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- This has already been done 3 times this year. I think permanent pending changes would be appropriate. agtx 18:29, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 18:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:45, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After protection expired, vandalism and socking continues. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 19:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
various wrestler pages
- A.J. Styles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Charlotte (wrestler) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Becky Lynch (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs (and one named account) attacking these articles with BLP violating claims. Meters (talk) 19:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Done for various lengths. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Stephen Yagman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Semi-protection -- the instant the page is unprotected the vandalism resumes (see here, here, and here). That should be clear by now after years of this nonsense. Leave it protected permanently.
It's a pain in the ass going on for years now.Quis separabit? 20:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC) - Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected. until March 2017. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Non-neutral language ("terrorist", "kill babies", etc.) has been persistently added to the article for the past few months, in addition to other general vandalism. It was previously semi-protected temporarily. GhostOfNoMeme (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption and block evasion from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. . Binksternet (talk) 15:39, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption and block evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 15:59, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued removal of content by IP. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued vandalism. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:34, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 06:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism, violations of WP:BLP that will likely continue in the upcoming weeks. Lizard (talk) 06:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Failure to reach consensus on basic WP requirements (see talk page).Keith-264 (talk) 07:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Keith-264: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, see below--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Permanent full protection or extended confirmed protection: See this. Also arbitration is highly active on this article. 96.237.20.169 (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – This article is already semiprotected. Some editors mentioned in that ANI report such as Wikiwürmleini (talk · contribs) and PoliticoSearch (talk · contribs) are already blocked as socks. If you think that more needs to be done, you might file an SPI or ask User:Bbb23. EdJohnston (talk) 01:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of edit warring and blanking after page protection wore off. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 06:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The1337gamer (talk) 23:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 01:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – As soon as previous protection expired, the IP hopper was back, adding unsourced content. Sro23 (talk) 14:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 01:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP vandals are back again. Primefac (talk) 14:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. One IP blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 01:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
False dates in astrology articles
- Aries (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Taurus (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Gemini (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Cancer (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Leo (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Virgo (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Libra (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Scorpio (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sagittarius (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Capricorn (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Aquarius (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Pisces (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Systematic incorrect claims about dates, often vaguely citing NASA, often changing template parameter to incorrect or malformed value. Going on since 3 September, suggest protection period be double the activity period, 38 days. IPs in different parts of world, 1 new registered user. diff 1 diff 2 diff 3 diff 4 diff 5 Jc3s5h (talk) 17:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Some protections have been implemented. Please reconsider. Jc3s5h is insisting that the vernal equinox time in 1903 is Coordinated Universal Time, but the timescale was not invented till 1972. 79.79.52.55 (talk) 16:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – Also left a warning for Vindictus23 (talk · contribs). If you disagree with User:Jc3s5h about Universal Time, please use the article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 16:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- We're supposed to not bite the newbies. Vindictus23 was trying to be helpful - the NASA website gives the dates when the sun is in the actual constellations, and for Pisces it's 12 March to 18 April. This should have been explained, instead (s)he gets a sarcastic message about NASA taking up astrology, a block is threatened and all astrology articles are offlimits to IPs for a year. 79.79.52.55 (talk) 16:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Jc3s5h: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- I was mistaken about the bad faith, but did not see the IP providing a reference for the change, only the word 'NASA'. The only talk page discussion I have seen about date formats in astrology articles seems to be the one begun by User:Jc3s5h at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astrology#Corrections to dates, date and citation format in sign articles. If you disagree with that is in the articles now, this might be a place to make your case. Arguing GMT over UTC i possibly a misunderstanding, because UTC can be freely used in notation for past dates, even if the astronomers of that time did not use it in their own writings. Just as we can put dates in articles like 44 BC, though the people who were alive then didn't use that terminology. EdJohnston (talk) 00:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute by extended confirmed users. Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) As an uninvolved editor who happened to spot this, might I suggest an alternative to full protection. A simple admonishment / reminder of WP:1RR and the potential consequences of violating it, to all involved parties, and an interim ruling on which sources are reliable (which can be changed by clear consensus on talk or taking it to WP:RSN). It just seems to me that this is an important area of current world events, which can have significant changes on a daily basis. It seems detrimental the the goals of the encyclopaedia if it is prevented from being kept current for any length of time. Hopefully some wise words of authority might be sufficient. Murph9000 (talk) 13:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Murph9000: Every single editor involved has been notified of the sanctions. Also see User talk:KrakatoaKatie. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- @DatGuy: Ok. It just seems a shame to cripple our ability to cover a fast moving current event, that's all. If that's the only way to achieve sanity on it, fair enough. I certainly agree that warring on here is a bad thing and needs to be controlled, especially on known controversial subjects. I leave my suggestion and thoughts above to the discretion of the admins, to use or ignore as they see fit. Murph9000 (talk) 15:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Murph9000: That's why it's probably going to be protected for a short amount of time, to let the users calm down and perhaps stop beating the dead horse. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- @DatGuy: Ok. It just seems a shame to cripple our ability to cover a fast moving current event, that's all. If that's the only way to achieve sanity on it, fair enough. I certainly agree that warring on here is a bad thing and needs to be controlled, especially on known controversial subjects. I leave my suggestion and thoughts above to the discretion of the admins, to use or ignore as they see fit. Murph9000 (talk) 15:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected – 5 days. Use the talk page to propose changes. Per WP:NOTNEWS we do not have to be up to the second on events like this. EdJohnston (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Murph9000: Every single editor involved has been notified of the sanctions. Also see User talk:KrakatoaKatie. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent disruptive edits in the box office details, in a regular basis. Also vandalism. Essex-1799 (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 01:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 10:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:47, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism--SaməkTalk 16:38, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Air.light (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 00:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
26 September 2016
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Spartacus! t@lk 09:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection This template links to currency conversion sites from all currencies pages, it is regularly spammed by account created just for this purpose. Very strange, that 2 days after creating an account these users are able to modify such complex template... Mascarponette (talk) 10:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being redirected to User:Jimmy Wales several times. NasssaNser (talk/edits) 11:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP(s) are adding unsourced information frequently. . Spartacus! t@lk 15:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism resumed immediately upon the previous protection expiring. Please re-protect the page for longer this time (it was a fortnight last time). Cwmxii (talk) 16:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 15:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper. Launchballer 12:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Question: @Launchballer: (or closing admin/page watcher) - is this sort of activity related to the recent surge in this LTAs activity? If so, we're trying to capture it in an edit filter -- samtar talk or stalk 12:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- No idea, I'll ask.--Launchballer 14:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No idea if this is LTA (I'm not well-versed in the area) but it certainly looks suspicious. I think a month of semi-protection would help out in the meantime. Good luck, Airplaneman ✈ 15:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Heavy vandalism immediately after previous protection expired. The bot hadn't even removed the protection template yet before the first vandal hit. Lizard (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 15:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 07:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Nairspecht: Full-protection is certainly not justified here, and I hesitate to apply semi-protection because of the number of IPs that are making constructive contributions. PC should take care of most of it: but if the volume of disruption is too high, please come back here for semi-protection. Vanamonde (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93: Continuous vandalism continues amidst which we are unable to get any fruitful contributions from IP's. Can you configure semi protection there. All IP edits are generally being reverted except 2-3. Semi-protection would be quite appropriate. Thank you VarunFEB2003 09:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Vanamonde93! Thanks for this. Let's implement trial and error for now. If things still look disruptive, we can see to that later. Best, Nairspecht (talk) (work) 09:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 12:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has received some disruptive editing from anonymous users (see page history). SapphireWilliams (talk page • contributions) 13:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Slow-moving vandalism that is sometimes not caught for a long time. I think PC would help the most here. Airplaneman ✈ 14:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has received some disruptive editing from anonymous users (see [75]). Dikamesywara (talk) 13:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism by new users. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 14:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @KATMAKROFAN: I don't think extended confirmed is necessary here, as all of the accounts seem to be new. Airplaneman ✈ 14:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right after the page protection was lifted, the John Stumpf article was again hit with a BLP violation relating to the Wells Fargo news. Please extend the protection to two weeks. Bahooka (talk) 14:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 14:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated abuse of an infobox field that is for the original Japanese network(s) on which the series first aired on. Italian IPs keep adding unsourced Italian networks that the series was re-aired months later. —Farix (t | c) 20:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repetitive vandalism from multiple IP's adding either unsourced or deleting content. MrWooHoo (T • C) 21:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 05:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Extreme levels of IP vandalism coming from a select group of IPs. JTP (talk • contribs) 02:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IPs and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 02:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Disruption -- Constant adding of unsourced info, original research, and terribly disruptive behaviour. I recommend a week's full protection to let involved editors (including myself) cooled down. Thank you, LLArrow (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mdrnpndr (talk) 19:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please ignore this mistaken report; I have filed a vandalism report instead as only one IP user was involved recently. Mdrnpndr (talk) 23:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Per above — MusikAnimal talk 04:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 03:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism going on for a good year now. A year of semi protection would be helpful. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:25, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Not enough activity to justify increasing the protection to a semi. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP deleting large controversial section with consensus. BilCat (talk) 07:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 08:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Johnlyh77 (talk) 07:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 08:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruptive editing. Again. Aloha27 talk 20:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. — MusikAnimal talk 05:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and pending changes protected for 2 months — MusikAnimal talk 05:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – 1600 + Transclusions . Mlpearc (open channel) 20:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected Semi should do fine, no history of vandalism — MusikAnimal talk 05:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Endless unconstructive edits: one or more IP-hoppers repeatedly changing numbers in the article (from the numbers of floors in the building to parameter values in templates etc) to random numbers, such as in the latest batch of edits. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 20:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recurrent vandalism by IP-hopper (Per WP:DUCK). Kleuske (talk) 21:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse IP is disrupting talk page. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. -- Gestrid (talk) 21:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of cast member to infobox, in contrary to discussion on talk page. Alex|The|Whovian? 01:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extensive and persistent vandalism and BLP violations by multiple IPs. General Ization Talk 02:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Far too much IP vandalism for pending changes. Lizard (talk) 02:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: BLP violations from new users and IP's and in some cases vandalism. Adog104 Talk to me 19:16, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tomcsy (talk) 23:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Astronomical level of IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 02:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Miniapolis 21:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by both autoconfirmed and non-autoconfirmed editors. -- Gestrid (talk) 17:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected – 1 week. EdJohnston (talk) 01:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cahk (talk) 23:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:33, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Done, handled by GorillaWarfare. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 01:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user is causing us pending changes reviewers quite a headache. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. -- Gestrid (talk) 21:45, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Done by Dennis Brown. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 01:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The disruptive IP editor has returned making the same edits. This page has been semi-protected before to cope with a disruptive IP editor. 9 July 2016, 30 May 2016 Toddy1 (talk) 06:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Disruptive Toddy1 does not know who's doing what again or who's doing it for their first time. And it's not disruptive to use the official name of the church in the article. The info. already uses it, and there's an article here with that name. The church specifies the official name is to be used except where the nickname "Mormon" shows up in "Mormon Tabernacle Choir" and The Book of Mormon (and Words of Mormon inside it, and the name of Mormon the prophet himself, etc.); or where abbreviating, to say "LDS Church." Why would it not be encyclopedic to use it to refer to the missionary service using the official name of the church? Disruptive Toddy1 is overreacting. There is a discussion at the talk page now too. 75.162.209.1 (talk) 06:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- If it's edit-warring then the likely reporter (Toddy1) will have to be reporting himself ("boomerang effect"). 75.162.209.1 (talk) 11:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. – Special:Contributions/75.162.209.1 was blocked three months as a sock by User:BU Rob13. Rob has also semiprotected the article for six months. (A different IP took up the same struggle immediately). EdJohnston (talk) 20:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP adding copy vio content copyvios. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:06, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Correction, all online checks confirm that there is no copyright violation.
[76] Thank you!45.120.201.79 (talk) 18:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and others editing against talk page consensus. BilCat (talk) 18:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 6 months. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jenimcphersoncow, which I hope will result in action against some registered accounts who have edited General Electric. EdJohnston (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
27 September 2016
30/500 protection: Disruptive IP edits have started again at this article relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict. —Granger (talk · contribs) 11:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 11:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection. Under attack from an IP-hopper. This person is adding large amounts of text with stuff sourced to Facebook, removing other large amounts of text with stuff sourced to reliable outlets, ignoring warnings and requests to discuss, the usual. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 17:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Perhaps this will be enough to force discussion. @RunnyAmiga: I recommend making posts on the IPs talk pages (looks maybe there's 3 or 4 of them total), pointing them to discuss at Talk:List of highest-grossing Pakistani films. Edit summaries aren't a good way to communicate — MusikAnimal talk 21:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. I've tried to explain to the IP user that his editing is not relevant to the article especially without any reliable sources but the user is not listening and keeps re-adding the same thing over and over again. Thebestwinter (talk) 17:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection. Similar to Azad Kashmir, which was under pending-changes protection when it was semiprotected last month, this extraordinarily sensitive article has become a target for unhappy nationalists to try to reverse well-sourced statements regarding dominion. The extensive sourcing there establishes India's claim but several new and/or anonymous editors over the past week have tried to replace the word "India" and its derivatives with "Pakistan" and its derivatives. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 16:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Only a handful of accepted edits out of a sea of reverts, so a brief semi seems appropriate, and leaving PC in place — MusikAnimal talk 21:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Barely any useful edits by non-confirmed users. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done by Widr for a period of three days. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 21:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP hopping spammer. Same behavior at Payroll, which could be semi-protected as well if necessary. Deli nk (talk) 19:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done by Widr. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 21:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP refusing to gain consensus as advised. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Mlpearc, is protection still needed, or has consensus been reached with the last edit of the IP?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined No further disruption has taken place. If edit-warring resumes, then please report back. Protection might have helped at the time of filing, and the responsibility for not applying it rests with the admin corps... Vanamonde (talk) 15:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, a very large spree involving many anons and new accounts is occurring. Duskmoon2005 (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Requesting a lengthy protection... well-meaning editors keep trying to change Stenberg's pronouns because she is non-binary. But she specifically asked that she/her be used on the article. See article talk page for discussion and links. EvergreenFir (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not terribly comfortable limiting the ability of good-faith editors when there's no bad-faith involved. PC protection should do the trick: if the edits become too frequent for that, please report back here for semi-protection. Vanamonde (talk) 15:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – As page has been irresponsibly been deleted on the issue of notability without verifying internet resources that are available at the click of the mouse in Find sources section. Mohsinwaheed 15:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined No disruption here. Vanamonde (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps adding unsourced content after being warned multiple times. -- Gestrid (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism, a very large spree involving many anons and new accounts is occurring. Entranced98 (talk) 13:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- support Kleuske (talk) 14:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @Kleuske: this isnt a disscussion noticeboard, there is no need to support/oppose a request. Its based upon admin discretion and page protection policies. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry. Kleuske (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @Kleuske: this isnt a disscussion noticeboard, there is no need to support/oppose a request. Its based upon admin discretion and page protection policies. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 14:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hollyckuhno (talk) 15:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page protect please, this users everyday edit. Shakibul Alam Risvy (Contact) 08:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined The reason behind this request is because of the edits made by one user. Please talk to the user and report for disruption if needed. Protection is not warranted at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 09:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 11:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs and new accounts. The article hasn't actually seen a constructive contribution to the content since June, just a long run of vandalism and corresponding reverts. Due to the long term problem, I suggest a longer protection period. Murph9000 (talk) 12:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An article related to the Arab-Israeli Conflict and IP-addresses are not allowed to edit here. Opdire657 (talk) 04:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected I set it for 1 year, but if needed, it can eventually be extended. --slakr\ talk / 00:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 23:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: This has had ongoing problems for months with poorly-sourced, controversial material being added, and when removed reverted back in rather than using the talk page. It was protected for five days, which has been fantastic for forcing people to use the talk page and get consensus before making disputed changes; however, this expires tomorrow, and unless it's extended the same problems are just going to resume. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Let's let it expire and see what happens then, I've no issue with you asking EdJohnston about it though. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent, long-term vandalism, due to the massive popularity of the Broadway musical Hamilton and the willingness of its fans to vandalize related pages. Several attempts at short term protection have, predictably, only had short term effect. If not permanent/indefinite protection, then at minimum, one year protection is needed. Otherwise, we'll constantly be doing short-term Band Aid fixes. X4n6 (talk) 08:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Policies require that semi is attempted first, which appears to be what will resolve the bulk of the vandalism. If further disruption continues and further protection is needed, please re-report. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Another case of persistent, long-term vandalism due to the massive popularity of the Broadway musical Hamilton and the willingness of its fans to vandalize related pages. Several short term protections have also been applied here with the predictable short term effect. Recommend 6 months of protection to cover the actor's remaining tenure with the show. X4n6 (talk) 08:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temp semi Attracting vandalism from disparate addresses and newbies. Philip Trueman (talk) 08:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 22:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IP edit warring, refuses interaction and discussion requests. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been blanked twice in 24 hours. Please provide temporary protection. -- Dane2007 talk 05:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's not enough activity to warrant semi protection, but hopefully pending changes will help solve the problem (including the longer term vandalism which has been occurring. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I started watching this page after seeing Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive931#Legal threat to User:Anomalocaris. Different IP addresses are being used to insert the same information that was originally removed by Anomalocaris. It was recently protected for a short time (on the wrong version of course), but I think something a bit more permanent (or at least longer) is required. I think this would work, but maybe blocks are more effective.@KrakatoaKatie: as she dealt with it a bit before. AIRcorn (talk) 05:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC). AIRcorn (talk) 05:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to change this if you like KrakatoaKatie. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's just a constant source of misleading edits or minor vandalism tags by IPs. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I am using my sandbox to create a list of IP addresses used by a sock puppeteering vandal for an administrative report, and the vandal has already tried to tamper with the list twice ([77], [78]). DarkKnight2149 22:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs changing flinders to flinder. A picture of a dead fish (talk) 05:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed immediately after protection had been lifted yesterday. See this diff - looks like the subject is asking his fans to edit the page. bonadea contributions talk 06:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – With the US Presidential Debate tonight, and Holt moderating, this page is coming under some serious vandalism. Primefac (talk) 03:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for three days by Drmies. tutterMouse (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit dispute due to a particularly insistent editor who has resorted to sockpuppetry. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Socks don't get to dispute content NeilN talk to me 04:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Same issues as report for 2016 in the Philippines. 172.56.38.183 (talk) 04:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 19:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined as per this note from Sro23. Airplaneman ✈ 00:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism on Thomas Wood article. Repeated revisions with non-RS. Persists in posting despite extended discussion. [Thomas Woods]. Stubb05 (talk) 19:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC) The requester is engaging in vandalism by removing highly sourced content from the page totally disregarding what reliable secondary sources demonstrate. --GLOBALIST LIBERTARIAN (talk) 20:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC) GLOBALIST LIBERTARIAN has made edit to page, in spite of stating he would await consensus. He has engaged in vandalism on multiple pages and continues this behavior. This page was previous protected. During this time GLOBALIST LIBERTARIAN made no recommendations to change but waited until it was unprotected and committed vandalism.Stubb05 (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC) STUBB05
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP policy violations. agtx 01:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of continued IP vandalism. AffeL (talk) 01:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I think PC protection would work well with this article. Long-term IP vandalism, however there has been some constructive anon contributions. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 01:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 07:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism on BLP article . Mlpearc (open channel) 17:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: It was unprotected a few days ago, but has since been regularly hit with the same type of roaming IP vandalism. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 23:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Due to current media story. Telfordbuck (talk) 21:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 00:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: A little over a year ago, my user page was set to "admin only". As I have recently appealed to the oversight committee and am now unblocked, I would appreciate it if I could have access to my user page. I would also like it if any ip is also able to reach me at my talk page. Thanks Ferociouslettuce (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- @KrakatoaKatie and HJ Mitchell: Airplaneman ✈ 15:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:06, 26
Requesting immediate archiving... Airplaneman ✈ 01:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
28 September 2016
Temporary semiprotection. Hard to tell if it's one student or a group, but Coronado is apparently today's topic in class and consequently, the article is under heavy attack. RunnyAmiga ※ talk 19:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced promo and BLP violating copy began again almost immediately after protection expired. John from Idegon (talk) 19:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See User_talk:108.51.18.138 & Candace Young history. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mlpearc, semied as this is block evasion. NeilN talk to me 19:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Highly visible used on every train article. Needs to be protected as it is at high risk. VarunFEB2003 16:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 19:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Keri (talk) 17:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs edit warring with negative comments about another editor's (not me) motives. Related to similar request below on Nate Turner where many more reverts occurred. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 18:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IP's with negative comments about another editor's (not me) motives. Related to article Nat Turner's slave rebellion which is also being referred. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Shakibul Alam Risvy (Contact) 08:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Shakibul Alam Risvy: Could you give diffs of problematic edits please. None are leaping out. GedUK 11:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: POV edits by multiple IPs. One blocked appears to have returned as 113.111.145.116 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Jim1138 (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- I see indeed heavy edit-warring, and there is no discussion at the talk page, but I do not understand what the problem is. Breitbart is a Jewish surname.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Katietalk 14:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Full protection: Intermittent but persistent caption vandalism(seems to have started ~2011 or earlier). Multiple users, both IP and confirmed have involved themselves. Hardly a serious offense, and I honestly appreciate the humor, but this isn't really the place. The article seems complete enough to not suffer from full protection - the photo may even be entirely unnecessary, given the graphic at the bottom of the page. Emetre (talk) 09:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nowhere near enough activity to merit protection NeilN talk to me 13:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 13:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after manager got sacked. Qed237 (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Remove PC from it as it is semi-protected. VarunFEB2003 08:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Pending changes in indefinite whereas the semi expires in a couple days. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 09:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 11:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (multiple blanking of page). Eagleash (talk) 12:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping editor has been repeatedly adding "fat-assed" to the article for almost two months now. Deli nk (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. agtx 03:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Agtx Note the line "In cases where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective". In this case there is very little editing on the page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Remove PC and enable semi too much of vandalism and disruptive editing. Recently unprotected then NeilN enabled PC but it ain't helping. Over 50 edits since his protection but not a single change as each edit is reverted by Vandal Fighters. VarunFEB2003 08:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: The previous protection expired last month, now being vandalised again with the same repeated IP edits as before. Angusta (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High IP vandalism by the same IP.. VietPride10 (talk) 00:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Given the persistent vandalism, addition of unsourced content, and general disruption that continues to be caused by anonymous editors, I believe PC might be a better option. I have left warnings on user talk pages, reverted with appropriate edit summaries and even created an editnotice for the page but none of these have any effect. The page is constantly edited by people who apparently only interested in editing this particular page and who have no intention of following our policies and guidelines, even if asked nicely. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like to much disruptive action to be able to use PC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Virtually no constructive edits from IPs or new users since pending changes was added two months ago. Lizard (talk) 02:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined PC seems to be working. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: High levels of vandalism from several IPs. Bakilas (talk) 10:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent non-stop vandalism by IP-hoppers. Wario-Man (talk) 06:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of drive-by vandalism and NOTHERE edits. Montanabw(talk) 07:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason, the Native American articles are seeing a lot of drive-by IP vandalism lately. Montanabw(talk) 07:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal IPs adding BLP violations. Person has been in the US poltical news. Dr. K. 03:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Was about to add this myself. The simultaneous appearance of different IPs (and unfortunately a couple users who should know better) suggests that this might be an attack that's being coordinated off wiki. So sooner rather than later is better.Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- I concur that this page needs semi-protection. Recent additions to the article range from highly problematic to overt and ugly vandalism. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Euryalus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Motion picture rating system (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Video game rating system (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Television content rating systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: An IP-hopping editor keeps altering the color scheme in the table at a number of articles which introduces a possible WP:ACCESSIBILITY issue. I have started a discussion at Talk:Motion_picture_rating_system#Table_changes where another editor agress with the accessibility concern, and have attempted to communicate with the editor at User talk:153.217.207.181 but the IP hopping is making it impossible to pin him down. Either he's unaware of my messages or ignoring them, but I'm hoping semi-protection would oblige the editor to at least discuss the changes. Betty Logan (talk) 03:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Betty Logan. It appears they do want to discuss. I see you have tried to engage them. Try a link in the edit summary. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – An IP hopper is intent on constantly re-adding unsourced content. It's the same person that got Chatswood, New South Wales pending changes. -- Gestrid (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create-protection: Create protection required after deletion. Repeatedly recreated after being deleted multiple times in the past few days. Political campaigning and advertising. Lourdes 06:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent non-stop vandalism by IP-hoppers. Wario-Man (talk) 06:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP(s) try to vandalize the page. . Spartacus! t@lk 00:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.200 (talk) 01:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The alternate account of Chickadee46 02:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term problem (all of 2016, by the looks of it) with IPs blanking it or redirecting it to a rival team. I suggest a long protection period. Murph9000 (talk) 06:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 2 weeks by Oshwah. tutterMouse (talk) 05:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by many IPs Jim1138 (talk) 01:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 2 weeks by Oshwah. tutterMouse (talk) 05:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.112.154 (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for three days by Widr. tutterMouse (talk) 05:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Spartacus! t@lk 17:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- User:SchroCat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Please remove page protection from User:SchroCat. If the page and its history could also be deleted I'd be grateful. Cheers – Gavin (talk) 22:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @SchroCat: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done I have no idea what is wrong with the formatting of this request, but *I* was able to parse it, and it's been unprotected and the history deleted. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- User:Cassianto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Please also remove pp from User:Cassianto. Likewise, if my page and its history could be erased in the same way as Gavin's, I'd be thankful. CassiantoTalk 22:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- ditto.
Done --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- ditto.
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from multiple IPs. Imminent77 (talk) 17:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 21:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 21:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I assume reason for vandalism increase is debate. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 19:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 21:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The main page is already protected but the vandals have moved into the talk page. If PP can't be done for a talk page (understandable) any other ideas welcome. GreenC 20:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined It can be protected shortly if necessary, but it's not needed at the moment. Widr (talk) 21:32, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High profile article that will be continued to be vandalised unless protected. Qed237 (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 22:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – By IP now has created User talk:Chachi6666. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a week. Acalamari 23:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption -- IP's (47.203.75.226 specifically is edit warring on multiple pages) and unconfirms making disruptive/non-consensus edits. LLArrow (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption -- Page just got out of protection and is already inundated with disruption. Again, IP 47.203.75.226 is instigating. LLArrow (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruption -- A ridiculous amount of IP's constantly changing/adding unsourced/poorly sourced info. LLArrow (talk) 19:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit warring between multiple editors. Deli nk (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High profile article that will be continued to be vandalised unless protected. Qed237 (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
29 September 2016
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 19:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 19:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Majora (talk) 20:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Euryalus (talk) 21:04, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Back and forth reverts, once side of which is 91.122.13.80. 3RR violation. Codename Lisa (talk) 13:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~ Rob13Talk 14:04, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
protection: Editor reversing results of merging info from an article to this page against the out comes of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Super Hero Adventures: Frost Fight!. Spshu (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 15:24, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Huh? It already went through AfD? I have to rehash it again, just because he wants to game the system with an edit war? We would not want to head off a edit war. Which is so easy to game as both sides should be punished under the elementary school style rules. He took me to notice board just because I did do what he said in regards to the article. Spshu (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- I guess it doesn't matter any ways since it is at his preference. Spshu (talk) 15:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Spshu, the AFD said redirect. How you merge content is a matter for discussion (which is happening on the talk page). --NeilN talk to me 15:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is that he doesn't want to do it what so ever. Not how. Spshu (talk) 15:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Spshu, the AFD said redirect. How you merge content is a matter for discussion (which is happening on the talk page). --NeilN talk to me 15:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi IP socks vandalizing. TimothyJosephWood 17:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry that I didn't get it before the IP reverted again. :-/ Katietalk 17:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- No worries. I figured you got to it so quickly you probably didn't there from here. TimothyJosephWood 17:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Katie, If you're feeling cheeky, you can also ban Aghosting while you're at it, since they are now vandalizing the related talk. TimothyJosephWood 17:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- The oh-so-cheeky Widr is much faster than I today. :-D Katietalk 18:01, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Katie, If you're feeling cheeky, you can also ban Aghosting while you're at it, since they are now vandalizing the related talk. TimothyJosephWood 17:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced IP additions of the (apparently unannounced) 2016 lineup. McGeddon (talk) 14:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A single editor from various IPs in the same range has been repeatedly changing this longstanding redirect to a malformed disambiguation page. As they do not initiate communication, and their IP continues to shift, warning is not likely to be effective. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 14:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism related to this. EricEnfermero (Talk) 17:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Mar11 (talk) 17:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mar11, I see a content dispute. The sources you removed were not re-added. NeilN talk to me 17:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 08:04, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 10:07, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection There has been recent news of an attack by India over the border with Pakistan: in response, there has been some edit-warring by IPs on the article. Perhaps a short duration semi-protection would be helpful to tamp down the disruption. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 10:42, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined There's almost no IP activity in the last 100 edits. At this point I don't think protection is necessary. GedUK 11:08, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism for at least a year. JoshBM16 (talk) 13:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 14:07, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs, including the insertion of unsourced content and the removal of sourced content, usually with no edit summary. Consider a longer-term semi-protection, as this article has been protected three times before. Neutralitytalk 15:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Restored indef which was somehow lost. NeilN talk to me 15:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This is an article which attracts never-ending vandalism. Has been protected countless times, and thus, I request PC for at least a year. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 10:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK 11:11, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Shortish semi: Extensive vandalism over the past ~72 hours by IPs and SPAs. I wouldn't protect more than a week. I expect they'll get bored and move on. TimothyJosephWood 12:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:02, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained content removal by a number of IPs. Two IPs have been temporarily blocked for socking, however exact same content removal continues by a different set of IPs. --Peaceworld 13:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 14:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.112.138 (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13Talk 04:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Harassment from socks of User:Mriduls.sharma. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 07:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection No longer active. We hope (talk) 10:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Done Hope to see you back soon. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist 111 Moi? Moi. 06:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User page vandalism (user hasn't contributed since 2007). Burninthruthesky (talk) 06:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent addition of "Trivia" section 9 times by IP hopper Jim1138 (talk) 06:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: To prevent socks of User:Mriduls.sharma from re-creating the user page ever again. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Folks, it's getting out of hand here. Second request. GreenC 14:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Going to try another alternative first and see what that does to the volume. ~ Rob13Talk 00:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
TV station vandal
- WJRT-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WIBW-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Reoccurring persistent meaningless/make work edits by possible IP socks of TheREALCableGuy as DI by Nate/Mrschimpf in one caae making false claims that Nate is endorsing his edits as TVS standards "do not disobey mrschimpf on what he said about tvs standards". Spshu (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ Rob13Talk 00:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The sock just won't die. I've filed another SPI to kill this one, but I'd like this page to be semi-protected to keep them off of it. Perhaps they may lose interest. Also requested semi-protection for the other page they've edited that isn't currently semi-protected because of them. -- Gestrid (talk) 04:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Vanamonde (talk) 06:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The sock just won't die. I've filed another SPI to kill this one, but I'd like this page to be semi-protected to keep them off of it. Perhaps they may lose interest. Also requested semi-protection for the other page they've edited that isn't currently semi-protected because of them. -- Gestrid (talk) 04:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Vanamonde (talk) 06:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.112.138 (talk) 02:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by CambridgeBayWeather. 73.96.112.138 (talk) 03:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism of a recent death. Wyliepedia 03:08, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by several IP users. Donner60 (talk) 03:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Adventure Time seasons 7 & 8
- Adventure Time (season 7) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Adventure Time (season 8) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reduction in protection level: From full protection to extended confirmed protection. These pages were repeatedly and vigorously vandalized the last few days by a user who has only been on the site for five days and has made 100 edits. I have been working on these pages for a long time, and now that they are fully protected, I as well as several other co-editors are unable to continue our expansion/clean-up of them. I request this decrease in protection so that the disruptive editor cannot modify their contents, but those who have edited for a while can update the pages as needed. I sent a note to the protecting admin (i.e. User talk:Yamaguchi先生), but I haven't heard back.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- As the disruptive user now has an indefinite block, I have no problem removing protection entirely. However, you need to wait for Yamaguchi to respond, and you only gave him 90 minutes before posting here. Katietalk 16:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- My mistake. That was silly of me.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've dropped season 8 back to semi. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Done Yamaguchi has reduced season 7 to semi, so I think we're okay here. If not, let us know. Katietalk 03:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've dropped season 8 back to semi. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- My mistake. That was silly of me.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Return of persistent IP vandalism after previous protection expired. Markhh (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of recent IP and new user vandalism. Hack (talk) 02:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.112.138 (talk) 02:42, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Create protection: Content has been added several times in the past by User:Gregjarlot, about a contest that has only been rumoured at present. The user has been advised 3 times in the last 3 months about not creating an article on unsourced information. User was also warned by an admin. Wes Mouse T@lk 18:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined Redirect is fine NeilN talk to me 19:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: @NeilN: I appreciate the redirect is fine. However, the user keeps reverting the redirect back to unsourced content. I'm not sure if there is a recommended way so that the user cannot revert a redirect into an article about a contest that is only in the "pipeline" with nothing more that can be verified with sources to expand the article. Wes Mouse T@lk 20:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Wesley Mouse: Do what you're doing. Warn the user and then report to AIV or your friendly neighborhood admin if they persist. --NeilN talk to me 21:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: @NeilN: I appreciate the redirect is fine. However, the user keeps reverting the redirect back to unsourced content. I'm not sure if there is a recommended way so that the user cannot revert a redirect into an article about a contest that is only in the "pipeline" with nothing more that can be verified with sources to expand the article. Wes Mouse T@lk 20:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rathfelder (talk) 21:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 00:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by IP's, and not many good faith edits from IP's to justify. This page has been temporarily protected once this year already (365 days), and has been protected over 5 times. JJBers (talk) 01:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's not enough there to warrant semi protection (let alone indefinite protection). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated attempts by a dynamic IP over the past few days to add hoax information to the article. Was given sole warning at one of the IP addresses, but as it is dynamic, they probably didn't even see it. oknazevad (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.115.117 (talk) 01:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Lots of IP and new user socking. Yellow Dingo (talk) 01:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Miniapolis 23:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SLBedit (talk) 19:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There seems to be a new user engaging in edit warring with several experienced editors since yesterday. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Huldra (talk) 23:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Probable candidate for WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 but let's see how this works out. NeilN talk to me 23:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
30 September 2016
Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.112.213 (talk) 01:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 16:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandal. 138.75.249.50 (talk) 04:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 16:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Might be time to lock down this user's talk page with their repeated unblock requests. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. NeilN talk to me 15:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection for 30 days: Not sourced and contradicts itself. 46.130.61.52 (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 15:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Deliberate and unencyclopedic changing of dates by anons. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a flurry of vandal-edits today from anons + 2 now-blocked new-users. Shearonink (talk) 16:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: ((very, very) long term). Recurring abuse by indef blocked user Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asdisis. Page was protected many, many times before: see [79]. - DVdm (talk) 16:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of very, very long term, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism on the page of a recently deceased person. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:08, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi: Persistent POV pushing by anon and brand new SPAs going back months. TimothyJosephWood 12:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Relevant SPI. TimothyJosephWood 12:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Timothyjosephwood: The SPAs are auto-confirmed. Protecting while SPI is processed. NeilN talk to me 16:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page created 4 times in the past month, each time a copyvio or spam. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Semi: due to recent repeated attacks from IP hopper Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 15:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since last two days. Requesting semi-protection for a week. Pratyush (talk) 15:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: - Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal - messing up and creating UNSANCTIONED behaviour JG Malmsimp (talk) 08:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MPFitz1968 (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of disruptive activity, protection for about a week. If semi isn't appropriate use PC. VarunFEB2003 14:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:16, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring. Jdcomix (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Declined, we do not protect articles against one user. The user is apparently being dealt with.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Longterm semi-protection: Repeated disruption by LTA IP ("Best-known for" IP) for the past 20 days. Previous semi of three days was insufficient for this persistent disruption. -- Softlavender (talk) 08:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly being used for testing, being vandalized, and being used for spamming. NasssaNser (talk/edits) 08:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Note: The page was previously semi-protected, on July 10. — Mudwater (Talk) 23:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent non-constructive additions by new editors/IPs. Vanamonde (talk) 05:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Change full to template protection. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Change full to template protection. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Change full to template protection. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Change full to template protection. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Change full to template protection. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This is the primary target for a banned editor who has been creating sockpuppets and attempting to recreate his deleted film article on a daily basis. It would be prudent to make this page off-limits to all but autoconfirmed users, at least until there is time for the sock master to disperse. DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 21:11, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of changes and reverts the past few days. Justin15w (talk) 21:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 22:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JC · Talk · Contributions 05:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection. Is there any shorthand, like an essay or something, for when an article's subject comes up in a high school class somewhere and it falls under attack from bored students? RunnyAmiga ※ talk 18:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is already under PC protection, which should persist after the semi-protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Speedily deleted 3 times today. —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 23:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 00:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. -- Gestrid (talk) 01:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Drmies. 73.96.112.129 (talk) 03:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Newly created sock is adding links to images on commons that are clear copyright violations. Neither sock (Saniasliza) nor the main account (Soshuvo) have made any attempt at communication despite multiple requests. Semi protection is to stop the new socks and their IP address from further copyright violations. Would not mind full protection to force them to discuss. Ravensfire (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ravensfire, the master has been blocked for 1 week, socks indefinitely. Please let me know if more socks show up. NeilN talk to me 17:42, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- @NeilN: Will do and thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 18:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Not too long ago, the page was protected because a disruptive IP-hopper was edit warring with non-constructive edits. Now that the protection expired, the user just went right back to doing the exact same thing. DarkKnight2149 18:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/socking. 2607:FB90:8153:BC58:0:49:E9F0:5001 (talk) 22:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:08, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Ks0stm. 73.96.112.213 (talk) 23:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)