Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/10
- 2021
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 October 2021
Reason: Repeated attempts to delete the infobox image or replace it with a non-free image. Khiikiat (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Question: Khiikiat, have you reviewed Commons:YouTube_files prior to uploading the YouTube screenshot, File:ปวิน ชัชวาลพงศ์พันธ์.jpg, to Commons on Sept 9? El_C 12:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: I'm sorry, but I don't understand the point you are making. Is there a problem with the image? Khiikiat (talk) 21:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Khiikiat: question, not a point. A yes or no would suffice. El_C 21:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: The link is broken (commons:COM:YouTube files); I have now started a deletion discussion at commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:ปวิน_ชัชวาลพงศ์พันธ์.jpg. Thanks for pointing out this problem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Right, I keep forgetting that commons:commons duplicates off project, unlike languages (en:wp). Thanks for looking into this. El_C 21:09, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: The link is broken (commons:COM:YouTube files); I have now started a deletion discussion at commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:ปวิน_ชัชวาลพงศ์พันธ์.jpg. Thanks for pointing out this problem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Khiikiat: question, not a point. A yes or no would suffice. El_C 21:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: I'm sorry, but I don't understand the point you are making. Is there a problem with the image? Khiikiat (talk) 21:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – It was reported that he plans on retiring, but he has not officially retired yet. This will not occur until Sunday, after the report surfaced, IP addresses began editing the page frequently stating he has already retired. We probably only need it protected through Sunday if that can be done. Rockchalk717 20:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tedious ongoing attempts by IP editors to change business model from "multi-level marketing" to "pyramid scheme" without ever providing a citation. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user continuously adding incorrect information. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 08:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Mattplaysthedrums, when this happens on your user talk page, please report the harassment at WP:AIV and avoid reverting the edits yourself until the user is blocked. The user may else feel encouraged to continue reverting, which you can not prevent in that moment.
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi ToBeFree, Thanks for informing of what to do when this situation happens. They are using a different IP adress this time, so I've reported to WP:AIV again. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 23:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – not even for semi-protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent racist disparaging by dynamic IP: "It's not a coincidence that article hijacking are done by people from certain countries." This has been removed by multiple editors. BilCat (talk) 23:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There seems to be recent high levels of editing concerning his name and the end date of his term in office. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 11:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until at least 7 October 2021. miHoYo has been the target of several raids by infuriated Genshin community members, which makes this page a big potential target for vandalism. Aasim (talk) 13:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Over the past few days this page has been persistently vandalized by anonymous IPs 64.235.89.236 (talk) 07:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user continuously adding incorrect information. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth Noted, already did that with one of the latest IP, blocked for 31 hours since yesterday should be expiring soon. Will see if they return back with the currently blocked IP or swap to new IP. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The persistent addition of unsourced content from IP users has returned as soon as the past page protection expired. I have warned users on talk pages and edit summaries but they do not want to add a source. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 08:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Not done None of the other cast members has a source, so why are you asking for one with regard to this addition? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive IP editing. KyleJoantalk 04:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs edit warring over one result against discussion. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Political Subject. It's shocking that it's not protected Green Shy Guy 54 (talk) 23:42, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We do not protect a page just because it is about an important subject. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors continuously re-adding statements, without evidence, that this YouTuber has died of botulism (he is known for eating old military rations on camera), a recurring joke in his community. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 06:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Once again, they seem to be coming from the same IPs, so maybe discuss with them on their respective talk pages first. Jeuno (talk) 06:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeuno: I can't tell if 135.180.129.208 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is socking or not, they made the bizarre decision to {{cn}} tag the vandalism death claim, which then a third IP totally deleted, now the original IP is back to trying to reinstate the death claim. I saw this as possible coordinated action (one sock makes outrageous claim, another sock makes it "balanced" so maybe it'll stick around) but could be wrong—decisions here are up to admins for a reason. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 06:55, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Psiĥedelisto: If they continue doing this then the admins can block the associated IPs from editing the page or put pending changes, as there seems to be no auto-confirmed accounts (as of now) that are claiming that the subject died. Could be potentially either sockpuppets or a group of people. Jeuno (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeuno: I can't tell if 135.180.129.208 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is socking or not, they made the bizarre decision to {{cn}} tag the vandalism death claim, which then a third IP totally deleted, now the original IP is back to trying to reinstate the death claim. I saw this as possible coordinated action (one sock makes outrageous claim, another sock makes it "balanced" so maybe it'll stick around) but could be wrong—decisions here are up to admins for a reason. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 06:55, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism that will continue as long as the meme is alive. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 11:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 11:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent MOS:CAPS violations by IP hopping editor. FDW777 (talk) 08:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 11:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed is bothering my friend. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 10:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism by three different IPs in just over half a day. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Revdels. El_C 11:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Previously protected page. Suspicious amount of new accounts editing article due to controversial figure. I suspect to create WP:PUFFERY. CaffeinAddict (talk) 01:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring from multiple IPs in New Jersey. Binksternet (talk) 03:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More Nate Speed sock puppets. This guy needs lots of therapy. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 10:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Though, indeed, indef would probably be better, FilmandTVFan28, as Nate Speed remembers like a fox! El_C 11:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 08:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism throughout September and continuing today. AngryHarpytalk 11:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several unconstructive IP edits over the past few days since Cr1TiKaL dropped a video on the subject. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Trolling by IP hopping editor. An alternative might be to add to the partial blocks at 2401:4900:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log). FDW777 (talk) 12:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: People keep on doing a redirect, I don't want that. Mohammed12313893 (talk) 00:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. You are edit-warring against multiple others. Page protection is not a tool that is used to help people win content disputes. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection for at least 1 year, but prefer 3. There has been a 7 year long stream of disruptive cast reordering edits on this article switching the order of Mohanlal and Mammootty in the credits for the movie. The article has been protected many, many times because of this disruption [1]. Each time the protection expires, the behavior resumes. There have been five year long protections already. The last protection expired expired last November, and there's been a least 18 disruptive attempts since then. Further, there's a never ending stream of attempts to change either the running time or the box office results. All of this is sourced to new editors or unregistered IP editors. I am loathe to apply such a long protection, but nothing is working to stop this silly war. I am an administrator, but given how many times I've had to revert this silliness I consider myself WP:INVOLVED at this point. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 13:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unreferenced content by LTA editor, page previously semi-protected due to this. FDW777 (talk) 13:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of a Google doodle today, has been attracting vandalism from newly created accounts and IPs. Ifnord (talk) 13:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: This template is used by user scripts and should be protection. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 13:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Template protected indefinitely. El_C 13:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 14:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the issue has been resolved. Parth006 (talk) 10:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Malformed request. Anarchyte (talk) 11:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is enough evidence on the topic that proves that it's historical name should be the title of the article which is Ram Setu Bridge , the name Adam's Bridge was a name that was given to it by a White Supremacist (Adam) during the British Raj and it is wrong to take away it's original name because a white man decided to name it after his name. It hurts the feelings ng of many people because the name that is being used for the bridge is not a name given by the local people but the name given by the colonizers. I rest my case.Parth006 (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Parth006: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Arbitration enforcement protection. Anarchyte (talk) 11:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 14:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 15:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Never-ending stream of IPs and new accounts that seek to change the referenced result. FDW777 (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 15:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP vandalism, some ips are helping preventing that MoonlightVectorTalk page 14:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active at this time for pc to work as intended. El_C 15:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sir if you save my user page then i will not face any problem i am a student i just want to protect your talk page from vandalism and disruptive editing otherwise i would not request you. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 13:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. @Lazy Maniik: it's just the one IP (now blocked), so I'm not sure protection is needed yet, certainly not of an indef duration. Feel free to relist if the disruption continues. Ping me so I can expedite if I'm around. El_C 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks @El C: Ok I will contact you if my talks are vandalized. Best Regards. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 14:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from new accounts and ips. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism from various IPs in the last few days, mostly around changing the collective name "labour" to "liberal democrat". CodeTalker (talk) 17:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And, I learned something new. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. RossButsy (talk) 17:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Oluwole is a minor but controversial figure in UK politics and some people seem to have a specific hatred of him for reasons that go beyond his politics (*cough*racism*cough*). Lately we have an IP hopping vandal who keeps on making nonsensical additions disparaging Oluwole. I'm pretty certain that it is just one person, deliberately IP hopping, as they always misuse the word "elected" in the same bizarre and distinctive way. A decent period of semi-protection might persuade them to go away. DanielRigal (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism after appearance in media. Citizen Kimi (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- comment: In other words, a stupid meme started by some cheeky schmeggege.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't get it, though granted, I didn't look very hard (which is to say, at all). El_C 19:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Means Nonsense, its relatively rare to find that word. MoonlightVectorTalk page 19:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: subject in news and article under constant unsourced editing and vandalism. Jibran1998 (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant IP vandalism since protection expired. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Anonymous and new users are repeatedly adding unsourced information about the subject dying. MrBelpitsLegs (talk) 16:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jakarta Goat vandal resumed after the last protection expired. Can also accept indefinite pending changes. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – All edits by non-confirmed since last protection expired (1–2 months) have been disruptive. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
02 October 2021
Reason: I want this page to be secure and lower vandalism risks. Mohammed12313893 (talk) 16:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite Extended-protection (Cascade): Persistent Vandalism. Cascade to all subpages, including players. Due to repeated Vandalism by multiple People, Not just this one page or others MoonlightVectorTalk page 19:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Semi-protection looks like it is working as intended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. Alexcalamaro (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continuous edit-warring by various editors. Especially IP ones who keep adding results, turnouts and reporting percentages from their preferred sources or even if it might not be what the source says any longer.
As I was banned from it and don't plan to get involved again even after getting unblocked (block me if I do), I ask the page be protected for a while so any edit-warring users can be blocked/banned from the page.
It seems the results will take many days to get counted. In the last 2 days only 4,000 votes have been counted according to the California Secretary of State. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 10:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
. The IPs seem to have resolved their sourcing dispute. BTW, Talk page? I've heard of it, LéKashmiriSocialiste... El_C 11:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Not done
- @El C: Actually they haven't resolved their dispute, I have checked. And it's not just one user who has engaged in an edit war, it's many. At least five if not more. Which is why I didn't use the talk page. How many people do you want me to talk to? I talked the last time and it didn't get me anywhere. And I'm not going to spend more time on an article where I am blocked and where people will never see eye-to-eye. Please protect the article. It's your choice not to, but you're just allowing edit wars by leaving it unprotected. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 12:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- LéKashmiriSocialiste, if you clicked on the link (un-piped: Talk:2021_California_gubernatorial_recall_election#This_article_documents_a_current_election), you'd see it's by yours truly. Anyway, I'll have another look.
Checking to see if protection is necessary. For the bot. El_C 12:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- LéKashmiriSocialiste, if you clicked on the link (un-piped: Talk:2021_California_gubernatorial_recall_election#This_article_documents_a_current_election), you'd see it's by yours truly. Anyway, I'll have another look.
- Okay, looked again, didn't reveal much, again, I'm afraid. Seems like normal'ish editorial stuff. Maybe you can provide some diffs and summaries of the disruption, explaining why it is so in those instances...? El_C 13:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: You're focusing on older edits when edit wars are still happening. Like this one where editors with starting IPs 95 and 67 keep changing the reporting vote percentage [2], [3]. I've just showed the most recent instance here but it's been going on for a while. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 13:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- LéKashmiriSocialiste, please try to explain better. Are the numbers fabricated? If so, by whom? If I can block one or two unconfirmed users, I'd rather do that than shut down this page entirely to all of em. El_C 13:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's inappropriate to accuse someone of fabrication. They're probably simply misunderstanding one of the sources, NY Times which states the reported vote as ">95%" meaning more than 95% which is usual for it in every poll. And I assume they don't understand what ">95%" means. I didn't too a few years earlier. No source as far as I know shows the reporting percentage as 95%. I'd ask them if they weren't an IP, as IPs keep shifting, and if I wanted to spend any time on that article. So no I don't believe they are fabricating at all. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 13:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, if that's been explained to them (even just in edit summaries), and they persist, then it is effectively a form of data fabrication (i.e. they seem to be using/reading edit summaries, so simply chucking it down to incompetence may not be sufficient in that instance). That is to say, when WP:AGF hits a brick wall, then we have to go the WP:PACT route, even if it might somehow misrepresent genuine intention (which, short of express admission or telepathy, is unknowable).
- Anyway, if that hasn't been done, there are ways to at least try to get that across, like with a WP:DUMMY edit and so on. I'm just having a hard time parsing what's happening, so I'll keep this request open and leave it to another admin, because your explanations are still not entirely connecting for me and I'm sort of losing hope that seeking further clarifications from you will remedy that (I'm sorry to say). El_C 13:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
@El C: It seems I misinterpreted. Sorry that happened because I didn't research the page properly and it's too puzzling to research a page I haven't been involved in for over a week. 67.185.196.190 himself has been doing it. In fact they seem to keep reverting their own edits and jumping from one source to another, asides from that of others. Not just the reported votes, but also the votes for candidates/options.
[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]
Also yes they do seem to have been made aware of his inaccuracies. In fact they have even changed his own reporting percentage once to 97 [11] before changing it back to 95 again [12]. And they later changed it again after editing it as 95 multiple times, this time to 98 [13].
They have also made other problematic edits like taking ownership behavior where they demand to be told which source an editor took the results from [14]. Or adding updates even when there are none [15].
I don't have any time to minutely go through their edits but it seems they simply keep changing the count whenever they see a source with different count. Regardless they have edit warred a lot. There are likely more problematic edits. Though there have been other editors edit warring too, they have edit warred far more than any one. Please block them. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- LéKashmiriSocialiste, if only the CNN/NYT/etc. sources being alluded to weren't a secret... El_C 15:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: They're not. I've given you evidence of edit warring but as usual you're doing nothing except being sarcastic. This is getting annoying. If you don't have any intent of doing anything at all please say so, so I don't have to waste more of my time. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 15:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Look, you ping'd me. It isn't sarcasm meant to berate. I'm just talking normally. There's multiple CNN sources, for example, so I'm not sure which one is being referenced to be able to check anything. Anyway, I'll leave you to it. El_C 16:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- No you're not. Calling sources which are public as secret is not normal. Neither is telling me to use the talk page by saying I've heard of it. Or "you'd see it's by yours truly". Starting talking about telepathy isn't normal either. Once is fine. But if you keep doing it, that's the biggest sign of trolling. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 16:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop, you are being aggressive. MoonlightVectorTalk page 16:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- MoonlightVector It's not aggressive to call out a person's behaviour with proof. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Look, i'm saying that you are breaking WP:AGF due to the "supposedly" evidence you brought, to add to it, you got a sanction block from the article. MoonlightVectorTalk page 16:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's not "supposedly" when the same behaviour is repeated again and again and a person keeps giving sarcastic responses. And my block has nothing to do with El C's behaviour or my problems with it, even though I admit I was wrong. But it cannot be used as an excuse to avoid one's behaviour. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is a pointless arguement, it already got denied. MoonlightVectorTalk page 16:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please close it. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is a pointless arguement, it already got denied. MoonlightVectorTalk page 16:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's not "supposedly" when the same behaviour is repeated again and again and a person keeps giving sarcastic responses. And my block has nothing to do with El C's behaviour or my problems with it, even though I admit I was wrong. But it cannot be used as an excuse to avoid one's behaviour. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Look, i'm saying that you are breaking WP:AGF due to the "supposedly" evidence you brought, to add to it, you got a sanction block from the article. MoonlightVectorTalk page 16:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- MoonlightVector It's not aggressive to call out a person's behaviour with proof. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop, you are being aggressive. MoonlightVectorTalk page 16:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- No you're not. Calling sources which are public as secret is not normal. Neither is telling me to use the talk page by saying I've heard of it. Or "you'd see it's by yours truly". Starting talking about telepathy isn't normal either. Once is fine. But if you keep doing it, that's the biggest sign of trolling. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 16:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- And btw if you're asking me to minutely explain every edit, no thank you. I'm already too exhausted especially after collecting the evidence about 67.185.196.190. And I'm not going to explain every time they reverted. There's a reason diffs are provided, so people can check themselves. Don't do anything since you don't want to. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
LéKashmiriSocialiste, sorry my tone clashed and otherwise didn't resonate. I meant no offense. Many comments ago, I re-opened this request and struck my closure of it. So I (still) invite other admins to have a look. Perhaps they'll be able to grasp what I couldn't. Your evidence is still here for all to see. I'm just done with this request, for now (this time for real). See ya. El_C 17:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. It appears that most of the editing is being done by IPs, but I don't see edit warring and I don't see many reverts. I think the IPs are doing a pretty good job of maintaining the article. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism - head teacher has been renamed to "Big Val" a few times (has been changed back to original version), address has been changed constantly (it's always been in Lerwick, Shetland, not - as in one example - Mumbai) and also "controversies" (originally titled "Pedo Scandal") section has been added about a teacher who was convicted for sexual harassment (this section has since been deleted due to it being inappropriately added and not notable). I feel that protection is needed to prevent the controversies section being added again and prevent users vandalising this page inappropriately and adding unnecessary sources. SarahTHunter (talk) 16:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with Template:Infobox legislative election. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Template protected indefinitely. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: frequent vandalism Anomalocaris Is Cool (talk) 01:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The protection on this article has only been lifted 3 days ago and already the level of vandalism in the article is ramping back up near the level it was when the article was last protected. In my opinion the article would benefit from another, slightly longer, semiprotection. RFZYNSPY talk 01:50, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spamming: addition of non-notable entries (probably by employees of those firms). Imcdc (talk) 01:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is recently being vandalised by IP and some new users. Like changing dates, templates etc. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 06:25, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- If possible increase the protection it more. Screenshots of vandalised condition of the article is being shared in the club FB groups and thus provoking others. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 06:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Revival of vandalism by IP users. Reprotect page ASAP. Laser Victor 2017 ❯❯❯ talk 08:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Casliber. --Blablubbs (talk) 09:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of vandalism currently going on. Jurtaa (talk) 08:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Casliber. El_C 11:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 09:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant IP disruption. Semsûrî (talk) 10:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's not fair, I had to log it!
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 11:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's not fair, I had to log it!
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 10:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 106.220.104.219 (talk) 06:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hardeep3673 (talk) 06:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – OP blocked as a sock. Favonian (talk) 10:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing. Beshogur (talk) 09:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue.
Warned, though. El_C 11:11, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Please remove Garden City University from the list. The university on the list under education tab are institutes of importance or state or Central University.
Garden City University must be moved to paragraph below along with other universities.
Thanks
Instead you may add the four state Universities in Bangalore
Bangalore University Bangalore City University Bengaluru North University
These universities have affliation to over 500 colleges. 49.207.223.50 (talk) 08:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. You have, very properly, requested this change on Talk:Bangalore. That's the correct venue. Favonian (talk) 10:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, BLP violation. Previous protection was expired. Eevee01(talk) 09:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent BLP violations due to a recent event — DaxServer (talk to me) 11:21, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like the disruption has subsided. Upto the admin to decide. — DaxServer (talk to me) 13:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- No, it didn't — DaxServer (talk to me) 14:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This may not entirely solve the problem because some reverted edits are coming from autoconfirmed editors. MelanieN (talk) 20:18, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. unsourced content added and recent vandalism by anonymous IP Aeengath (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:21, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
03 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent content removal by an IP hopping (1, 2, 3) disruptive editor. M.Bitton (talk) 13:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC): Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:26, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. IP accounts keep adding results of elections even when the counting of votes has not started yet. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. It looks as if results are starting to come in. MelanieN (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent abuse/NPA on talkpage from temporary blocked user. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 17:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for the block's duration (72 hours). El_C 23:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Consistent IP vandalism, new user vandalism Spherical Cassowary (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Please permanently auto-confirmed or pending changes protect this article, there had been many disputes, spam and vandlisms, Wingwatchers (talk) 20:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent violations of WP:GENDERID in the past couple of weeks, changing pronouns. CodeTalker (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. Not just for the last few weeks, CodeTalker, but a perennial problem. Here's one from 2017, for example. El_C 00:07, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 22:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Talk:History of the race and intelligence controversy (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: The main article was semi-protected for one year by User:EdJohnston because of IP hoppers from Milan. On the article talk page, the same IP hoppers have been persistently lobbying for a new paragraph to be added to the lede. These proposals are contentious and none of them have gained consensus from regular editors. During this period of disorder, please could the talk page be semi-protected for a brief period of a month or so, as suggested by EdJohnston on WP:ANI?[16] Mathsci (talk) 23:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. Logged AE action. El_C 23:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is currently autoconfirmed protected, but there has been consistent disruptive editing occurring despite this, so requesting an increase to semi protection as such. Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits (mostly incorrect information) by an IP. Magitroopa (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . David Vo (YouTube) (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – no coherent argument presented. Favonian (talk) 21:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption (likely same person with different IPs). Kurdish-related so sanctions apply here. Semsûrî (talk) 14:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism - anon IPs removing reliably-sourced information because they apparently don't like it. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Protection should be removed so the page can be made better as many editors are not able to edit it. Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: The page was protected a month ago until March 2022 by El C (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) due to move warring. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 06:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Sockpuppet editing; page is under WP:GS/PAGEANTS sanctions. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An unregistered user keeps removing large chunks of material from the article and changing the content of referenced sentences to make it appear as though she was not murdered by her husband. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 20:21, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Showbiz826. Ravensfire (talk) 22:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring over templates, primary by IPs. O.N.R. (talk) 01:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring over templates, primarily by IPs. O.N.R. (talk) 01:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 106.204.197.159 (talk) 02:20, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:20, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Protein Ontology is fully protected since 2006 (nearly 15 long years), for repeated advertising. As far as I can see, the advertising happened only in 2006. Similar page history would likely not result in a full protection today.
I noticed this page, because it is a fully protected double redirect as of writing. If you think the protection should stand, please fix the redirect instead :-). Thanks! Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Done DrKay (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism after removal of Indefinite protection. DrNegative (talk) 16:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP disruptive editing 114.125.126.8 (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most of the IP editing is constructive. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP disruptive editing 114.125.126.8 (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP edits adding false information. Basically there is a popular TV show character in India with this name in a historical drama. However, the character is fictional and IPs keep trying to assert she is a real person when there is no supporting evidence (the writers of the TV show made her up but other characters in the the show are real historical figures). We sorted out this mess at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charumitra. The IPs keep trying to add back content that was removed per consensus at the AFD. I would prefer long term semi-protection as I doubt this problem will go away if it’s just done for a few days or even a month.4meter4 (talk) 02:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced text re cuisine, despite warnings to the numerous IPs which this editor has been using. David Biddulph (talk) 08:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keep on vandal by ip. Matthew hk (talk) 08:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need semi protection due the vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 09:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 10:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An LTA has turned this into amateur hour in the last year, especially in recent days. Larry Hockett (Talk) 10:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 10:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent and persistent IP vandalism. Fichid (talk) 05:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 07:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The older version of this page has so many important info, especially about the Kurdish Documentary Movement, yet for some reason, most of those info and films that were listed got delated, it seem there are some kind of censorship taking place. Why not free the page and restore those info? 62.201.254.19 (talk) 23:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @ReaderofthePack: as the protecting admin. Anarchyte (talk) 11:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. DrKay (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the limited amount of information is present regarding the topic and due to the protection everyone can not access to edit the page, which is the reason for misleading information provided on the page. Nick2764 (talk) 12:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging the protecting administrator Materialscientist. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. DrKay (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need semi protect due the vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 09:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bishonen | tålk 10:25, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Continued IP vandalism. It was given a week's worth of protection, and after it wore off IP's were right back inserting the same quotes by late comedian Norm Macdonald from his appearance on a talk show bashing the film. The video has gained 1.9 million views in 2 weeks, giving his critique of the film continued relevancy. Harizotoh9 (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:24, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of poorly sourced content + copyvios by block-evading IP user. Austronesier (talk) 11:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Doesn't seem active enough for semi at this time, Austronesier. Feel free to relist if that changes. El_C 14:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP continuously changing next_title
and next_year
parameter to TBD and 2021, respectively, with no reason in doing so. While some would change to The Feels (song) which is incorrect as that is Single not Album/EP. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recently died. CptViraj (talk) 13:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive IP editor keeps changing review summary to "negative" despite RT 42% and MC 41%. Disruption continued after last lock expired. Please lock the article again[17] this time for at least a week, preferably a month. 109.78.194.120 (talk) 12:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thank y. El_C 14:38, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW /ˈmɪɡtaʊ/) is an anti-feminist, misogynistic, mostly online community advocating for men to separate themselves from women and from a society which they believe has been corrupted by feminism.
Should be changed to
Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW /ˈmɪɡtaʊ/) Is an online community of men, that carry the stance that the system that we live in favors women so much that co-habitating with one is not worth it due to unjust representation and financial hardship. 2600:1700:BFA0:96D0:8D64:2238:20AE:50C5 (talk) 01:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. You will need to gain consensus for this form of wording. The best way to do that is to show that many published, reliable sources such as scholarly journals and books describe the community in this way. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
BalPakna2021 (talk) 07:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment BalPakna2021 created this article in mainspace on 3 October. David notMD (talk) 08:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined It is not clear what is being requested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: edit protection SBGhegadmal (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:21, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from multiple anonymous and newly registered users deleting referenced content and the references themselves to the steamed curry's possible origin in Cambodia and replacing it with unreferenced claims with steamed curries originating in Thailand. The page was already protected for a week last month due to constant vandalism, but the protection, unfortunately, was ineffective. After I sought the administrator intervention against vandalism one registered vandal was permanently banned for consistently disruptive edits to this and other Cambodia-related articles. I thought that should be the end of it, but now there's what seems to be yet another Thai nationalist (or the same one under a different username) starting his rampage, therefore I'm starting to see a pattern here and am requesting the page's permanent protection against edits from anonymous and newly-registered users. Turaids (talk) 16:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of false information. wizzito | say hello! 16:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Unfaithful edits. Wikibijay1 (talk) 12:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 14:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users keep adding "of Hungarian ethnicity" in the lead of the article, despite being warned before that this only belongs in the "Personal life" section. 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 16:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not active enough for semi at this time, and doubly so for ECP. El_C 17:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 16:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:07, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user introducing incorrect/misleading content. Benjamin112 ☎ 19:28, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- False accusation. Misleading. The 6 of 6 is unnecessary because it is invisible from the page (commented) and if anyone deletes it there won't be anything different above in the reading page. Have erased and nothing happened except underneath the source. A basic programming lesson will teach that everything inside comment (open source editing to prove what I said before the closing bracket) is invisible. 36.68.220.192 (talk) 19:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: another day, another "League" request I can't make sense of. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ El_C 14:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.
- It is difficult for me to see what is the problem here though I imagine it involves IP 36.68.220.192. Is it a dispute over what is written in a few commented out texts?? Essentially a dispute over content that can’t be seen? That aside, there are many, many unregistered users editing this article and there would be collateral damage if protection were applied. So I decline partly because this seems to me to be a content dispute but mainly because there would be collateral damage. I encourage editors to resolve their differences in some other way, perhaps by way of dialogue on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, at least one of us was able to parse what was happening. Malcolmxl5: "League" Riddle Master. El_C 14:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- It took a while, El C! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I feel a little better now.
El_C 15:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I feel a little better now.
- It took a while, El C! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:52, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, at least one of us was able to parse what was happening. Malcolmxl5: "League" Riddle Master. El_C 14:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Skyerise (talk) 15:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 15:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The show started to broadcast on 2nd October and needs to be updated regularly but page is extended protected. The page is in starting phase but due to extended protection some editors are not able to edit it. 2409:4063:4004:CE6F:5CC5:D83:6F4C:56E2 (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Wikipedia is not a news feed and the article is already being updated on a quite regular basis. Favonian (talk) 14:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- List of top international men's football goal scorers by country (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: This page has been semi-protected twice before but has recently had its latest month elapse and has already been the subject to (abeit light) vandalism. Usually, and especially around international breaks (one is upcoming in the next week), users add players that are not their country's top scorer (namely Neymar or Muller) along with edit warring Cristiano Ronaldo's statistics. Could a longer term protection be placed on the page or should I wait for more vandalism to occur to request it? Felixsv7 (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Semi-protected for 1 year. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP disruptive editing. Controversial subject matter CaffeinAddict (talk) 17:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 19:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of LTA Jinnifer, see edit history and Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer. For reference Horror film, Friday the 13th (1980 film) and several other horror film articles are protected until next year because of this vandal. MrOllie (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This is written with political bias. I once donated to Wikipedia, but I will never again donate money to a supposed neutral information source that has obvious political bias. The published political bias is protected so no other point of view can be shared. Opinions are represented as facts. The credibility and purpose of Wikipedia is now lost. Remove the protection; make it neutral or offer all opinions and all points of view, or be honest and declare your company to have a one sided political bias. 2600:1011:B101:5C79:2D2C:E43B:C28E:8FD9 (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. You're so busy ranting that you forgot to tell us which article you want to edit. Favonian (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: continuous disruptive editing by an IP on this page and other pages; warnings posted on their talk page have been ignored. Keivan.fTalk 16:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I've left some additional warnings, Keivan.f. But maybe try to explain yourself better to the IP, in your edit summaries and otherwise...? Thanks. El_C 16:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: Sure. I'll try to ask them about their motives on their talk page; however, if I don't get a response I'm afraid I'll need to come back and ask for the page to be protected. Thanks anyway. Keivan.fTalk 16:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keivan.f, I just put myself in the place if this IP editor, so from that perspective, I found your edit summaries, especially, challenging to parse. It would have been better for you to just state something to the effect of: IP editor, I undid your edits because [X,Y,Z]. Anyway, for sure, feel free to drop me a line if problems persist. El_C 16:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- I totally understand, El_C. I explained the specific issue on their talk page, and I'll be waiting for a response. I'll let you know if the issue doesn't get solved. Keivan.fTalk 16:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keivan.f, I just put myself in the place if this IP editor, so from that perspective, I found your edit summaries, especially, challenging to parse. It would have been better for you to just state something to the effect of: IP editor, I undid your edits because [X,Y,Z]. Anyway, for sure, feel free to drop me a line if problems persist. El_C 16:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: Sure. I'll try to ask them about their motives on their talk page; however, if I don't get a response I'm afraid I'll need to come back and ask for the page to be protected. Thanks anyway. Keivan.fTalk 16:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive bad grammar changes by IP user - previous IPs have been warned, but the disruption persists. BilCat (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent BLP violations being added into the article by IP's relating to unsourced accusations of criminal activities and being part of a "human depopulation" orgainisation. This seems to have been spurred on by recent news coverage, so a week or so of semi-protection should deal with the immediate issue. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 18:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. Recent protections didn't seem to work, unlikely to get better now that she's the current director of the Bureau of Land Management (as of Sept 30). El_C 19:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Please semi-protect my user talk page as it has been vandalised several times in the last few days (probably always by the same person under different accounts and IP addresses). Plani (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like cross-wiki harassment. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors repeatedly adding content to infobox past objections without engaging with discussion. I would act myself, but could be perceived as being involved so I'm passing the buck. signed, Rosguill talk 19:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 19:56, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Zhmailik. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Zhmailik. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:23, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs have been vandalizing for two days now. MB 20:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blocked one IP too. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
04 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:24, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced BLP by anons: birthday Adakiko (talk) 01:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Not even a day, and already, there is IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Requesting a longer protection than the last one. TheVHSArtist (talk) 03:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: repeated unsourced BLP. Multiple IPs, probably one editor. Adakiko (talk) 03:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked ip editor. BusterD (talk) 03:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced BLP. Multiple IPs, likely one editor. Adakiko (talk) 03:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. Subject matter is new NSW Premier which is attracting vandals. Violates BLP. Kylesenior (talk) 04:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated addition by IP editors of unsourced or inappropriate content. Joeyconnick (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A 2 day old WP:SPA with 7 edits continues the edit war of Br Ibrahim john just hours after they were blocked for edit warring. Both the users argued about lack of sources while the article is fully sourced.[18][19]. Asking for ECP as I'm sure the edit war will likely continue. Likely sock-puppetry by the same user. - SUN EYE 1 05:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try semi-protection first. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
(So sorry, I accidentally requested a protection lowering instead of an edit for this page. I am new to Wikipedia editing and don’t know how to delete that one. Apologies for the trouble!)
The ‘rats spread the plague’ in the case of the Black Death specifically is inaccurate.
It seems like the first part mentioning it, with the patterns of spreading and where it went geographically, just tacked ‘rats’ onto actually cited information without validating what is a popular but mostly debunked theory.
Were rats a major factor in some other plagues? Yes. Is there historical evidence that they a primary cause of the Black Death? No, quite the opposite. Historical evidence and modern modeling techniques suggest it was spread almost entirely by human-to-human contact. The most obvious reason being that rat migratory patterns (even accounting for ships) do not line up with the speed the Black Death spread. As well as other historical accounts where rats did cause the spread not aligning with the accounts of the Black Death. 2600:1700:120:6410:B876:233E:D86F:A9EF (talk) 00:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ideally, edit requests should be made on the article talk page. May I encourage you to make your comment there? If you wish to propose a specific change to the text, you can do that there with the use of the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. P.S. I have removed the misplaced entry in the 'requests for reduction in protection level' section. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done This has been open for over 24 hours without response so I will close this. This is a good faith comment but one that is better placed on the article talk page where the content can be discussed. Specific changes to text can be requested there too. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Recurring disruptive editing by IPs and accounts. The Banner talk 21:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 00:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
BalPakna2021 (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Please explain what change you are actually requesting. The article is not protected so you can improve it if you wish. Anyway, I have undone the removal of the AfD template. You can participate in the deletion discussion and make your arguments there. EdJohnston (talk) 03:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
96.5.10.130 (talk) 03:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No page specified. EdJohnston (talk) 03:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. زنجي التنفس (talk) 00:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- زنجي التنفس: there are no IP edits to that page. P.S. As it currently is, it is not suitable for the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Malcolmxl5: It is, however, a blatant copyvio. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 01:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Page has been deleted. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. BalPakna2021 (talk) 00:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Utter rubbish. There has not been a single IP edit on the article. The nearest to vandalism has been the OP (twice), and another editor (4 times), removing the AFD notice from the page. The same comment applies to the repeated request further down this page. --David Biddulph (talk) 05:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined There is no IP vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. BalPakna2021 (talk) 02:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done This request seems to have been made in error. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. BalPakna2021 (talk) 04:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined There is no IP vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. BalPakna2021 (talk) 02:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @BalPakna2021: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined There is no IP vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Peristant Descruptive Editing Or Vandalism. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 05:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Already done by @Cwmhiraeth Please See [20]
Already done by administrator Cwmhiraeth. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 10:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 week semi-protection would be enough to convince this IP that is POV-edits are unwanted. The Banner talk 09:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Enormous amount of vandalism - subject is recently deceased 192.76.8.74 (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bishonen. Favonian (talk) 10:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP harassment by 2409:4063:6D81:3F52:0:0:7ACA:AA00 (talk · contribs). Meters (talk) 06:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP harassment has moved to this alternate (and retired) account. No need for anyone to ever edit this. Meters (talk) 06:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- The requests for this page, and the above requests for User talk:Meters and User talk:Lazy Maniik are all due to one IP repeatedly posting the same content. Meters (talk) 06:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from IPs, high attention because of Lars Vilks death yesterday Macuser (talk) 09:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple accounts seem to have been blanking this page disruptively throughout the AfD discussion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ongoing repeated addition of WP:TRIVIA. Joeyconnick (talk) 07:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 13:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP (103.119.140.71) continously added non-notable "award"/category that isn't recognized by award presenter nor was it reported by news media. This is a search results from Naver which return no results of the subject in relation to the award ceremony, meaning they didn't won any awards hence there were zero articles to even write about them. Here is another results to show searching is not broke, in which seach term "TMA 시크릿넘버" was replaced with "TMA BTS", and results was returned. In addition, to changing sales figure without updating the existing source or providing a new source to support the changes. Please help to protect the article or block the user. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Adding on, user decided to switched to Weeekly and removed sourced content there. I have actually reported on WP:AIV before coming here, but no actions was taken there, and it is becoming annoying. Report is still there. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. If the user resumes disruptive editing after the 72 hours have passed, report it to the admin who issued the block. MelanieN (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: A number of editors (presumably socks) repeatedly removing AFD notification from this page, hence needing extended-confirmed protection until the AFD process is complete. David Biddulph (talk) 09:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Reply to automated comment: The requests which were denied earlier today were for semi-protection, and they were denied as at that time there had been no IP edits. This request is for ECP, as various of the socks vandalising the article by removing the AFD nomination are autoconfirmed accounts. The vandalism, and hence the need for protection, has continued throughout today, as is clear from the page history. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This protest is a current event and is affected by persistent vandalism by IP users. Much of the vandalism is defamatory language directed at the protestors themselves, risking a BLP violation as well. JeffUK (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism Phichanad (talk) 07:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. I have warned the user. MelanieN (talk) 15:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After edits that had incorrectly amended the player statistics, (hidden) advice was left with guidance to correctly updating the article. At a subsequent edit, the stats were again incorrectly updated and the advice removed. It has been replaced and then removed by anon editors, several times since. An Admin. involved in the football project suggested a range block but there has been more than one 'range' involved now. Eagleash (talk) 11:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 11:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP Vandalism spike, just undone a serious one MoonlightVectorTalk page 14:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Semi-protection of this page would no longer allow reports of vandalism by ip editors or unconfirmed new accounts. The vandalism you speak of was reverted quickly and oversighted. If any page is watched by many administrators I would assume it is this one. -- Longhair\talk 18:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Target of long-term block evasion. See this list of IP addresses, this SPI case and the page log for this similar article (protected until next January). Please drop a note on my talkpage if you need more info. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Table Vandalism? MoonlightVectorTalk page 19:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
05 October 2021
Reason: This article about association football team has been vandalized multiple times (more known as an Editing war), please protect this page and block or warn Straubrey1234 as soon + Isaac Aubrey is an imaginary association footballer. Thank you Noel baran for you job, ;).
Indefinite semi-protection or Temporary protection for this reason.
Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 11:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing vandalism and BLP issues Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism after recent loss... Adolphus79 (talk) 14:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – see history. Idan (username is Zvikorn) (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 23:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Virtually every single IP edit of the last 50 edits have been reverted. Page is also not highly watched and last vandalism lasted for nearly 12 hours. Recommending for indefinite semiprotection or pending changes protection. Seloloving (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi protection Rapid sockpuppetry by a sock. Also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat. AnM2002 (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Rahul Vijay Kumar (talk) 21:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Empty request. (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
i want to change my bio Fostarking Ug (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Your bio is not protected (asumming you are talking about your sandbox's subject). (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The page has now stabilised, and the lab leak issue, which seems to have been the cause of disruption, has been included in the page, and even has a page of its own. 217.35.76.147 (talk) 18:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Nonsense, the above IP has been disrupting DRASTIC, which if anything also needs ECP or SP. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Don't decrease protection, its too soon, maybe lets try with the talk page first, see below. Forich (talk) 22:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Courtesy @ToBeFree: (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Investigations into the origin of COVID-19 was protected by ToBeFree in February 2021 and logged at WP:DSLOG/2021. I see no reason to change it. Johnuniq (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The initial cause of disruption has subsided, which should enable the wider community to contribute. 217.35.76.147 (talk) 18:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- No, it hasn't. See above. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose decrease, definitely too soon. Forich (talk) 22:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Courtesy @ToBeFree: (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined COVID-19 lab leak theory inherited indefinite ECP protection from COVID-19 lab leak hypothesis which was set by ToBeFree in February 2021 and which is logged at WP:DSLOG/2021. I see no reason to change it. Johnuniq (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Same reason as decreasing protection of the main page. 217.35.76.147 (talk) 18:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- See above. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with reducing protection to this talk page, at most to GS, but disagree with the other related proposals (the main article, or the covid-19 lab leak entry). As suggested by the daily page views figure, it has received much less atention compared to its June levels. At that time, arguments in favor of upping protection to DS (see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1070), stressed "increased disruption around COVID origins", and "IP-based unproductive edits" which are not to be found in recent weeks anywhere on that talk page. Perusing its history, the last agressive discussion was made by AdoringNanny on August 28th, other than that it is easy to see how edits from new users or even IPs are made civilly, which is likely due to to the great efforts of moderation made by Shibbolethink and others. Forich (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Courtesy @Johnuniq: (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined I semi-protected this talk page for a year in June 2021 and logged it at WP:DSLOG/2021. Anyone with an interest in improving the encyclopedia would find that achieving WP:AUTOCONFIRM is easy and I see no reason to change the permission. Johnuniq (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent Vandalism Repeatedly Disrupted Editing on WP:HAT Kent2121 (talk) 08:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The controversial nature of the article attracts mild vandalism throughout the year. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 11:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The page has been consistently vandalised for several months. Sslaptnhablhat (talk) 14:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Increase in vandalism and BLP issues Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Content, especially that which is cited from public news source Nation.Cymru, is frequently blanked by various ips and users with very similar edit summaries JellyMan9001 (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism and adding unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 20:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 14:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined for now. Things seem to have calmed down now that it is no longer on the front page. If vandalism continues, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 18:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 18:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last problem edit was more than a week ago. MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing, breaking infobox parameter with an invalid title so that it doesn't show along with edit warring. Has used IPs and registered usernames. BilCat (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of primary sources and original research to a BLP. Woodroar (talk) 21:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week. If the problem resumes, pending changes might be an option., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone from Modesto, CA under three different IP addresses has been adding a bogus entry as "youngest proffesional astronaut" (sic). Presumably self-promotion by a teenager, but since the IP keeps changing (both IPv4 and IPv6), no easy way to isolate the page from them. Tarl N. (discuss) 02:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 06:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vios by IPs and newly registered accounts. –FlyingAce✈hello 03:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 06:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Previously protected page. Persistent IP vandalism. CaffeinAddict (talk) 04:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 06:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP disruption due to recent news stories. KidAd • SPEAK 21:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined It does not appear to me that there is any disruption at this time. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A variety of IPs and suspicious single-edit new editors have been attempting to remove sourced content from this article. CodeTalker (talk) 01:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 10:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism SkyFlubbler (talk) 10:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 12:03, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 11:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 12:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Curbon7 (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 12:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, some ip addresses like 122.168.31.22, 2401:4900:45C9:9D01:AB8E:F56:AFA5:E8F5, 122.170.210.148 are consistently performing distructive edits, see this, this, this, this. so please semi-protect this page Pyaarkarona (talk) 09:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 12:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Personal attack on admin. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Callanecc. Favonian (talk) 10:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gotitbro (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:03, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 13:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Rahul Vijay Kumar (talk) 21:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: IPs shouldn't be editing this page. (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The "Minister of National Defense" vandalspam has resumed. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 13:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Constant IP vandalism for years The Tips of Apmh (talk) 15:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry of Jun Matsumoto appears to have stopped. I requested my talk page be protected so I would not persistently be asked by socks to change edits on the Jun Matsumoto page, and since the sockpuppetry seems to have stopped I no longer have a need to have my talk page protected. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotected. No biggie, but I did say at the time that I thought the request was premature and so was acting on it. El_C 16:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Recent high level of IP edit warring against consensus (established on the talk page per WP:NPOV and WP:FRINGE): [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]
There has also been some new user edit warring/disruptive editing: [31] [32]
Given the nature of DRASTIC, I would bet very good money there is off-wiki coordination involved...
Given all of this, requesting semi-protection. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: I was the IP that made several changes which were reverted by Paul Siebert, which I took to the talk page before reinstating one of my changes, which was based on a summary of an RFC Shibbolethink here posted and withdrew. I have now posted that RfC discussion for proper closure in Wikipedia:Closure_requests#Other_types_of_closing_requests, and I am not the only editor who notes the concern with Shibbolethink's preferred label. Can Shibbolethink explain how my edits were out of the norm for Wikipedia editing, requiring this higher level of protection? 217.35.76.147 (talk) 17:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- See WP:BRD and WP:EW. Two policies you did not follow when you continued to edit your preferred wording into the page even when multiple others had reverted your additions. I might add, disruption is not just from this user, but by several different IP users. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 21:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Was going to make a request, before Twinkle told me this already existed, so support: disruption by IPs over the short term has increased, and, as one would expect from something under WP:COVIDDS which is being actively promoted by a "loose collection of internet activists", such disruption is unlikely to stop without encouragement. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism Annamargarita0 (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Suspect logged-out sockpuppets given the history of the BP articles this year. Authorized under WP:GS/PAGEANT. Bri.public (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Bri.public, it's currently neither an article nor a biography, and thus currently not covered. As soon as it becomes an article, please notify me on my talk page and I'll extend the protection to indefinitely per WP:GS/PAGEANT. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Working on the sockpuppetry case; will protect the page temporarily afterwards, and all affected articles indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs stopping by once a day to change pronouns. Slywriter (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism. LizardJr8 (talk) 18:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This is the page that I am using to confirm my alternate account. I am requesting it to be protected to prevent impersonation from new accounts. -- lomrjyo (✉ • 📝) 19:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 19:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Various SPIs adding removing content and promotional language to the article. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 18:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: This was a rather poor decision to stop all IPs editing given the disruption was more from registered editors deleting the plot section, rather than only being IPs. Can we remove the protection now, just to see if the problems recommence? If waves of IPs start deleting sections, then it can reimposed, but at the moment it isn't working - I'm having to leave numerous edit requests on the talk page, which is a waste of everyone's time. Thanks. - The editor formally known as SchroCat, editing from 2A00:23C7:2B86:9800:C9A6:5975:8A9A:D14B (talk) 11:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Administrators are unlikely to reverse this protection without ToBeFree's permission. If you can't log into your account, I suggest you create a new one, making it clear that it's your new account (i.e. "Schrocat2"), otherwise continue with the edit requests. Sro23 (talk) 12:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't want to have an account and there is no reason for me to have an account. I am happy with occasional editing as an IP, but the protection on the page was a heavy-handed and misguided step that shouldn't have been made in the first place, given the number of registered users that were involved in deleting the entire plot section. - 2A00:23C7:2B86:9800:C9A6:5975:8A9A:D14B (talk) 12:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, this would be a reason to have an account. Your choice.
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:03, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Could you try to give a proper reason for the decline please, one that focuses on the article and not whether I have an account or not. It's a spurious reason to reject a reasonable request from someone who has not been involved in vandalising the article, so could you try with something more appropriate please? - 2A00:23C7:2B86:9800:C9A6:5975:8A9A:D14B (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Ashish Khetan Akhetan76 (talk) 17:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
06 October 2021
Reason: Persistent vandalism by an anonymous user. This article was protected twice before this year and the user continued to vandalize after the protections expired. It needs Indefinite extended protection. LittleJerry (talk) 12:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: My impression is that the article does not need protection, but I will defer to another admin. MelanieN (talk) 23:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please see here and here. LittleJerry (talk) 01:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I took those previous protections into account. -- MelanieN (talk) 02:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please see here and here. LittleJerry (talk) 01:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Temporary SP might be necessary on top of the existing PC; (which might do with being prolonged, IMHO); given the disruption has picked up in recent days. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. HurricaneEdgar 11:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 01:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 01:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. YttriumShrew (talk) 01:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please warn the IPs on their talk pages. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please can this be protected at least until the AfD concludes? The main disruptor has been blocked indefinitely but two more accounts have now appeared and are doing the exact same thing. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bbb23. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Candidates in the 2022 Philippine presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Hot topic, and there has been recent IP vandalism going on here, especially regarding Pacquiao. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 07:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A user with a clear COI has made numerous edits to this page, even after being advised of COI policy. Lenny Marks (talk) 20:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalization by ips. MoonlightVectorTalk page 20:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
i would like to ask if any user can update correct logo from my edit link there
Reason: Article has become a target for spammy text in the past month or so. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the problem continues, pending changes protection might be suitable. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A few IPs keep adding people, such as a McDonald's (misspelled) employee, to the "Notable residents" section without demonstrating notability, as I requested when I reverted them. I explained that their Instagram account is not sufficient. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:51, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: After beggining to be protected to this vandalism starting to take a short edit warring later when user blocked since 2020, later in the next year when IP addresses to see additional information later. 112.207.99.11 (talk) 03:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Courtesy @Sro23: (CC) Tbhotch™ 04:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Sro23 (talk) 04:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: After beggining to be protected to this vandalism starting to take a short edit warring later when user blocked since 2020, later in the next year when IP addresses to see additional information later. 112.207.99.11 (talk) 03:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Courtesy @Sro23: (CC) Tbhotch™ 04:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Sro23 (talk) 04:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Consistent removal of redirect by LTA. wizzito | say hello! 22:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @BusterD: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- @BusterD: You protected Nickelodeon Land (Gold Coast, Australia) instead. (CC) Tbhotch™ 04:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined The IP has been blocked for three months. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi-Protection for Yohani article. Superatp 16:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection/Pending changes protection. Long term issues with vandalism and BLP violations from IP editors and SPA's. IPs keep on editing the article to add false claims that this person is married to Elçin Sangu, basically every IP edit since early September has been reinserting this bit of vandalism. There are also a couple of SPA's in the page history dedicated to doing the same thing. This is seemingly related to a TV show that the two of them starred in where they got "married" in 2017, so given it's been 4 years already it doesn't seem like this disruption is going to end any time soon. 192.76.8.82 (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The vandalism seems to have died down. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Kattar Hindu6262727 (talk) 05:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – no argument presented. Favonian (talk) 05:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: repeated vandalism by an IP address Elemimele (talk) 20:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is a village that changed hands between India and Pakistan in a 1971 war. All I see the unconfirmed users doing to this page now is to add respective Indian and Pakistani POVs. It is a waste of our time to keep reverting it. I am requesting indefinite semi-protection. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kautilya3, be that as it may, it's rare for a page to go from zero previous protections to one of an indef duration. El_C 10:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Mentions of the Pandora Papers leak have been removed from this article at least 5 times, either by IP editors or SPAs Uhooep (talk) 06:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Continued disruptive editing straight after the previous semi-protection expired. FDW777 (talk) 07:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
High vandalism: High level of IP vandalism. Johnnyscott21 (talk) 04:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Johnnyscott21: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done The OP's changes to the page are suspect (claims accompanied by zero substance). No IP has edited the page since Sep 15, so
Stale on that front. El_C 09:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of editing by anonymous and registered users Kkangsonp (talk) 09:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: vandalism from IP and new users, see also this--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 10:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. Stop being weird, bot. El_C 11:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sock farm of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dedy Tisna Amijaya is wreaking havoc. Austronesier (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ditto for Lampung. El_C 13:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism by ips, some are reverting others and is just general chaos MoonlightVectorTalk page 13:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes first--Ymblanter (talk) 13:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive edits of Nationalism, see extensive talk page discussions. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Not really seeing problems coming from confirmed accounts, so not sure about the utility of going straight to WP:ECP. El_C 13:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP edits removing reliably sourced content. BLP is engaged in an election, so there are multiple IP pov edits. Protection appears to be the only resolution. Thanks X4n6 (talk) 13:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP has returned reinserting promotional content after previous protection lapsed. SPECIFICO talk 13:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. This is a historically oppressed minority in India, kind of like blacks in the US, and I believe there will be vandalism going on, on this page for the foreseeable future. I just reverted a few edits, and I see many IPs do vandalise this page regularly Daiyusha (talk) 05:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected, this is the best I can come with. I do not see any need for extended confirmed protection, and for me even long-term semi-protection would be a stretch given the frequency of the edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Kevin is trying to vandilse the Medabots IP but editing the wiki so he can his Crypto scam Dash.EXE (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing continued after the expiration of the previous protection. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by the IP ranges (particularly the IPv6 2402:3a80...). All of the IP edits have been reverted by multiple different editors. Some1 (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
07 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been victim to incessant vandalism recently, from different registered users and possible sock puppets. Lenny Marks (talk) 14:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term copyvios issues. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor: Self tagged as handled and too late to request. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: I believe this page should be move protected because people believe they can just keep moving without any discussion. For 3 years it was HoYeon Jung, now all of a sudden people watch a squid tv show and think they can just go meddling with precedence. Trillfendi (talk) 21:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Move protected indefinitely. El_C 01:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
The Project Vertas page has several fallacies that have been taken to United States Court and have resulted in several law suits in defamation of character cases. I find it offensive that this is protected from being edited as it is libel. I propose to rewrite the page in a non offensive, accurate and unbiased manner that reflects facts rather than opinion. Example: Project Veritas is a far right misinformation group Change to: Project Veritas is an investigational reporting group.
Please contact me with any questions at (Redacted) 2600:387:C:6F16:0:0:0:C (talk) 21:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There are news of his release from the Dallas Cowboys, but the release isn't official until tomorrow. Still, many IP users try to make the edit reflecting the release before it becomes official. Dannyyankee12let's talk 01:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- I should add that now he is officially released, however now there is breaking news of him being signed by the Green Bay Packers. As before, IP and non-comfirmed users are treating the article as WP:BREAKINGNEWS and editing the page to reflect the initial reports. I still wish for Temporary semi-protection until the transaction is made official. Thank you. Dannyyankee12let's talk 21:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ferret. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Request short term semi protect - for persistent disruption from block evading edit warrior. First account User talk:Tron4444444 partially blocked, so they are now using Tron444444 (talk · contribs) (one less "4"), all this desite ×2 wp:anew reports, multiple warnings from multiple editors, and a continued refusal to engage anywhere. (which was the purpose of the partial block) Thank you - wolf 08:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: A Very High Level Of IP Vandalism Dash.EXE (talk) 14:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Dash.EXE, please stop relisting this request (yesterday), when nothing new has happened. El_C 01:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 01:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 12:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP editors who post false or unsourced edits. Areaseven (talk) 14:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page has been protected multiple times in the past. New and unregistered users have persistently tried to remove one of the sections. Snuish (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Masked IP editors with UK IP addresses are back to making nonsensical edits about characters being "new" to the Batman animated series continuity. Page was protected for a month but probably needs long-term protection. Thanks! Posters5 (talk) 00:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- I should add that one or maybe more of them has/have an obsession with trying to make it appear as if Black Mask is a new addition to the animated series continuity, even though he was featured in previous comics based on BTAS. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Batman:_The_Adventures_Continue&action=history and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Batman:_The_Adventures_Continue . Posters5 (talk) 02:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. (Single IP, 2 times in a fortnight.) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The rfc is not ended yet but an user who has always been supportive to the rfc demander in every discussion at the talk page of this article, doesn't want to wait for clear consensus, with experts in music related articles Woovee (talk) 02:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Woovee: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Please stop edit warring. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be the target of some kind of coordinated action. AngryHarpytalk 07:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InvalidOStalk 15:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recently arrested, page now being vandalised. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 10:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: His new film is coming. AapkaWikian (talk) 08:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. Draft:Raaj Vishwakarma is not yet ready for article space. Wait for approval. Furthermore, don't try to move it to an alternative title! Favonian (talk) 09:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and ongoing vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 02:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Spike in vandalism from multiple anonymous IP editors due to the team's participation in the prestigious 2021 League of Legends World Championship. Requesting temporary protection for a month (the duration of the tournament) or whatever action is deemed appropriate. CentreLeftRight ✉ 05:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. POV content removals by IPs — DaxServer (talk to me) 06:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Arunjkumar007 (talk) 11:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 12:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – see Ali Mansour (actor). GPL93 (talk) 11:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InvalidOStalk 15:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. 2 disruptive IPs who seem to have stopped, and otherwise no disruption since August. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 disruptive IP edits within the past days and it seems to be persistent. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 15:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism / changing name of dish 90.198.49.249 (talk) 10:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2001:16b8::/35 is blocked from editing the article for a year. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to BLP. Subject currently in prison on charges. Egghead06 (talk) 12:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism over the previous week. Billcasey905 (talk) 14:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Today's FA - it's getting lot of attention from IPs and new accounts, perhaps someone would like to semi protect it for a few hours? (I would do it myself, but I wrote it, so am involved.) Girth Summit (blether) 14:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Okay, so it's also a town — wanna fight about it? El_C 14:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because cryptozoology is not, as your page describes it, a “pseudoscience.” A pseudoscience is a false science that does not follow actual scientific rules, and is biased. Cryptozoologists are not biased. As with any science, all cryptozoologists have our opinions and hypotheses, but we are as honest and inspective as any other scientists. We hear theories, we test them. We are given reports, we investigate them. It is true that we do not always follow the scientific method, but the scientific method simply does not apply. If you were looking for bears in the forest to determine how their species is growing and to gather population info, that would be science. We are doing the exact same thing. Think of the platypus. Platypi were not believed to exist for the longest time, and then they were found in the flesh and nobody questions them anymore. If one day, someone found, say, Sasquatch or el Chupacabra, it would be fact and in a few generations most people wouldn’t even know that they had once been cryptids. You should lower the protection on this Wikipedia article because the description of cryptozoology as a pseudoscience is wrong and biased. Cryptozoologists are real scientists with real scientific goals and real scientific expertise. I am one of many who have tried to remove this description, and like everyone else who tried, I have been denied and am insulted as a cryptozoologist. I get that Wikipedia tries as hard as possible to be reliable a source and I respect that, but honestly: get over yourselves and except cryptozoology for what it is: a science (perhaps a minor and challenged one, but a science nonetheless). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.17.58 (talk) 21:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Not unprotected – This page was protected by the action of the Arbitration Committee in this case. If you want the page to be unprotected, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment would be the proper venue, though I doubt the Arbitration Committee would be sympathetic, since cryptozoology is still widely considered a pseudoscience. InvalidOStalk 12:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-Protection expired, Please renew it as IP vandalism is high Laxmanthaletto (talk) 15:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism by ips right after it was created MoonlightVectorTalk page 17:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, vandalism, BLP violations from IP editors. The article subject has recently been in the news as a Facebook whistleblower. Beccaynr (talk) 17:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Content being removed from the article without the use of citations. The content is being restored by other users, and soon after again erased. The article has been previously protected.
I suggest to just grant an indefinite protection since this issue keeps coming back. As in the previous cases, there is no discussion whatsoever on the talk page but just the arbitrary removal of content. GDuwenHoller! 18:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection, due to repeated IP insertion of presumably WP:BLP claims, e.g. [33], [34] AllyD (talk) 21:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Requesting semi-protection. Ishtirak (talk) 01:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Requesting preemptive protection due to Pitman's ruling that blocked Texas' abortion law. Snickers2686 (talk) 01:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
full protection: Few editors edit warring and pretending to have gained consensus from RfC that was closed as 'No consensus'.[35] Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 03:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template.
15:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant removal of information by IP editors. Semsûrî (talk) 06:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Semi protection for at least one year because of edits made by IPs every month. This happened many time. Shinnosuke15 (talk) 08:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of spam link in see also section. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs has been continuously changing the person's name, has been happening since 31 August 2021. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism b/c Main Page appearance. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Wehwalt. Less Unless (talk) 17:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Low-intensity but persistent addition of unsourced material despite warnings. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 09:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: sustained continuing vandalism over the last couple of hours. Struway2 (talk) 19:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 19:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism due to HBO special in the news. Jacona (talk) 17:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked by Discospinster. Less Unless (talk) 17:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Less Unless (talk) 17:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 17:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 20:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring ongoing for two months with sources that state he is often regarded “as the greatest of all time” changed to “often regarded as one of the greatest of all time” CaPslOcksBroKEn (talk) 20:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is being repeatedly moved to article space, and is being moved back to draft space by reviewers. Request ECP move-protection so that it cannot be moved to article space except by extended-confirmed editors. This only needs to apply to moving. Editing by new editors should be permitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I recommend just blocking the IP that keeps moving it and then do a Semi move-protection. MoonlightVectorTalk page 17:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Reported the user to WP:AIV. MoonlightVectorTalk page 17:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-Protection A lot of Ip's has been changing Drew McIntyre's Brand Status from Raw to SmackDown Despite the fact the ip's did not realize that 2021 WWE Draft Results Do Not Go into Effect until October 22, 2021 and the ip's still does that after reverting the ip's edit. Six Ip's been doing this since Friday .Chip3004 (talk) 18:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Wikipedia:Manual of Style not followed. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IMO the main problem is not style; you could educate them on that. It is the addition of unsourced puffery. MelanieN (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
08 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring over logo. — Czello (Please tag me in replies) 09:18, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: Flaring up of an AA2 related dispute. There is discussion on the talkpage, but it's the third day of edit warring now. CMD (talk) 09:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please ping me to restore the indefinite semi-protection when the full protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level if IP vandalism Annamargarita0 (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The IP and a sock have been blocked, but there are clearly more where they came from. MelanieN (talk) 23:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated recent additions by IP users and other accounts of Bradley Cooper to the cast as Rocket using sources that aren't as reliable and appear to be WP:OR, given nothing has been officially confirmed. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP users and BLP issues DeputyBeagle (talk) 17:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two day edit war. Ifnord (talk) 17:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism and BLP violations by multiple IP editors. Incidentally, there are also a couple of recent edit summaries which may benefit from being hidden / revision deleted due to being offensive violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Re the rev/del material, I'm way ahead of you. MelanieN (talk) 23:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This is a long explanation. Starting from last month, a revolving IP mobile app massively revamped Night Safari, Singapore, Jurong Bird Park, River Safari and Singapore Zoo, but due to unfamiliarity with the verification policy, has not added any sources.
My previous attempts to communicate with them have been left unseen due to WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU and <!--messages--> were removed. I do not think there would be any good of asking for a block as the IP simply changes every time and a range block would affect a lot of Singapore.
The IP recently began to edit again, and as usual still not adding any sources or explaining their edits. May I request for all four pages to be protected under pending changes for at least a month? Under the policy, this would be due to repeated adding of unsourced content, but my primary aim is to spur the IP to create an account. If not, the alternative would be to put Night Safari, Singapore under pending changes, as the page was just recently edited. Seloloving (talk) 21:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. The Night Safari article is heavily edited by IPs, and most of their edits appear constructive. There is one recent problem edit at that article and no recent problem edits at the other articles. MelanieN (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flood of IP vandalism because club is in the news. David Biddulph (talk) 17:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After a recent string of attacks by Wikinger, Widr protected the page, inadvertently overriding the older indefinite semiprotection that had been in place before due to GRP and Wikinger harassing Antandrus; the protection had been briefly lifted as a test a few days back and had to be quickly reinstated after Wikinger socked. JavaHurricane 11:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: According to the protection log, it was Antandrus himself who lifted the indef. Widr imposed a new temporary protection, the second since the removal of the indef. We probably should not indef a user talk page (a controversial decision in any case) without the consent of the user. Favonian (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks all. It's okay as it is now - I may try unprotecting it again, and then indef it myself if the silliness returns. I wanted to make it open to anons if possible. Antandrus (talk) 14:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – Antandrus is in control. Favonian (talk) 20:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 17:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced content by IPs. Nehme1499 18:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Increase in vandalism activity from IP editors since the Vice President filed her candidacy for the 2022 presidential elections. - WayKurat (talk) 06:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 06:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is an ongoing battle to downplay or overplay the impact of the word. In all senses it functions as a slur with varying connotations from diminutive to downright hostile. Its origins also lie firmly in xenophobia. There also is a dependence on non-English sources. My strong advice is to protect the page and move all of these types of impulsive changes to a discussion in talk. Thank you. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 00:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 07:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. JellyMan9001 (talk) 03:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 07:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 04:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 07:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Haolinz (talk) 01:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 07:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP who is restoring redirect and reverting established editors. 27.57.177.155 (talk) 01:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Done fully protected for 1 week at new page title: Breast tax. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 07:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 07:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection
Reason: Changing Nationality without proper citations. Ayush6568 (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP has been the subject of multiple unsourced edits from recently registered accounts. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uness232 (talk) 17:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Seems to be a target for accidental edits from newbies, not sure if semi-protection would be sufficient and there isn't much of a reason to edit this redirect anyway. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: I hate to dispute this, but... is there any reason to not protect this? It's a redirect which should never be edited, especially by newbies. It's gotten 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 test edits from non-extended confirmed users - and zero helpful ones. Clearly more newbies are going to come across this page and make more test edits. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. @Elli: I'm unsure what the policy is about protecting such a redirect. I agree with what you say and have now protected it, even though the test edits are very infrequent. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:52, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite pending changes: High level of vandalism - After Frank Welker's article temporarily expired its protection, several IPs of unknown origin revert to vandalism again by repeatedly changing Welker's occupation under the same term, and acting covers his work as a voice actor, filmmaker, and the television, but it seems that someone or some user does not want to understand and I need a librarian to come here to definitely protect the pending changes so that an IP or a user repeatedly changes the occupation of this because it cannot be in the same. 148.101.50.48 (talk) 23:55, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 17:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruption started again straight after the latest in a series of semi-protections expired. FDW777 (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wareon (talk) 09:06, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: His birth place is getting changed again and again. Here is the document proof for his birth place thumb Request you to increase the protection. Sukant Kadam (talk) 19:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 07:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP is back to his informal, amateur, biased, unsourced editing style and deleting sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Please warn the IP-users accordingly. Less Unless (talk) 12:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Being Today's featured article, it’s getting vandalised quite a bit. Luigitehplumber (talk) 08:23, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Could we get a 3-month bump to ECP protection, and then an indefinite SP (agreement to, rather than implementation, as it can't do that, ofc), as current protection is proving insufficient. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for the duration. I'm more inclined to take it one step at the time atm, actually. El_C 14:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Page has in recent months been the target of both an a edit wars campaign and a vendetta led my editor duffbeerforme, whose harassment can be seen posted on page creator's user talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QLitBabel Since, duffbeerforme has mustered a posse of destructive editors, vandalizing the referencing to make the page appear inadequately sourced - also applying blatant misuse of administrative tools, gross and persistent misjudgment and conduct issues e.g. first tagging page 'articles for deletion' (tag expired due to non-consensus, now another afd taghas been re-added by duffbeerorme's cohort Theroadislong - the page has been so maliciously vandalized with false edit note reasoning that it now appears lacking in citations, using this as false rationale to repost an afd tag (see page's edit history for verification of all this) QLitBabel (talk) 01:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Less Unless (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from IPs inserting unencyclopedic nonsense or egregious epithets vs the subject. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Less Unless (talk) 12:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent Vandalism and changes in date of birth by unregistered users https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahima_Makwana&action=history Redcap78 (talk) 05:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 12:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 06:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 12:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP's, edit war, removal of information. Antique Rose 09:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 12:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Less Unless: Sock Seragont continues to conduct the edit war. Maybe it's time for extended confirmed protection? Antique Rose 14:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Antique Rose: Seragont has joined their IP range in the sin bin. Favonian (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Less Unless: Sock Seragont continues to conduct the edit war. Maybe it's time for extended confirmed protection? Antique Rose 14:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, constant unconstructive and disruptive editing by unregistered users. Bionic (talk) 10:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Less Unless (talk) 12:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Less Unless: It actually isn't a content dispute. There has been already a consensus over the content. It's the IPs who continuously and intentionally remove the information. First it was Unknown artist a vandal user, then their WP:SOCKs and now different IPs who may or may not be related to the blocked user, are purposely disrupting the article. There's this pattern of vandalizing by different IPs every day. Bionic (talk) 13:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- "...and now different IPs who may or may not be related to the blocked user, are purposely disrupting the article."
- A. The user (Unknown artist) is currently not blocked (and hasn't been blocked since February 2019)
- B. Based on what you've said, you are literally just assuming for your own sake that every user/IP that has removed the section/information is the same person.
- I would agree that this is more so content dispute at this point, it would be best to discuss at the respective section on the talk page, because at this point, you're the one edit warring to keep the information you've added rather than discuss it at all. Magitroopa (talk) 13:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- There are no 'users who are making improvements' here. Only a WP:SPA whose edits are virtually all DWTS-related. This does not strike me as someone here to help this altruistic free encyclopedia but only to add biased perspective and original research to their fan objects. And other disruptive edits are all done by the IPs. Bionic (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Less Unless: It actually isn't a content dispute. There has been already a consensus over the content. It's the IPs who continuously and intentionally remove the information. First it was Unknown artist a vandal user, then their WP:SOCKs and now different IPs who may or may not be related to the blocked user, are purposely disrupting the article. There's this pattern of vandalizing by different IPs every day. Bionic (talk) 13:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: User:WikiDan61 is harassing this page and immediately reverting published updates. Dan is making false accusations of misleading information. Dan is vigorously trolling this specific page without reason. I have attempted to clear up any ambiguity with a civil discussion but to no avail. I've exhausted my resources and need protection both on this page and from Dan following me, personally, so that I may use wikipedia freely and without intimidation. Laurenocmd (talk) 15:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It also appears that you have a conflict of interest regarding this topic. I've left some additional information on your talk page, but it appears to me that WikiDan61 has been trying to exlain our policies to you and you don't like what he's saying.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. User:worldgiant (talk) 15:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 15:52, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I've blocked HipHopThelogian for the three-revert violation Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the semi-protection expired in June, the vandals have gone back at it. Literally every edit to this page has been vandalism, and those which weren't vandalism were people reverting it. Helen(💬📖) 16:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blanking by IP and newly registered account. VQuakr (talk) 18:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
09 October 2021
Reason: Could we have full protection for ~30 days to stop edit-warring and refocus attention on talk page resolution. Most recently editors have gone against a very recent RfC close to reinsert content rejected at the close of the RfC. Related link: SPECIFICO talk 15:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think this is needed. There has been great progress made recently on achieving strong consensus to satisfy the small handful of editors who object to new content. Mr Ernie (talk) 17:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... I've restored CR to the page. @SPECIFICO and Mr Ernie: courtesy pings. El_C 23:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Itcouldbepossible (talk) 15:40, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 19:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. It looks like 2001:579:8314:1::/64 has been blocked for 2 weeks. Please re-report if disruption continues. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of spam links for over two years: [36], [37], [38]. Thepharoah17 (talk) 10:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 10:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: high level of ip vandalism Itcouldbepossible (talk) 15:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 22:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 21:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 21:40, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- OK. I withdraw my request. Editor2020 (talk) 21:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP6 editor has resumed adding unsourced/hoax material after previous 2 week protection has expired. MrOllie (talk) 11:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's not a hoax, but a different interpretation of the show's history. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism does not stop in this article, please protect it for a long time. Mishary94 (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing redirect without improving article content. DonIago (talk) 16:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Adding unsourced information and fancruft to the cast section of the page based on sourceless rumors. NoobMiester96 (talk) 17:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by a number of IP users over the past week (in violation of WP:DNTL WP:V). I left messages on each Talk Page to stop their unconstructive edits, but they continue anyways (NOT WP:HTBAE). 2601:5C4:4301:5420:20FE:B5A0:9472:F9FC (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption is moderate and you are doing well in controlling it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Three times in past week, four times in past month, by suckpoppets; please protect admin-only. If a neutral editor really wants to create an article, they can always come back here to RFPP or go to DRV. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:06, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Countless reverting from an IP user without any source. NoobMiester96 (talk) 18:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of sockpuppets of LTA Jinnifer, most recently blocked as User:Killtrigger See Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer. MrOllie (talk) 19:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – I gather that Mr. Chappelle has recently said something silly on the Internet, or perhaps on TV; in the last few days it seems that people cannot stop themselves from adding rude unsourced accusations about him to the lead. jp×g 23:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Revdels. El_C 10:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Currently getting spammed to death by two newly created users. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry from POV pusher to incorporate poorly sourced content in lead section, that too violating the long term consensus; WP:CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 06:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bishonen. El_C 11:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing from IPs — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hmm, I remember this page being a lot busier. Weird. El_C 11:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: - User-space page. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Request full protection to force discussion in the talk page. Jetstreamer Talk 11:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Going with sprotection instead, which isn't to say there isn't a legit content dispute here. El_C 12:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People are continuing to insert thoroughly debunked hoax content into this BLP claiming that the subject served in Afghanistan. DanielRigal (talk) 11:58, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant addition of unsourced content without consensus. Vacant0 (talk) 12:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. Logged AE action. El_C 12:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated POV-pushing by IPs. The Banner talk 12:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- *Bot slap*
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- *Bot slap*
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of sockpuppets of LTA Jinnifer, most recently blocked as User:Killtrigger See Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer. On this one the socks were back before the bot got around to removing the protection notice. MrOllie (talk) 19:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit by the sock since the protection was lifted. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 8 of the last 10 edits were vandalism or reverting vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 21:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined The IP making the three childish edits on 6 October seems to have stopped. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Near permanent POV-pushing by IPs. The Banner talk 07:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could someone please either protect this page or block the IP that keeps vandalising it? I've continually been ignored over at AIV, despite the fact that the IP was blocked for vandalism recently and has continued the same behaviour since the block expired. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. DanCherek (talk) 03:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. The pending changes are being made only to be reverted. I don't see any end to this disruptive editing — DaxServer (talk to me) 12:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Haveyouseenthisboy (talk) 02:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DanCherek (talk) 03:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-Protected Persistent Disrupted Editing. Poorly Unsourced Violations.Kent2121 (talk) 07:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Four acts of vandalism by three non-autoconfirmed users so far this month, with no productive changes by non-autoconfirmed users for a while. — Bilorv (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Flurry of recent vandalism from anonymous and new users. Funcrunch (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- International Community School (Kirkland, Washington) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 05:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP keeps adding degrading insults towards KSI. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated promotional editing and removal of maintenance templates by IP editors Melcous (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MRZQ (talk) 04:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined, please warn the IP and, if they continue, report them for WP:AIV--Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, specifically the repeated insertion of vulgar terms that has nothing to do with the contents of the page. Haleth (talk) 04:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing due to recent Nobel Prize win. Please page protect asap. Unilimited247 (talk) 15:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator CaptainEek. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Developing story - IPs are frequently adding that he has resigned, and this is not vandalism, they have sources, but there is no official primary source to fully confirm this. See edit history and other user's explanations. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
10 October 2021
Reason: Please enable page protection. The page was protected for a month, and the masked IP editors based in the UK are back to making nonsensical edits. They refuse to read the Talk Page discussion regarding the fact that certain characters have already been introduced into BTAS continuity via previous comics. Posters5 (talk) 07:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Moderate level of IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 15:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
I want to create a page with the name of 'Pavankumar Hegde' which is for my self biography. But it's showing that administration permission is required to create with this name. Please help me to create this page. Pavankumar L Hegde (talk) 09:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- We have little tolerance for autobiographies due to the inherent conflict of interest. Create a draft, with in-depth, independent, editorially-controlled sources, and submit it for review. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – what Jéské says. Favonian (talk) 19:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and additions of unsourced content. JuneGloom07 Talk 18:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, and historical revisionism. WikiInky (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP Vandalisation. Making same disruptive edits again and again Suneye12 (talk) 19:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – About three days would be enough to await the official results. Sjö (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Regular and consistent IP vandalism The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator BusterD. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated template vandalism by an IPv6 range-hopper, restarting hours after initial protection expired ( 2603:9000:6c01:79c:(varying portion), IP range is too broad to block per this now-archived discussion I had at the Teahouse). See the following diffs (first three from before first protection, last one from today): (false as the episode he edited had already aired). (episode 2 of season 5 is messed up), (original release date for episode one of season five disappears), After the previous protection expired the vandal returned to mess up the article again (Season five is not available in the table of contents). TBH, for edits so simple a 6-year-old could perform them, they are quite annoying. Tube·of·Light 15:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ask again if disruption gets worse. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi protection this page. Aj indiana (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Semi-protection would not help, and I do not see a case for extended confirmed here. Will appreciate a second admin opinion.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I agree with Ymblanter. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry by Dealer07; it was earlier protected for 2 weeks but that turned out insufficient. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator SQL. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Same as Belarus above. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator SQL. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I have requested protection for 2 days... I hope that can protect it from persistent vandalism, thanks. Limited Idea4me (talk) 04:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator TheSandDoctor. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection. Reason: Continuing edit war by sock puppet IP's. Removal of content. Please protect the article. Antique Rose 18:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Incorrect. It was neither denied nor declined. Antique Rose 00:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently death, heavily edited by ips because this person has recently died. Knowledge about the circumstances of the death and surrounding events may change rapidly by ip addresses... make it semi protect for a short time. Limited Idea4me (talk) 07:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Favonian (talk) 11:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism following recent death of subject Okay420 (talk) 07:37, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Favonian (talk) 11:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Quite few number of vandalic edits by autoconfirmed user. So, I requested it for Extended confirmed. Fade258 (talk) 10:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect this article for a few weeks The name of the person in this article is constantly being changed by an anonymous Users. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 10:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 12:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Few numbers of disruptive edits by autoconfirmed users. Fade258 (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs who ignore British English, other editors' edit summaries, and the talk page. DuncanHill (talk) 11:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I trust you meant the article and not its talk page. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Favonian: Thank you, yes, I meant the article - I want the IPs (I think they are all the same person) to come and engage on the talk page - it's where all the cool kids hang out. DuncanHill (talk) 12:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Page belongs to the honourable governor of Gujarat, constitutional head of the state and is prone to high level of vandalism with history of such cases in the past 103.234.162.225 (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Three reverts today so far (three different accounts). MB 20:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Let's see if vandalism persists. Less Unless (talk) 12:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued changing/reverting with absolutely no discussion on TP. MB 21:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated efforts to remove sourced (but unflattering) content by IP users. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 11:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2601:601:9a00::/40 has been blocked from editing the article for a year. Favonian (talk) 11:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Repeated arguments over the real Zodiac Killer's identity. O.N.R. (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Presistent disruptive edits by IP. Fade258 (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated IP vandalism. Ravensfire (talk) 16:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Request for semi-protection. Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by anonymous IP accounts. Object404 (talk) 17:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent low-level vandalism, probably one person behind it because all the edits are so similar and the edit reason never varies. But ip hopping over a wide range so I think this may be the best solution. Nick Levine (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Continued attempts at white-washing by misrepresenting refs Arjayay (talk) 22:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. MelanieN (talk) 19:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandlism Mishary94 (talk) 23:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sustained disruptive IP editing over the past 4 days. JBL (talk) 01:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of anti-Tide website. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. (CC) Tbhotch™ 01:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High amount of vandalism, people changing his age. Should be 13,people keep altering it. RedPatch (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Duplicate entry, reported above. MB 03:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator yours truly. Lectonar (talk) 19:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection - BLP article attracting a fair bit of IP vandalism. JuneGloom07 Talk 23:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Article is the target of a concentrated whitewashing effort by IPs and recently registered editors in Nicaragua. Skywatcher68 (talk) 03:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/WikiProject SpaceX (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: IPs can not join WikiProjects, and should not be in the discussion either. Starship SN20 (talk) 12:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – inadequate rationale from an editor who is no longer with us. Favonian (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP Addresses – Swagging (talk) 20:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Longhair\talk 20:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption since 2019. The page is just a series of reverts at this point, so an upgrade to semi-indefinite protection would be best. Seloloving (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined But these disruptions are few and often far between; I do not see that more than pending-changes protection is needed at the moment, the reverts to not put too great a strain on pending-changes revievers. Lectonar (talk) 17:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Even after the protection expired a few days ago persistently vandalizing by ips; I think it should be semi protected for infinite to prevent future vandalize ~. Limited Idea4me (talk) 06:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Airplaneman. PC protection has been installed. MelanieN (talk) 20:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of content from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Spaceastronaut. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Even after protection, the page has been vandalised, renamed etc. So, asking for an upgrade in protection level. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 08:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
someone has to complete vandalism reverting, league is still level 2 and both names in use, new logo not added...best if vandals are banned first
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The title requested here, I-League Qualifiers, is a redirect. The article was recently moved from I-League 2nd Division to I-League Qualifiers, and then moved back. I’m going to move-protect and await talk page discussion about the title. After the title is confirmed and stable, this request here should be clarified as to what title we are talking about, and we can then look at the history to see if protection needed to be upgraded from the current semi-protection. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and a lot of WP:CRYSTAL. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 08:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of unsourced content. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP inserting rude material Elemimele (talk) 18:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 09:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism (death announcement) Cheep (talk) 12:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by Holocaust Denier IP. Austronesier (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and disruptive editing in recent days by multiple IP editors. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A long-term abusive IP in the Balkans area with a dynamic range is adding unsourced content. Griboski (talk) 16:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spamming by IPs. Seems like recent ones just in the same /64 range, and looks like may be same user(s) that have spammed this article earlier in the year. Also, may I request revdel on the edits (which appear to present an ID number of some sort)?. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked the /64 for one year. I think I got all the revdels. Let me know if I missed any. Not sure protection is called for right now, though. Maybe the block will be enough...? El_C 19:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
11 October 2021
Reason: Dave Chappelle made jokes, people are taking offense. It seems highly unlikely that people will respect WP:NPOV. I suggest increasing the page protection sooner rather than later (knowing fully that will lock me out too). -- 109.79.170.230 (talk) 23:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- I came here to ask for page protection as well. IP vandalism. CaffeinAddict (talk) 23:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. This article is brand new, still being built up. Some IPs are taking constructive part in that process. There is also some IP vandalism. At this point it would be proactive to protect the page on the assumption that IP vandalism is going to become a major problem. If that turns out to be true after a day or two, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 19:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- I find it strange that my constructive edits undermined my own request for greater page protection, even with another editor also asking for page protection. We will wait and see. -- 109.78.199.18 (talk) 20:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- You were not the only constructively editing IP. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- I find it strange that my constructive edits undermined my own request for greater page protection, even with another editor also asking for page protection. We will wait and see. -- 109.78.199.18 (talk) 20:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption / POV. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 01:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Non-neutral Personal Life section content is being re-added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.137.40 (talk) 04:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. This appears to be a content dispute involving the attempted removal of longstanding content. Several of the participants are auto-confirmed so semi-protection would not help. It has not yet reached the point of needing full protection. The issue should be discussed at the article's talk page - and if you believe the section under discussion involves BLP issues, which it may, you could ask for input at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. MelanieN (talk) 20:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SangrurUser (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. LordSnow242 (talk) 14:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: @LordSnow242: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm seeing lots and lots of editing, but very little reverting, so I have to assume the edits are constructive. MelanieN (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Guy just missed 3 field goals and an extra point. DB1729 (talk) 20:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined I assume this report was intended for WP:AIV? -- Longhair\talk 20:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Longhair: Actually I intended to request protection for Mason Crosby, see below. I thought I had reverted myself here; apparently that was unsuccessful as well. --DB1729 (talk) 20:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- See directly below. -- Longhair\talk 20:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of badly sourced content by IP adresses, and previous temporary protections don't seem to work. Synthwave.94 (talk) 15:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 16:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. Page was semi-protected due to IP vandalism. However, page is being reverted to initial versions of IP vandalism by registered burner accounts. Requesting full page protection. Dman170 (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The current semi-protection seems to be doing the job. I see a couple of recent contested edits by an autoconfirmed editor; discuss at the article's talk page or their user talk page. MelanieN (talk) 22:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive IP/sock editting. Spike 'em (talk) 01:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- List of programs broadcast by Sonshine Media Network International (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism AsphereOfficial (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of plagiarism allegations without a reliable source. Seloloving (talk) 22:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent vandalism of 2005 tournament results due to the presence of internet-infamous DarksydePhil. Reimuhakureifan69 (talk) 23:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. An army of IPs has flooded this article for some reason -- FMSky (talk) 00:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Most edits are reverted Lucie281 (talk) 02:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 03:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done I've applied a rangeblock for the ips instead. Please message me directly if we need to revisit this. BusterD (talk) 03:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent and severe IP vandalism C12346567890- (talk) 03:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 03:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism by an anonymous user was reverting my edits back to previous version that is no longer accurate in terms of subchannel changes. FreewayDan (talk) 21:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High Level of IP vandalism Skblole (talk) 23:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 03:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP keeps making an edit that goes against prior consensus. (Oinkers42) (talk) 02:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD (talk) 03:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
COVID-19 data templates
- Template:Import-blanktable (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Import-blanktable/styles.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:COVID-19 data (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:COVID-19 data/Cite (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:COVID-19 data/data (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Templates and modules used by semi-protected Template:COVID-19 pandemic data. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Done all. El_C 12:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 02:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @BusterD: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. EC protection applied, but lock icon not appearing although apparently applied. May I ask another admin to check my work? Thanks! BusterD (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. You only semi'd the page, BusterD, plus there was only the pc lock icon. Anyway, fixed. El_C 11:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute / edit warring; resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- For your background, there has already been consensus to proceed in the talk page. The materials added aren't in anyway disruptive but were meant to improve the article further. Blind reverts and not incorporating the improvements anywhere have been relatively more disruptive. 124.217.188.171 (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent addition of the series ending by IP editors, despite only being about 3 months since the last episode and despite many reverts. wizzito | say hello! 08:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EN-Jungwon 09:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced / unexplained edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 11:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive editing by IPs that goes at least a year back. Semsûrî (talk) 12:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. Logged AE action. El_C 12:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: There's no reason for this to be template-protected any more; it only has 438 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 00:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protecting administrator is retired and there seems to be no previous requests. I am not familiar with the subject, but enough time have passed that I though it would make sense to reconsider the matter.
Addendum: I went through this list of protected talk pages and narrowed it down by excluding subpages, redirects and disambiguations until 2016, when sensible topics seem to start being more common. It's less than 30 entries and I still have to check for previous requests, but if someone can and wants to deal with it in some swifter fashion I can drop the list on their talk page or where suggested. 176.247.159.174 (talk) 16:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- I just relized that I can bookmark an Ip talk page, so the list is here, comments and suggestions are welcomed and I will stop spamming this request.176.247.159.174 (talk) 01:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Done Anarchyte (talk) 12:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding unsourced and also performed vandalism edits. Cassiopeia talk 23:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent Vandalism from unregistered IPs. Changing Date OF Birth and School name. The Date of birth has been corrected. Recent changes in the school name by unregistered IDs. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahima_Makwana&action=history Redcap78 (talk) 05:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cyberbot I: The request was made and denied following the argument that there hasn't been any recent Vandalism, but recently there has been Vandalism again made in the school Name by unregistered IP (110.224.242.214). See the history here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahima_Makwana&action=history Redcap78 (talk) 05:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Redcap78, as much as I like to pretend otherwise, Cyberbot I isn't a person (or a pet), it's a bot. Still, they do like treats. El_C 12:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cyberbot I: The request was made and denied following the argument that there hasn't been any recent Vandalism, but recently there has been Vandalism again made in the school Name by unregistered IP (110.224.242.214). See the history here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahima_Makwana&action=history Redcap78 (talk) 05:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 10:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Long history of IP vandalism to a controversial article, requesting permanent or long term semi protection. INDT (talk) 06:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Laxmanthaletto (talk) 13:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been the subject of repeated vandalism that hasn't been being caught in a timely manner for some reason. Hog Farm Talk 13:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- What, I was writing the thing, leave me be! Erm:
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- What, I was writing the thing, leave me be! Erm:
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gotitbro (talk) 13:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 14:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Article WP:CONFUSE, some editors are keeping on adding or changing edits without reason why. I often read the articles history but they don't add a reason why they add or change the edit and it was like confusing . SeanJ 2007 (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 16:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Full protection Edit warring over POV content without gaining consensus prior hand. Srijanx22 (talk) 15:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Apparent meat-puppetry from various IPs, looks like COI/POV editing. Forcing use of the talk page would be helpful. DuncanHill (talk) 15:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Huh. There's a UK one, what do you know. El_C 15:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of IP vandalism lately. Jacce (talk) 15:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism from a variety of users (see page history from this year alone). There are several edits that have had to be reversed due to poor grammar and unsubstantiated/erroneous claims. Edits should be restricted to accounts that are at least 30 days old to protect the page from further vandalism. Computermichael (talk) 13:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 14:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism in the last hours. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated removal of AfD tags while a discussion is ongoing. One IP has already been blocked, but the removals have come from multiple (obviously related) IPs and is likely to continue. PohranicniStraze (talk) 21:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To allow the AfD to proceed without the removal of the tag. Deor (talk) 22:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi freind can you add this person Brij Kishore Sharma here List of Poets Please 2405:201:3000:412D:AD8A:91EB:6A27:CC45 (talk) 16:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – block evasion by prolific sockpuppeteer User:HARSH VARDHAN SHARMA "TARA". Favonian (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
12 October 2021
Reason: Significant WP:BLP/WP:MOS violations and disruption from IPs and unregistered users making the same edits. KidAd • SPEAK 16:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 22:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 20:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Deor (talk) 22:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption and vandalism: although it is relatively slow-motion, most of the recent page history solely consists of vandalism and reverts thereof. This page was already SPed in the past, for shorter durations, but these do not appear to have had a significant impact on the drive-by vandalism which keeps occurring. Suggest at least 6 months to 1 year, possibly indef. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm sympathetic to challenges on such a high visibility article. Perhaps this should be pending changes, which would prevent the majority of livespace vandals. BusterD (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High risk of vandalism. 86.138.45.129 (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pages are not pre-emptively protected. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 22:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Both Present vandalism and addition of unsourced and poorly sourced content after its reported he’s stepping down. Swagging (talk) 01:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Misinformation and vandalism 86.21.237.64 (talk) 18:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) You were the one vandalizing. Very Unlikely to get protected. MoonlightVectorTalk page 20:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done A frivolous request. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This article probably needs to keep some I protection for at least another year, Baffert is regularly in the news, and although recent edits have been constructed updates, this is a big controversy presenting risk of BLP violations. Montanabw(talk) 20:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Deor (talk) 22:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Notre-Dame fire 199.231.119.94 keeps changing the background pag on the article to MEEP
2600:8803:5904:DA00:B451:3B13:DA2C:4A45 (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Thanks. I have blocked the miscreant for a short while. For future reference, straightforward vandalism like this should be reported at WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This needs to be protected indefinitely; it is constantly being vandalised because of 'sus' being used as the Among Us catchphrase (see block log and talk page). —. AFreshStart (talk) 23:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Doesn't need full protection. SP is likely enough. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This has less than 10 edits total in the last 6 weeks. BusterD (talk) 00:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This page and others are prone to vandalism due to 'sus' becoming an internet meme (see block log and talk page) and will remain so for a while. AFreshStart (talk) 23:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- @AFreshStart: I suggest you go take a look at WP:PROTECT and judge whether full protection is really appropriate. For dealing with vandalism, semi-protection or pending changes (rarely, extended confirmed) is usually quite enough. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Zero edits of any kind in last two weeks. User:AFreshStart, I suggest you follow a RandomCanadian's advice. BusterD (talk) 00:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Protection is not nessasary 60.242.223.143 (talk) 22:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- The last time this page was protected was in 2019. (CC) Tbhotch™ 22:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done The page is not protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism immediately after semi-protection expiration, fixed embarrassingly slowly. — Bilorv (talk) 20:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repetitive removal of the end year made by IP addresses only without discussion. Edit history shows a lot of edits recently has been removing the end year where registered users revert back. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotection: Apparently, the bot will be protecting these as well, but they are transcluded just for 24 hours. Pinging @MusikAnimal: just in case. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotected. These pages should now be ignored following Special:Diff/1049501592. — MusikAnimal talk 05:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: A user continues to edit the page adding extremely unsourced information for something called "NickRewind Jr.". BrickMaster02 (talk) 17:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disrupttion by IP hopping block evader, 103.210.146.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) currently blocked for three months. FDW777 (talk) 17:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: WP:DECEASED. I am not autoconfirmed on Meta, can someone request global lock at m:SRG? dudhhrContribs 19:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC). dudhhrContribs 19:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Will do soon. MoonlightVectorTalk page 19:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Completed. This page and user will soon be locked MoonlightVectorTalk page 19:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Done Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 10:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Completed. This page and user will soon be locked MoonlightVectorTalk page 19:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – from various IPs trying to change his name and photo. · • SUM1 • · (talk) 21:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. As often happens on political articles, every few days somebody will blank or whitewash content JellyMan9001 (talk) 02:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by IPs. OnewithThePeople (talk) 04:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has slow but steady drumbeat of unconstructive edits by IP editors. Permanent semi would save editor resources. Montanabw(talk) 04:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Too slow for semi at this time, though. El_C 12:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level ip 179.177.173.112 vandalism 89.172.79.221 (talk) 04:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing, seems to be one Australian IP edit warring with himself. Loafiewa (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High amount of vandalism, made by sockpuppet accounts RainbowLover334148 (talk) 05:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Multiple IPs nd new accounts attacking article. We've had more than 70 edits in the last 2 or 3 days, with zero content change. Meters (talk) 05:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. El_C 12:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing IP disruption - trolling, attempts to "close" the discussion. One IP has already been blocked for repeated removals of AfD tags on the related article, but the disruption is coming from multiple (clearly related) IPs. PohranicniStraze (talk) 21:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: New and IP editors are disrupting the discussion by removing comments from other editors and refactoring comments after the fact. An uninvolved admin might want to just close the discussion and salt the title. St★lwart111 01:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Stalwart111, Duplicate request. PohranicniStraze already requested above. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed! Happy for that request to be progressed. St★lwart111 03:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AfD speedy deleted. El_C 12:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed! Happy for that request to be progressed. St★lwart111 03:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unreferenced edits by Time-Swap and several anonymous IP addresses. Editor is possibly Kenny Jackal (or someone associated with Jackal), an individual written about in the article. There have been a number of IP address edits that attempt to remove details which portray Kenny Jackal in a negative light. Shamrox (talk) 01:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 12:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP hopping user. Removal of content. I know that the IP hopper may be blocked, but a protection of the article would be more efficient. Is there anything in particular that prevents the article from being protected? Antique Rose 17:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 6 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP Vandals GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 07:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Please semi-protect my user talk page for a longer period as it has become subject of significant cross-wiki harrassment and vandalism in recent days and weeks. Thank you. Plani (talk) 12:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect overwrites to article that does not demonstrate notability. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant unsourced additions by IP addresses. (Solid chance of a VPN being used.). {{u|Abillionradios}} {Static} 03:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FNSky (talk) 03:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. OP indeffed.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 03:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Eyad Abu Abaid soft blocked. El_C 13:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SSSB (talk) 07:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cars again? El_C 12:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Extreme levels of vandalism in recent days MSportWiki (talk) 10:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, give me a chance to write it! Erm:
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, give me a chance to write it! Erm:
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Possible sockpuppetry as well. Amaury • 07:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (talk to me) 07:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping spammer keeps adding an irrelevant external link. Squeakachu (talk) 07:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has had pending changes protection for a long time, but I think it requires permanent semi protection, as virtually all of the edits made over the last several months have been reverted as unsuitable. Perhaps as an alternative the pending changes protection needs to be tightened. Montanabw(talk) 20:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC). Montanabw(talk) 20:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined But these disruptions are few and often far between; I do not see that more than pending-changes protection is needed at the moment, the reverts to not put too great a strain on pending-changes reviewers. Lectonar (talk) 10:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term IP trying to remove unflattering sourced information about the subject and misrepresent sources. Seloloving (talk) 21:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done The IP 119.74.173.81 has received a final warning, report them to ANI if they persist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High risk of Vandalism. D97931478 (talk) 10:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. NicoCloforrin (talk) 10:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of necessary track and stuff removal by autoconfirmed users. Needs high protection with only extended confirmed users performing the actions. Pra2310 (talk) 10:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dispute regarding who should be put first in the infobox, constant reverts. Vacant0 (talk) 14:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Overly generic template name. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 17:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- You never give me a chance to write! Erm:
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 17:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- You never give me a chance to write! Erm:
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined This is more of a content dispute. The information is sourced, but how much of it requires inclusion here is matter for consensus. The article talk page has not been edited since 2019, and the reverting user (who is edit warring) hasn't edited the article since being warned. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from IP and registered users. VVikingTalkEdits 13:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because to prevent obvious vandalism we can decrease the level of protection to autoconfirmed. If some incident happen in future that is notable to be written in the article, it will take max 2 minutes and would not bother administrators. Even administrators are not needed to do this.
- What do I want in conclusion- To decrease the ;evel of protection to autoconfirmed.
Thanks, Contributers2020Talk to me here 04:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)
Not done This page is under 500/30 protection authorised by the Arbitration Committee. See WP:ARBIND. dudhhrContribs 14:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes below this line, preferably in a "change X to Y" format. Other editors need to know what to add or remove. nobody under the age of 13 or they will be declined also blank applications will be declined 174.78.159.3 (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC) My request is to be able to remove and add anything we want.
Not done – fuhgeddaboudit! Favonian (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Semi Protection Priyanshu Sharma Official (talk) 15:28, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Semi Protection Priyanshu Sharma Official (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – the only person vandalizing the article is you! Favonian (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Priyanshu Sharma Official (talk) 15:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – wait for Draft:Priyanshu Sharma Music Journey to be approved in the articles for creation process. Favonian (talk) 15:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP and SPA vandalism. Nosferattus (talk) 15:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP and SPA vandalism. Notfrompedro (talk) 18:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What a strange article to vandalize. Bishonen | tålk 19:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Suonii180 (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection due to constant vandalism since the semi-protection was taken off SoonerFan4life67 (talk) 20:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
13 October 2021
Temporary semi - continued addition of unsourced material by changing IPs.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - only two IPs involved; I warned one that hadn't been warned yet. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent efforts by IP and new users to add unsourced and/or un-encyclopedic content. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two users adding unsourced info today, nothing else since July. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits in that past two years appear to have been vandalism or reversions of vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm reluctant to indef as it's never been protected before. But I do see your point. Given the history and nature of the page I'll give it a month. If vandalism resumes when protection expires, we can go to indef then. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- @CorbieVreccan:Would you like to be pinged in such an instance? TornadoLGS (talk) 22:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- @CorbieVreccan:Would you like to be pinged in such an instance? TornadoLGS (talk) 22:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Tendentious IPs repeatedly adding unsourced trivia despite warnings. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2603:8000:6443:108c::/64 blocked for 31 hours for block evasion. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. JellyMan9001 (talk) 02:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edit war Vdjj1960 (talk) 19:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Same as Nathan Redmond, a group of IP addresses have repetitively removed the end year without discussion first that has been going on for many days. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP and SPA vandalism. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 22:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High Level of vandalism, been warned many times on talk but still continue to removing. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 00:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Guaranagelado (talk) 14:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 16:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Please add semi protection. Diig (talk) 16:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Since the page is only for users who want to become an extended confirmed users, please protect the page because other pages like this are protected. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 17:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 19:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 03:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple IPs making one specific edit change against policies on WP:CITE, and WP:RS. This is an ongoing and continuous issue with this page making simple blocks of individual IPs unlikely to stop the ongoing edit war. A 1-3 month protection is requested. Heiro 01:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Donald Albury. El_C 12:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Unaware newly registered users kept editing article despite the draft at Draft:Kim So-jung (actress) failing notability too many times. Requesting temporary semi-protection. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 01:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 13:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: I am conflicted on asking for semi-protection because this politician just won his party primaries and has a good chance of being the next president of South Korea. As a result, the page is receiving a lot of attention and edits it needs, which is helpful because the page currently in somewhat poor shape. However, there have been persistent extremely biased edits that read like campaign propaganda. It seems it would help to disallow IP address-users and only allow registered users to edit the page. Holidayruin (talk) 01:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
edit: I have opened a sockpuppet investigation based on what is occuring on this article. If the investigation develops please feel free to use this information on your judgement on page protection. Holidayruin (talk) 08:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Please increase the protection level of Anupamaa to protect it from high level of constant removal of necessary track and stuff by autoconfirmed users. It should be edited by extended confirmed users onlyPra2310 (talk) 02:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism regarding the name of Headmistress - likely by students. Uzorglemon (talk) 03:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism by shifting IPs. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent target of an LTA since May, with no helpful edits from IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Suspected sockpuppet damaging the article and editwarring. The Banner talk 14:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Extended confirmed protected for the duration. El_C 15:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Suspected sockpuppet damaging the article and editwarring. The Banner talk 14:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Extended confirmed protected for the duration. El_C 15:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Dear Sir/Madam, My text about StockVideos.org was deleted from Wikipedia: Drafts. I would like to talk to the person who did it, and discuss my plans further, but I can’t do this because my account is blocked. Please, remove the restriction from my account. Vladrichi (talk) 16:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- I do not see any restrictions on your account. I do see the draft that was deleted and I see a few problems. One, it was not written in an encyclopaedic tone; two, it was unsourced (it should be sourced to reliable and independent sources); three, you have a conflict of interest. I suggest you spend some time familiarising yourself with Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- The First and True Home of Asianovelas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- GMA The Heart of Asia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Continuously edited by a sockpuppet of ASIANPOPCHANNEL which is Novela1221. Novela1221 is a current autoconfirmed user. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks (both), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: A high possibility of this network list being an extreme victim of IP vandalism; just reverted 65k bytes of WP:FAIRUSE image violations which include network logos,and alleged programming lists that basically assert every damned American TV show since 1990 on broadcast, cable and PREMIUM networks, and the entire Hanna-Barbera library, somehow airs/aired on this Japanese network. This needs long-term protection. Nate • (chatter) 03:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 14:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Promotional hijacking. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days (both), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 15:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing, vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 15:59, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Continued vandalism/BLP issues. Page has previously been protected seven times before, three of those in the past year for the same thing. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Taiwan is NOT part of China or ROC, to say so is a lie. This information should be edited and not protected. 2600:1008:B10D:7D15:2011:F64A:1E1B:46C7 (talk) 02:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
·This is labeled as disinformation, but a lot of what the undercover journalists are uncovering is factual. If its factual, it would be immoral and incorrect to label its purpose as disinformation. 2600:8803:820F:9600:F1EB:DC3C:DEE7:6EA2 (talk) 03:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
2600:8803:820F:9600:F1EB:DC3C:DEE7:6EA2 (talk) 03:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism by anon IP. Also multiple editors have blanked the page as a redirect. This is a problem as there is an ongoing AFD of this article, and the AFD template has been repeatedly removed against AFD procedure. 4meter4 (talk) 16:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected Should last until the AFD is ready to close. bibliomaniac15 18:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive unreferenced editing by multiple IPs. Davidships (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 18:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Adding unsourced info Venkat TL (talk) 18:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support, a politically sensitive page, disruptive editing and edit warring by IPs and 3 hour old accounts. - SUN EYE 1 18:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism NSH001 (talk) 18:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of edit warring, with plenty of IP accounts engaging in unnecessary edits Steinmetz2001 (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Students occasionally modify the page to list themselves as president or other minor inaccuracies. CornHead764 (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:59, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection prevents the page from being updated with relevant and important information. Most of the frequent editors are non-extended confirmed users so this page has been neglected and is missing a lot of up-to-date information since the protection is increased. The Crown Whisperer (talk) 15:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: and @Scottywong: I wouldn't lower the protection, though. Lectonar (talk) 11:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Miss Universe, make way for Miss information! El_C 15:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- The exclusion of non-extendedconfirmed users from the sanctioned area of beauty pageant articles where semi-protection has proven to be ineffective is a benefit, not a loss, for Wikipedia's adherence to central policies such as WP:BLP and WP:NOR.
- Hence,
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I use SnatchBot as an educational tool and think it worth an entry. When I went to check if anyone had written one, I found that in 2017 SnatchBot/someone had repeatedly attempted to create an entry, which led to a permanent block: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snatchbot. Now in 2021, a quick check shows they have hundreds of results on Google Books and Google Scholar that would make for reliable, neutral, references. There are a couple of interesting quotes from their founders on AI. I've drafted how I think it might look in my sandbox. I've approached the original editor who placed the block but they have not been active since 2018. Seleucus123 11:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Seleucus123, although this page was deleted multiple times, is was never protected. That said, please don't create it right now. Your sandbox version is too promotional (WP:PROMO). Needless to say, a company with 40 employees and a $5 million revenue doesn't automatically merit inclusion on Wikipedia. Considering the multiple deletions, both the promotional tone and notability (WP:ORG) concerns will need to be addressed more substantively before going live. El_C 15:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Company or flagship product (WP:PRODUCT). The point is that, wrt usage, there needs to be an inkling about scale and scope. El_C 16:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Seleucus123, you can't remove closed requests from here. They need to be properly archived.
Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 21:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Seleucus123, you can't remove closed requests from here. They need to be properly archived.
- Company or flagship product (WP:PRODUCT). The point is that, wrt usage, there needs to be an inkling about scale and scope. El_C 16:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
14 October 2021
Reason: At least 5 IP users have reverted the Active date for the U.S. Army Special Forces, these users have been warned. There is an on-going active discussion on the talk page, in addition to an active Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. No IP user has engaged in the discussion and continues to make changes without input or discussion as to the logic or evidence based on other establishment of branches of the United States Army. I am requesting the article be escalated to disable IP users from making additional changes to the article. - Signaleer (talk) 17:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: this is a content dispute between the requester and the IP user(s). An IP user has participated in the tp discussion. DR has been requested via DRN. (fyi) - wolf 17:43, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: One IP user has made comment, no further discussions has been made or added comments regarding this topic. -Signaleer (talk) 18:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. But, if the IP/s fail to engage the talk in, say, a couple of days, let me know and I'll convert to a longer semiprotection. @Signaleer and Thewolfchild: courtesy pings. El_C 23:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Continued edit revisions concerning speculation of upcoming season's casting. 2A01:4B00:85BB:5200:349B:89A0:E9BE:8F30 (talk) 21:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: A singular user who probably only just recently created an account has been constantly re-adding unsourced material. Their disruptive editing has been warned by several users however this user itself is quite stubborn. Suugaapio (talk) 23:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Counting 19 reverts in the last 2 weeks. Current pp level is pp-pc1 since 2014. May require additional protection for a short period of time. — WILDSTARtalk 23:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 23:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs put non-flattering/non-relevant pictures i the lead. Huldra (talk) 23:44, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- BTW, Huldra, any of em had him with the top hat? Because that would have been funny. El_C 23:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- User:El C; Nah, but one (semi-nude) selfie(?) (which probably should be deleted from commons, (but I don't really want to get involved over there :/)) Huldra (talk) 23:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Too bad, those top hat pics are comedy gold. Not wanting to get involved at Commons is sort of akin to not wanting to go out in the pouring rain without an umbrella (or a top hat). El_C 00:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- User:El C; Nah, but one (semi-nude) selfie(?) (which probably should be deleted from commons, (but I don't really want to get involved over there :/)) Huldra (talk) 23:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- BTW, Huldra, any of em had him with the top hat? Because that would have been funny. El_C 23:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing IP disruption. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 23:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent increasing of death toll without RS by one IP (4 times in 11 days) Davidships (talk) 19:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I've taken the drastic measure of blocking the range 78.123.20.0/22 for a year. The systematic disruption had to be stopped. Favonian (talk) 21:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Newly registered user changing content without citations or explanation. This is not the first time IP or new editors have done this. There was a request for admin protection at Talk:Kudumi Mahato. Peaceray (talk) 21:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 23:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. vandalism referencing a Sadie Riggins, which seems to have no article & nothing substantial from a quick google search melecie t 02:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Alexf. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Recently there's been 3 instances of IP Vandalism that has been fixed by Username editors. The article in question doesn't have any protection and the "Semi-Protection" level might be a good fit for this situation. Thank you in advance for your time and attention. ImAbetastico (talk) 00:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent hijacking to non-English content. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry/SPAs. Loafiewa (talk) 02:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a racist vandal who has revealed themself to be able to hop to new IPs in order to continue their obscene vandalism.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from different IP addresses. An anonymous editor is repeatedly changing the capitalisation of a phrase without explanation. I have reverted five times in the last few days, giving detailed edit summaries, and I have tried to start a talk page discussion. Possibly a WP:NOTBROKEN issue. Temporary semi-protection is requested. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done I suggest you leave the most recent version in place (financial crisis of 2007–08). Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. No reason for non-autoconfirmed editors to be editing this page at all. (t · c) buidhe 02:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting extended semi-protection or pending-changes. No idea why this page suffers continuous vandalism from what look like unrelated accounts, but it does. CMD (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed suggested; a couple weeks ago she had to drown out a profane crowd chant during an interview (specifically, F**k Joe Biden, link to AfD), and now her article is being polluted with low-quality sources about her having to save the interview by saying it was something else as if it's the only thing she'll ever be known for. Nate • (chatter) 03:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP Hopper has been vandalizing the page for months. Link20XX (talk) 05:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive IP vandalism. Ronherry (talk) 06:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Conversion of non-Hindu places of worship into temples (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LostCitrationHunter (talk) 08:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Protection against vandalism Timis189 (talk) 08:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. WP:TROUBLES, I've heard of it. El_C 11:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (talk to me) 11:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Drmies, what is it with wrestling articles? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- User:Ritchie333, it's part and parcel of our demographics... Drmies (talk) 13:51, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: high level of IP Vandalism Leonardo.rothscild (talk) 09:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP edit was nearly 10 days ago, so
Stale. El_C 11:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Persistent violation of WP:LIVESCORES Qby (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Qby, this is a single user, so would not ordinarily merit protection. Please report to WP:AIV next time. Thanks. El_C 11:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 10:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 217.73.143.5 (talk · contribs). blocked from the article for 72 hours. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Change the title of this page to Different Strokes (Jim Hoiles & Friends, Alison Krauss & Swamp Weiss album). SweetTaylorJames (talk) 06:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – this belongs on the article talk page, where you have already proposed the change. The correct procedure for renaming articles is found at WP:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Favonian (talk) 11:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of OR unsupported by sources given. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Use the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting Extended confirmed protection
Reason: This article has been frequently subject to disruptive editing and Vandalism. Protection is needed to maintain article quality and integrity. Shadowwarrior8 (talk)
12:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:00, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 15:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:00, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: to improve the page to meet with wikipedia guidelines Thejenniec (talk) 06:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. El_C 11:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The modifications and updates made today were reasonable AXELAALEXA (talk) 06:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. El_C 11:51, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism related to current events 216.180.89.33 (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 17:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Redirect to WP:Help Desk that constantly gets treated as if it were actually the Help Desk itself. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent target of LTA since at least May 2019. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked 2001:d08:229c:6145::/64 range. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of content supported by 3 reliable source while insisting content as false information. User also removed/replaced the same content with original research sentence and couldn't even provide a reliable source that isn't self-published source with editorial oversight while insisting self-published source as "not a personal web page" which is certainly make me laugh. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uness232 (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:04, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 20:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent additions of unsourced info by new users and IPs —El Millo (talk) 19:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
15 October 2021
Reason: Dynamic IP has repeatedly vandalized the article specifically targeting an individual. Examples: [39] [40] [41] Mkdw talk 19:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A variety of IPs (all in 204.18.0.0/16) have been repeatedly removing large portions of the article content with no edit summaries nor talk page explanations. CodeTalker (talk) 22:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Maybe something in the news or an aggressive IP-hopping vandal. Ifnord (talk) 02:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Evidence is out of date and historical context needs rewriting. Thetruthshallsetyoufeee (talk) 23:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined So make an edit request on the talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of poorly sourced material to this BLP, with subsequent edit warring over removal. Jack Frost (talk) 13:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On front page, getting quite a bit of disruptive IP editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Recent disruption from unregistered user. KidAd • SPEAK 18:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a few edits in the past few days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ILLEGIT EWLO to persistently add unsourced caste promotion over the objection of multiple editors; ignoring talk. Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ben & Jerry's courts a reasonable amount of controversy and there is a lot of persistent disruptive editing on this page by either IP users or named editors with fewer than 30 edits. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP BLP violations, relating to recent prison sentence. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeing some anon IPs trying to be cute, and I just want to cut it off before it gets too out of hand. Vjmlhds 18:45, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – ongoing removal/change of sourced BLP content. Joeyconnick (talk) 19:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of content and archive sources. AldezD (talk) 21:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of false numbers by multiple IPs. YttriumShrew (talk) 21:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP-hopper persistently adding poorly-sourced biographical info. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- You're removing properly sourced content from the article. One of the sources is a self-published blog in which she makes this information publically available through her husband, Dave Naz, and is even included in his wiki article. 156.204.196.58 (talk) 00:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- IAFD is not Ashley Blue's self-published blog. It's an IMDb-style or wiki-style site that anyone can add information to. Regardless, the way to go is to follow WP:BRD and discuss the issue on the talk page. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about IAFD. I'm talking about this source:[1]. 156.204.196.58 (talk) 00:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- That source doesn't say when they were married, and self-published sources should not be used for material about third parties anyway. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about IAFD. I'm talking about this source:[1]. 156.204.196.58 (talk) 00:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- IAFD is not Ashley Blue's self-published blog. It's an IMDb-style or wiki-style site that anyone can add information to. Regardless, the way to go is to follow WP:BRD and discuss the issue on the talk page. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Dave Naz: Ashley Blue Official Blog". Archived from the original on 9 February 2010.
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IPs today. CodeTalker (talk) 04:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:08, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism BnTAA (talk) 08:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: I don't understand what I'm looking at. Which seems to be par for the course for Leagues and Cups — they are probably some of the most difficult protection requests to make sense of. Also, it takes a while before the article tells us that this is about badminton (I kept thinking it was a car race, I dunno, among Uber drivers or whatever). @BnTAA: courtesy ping. El_C 11:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I don't see much vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased attention due to the netflix series, there's been some odd terminology used that I suspect is disruptive editing. AtlasDuane (talk) 16:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism BnTAA (talk) 18:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I don't see much vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism BnTAA (talk) 18:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. as soon as previous protection was lifted disrupted editing from ano IP is restarting Aeengath (talk) 20:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Alain Berset is the Swiss Minister of Health. Because of the Corona pandemic, some people disagree with his politics, so they try to make him look particularly bad in Wikipedia in different language versions, they spam it in six different wikipedia language versions with same text. The same in the English Wikipedia. An IP posts a tendentious, partly erroneous text. The discussion leads nowhere. The article should be protected in the neutral version version (this one https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alain_Berset&oldid=1049930279). It can not be that someone is so misrepresented and tendentious. Any subsequent changes can be later made after talk on the discussion page. Thanks KurtR (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mostly person-related vandalism, e.g. changing the mayor's name or adding their own name to the Notable people section. Vandal seems to use multiple IPs. SounderBruce 21:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 06:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because of her work. ....... . 2409:4056:E1F:964C:339A:C5E7:4A1A:2007 (talk) 03:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 06:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Gajini ghani (talk) 04:09, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. M.Bitton (talk) 22:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I suspect that there may be some sock/meat puppetry going on here. Three users, two IPs (who are around the same geolocation) and a user, Jikbg. These users are removing people from the coaching infobox and saying David Houghton is the manager, without any verifiable sources (and no mention of this on his own article as well. After it gets reverted due to a lack of sources, another user shows up and puts the information back on. I’m very tempted to open an SPI, but I’m not sure if I have enough evidence yet. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 03:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Umpire involved in a controversial baseball playoff game tonight. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 14:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 14:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending protection: IP vandalism. Erinius (talk) 10:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: To further deliberate on whether the undiscussed move which turned the list into a redirect should be undone. 219.76.24.210 (talk) 07:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined This can easily be done on the appropriate talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- The result of the previous discussion was "no consensus", so presumably the status quo before the list was redirected without any discussion should be restore. But that was not acted upon. Also by protecting the list indefinitely there is no incentive at all for the mergists to discuss. Would suggest reducing the protection to, say, 14 or 30 days or at most 90 days, rather than indefinite, counted from the point when it was first protected. 219.76.24.210 (talk) 08:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Failure to discuss. Persistent edit-wars and re-reverts with no consensus. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 12:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bot: 1, me: 0.
El_C 14:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: To further deliberate on whether the undiscussed move which turned the list into a redirect should be undone. 219.76.24.210 (talk) 07:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined This can easily be done on the appropriate talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- As above, the result of the previous discussion was "no consensus", so presumably the status quo before the list was redirected without any discussion should be restored. But that was not acted upon. Also by protecting the list indefinitely there is no incentive at all for the mergists to discuss. Would suggest reducing the protection to, say, 14 or 30 days or at most 90 days, counted from the point when it was first protected. 219.76.24.210 (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The Page was repeadly deleted because a blocked user wants to create that page but now I want to create that page. ILiveinIndiaAsia (talk) 10:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – requester blocked as a sock. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
103.105.35.126 (talk) 10:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 12:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Judeobasquelanguage (talk · contribs) and Mutt Lunker (talk · contribs) blocked from the article for 72 hours. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Constant edit warring by 2 People, both are autoconfirmed. MoonlightVectorTalk page 12:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected indefinitely. Me: 1, Bot: 1. Now we have a match! El_C 15:05, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Move warring. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Being attacked by multiple accounts. Starman2377 (talk) 15:21, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism 8ya (talk • contribs) 07:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Today's songspam! El_C 14:37, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of unhelpful IP editing, he's allegedly been recently stabbed, so high on UK news [42]. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined I think this is too soon; many eyes are looking at the article right now, and a random sample of IP edits suggest they are good faith. If there is persistent and relentless vandalism, consider reporting at WP:AIV. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:19, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism (even from a US Congress account). Requesting semi-protection. Pyramids09 (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. The US Congress IP (T&S notified).
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Several revdels, too. El_C 17:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The page does not appear to have been "subject to heavy and persistent vandalism or violations of content policy" as required by WP:SEMI. There has not even been a single reversion in the past decade that wasn't a self-reversion.
I appear to be unable to see who the protecting admin is due to a 2009 page move. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- That was Juliancolton back in 2009, who is currently inactive (4 months).
Unprotected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The source of the page is being deleted by many people. I ensure that i found that some of people do that. Paruart (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- The page wasn't protected, but thanks for the notification. I have blocked your sockpuppet account and protected the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 18:08, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. There have been many rollbacks in recent days. And analyzing the article, there's not much to add for now. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 17:30, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 18:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Nothing but disruptive editing by IP users since the last ECP expired, typically ungrammatical and adding vandalism or unsourced content; is a WP:GS/CASTE topic. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:30, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 18:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The edit requests are piling up and none of the regular autoconfirmed users are paying attention to them. Heck, there's even more information that I haven't formally requested that should be in there. I just want to ensure the page is up-to-date. I would even be open to it being a temporary 24-hour window 141.157.254.24 (talk) 05:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotected. El_C 17:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Permanent semi protection or ECP The full protection has just expired which was instated after an edit war initiated by IP addresses. It is likely that IP disruption is going to cause disruption thus semi or ECP protection is much needed for this subject that falls under WP:ARBIPA. Azuredivay (talk) 07:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- While the likelihood for future protection seems high,
El_C 14:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively.
- @El C: You can check the history of the page now. The disruptive IP hopping to edit war is already happening. I find it very difficult to expect any improvement with regards to this subject as long as the IP hoppers can disrupt it. Azuredivay (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Azuredivay, so long as the IPs are engaging the talk page, their position in a content dispute is as valid as any named account. El_C 18:19, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The threat of vandalism on the page is smaller than when it was protected. 2804:248:F632:A100:CC6F:97C1:8CF3:C422 (talk) 22:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – lower level of vandalism is a well-documented effect of protection. Favonian (talk) 15:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Because of this, Constancia's article is unsourced. 49.144.36.170 (talk) 06:19, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- I do not see why anything is needed here.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. They keep changing the summary table despite the consensus in the talk page. Piotr Bart (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of reverts over the past few days involving several IPs and autoconfirmed users. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 12:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting: Extended Confirmed protection
Reason: disruptive edits by random IPs shadowwarrior8 (talk) 15:07, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:30, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruption by sockpuppets of 103.210.146.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), started again within two hours of the previous protection expiring. FDW777 (talk) 16:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and verbal abuse from different IPs. Skblole (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Stamm Eashleyfox (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Reason: I am the editor and creator, there are no copyright issues. The user User:Vexations keeps deleting large areas of text that is sourced properly and been in place for many years. Eashleyfox (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Please stop. Both of you will be blocked if you continue. MoonlightVectorTalk page 18:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Edit-warring regarding suspect's ethnicity. Love of Corey (talk) 18:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of until tomorrow lunchtime, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple unregistered and one new editor persistently falsifying year of birth in a BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
16 October 2021
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Old protection ended, but the dispute has not gone away. This is going to need a bit longer before all is settled. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not making a call on whether this is protected at the right or wrong version. Clearly, this needs to be worked out via talk or RFC. There's already a lot to sort through on talk as it is. I have a bit of familiarity with the topic, though not so much with the particulars of this dispute. I will try to take a look when I've got more available brain cells. I agree this one might take a while, in addition to more eyes on it. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
: Already done by administrator EvergreenFir. Euryalus (talk) 04:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject seemingly announced retirement, only for that to be debunked by his reps: [as seen here]. A few IPs keep saying he's retired. $chnauzer 04:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
: Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sources conflict so have requested consensus on the talkpage - happy to lift this early if that is reached. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Create the following redirects:
- 𝅗𝅥 to Half note
- 𝅘𝅥 to Quarter note
- 𝅘𝅥𝅮 to Eighth note
- (this can be done for the other relevant ones in the Musical Symbols (Unicode block) list, if so wished).
All with the following rcat templates:
{{Redirect shell |
{{R from symbol}}
{{R from Unicode}}
}}
This matches some title filter (.*[^\P{So}¦§©®°¶№™☀-⚲✁-➾`].* <casesensitive> # "Other punctuation", with some exceptions
), so yeah... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EN-Jungwon 15:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss the issues with the persistent IP so that this disruption can be resolved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Massive recent increase in edits and pageview traffic, including vandalism and other unconstructive edits that got overlooked. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: this is a highly controversial topic; since it was rewritten mid-September almost all edits have been trying to 'correct' it in GF, and this is expected to continue indefinitely. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:09, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe this one needs some more details. The article is about a traditional Shi'ite festival held in Iran celebrating the assassination of Umar ibn al-Khattab, a figure held in high esteem by Sunni Muslims. The celebration is officially banned by the Islamic Republic of Iran. Though the festival dates back to the 16th century, a 20th-century revisionist tradition appears to have arisen that has replaced Umar ibn al-Khattab with Umar ibn Sa'ad, a figure of no special importance to Sunnis, seemingly in an effort to improve Sunni-Shi'i relations.
- All of this is well-sourced in the article. However, there are many people out there who honestly believe that the festival has always been about Umar ibn Sa'ad, and who are coming to 'correct' the article, obviously without any sources, some with friendly explanations, others outright vandalizing the page [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50]. I have reverted this 3 times today, but the misinformation is present at the page right now because I don't want to break 3RR.
- Tomorrow 16 October it will be 9 Rabi' al-Awwal AH, the first day of the festival, which will last until 27 Rabi' al-Awwal / 3 November. Hence the uptick in disruption. However, I believe that the very nature of the article ensures that there will always be a flood of IPs and new users coming to 'correct' this. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 23:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason:
Hello there, the page Renato Aragão has been vandalized by some users who think it's funny to include language to say he's senile because of jokes he made, etc. This is non-encyclopedic, in my opinion. Is it possible for anyone to remove the last sentence of the first paragraph and lock the page for autoconfirmed users only maybe for 48-72h? Thank you!
It's text that says "In his later years, Didi has grown increasingly senile, going as far as suggesting that the American rapper P. Diddy was named after himself." -User:Plurabilities[51]
191.214.123.0 (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 02:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of recent IP vandalism from first-time IPs (i.e, this is their first contribution to Wikipedia.) Please semi-protect, thanks shanghai.talk to me 03:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing is irregular however rather tiring...... Perhaps keep IPs off. Neils51 (talk) 07:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of unsubstantiated and egregious sociopolitical accusations against the subject by anonymous IPs. Blake Gripling (talk) 16:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandal IP address keeps editing the article, maybe semi-protect for 24 hours? Plutonical (talk) 16:45, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection – Reason: Persistent vandalism, editing without providing sources, etc. Warnings not working at all. Coltsfan (talk) 23:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBEE. Persistent addition of unsourced strength figures. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: edit warring over re-insertion of copyright violations Vexations (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP hopper. Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP hopper. Same one as above. Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP hopper. Same as the two above. Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP MOS issues, consensus issues. IP not taking guidance. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:18, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Deletions by various IPs. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:21, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP addresses. The PACER test meme has remained consistent in popular culture for an extended period of time, and there is reason to believe it will remain in popular culture for as long as the PACER test continues to be a national requirement in US public schools, so I suggest this article should receive indefinite semi-protection. TheGEICOgecko (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has only been one instance of vandalism in October. Protection is only given where disruptive activity is persistent. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. – DarkGlow • 22:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 00:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Less Unless. Favonian (talk) 09:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Protection seems to be over a page move that occurred months ago. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 17:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- @OhanaUnited: Revision history archaeology indicates that you protected the article – 11 years ago. Would you like to comment? Favonian (talk) 21:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Favonian: As stated in my page protection reason, it was a default action after pending change trial ended. I have no problem with downgrading the page protection. OhanaUnitedTalk page 00:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Leave me be, bot, I was here third!
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 10:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 49.144.36.170 (talk) 01:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Jumping IP has repeatedly changed the birth year, over a dozen times over a period of three weeks. 15zulu (talk) 02:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopping IP, 15zulu.
El_C 10:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:米記123 GAME and DE. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 14:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Today,米記123 sock continued.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 08:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MCC214, please reduce your sig's text size. It's quite distracting. El_C 11:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: TFA is coming up, want to make sure there is no vandalism and protect it until TFA date. Keres🌕Luna edits! 03:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: No point to protect something for more than a decade, given there's no discussion whatsoever over the years. The opening of two new checkpoints in recent years has also made the template outdated. 219.76.24.210 (talk) 11:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ping MSGJ. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. Only 4 transclusions so little risk. I have removed protection — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Already unprotected by administrator MSGJ. Favonian (talk) 11:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same old drama as old WP:ANI that either offsite canvassing or ip hopping sock (using mobile network, public wifi, etc) that try to vote the rfc. Matthew hk (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC).
- @Matthew hk: I need details if possible, ideally about currently-blocked users involved. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Not the concreate example. I don't wanna be a spy to join the cult. But such message and telegram bot is readily searchable in the app. https://imgur.com/L7qmaSa Those new ip pretty prime example of WP:DUCK, which some of them only try to "collect" edit count after the RFC. Matthew hk (talk) 23:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Matthew hk, if this is sockpuppetry, "duck"-level even, then it should be easy to name at least one blocked user or IP address that is allegedly behind these edits. I have not seen any yet. Could you perhaps open a SPI with your specific evidence? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Not the concreate example. I don't wanna be a spy to join the cult. But such message and telegram bot is readily searchable in the app. https://imgur.com/L7qmaSa Those new ip pretty prime example of WP:DUCK, which some of them only try to "collect" edit count after the RFC. Matthew hk (talk) 23:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – doing same thing again and again from new ips, also see Doraemon: Gadget Cat from the Future. Limited Idea4me (talk) 11:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months (both), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP PR edits, ~10 reversions done in the last week. Target of edits by state-paid editors (Riyadhcafe87) and pattern of similar PR actions by registered and IP users in the same time frame (diff, diff, diff) and sporadically (diff, diff) suggests target of sockpuppet networks operated by paid masters. Increasing protection to semi-protection would greatly improve both ability to detect sockpuppetry and deter likely future vandalism due to the controversial nature of Saudi articles (diff in other page and diff in other page). A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 11:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Anonymous user have been adding an unsourced edit without any adding reliable sources. Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 10:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Less Unless (talk) 10:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue.. Cornerstone2.0, this involves a single user, so it isn't a protection matter. Also, as mentioned on the IP's talk page (here), I think you went a bit overboard with that final warning (i.e. skipped gradual escalation for no apparent reason). When dealing with newcomers, it's best to treat them like, well, newcomers. So, for eg., RE: your edit summary which reads:
RV edits 69.118.194.250 (talk) need a reliable source
- A newcomer would probably have an easier time grasping something to the effect of:
Revert (WP:RV) edits 69.118.194.250 (talk) need a reliable source (WP:RS)
.
- If adopted as a general practice, such a slight alteration can actually end up making a not inconsiderable difference. Hope that makes sense. Feel free to contact me if issues still persist. El_C 10:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Edited by paid actors employed by the fund (Special:Contributions/Riyadhcafe87). Approximately 20 reverts in the last month as part of an extended edit war. Large amount of similar IP edits that remove criticism (diff, diff, diff) misrepresent public reaction to their actions (such as by calling overwhelming criticism controversial) (diff), or tout figures (diff) indicates likely sockpuppetry by paid PR master or Saudi state agents. Semi-protection would greatly improve ability to detect such sockpuppetry.
Note also vandalism by IPs (diff). A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 12:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and editing that don't have any idea NastieSmirnova (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. There has been no vandalism, but a couple of users question the subject's notability as well as certain references made from the article text. Favonian (talk) 14:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 16:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support High level of IP vandalism 36.81.181.27 (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bbb23. Favonian (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edits from a somewhat dynamic IP user to describe this actor as “the ideal Aryan”. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Favonian: thanks! Could you also check out an edit summary about six edits back for rev-del? Grossly offensive stuff. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. Favonian (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Favonian: thanks! Could you also check out an edit summary about six edits back for rev-del? Grossly offensive stuff. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Another round of recurring disruptive IP edits. Ippantekina (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Only one IP (well, technically IPv6 /64 subnet) is edit-warring, and they're not (in my view) doing it enough to warrant a block, certainly not WP:3RR. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP reverting sourced material because it doesn't fit their agenda Seasider53 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 19:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP reverting sourced material because it doesn't fit their agenda. Seasider53 (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 19:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
17 October 2021
Reason: Note: I had requested protection 1 week before and that request was declined because there was "not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection". I disagree as it's always the same unblockable editor (IP range is too large to block) and there will be almost no collateral damage since all the constructive editors are already semi-confirmed. Here is the old request: Reason: Repeated template vandalism by an IPv6 range-hopper, restarting hours after initial protection expired ( 2603:9000:6c01:79c:(varying portion), IP range is too broad to block per this now-archived discussion I had at the Teahouse). See the following diffs (first three from before first protection, last one from today): (false as the episode he edited had already aired). (episode 2 of season 5 is messed up), (original release date for episode one of season five disappears), After the previous protection expired the vandal returned to mess up the article again (Season five is not available in the table of contents). TBH, for edits so simple a 6-year-old could perform them, they are quite annoying. Tube·of·Light 15:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC). The editor had again messed up the article yesterday by removing the airing date for one episode. Tube·of·Light 02:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If vandalism resumes like that after the prior protection expired, it means the prior duration wasn't long enough. There is no way to tell how long it needs to be. So we just have to escalate gradually. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The anon IP vandal (with constantly changing addresses, but all from the same geographic area) who had been attacking Rose Parade has moved on to this page, having apparently gotten a message (though not the right one) from the protection on the previous page. Adding repeated unsourced, and according to all current reports, inaccurate, claims that the 2022 parade will be cancelled. This despite the naming of judges, a grand marshal, and a queen's court. Floatjon (talk) 15:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edits contrary to WP:NPOV. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP disruption and vandalism. User (I assume the same one) has been using a proxy for months to consistently delete referenced sections and text and add unreferenced claims. The page was semi-protected for a month and one day after after the protection was lifted, the user has returned to delete a section and the reflist. ExRat (talk) 22:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over the symbol of the party. Should be resolved on talk page if it is or is not the symbol instead of persistent revert/unrevert. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 19:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/disruption has resumed (after a pause only slightly longer than the protection), and is persisting. Longer?. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - SUN EYE 1 19:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism by ip users, showing hate towards a particular federation!. Laser Victor 2017 ❯❯❯ talk 21:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The vandalism on the article did warrant temporary protection, but not permanent. 2804:248:F657:B700:B432:EDAA:2B9C:9945 (talk) 01:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: There is an ongoing disagreement concerning the inclusion of this article in Fascism-related categories. The protection lowers the risk of this dispute turning into all-out edit war. Since I have previously rejected a similar request from the 2804:248:c000::/34 range, I'll leave this one for another admin. Favonian (talk) 13:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done per Favonian's rationale. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection was unreasonable and administrator use it now to put his own agenda. For example, deleting mentions of nationality after setting the protection was irrational since this information was mentioned before and everybody were ok with it for a long time. No credible sources were provided for such after-protection changes. Also it is important aspect counting the fact that article is about person from post-colonial country and some editors and administrator made speculation on his nationality. Secondly, the changes of the name provided by admin has no credibility too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ґендерний Джихад (talk • contribs) 22:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Articles are protected to preserve stability, and it looks as if that is the reason for it. Your assertions about other editors are better suited for another venue. Go to WP:ANI and make your behavior-related complaints there. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Continued removal of the Romanian name of the city from the infobox and the lead by different users and IPs over a long period of time. This city had an ethnic Romanian majority in the 1860s (if I remember correctly the decade) and was part of Romanian states (Moldavia, Kingdom of Romania) for centuries. The Romanian name should be kept for its historical importance. Romanians still make up 6.2% of the city's population. Here are diffs showing the name getting deleted on this year (there are many more from 2020 or earlier too): [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58]. Note this has been happening since at least 2016 [59], 2015 [60] AND 2013 (and probably earlier) [61]. I believe permanent semi-protection would be ideal. See also other cities in Ukraine that use foreign names: Lviv, Izmail, Uzhhorod, Khotyn, Sevastopol, etc.. It is common practice to use non-Ukrainian names on cities that have a lot of non-Ukrainian history. Super Ψ Dro 14:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Please increase the protection level of Anupamaa as some autoconfirmed users are constantly adding unnecessary stuff, unsourced ratings, removing necessary stuff from plot and cast section even from soundtrack section Pra2310 (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This ip is removing "warning notice" & "blocking notice" again and again. Limited Idea4me (talk) 04:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done This IP has been blocked globally. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive levels of IP puffery, censoring and vandalism. Ronherry (talk) 17:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Heavy editing, but little vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. Requesting semi-protection Pyramids09 (talk) 19:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of sockpuppet rapidly creating accounts. Politanvm talk 04:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian (talk) 09:50, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Over 10000 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 03:50, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of poorly sourced content. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 08:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained content removal by a user with multiple IPs which were not responding to warnings. Andra Febrian (talk) 10:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Seems the trans count is high enough. - FlightTime (open channel) 04:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Template protected. Favonian (talk) 11:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: This LTA use only IPs WikiBayer (talk) 05:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Crosswiki LTA WikiBayer (talk) 05:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: As the tournament starts today, from yesterday onwards high level of IP Vandalism and Non-autoconfirmed user edits, which are being non-constructive and distractive. Protection needed until 14 November 2021, the end of the tournament.Kirubar (talk) 07:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Was just about to log this myself - thanks Kirubar. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected until 2021-11-15, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated Character Deformation Sterlingchair (talk) 07:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP stopped their attacks after receiving a warning. Please report if they resume. Favonian (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The 2021 tournament starts today and this parent article has had an increase in vandalism over the past few days. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected until 2021-11-15, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Sockpuppetry. Unnecessary pings by a blocked sock Venkat TL (talk) 07:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Venkat TL, see Special:Mute/Rusianejohn; I recommend not talking to them if you don't want an answer. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:15, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. Just to be clear, I never talked to him after he was blocked. Chiswick Chap continued replying there. Venkat TL (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree, sorry forgot to ping above. Venkat TL (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:15, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism 103.55.247.79 (talk) 12:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much!
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism by both IPs and registered users. Prospero One (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of random IP vandalism this month. Notfrompedro (talk) 23:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. Due to current events (mlb postseason) Shadowbreath15789 (talk) 23:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 19:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Personal attacks by multiple IPs. Isabelle 🔔 14:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment: I generally prefer to not have anything in my userspace protected, but if an admin feels it's necessary, I do understand; just, if so, I'd ask it be kept to 24-48 hours, please. Thanks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 14:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 24 h, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., pls let me know if they come back.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I moved it to draftspace because it has no sources. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Draftification reverted. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uness232 (talk) 13:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 20:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing disruption from VXfC. JavaHurricane 13:50, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 20:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article probably should have pending changes protection, there are a number of anonymous IP’s who periodically add POV pushing content. Montanabw(talk) 20:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 20:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spurious use of the owner parameter of the infobox (to tell a really old, overdone joke). Larry Hockett (Talk) 20:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 20:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of repeated edits regarding the city's political status by IP addresses and unconfirmed accounts. Semi-protection would solve this. Diig (talk) 22:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 19:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP continuing to restore disputed/incorrect changes despite reverts and warnings from multiple editors. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Due to many recent reverts. However, please warn the user accordingly on their talk page. Less Unless (talk) 21:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and subtle vandalism from random IPs showing up every now and then. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see. Less Unless (talk) 21:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
18 October 2021
Reason: IP vandalism. I've tired reverting unconstructive edits. Now the IPs are adding unreliable sources also that doesn't have connection to the article. Shinnosuke15 (talk) 23:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please warn the users appropriately. Less Unless (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Until the End of Time (Justin Timberlake and Beyoncé song) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse, block evasion by Special:Contributions/50.201.7.46, Special:Contributions/172.58.136.0/21, Special:Contributions/2600:1702:3310:6C30::/64, and Special:Contributions/107.19.24.146. Binksternet (talk) 06:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 21:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: User Marcelus is aggressively removing quality content, references from article Coat of arms of Lithuania (1, 2). In these edits he removed facts about the Coat of arms of Lithuania, published by the Oxford University Press and Lithuanian National Museum of Art. This article currently is extended-protected due to disruptive editing in the past, however user Marcelus is extended user, thus he is able to perform such edits. Please apply sanctions to him for removing quality content and ensure necessary protection to this article. The latest removal of content was performed today (number 2). -- Pofka (talk) 06:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. This is not the place for asking for sanctions for a user you are edit-warring with. Bbb23 (talk) 00:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruption by IP-hopper image vandal. Pahunkat (talk) 13:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism by former/current students of the school. Imsome1 (talk) 14:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There are a lot of 'personal opinion' edits on this page and pages like it due to the contentious nature of the subject. Semi-protected will slow down vandalism and hopefully people can expand the article thoughtfully and with citations. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 15:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Sock strikes again. – robertsky (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment This page was also created as Renxe, Draft:RENXE, and Draft:Renxe. See also Draft:John Clarence Velasco above. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:49, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Creation protected. Applies to all five of them. MelanieN (talk) 02:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Unfortunately, it seems that a minor disagreement over a few words in the lede has turned into a prolonged edit war; another user is repeatedly re-adding unsourced content to the intro, and is not using edit summaries or talk pages. Temporarily increasing the page protection could (hopefully) require more dialogue and less reverting without getting AN/EW involved. Vanilla Wizard 💙 21:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. The current problem editor, who is extended confirmed, has not posted since they were given a Final Warning. See what happens. If they post disruptively again, it's time for a block. But we do not apply protection, especially ECP protection, because of problems from a single user. MelanieN (talk) 01:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Regarding ideology and position. Curbon7 (talk) 03:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. The article is well protected by its current ECP protection - not worth disrupting it for a few argumentative edits. I see that you have posted on the talk page; you might also give the other party an EW warning on their talk page. MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of unsourced article. Onel5969 TT me 15:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please warn user on their talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism resumed almost immediately after protection was lifted. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandaslim and fake news. Gyshei (talk) 18:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Ever changing IP, edit-warring GoodDay (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Article has been protected for 1-week. GoodDay (talk) 23:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism incl. BLP vios by IPs and new users. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator LuK3. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See also RENXE below. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given the sudden surge of SPAs, I also suspect that they are most likely the socks of /نوفل_بنسعيد (the first disruptive editor who started it). M.Bitton (talk) 00:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Full protection: This page has long been a battleground. I was granted full page protection on this page a few months back. The past few days I have corrected several major errors on this page (such as so-called records that Hoad does not have) put on the page by one editor, who continues his relentless promotion of Lew Hoad on a daily basis. I request full protection for this page. The previous page protection did help, as it was a considerable time after the page protection expired that the editor began his assault on the page again. Tennishistory1877 (talk) 11:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP and new editors trying to add A. Rodgers as Nagy's father. Schazjmd (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous back and forth editing. Multiple on-line sources have reported that Malu Trevejo announced that she had been signed. Some editors apparently don't like her so they have been deleting or vandalizing the entry. We've had more than 70 edits in the last two days or so, with no content change other than wrt Trevejo. I added a source to the initially unsourced claim, but I personally don't care whether we list her now or wait for a better source. Meters (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual addition of nonsense suggestions, adding WP:LISTCRUFT to an already overly-lengthy list of game show contestants. Appears to be one user jumping IPs to add suggestions to a ridiculously long list. AldezD (talk) 16:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- AldezD, I'm no admin but have you took the IP to WP:AIV or WP:ANI instead? A rangeblock might be better than a semi-protect. wizzito | say hello! 16:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very common target for vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 16:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 16:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The excitement will soon decline. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 81.154.156.56 (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random IPs making unhelpful edits. Total random nerd (talk) 18:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hardcore punk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Hardcore punk in the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Misinterpretation of source, edit warring from Israel IPs. Binksternet (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IPs adding info not relevant to the article. Vjmlhds 03:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Reference to Rosetta Smith required . Jrbsaunders (talk) 22:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC) Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jrbsaunders (talk) 22:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I see no IP vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuing POV-pushing by IP-user separatists after the article was overhaul by InspectorTiger (talk · contribs) in September. 7/21 edits in the last 30 days were reverted POV edits. Topic is highly controversial due to an ongoing civil war in the region. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Looks like a single IP. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
All article subway pages
Temporary Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- 2 username is Oobi puppet 5680 and Flippy puppet 5680 with 4 digit at the end is similar to sockmaster is in investigation of Rgalo10. [62] 24.228.203.22 (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: - Same open-proxy vandal removing information about personal life is at it again. Been going on for years.BabbaQ (talk) 00:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism of infobox. Simione001 (talk) 00:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: An ip (2600:8800:7D96:5400:F0E4:CBEC:2C07:996) has been adding unsourced information to Ricky Schroder Possible BLP violations. Chip3004 (talk) 01:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Second this. Thank you Chip3004 for posting this. Springee (talk) 01:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 04:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping LTA back. Meters (talk) 04:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion by Lobstobar — DaxServer (talk) 07:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion by Lobstobar — DaxServer (talk) 07:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion by Lobstobar — DaxServer (talk) 07:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion by Lobstobar — DaxServer (talk) 07:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent spamming and block evasion. 15 to 30 days of semi-protection should be enough to encourage this person to move on with their life. - Daveout
(talk) 10:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the expiration of yesterday's semi-protection, this article about a recently-murdered British politician has continued to attract vandalism necessitating a number of reverts. Semi-protection for another week or so would be useful. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A couple of revdels. El_C 12:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption on a sanctioned page. Semsûrî (talk) 12:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 12:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The page is very poor in information and nobody participates in the talk page. Midofe1996 (talk) 22:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 09:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incredible amounts of vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Marriage drama causing vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 05:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Mass removal of contents often being done by some IPs and some unreliable unsourced contents also being added by those IPs. So, requesting for ECP. Sony R (talk) 06:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sony R, WP:ECP is to restrict users with the WP:CONFIRM permission — that isn't possible for IPs, so WP:SEMI will always suffice for them. El_C 13:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent IP vandalism, previously protected page. CaffeinAddict (talk) 06:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 13:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive by new users along nationalistic lines - having to be fixed repeatedly by multiple editors (and ClueBot). Iskandar323 (talk) 06:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 12:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism (featured list) SatDis (talk) 12:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP editors (most likely affiliated with the subject) keep scrubbing the same content that they've been trying to remove for the last few years. The page has been protected on three separate occasions in the last year. I think a long-term semi-protection is warranted. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 13:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Anonymous user spam edit the page with hate speech towards arthur irawan. making the page article filled with miss information and hate towards the athlete. TiempoGT (talk) 03:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems that this page is under attack by POV nationalists. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk 13:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems Nicole Byer mentioned the article and subsequently many people are coming and blanking sections without valid reasons or discussion. Cerebral726 (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to suspicions surrounding Chris's death, and alleged edits by Chris himself, disruptive editing has been rampant. Eridian314 (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm writing over here!
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm writing over here!
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced nonsense by a certain IP range. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 12:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reason as with the ABS-CBN News Channel article. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 13:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - Vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edvin Ryding parity. El_C 15:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs vandalizing back and forth. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 06:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 13:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Please increase the protection level of this page from semi-protection to extended confirmed users protection. Pra2310 (talk) 10:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
The person who's doing dispute isn't even ready to come on talk page and involves in dispute with everyone on each page he/she edits Pra2310 (talk)
- How about trying to talk to them directly? Communication via edit-summaries is not always helpful. Lectonar (talk) 13:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IP users add wrong/disruptive content to "spouse" parameter in the infobox. Mann Mann (talk) 15:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 16:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – It has been recently announced that the town will become a city in the UK, in honour of a deceased MP who campaigned for city status. There have been some pre-emptive back-and-forth changes from 'town' to 'city' and this is likely to continue for a while. Page has been protected before. AFreshStart (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Second AFreshStart request.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 15:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 16:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP-sock vandalism. Skyerise (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 16:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of edits from IPs who think the town is now a city, but this status has not yet been granted. MRSC (talk) 16:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 16:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level IP Vandalism 117.222.161.162 (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit about 6 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Image vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 17:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and SPA vandalism. Constant attempts to hijack to article for self promotion. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 17:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IP Addresses – Swagging (talk) 16:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A few revdels. El_C 17:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. BilCat (talk) 17:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. You say temporary, I say indef. El_C 17:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. The Tips of Apmh (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A series of IP addresses beginning with 36.68 or 36.81 is purportedly being used by Flix11, who has been blocked indefinitely, with edits being made to update the league stats. If you use Geolocate from those IP addresses, it appears they are located from the same place. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 07:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Question: So what's the problem that requires protection? I see no reverts in the recent history. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, yet another impenetrable League protection request. We RfPP admins love these so much! El_C 12:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Huh. {{subst:RFPP|co}} — I learned something new. That's a good close for many League protection requests (due to nobody understanding what's happening, often including the filers themselves). El_C 13:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Exactly my thought...my brain hurts when I try to follow the byzantine and labyrinthine edits in those and other articles, see below the Dino one, e.g. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- What we really need is an {{subst:RFPP|league}}! It should read:
Declined — this is a request that concerns a League or a Cup, so no one can understand what's happening presently and no one ever will. El_C 15:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- What we really need is an {{subst:RFPP|league}}! It should read:
- Ah, yet another impenetrable League protection request. We RfPP admins love these so much! El_C 12:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. CivilianArthur (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of IP vandalism in the last 6 weeks. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. clpo13(talk) 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping vandal (maybe just walking from computer to computer in the uni's library). Ifnord (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator widr. clpo13(talk) 19:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Edit-Warring by several Users. InNeed95 (talk) 16:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. OP blocked. El_C 17:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Massive amounts of vandalism by IPs. There should be increased protection PERMENANTLY. Xpërt3 (talk) 20:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Odd revdel. El_C 20:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Massive amounts of IP vandalism. Temporary protection was placed and proved effective, but shortly after temporary protection, the vandalism started almost immediately. There should be PERMANENT protection. Xpërt3 (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Odd revdel. El_C 20:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: only 124 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @MusikAnimal and Primefac: the protecting admins — do you guys understand what happened with the transclusion count for these listed Taxonomy templates? MusikAnimal, would these templates be on MusikBot II que? (Does it do templates, in general? Does it revisit protected templates, specifically?) El_C 17:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C I've no idea what changed, but there were many thousands of transclusions before. User:MusikBot II/TemplateProtector does revisit protected templates to raise the protection level as needed, but these taxonomy templates are excluded as per the configuration. They are also already semi-protected via the MediaWiki:Titleblacklist. I think it's safe to unprotect the ones listed here. — MusikAnimal talk 18:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Musikanimal and El C: These templates used to be transcluded at Template:Taxonomy/Aves, which is used on almost every bird article. However, this was changed in 2019 by User:ErikHaugen. If you need more info, you should ask him. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 20:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, mystery solved, on both counts (which I totally understood!). Thank you both.
Done. El_C 21:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, mystery solved, on both counts (which I totally understood!). Thank you both.
- @Musikanimal and El C: These templates used to be transcluded at Template:Taxonomy/Aves, which is used on almost every bird article. However, this was changed in 2019 by User:ErikHaugen. If you need more info, you should ask him. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 20:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C I've no idea what changed, but there were many thousands of transclusions before. User:MusikBot II/TemplateProtector does revisit protected templates to raise the protection level as needed, but these taxonomy templates are excluded as per the configuration. They are also already semi-protected via the MediaWiki:Titleblacklist. I think it's safe to unprotect the ones listed here. — MusikAnimal talk 18:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: only 168 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: only 391 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: only 401 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: only 403 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotection: only 6 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 18:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotected. El_C 21:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: only 96 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 19:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotection: Can anyone please unprotect the page or move my created draft Draft: Shweta Rohira ? As I had created the draft and the draft is meeting GNG and Nactor so I want to move the created draft into the main space. Thanks. Sgloves (talk) 10:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Given the history of COI-editing with this article, please go through the WP:AFC process; you can add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article to submit it for review. If the draft is accepted via AfC, then we can unprotect. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
19 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing in light of Orgeron's impending departure from LSU. United States Man (talk) 23:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 03:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive IP vandalism. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:17, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 03:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: only 371 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. El_C 21:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: This one appears to still be protected. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oops, now
Done (done done). El_C 21:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oops, now
- @El C: This one appears to still be protected. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive IP vandalism. Ronherry (talk) 21:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Like any other Medes-related article, this article suffers from occasional ethno-nationalistic disruption by new users and IPs. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Redirect hijacking. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repetitive disruptive unsourced editing from IPs and new accounts. CaffeinAddict (talk) 03:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:28, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. This looks like one person repeatedly making new accounts.See User talk:Riyyyaa19aaaa#User:Riiiiiraa19 Venkat TL (talk) 04:58, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Excessive socking. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Brand new account disruption. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 21:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikaviani, have you put this in the wrong section? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, my bad, i don't get how i have done that, i followed the twinke icon and i went here instead of RPP "increase protection". My sincere apologies.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, I’ve moved it over. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 06:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, I’ve moved it over. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, my bad, i don't get how i have done that, i followed the twinke icon and i went here instead of RPP "increase protection". My sincere apologies.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nardog (talk) 05:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued IP vandalism and page disruptive editing. Vandalism continued after page protection expired.OnewithThePeople (talk) 05:58, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Curbon7 (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. A problem with full protection is that when it expires, the article is no longer semi-protected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 49.144.37.87 (talk) 02:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalisms, particularly concerning name or occupation in infobox. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 04:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. The same blocked editor [[63]], now deletes sources via ip [[64]] 89.172.36.100 (talk) 02:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Cwmhiraeth activity has now started 5 minutes ago from a blocked user PTS-188 via IP. Protect it or as you wish I just informed you. Greeting89.172.36.100 (talk) 08:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 42.109.208.31 (talk) 01:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:28, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined No rationale given. Lectonar (talk) 06:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Edit war was 10 years ago, sole responsible user has been indef blocked and globally locked. rchard2scout (talk) 08:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: That's a protected redirect...do we need an article named "Eurovision", or is this just because it has been protected for a long time? Tbh, I do not see a dire need to unprotect. Lectonar (talk) 08:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not really a big deal but it does make improving the page more difficult, for example this edit request. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 09:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Done I should have looked at the talkpage, thanks for pointing that out. I have downgraded to extended-confirmed protection, which should make improvement easier. Lectonar (talk) 09:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not really a big deal but it does make improving the page more difficult, for example this edit request. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 09:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Too many anonymous IP addresses keeping making unexplained edits, ruining the placement of citations, disrespecting how recurring and guest characters work, and adding fancruft. Blazewing16 (talk) 03:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: well, I'm lost (and this isn't even a League request!). El_C 13:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Piotr Bart (talk) 08:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Edit-war is still continuing, so the request seems justified. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Avoiding adding any fake info on this page......AdhiOK (talk) 12:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AdhiOK, all your requests here concern disruptive edits that are
Stale. Normally, I don't know if those pages would even be deemed active enough to warrant pc. However, since there seems to be some sort of a pattern, I suppose it wouldn't hurt. El_C 13:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and adding fake info. AdhiOK (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See my note at #Paramount Pictures. El_C 13:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Article about assets of The Walt Disney Company, WarnerMedia, NBCUniversal and ViacomCBS
- List of assets owned by The Walt Disney Company (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of assets owned by WarnerMedia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of assets owned by NBCUniversal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of assets owned by ViacomCBS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Avoiding adding any fake info on these pages. AdhiOK (talk) 12:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months (all), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See my note at #Paramount Pictures. El_C 13:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary create protection. Shoo Mila (talk) 12:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. No need for temporary. Salting at WP:ECP seems fine. If a legit user below this permission wishes to create the page, they can otherwise request or draft it. As I was writing this, I realized this was recreated in May, not Oct. So quite a
Stale request. Oh well. And I lost to the bot. Double L for moi. El_C 13:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs edit-warring. David Biddulph (talk) 13:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- OMG, I am getting smoked (smacked) by the bot today!
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. David Biddulph, that's not vandalism, it's disruptive editing of which vandalism is one subset. Anyway, I used my protection summary to write a short essay! El_C 13:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- OMG, I am getting smoked (smacked) by the bot today!
Reason: There are to many errors in the text. This page now is completely innacurate. PaulM1234a (talk) 12:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – in view of current controversies, unprotection is not a good idea. Favonian (talk) 12:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No explanation behind this sudden spike in vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. clpo13(talk) 18:10, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last constructive edit to this page was about three years ago. Larry Hockett (Talk) 11:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 11:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Do to Kanye West reportedly has his name change, IP keep changing his name in the article without discussion or sources. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 12:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed promptly when the protection expired yesterday. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 13:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. clpo13(talk) 18:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Philippine-related articles
- Balitang A2Z (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Pinoy Big Brother: Kumunity Season 10 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Darna (2021 TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Honeycomb toffee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Temporary protection against persistent vandalisms, not adding references, unconstructive edits, and edit wars made by two IP users. Ctrlwiki (talk) 14:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Adding names of the main cast in the infobox does not count as vandalism. Ctrlwiki can't seem to understand that. 143.44.164.124 (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Please Add References so we can see if it is real: WP:REFB MoonlightVectorTalk page 14:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- You can see it in the Page history of the articles I've mentioned above. Ctrlwiki (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- @MoonlightVector: If you scrolled down to the main cast section and checked the references, you'd know. 143.44.164.124 (talk) 14:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Hash it out on the respective talk-page(s) please; this can't be solved via protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Please Add References so we can see if it is real: WP:REFB MoonlightVectorTalk page 14:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Adding names of the main cast in the infobox does not count as vandalism. Ctrlwiki can't seem to understand that. 143.44.164.124 (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Too many errors. Big risc of a lawsuit when there are so many errors and sources do not point to the specific line written. Lots of material in article are copy right owned and cannot be used. PaulM1234a (talk) 12:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – you have created 4(!) items today on Talk:Eric Clapton related to this issue. Please be patient and wait for reactions! Favonian (talk) 12:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
176.219.34.99 (talk) 14:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 15:09, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Enough non-constructive edits from IPs. Everytime a different IP performs this thing. So I can't warn the user(s). So it is highly needed to protect this page for at least six months. Shinnosuke15 (talk) 09:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some IP edits seem to be in good faith, so let's try this first and see how it goes. clpo13(talk) 18:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Countries in the Eurovision Song Contest
- Azerbaijan in the Eurovision Song Contest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Bulgaria in the Eurovision Song Contest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Georgia in the Eurovision Song Contest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Ireland in the Eurovision Song Contest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Serbia in the Eurovision Song Contest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent edit warring from multiple IP addresses. (And also without that edit war, these pages generally get a lot of vandalism from unregistered users.) ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 13:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection – Persistent WP:BLP violations/WP:DE/WP:CIR edits from IPv6, who persists after multiple warnings, etc. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP addresses. SangrurUser (talk) 09:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This seems to be a long-term problem judging by the protection log. clpo13(talk) 18:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term IP who wants the article to imply that Cohen is Jewish, after failing to find any sources that he is Jewish. Article has been protected for individual years at a time, and the IP returns after each protection expires. Low traffic article otherwise. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: Wouldn't permanent semi-protection be more helpful then? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Agree with MJL. This has been going on long enough that indef semi is justified, I think. clpo13(talk) 19:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Third time the same IP has added disruptive material to the article. [65][66][67] (a partial block on the IP range might also work). –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Interestingly, the 2A04:4A43:4000::/36 range, which covers the IPs in question, is already blocked from editing a different article. Might be worth following up on SPI or with the blocking admin about changing the block or extending it sitewide. clpo13(talk) 19:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High Level of vandalism and unfounded accusations that have not been proven being added to the page. Changes are continuously reverted back. Abuse of editing currently that requires locking. Wisdommonitor (talk) 09:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. clpo13(talk) 18:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Recently, we have been trying to update the content related to changes in our Party and other users deleting and modifying it into something what is not accurate. 46.161.98.31 (talk) 09:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. clpo13(talk) 18:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary Semi Protection: - IP vandalism for second day in a row.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. clpo13(talk) 18:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
20 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. The user is engaging in discussion but continues to revert, this might help. Venkat TL (talk) 18:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Venkat TL and TallMegan, please be aware of WP:3RR. clpo13(talk) 18:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Clpo13 He has only made 3 reverts so I think it is not correct to report there, Why not protect this article for a few days so that the other user can focus on resolution instead of edit warring. Venkat TL (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'm hesitant to apply full protection at this point, as that would prevent uninvolved editors from improving the page, and the disruption appears to have stopped for now. clpo13(talk) 19:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Clpo13 ok. let's hope it remains stopped. Venkat TL (talk) 19:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Clpo13 I am not the one reverting changes. I tried explaining to Venkat TL why his section was out of place https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Editors_Guild_of_India . He reverted 3 times already. Should I report him for this ? TallMegan (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)TallMegan
- I actually did misidentify your first edit as a revert, but continuing to remove content after Venkat objected is considered edit warring, just as they were edit warring by putting it back constantly. I don't think any reports would be actionable at this time since neither of you has gone beyond 3RR, though page protection might still be an option to force a discussion. clpo13(talk) 20:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'm hesitant to apply full protection at this point, as that would prevent uninvolved editors from improving the page, and the disruption appears to have stopped for now. clpo13(talk) 19:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Clpo13 He has only made 3 reverts so I think it is not correct to report there, Why not protect this article for a few days so that the other user can focus on resolution instead of edit warring. Venkat TL (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of out-of-the-woodwork SPAs and anon IPs edited this article in great frequency in 2019 to make the subject look bad with weaselly word choice and bending the rules/expectations of sourcing. Page was protected and longer-term registered users with differing views reached consensus on article talk. Starting last week a new registered user deleted the contentious material wholesale, and subsequently a lot of brand new IPs started adding back the material removed in 2019. Requesting short term protection until this sudden interest evaporates. Before last week article only gets substantive edits like once per month. JesseRafe (talk) 19:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Note that user JesseRafe has engaged in persistent removal of well-referenced material because of WP:IDONTLIKEIT and has not shared a single example of the "weaselly word choice and bending the rules/expectations of sourcing" they allege. They have also referred to me (as well as previous editors) as a "bots" or "trolls", violating WP:NOPA. 2001:569:7FEA:C900:E40B:4D99:287B:AF38 (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note, I don't have to "prove" anything of the sort as that behavior was in 2019 as the sentence you are selectively copying from clearly states and in 2019 the page was protected for those very edits three times. JesseRafe (talk) 20:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Again, not a single example of the "weaselly word choice and bending the rules/expectations of sourcing" you allege. 2001:569:7FEA:C900:E40B:4D99:287B:AF38 (talk) 21:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Addendum: JesseRafe's behavior on the article, together with this request to lock out other users from making well-referenced contributions (while calling them "bots" and "trolls"), suggests that they're trying to establish ownership over the article. Notice how they jumped to "Requesting short term protection until this sudden interest evaporates" as soon as one person (myself) tried to contribute to the article. In other words, "sudden interest" apparently means "interest from anyone whatsoever". Thus JesseRafe is not only engaging in disruptive deletion, but also appears to be deliberately misrepresenting the situation to administrators. 2001:569:7FEA:C900:E40B:4D99:287B:AF38 (talk) 20:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Addendum, are you one person or 5 (the number of IPs adding this content this week)? How could anyone tell? Seek consensus on the talk page to make this change that would overturn the consensus previously established. It looks like you are trying to brigade this page because you don't like him and not respecting clearly established guidelines while gaslighting me. While there is a surge of IP and newly registered users adding potentially BLP sensitive material seeking PP is the correct move now as it was in 2019. Three times. JesseRafe (talk) 20:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- "are you one person or 5" I am one person, obviously. My IP is not static.
- "How could anyone tell?" By asking before accusing, as you did.
- "Seek consensus on the talk page to make this change that would overturn the consensus previously established." What part of my contributions do you wish to dispute, exactly? You need to read WP:OWN, in particular:
An editor reverts justified article changes by different editors repeatedly over an extended period to protect a certain version, stable or not.
An editor reverts a change simply because the editor finds it "unnecessary" without claiming that the change is detrimental. This has the effect of assigning priority, between two equivalent versions, to an owner's version.
An editor reverts a good-faith change without providing an edit summary that refers to relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines, previous reviews and discussions, reliable sources, or specific grammar or prose problems introduced by the edit. Repeating such no-reason reversions after being asked for a rationale is a strong indicator of ownership behavior.
An editor comments on other editors' talk pages with the purpose of discouraging them from making additional contributions.
- "It looks like you are trying to brigade this page" Please stop repeating this fantasy of yours, and stop lying to the administrators. There was no brigade. I simply added well-referenced material to the article and you called my contributions vandalism and hoped I would be blocked.
- "because you don't like him" Your repeated comments along these lines (such as your previous complaint that additions "make the subject look bad") should make it clear to the administrators what your real rationale is. You don't want any well-referenced material added to the article that portrays the subject in (what you perceive as) a bad light. Please read WP:IDONTLIKEIT and WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT.
- "not respecting clearly established guidelines" Given the information above, it should be clear that this applies to you, not me.
- "there is a surge of IP and newly registered users adding potentially BLP sensitive material" What "surge" are you referring to, exactly? 2001:569:7FEA:C900:E40B:4D99:287B:AF38 (talk) 21:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Per the verifiability policy, the onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. Violations can be reported at WP:ANEW.
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GENSEX. This article is semiprotected for disruption primarily related to the fact that Levine is a trans woman. However there have been three edits today by autoconfirmed users that have added Levine's deadname (against MOS:DEADNAME and explicit past consensus at the page) or have referred to her as the incorrect gender. The spike in activity is likely related to Levine being in the news today for becoming a four-star admiral. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of until the original expiration date, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent IPs adding unsourced BLP info. Trivialist (talk) 00:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection as there has been a steady influx of IPs and new user accounts blanking information over the past three days. Not sure why there has been a sudden spike, but this is a controversial topic that occasionally attracts off-wiki interest and waves of disruption. Grandpallama (talk) 21:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Semi-protected for 6 months. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Already been protected multiple times in the past, but vandals keep coming back. Chlod (say hi!) 21:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bsadowski1. Semi-protected for 10 days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs protection for longer period, since disruption resumed when previous protection expired. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandals are back at it again after the page protection expired on the 2nd. Helen(💬📖) 01:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP hoppers. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Semi-protected for 2 weeks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 23:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. User blocked, other measures taken. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See my comment on the talk page, way too much edit warring going on here (not by me). (t · c) buidhe 23:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not just there, and not just recently.
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Frequent additions of unsourced and highly contested material by anonymous and new editors. However, most are made by the IP address 72.141.27.96, so another course of action may be appropriate. CentreLeftRight ✉ 20:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss the issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Various IP users, presumably all the same person, deleting references and notes for no good reason and is refusing to stop, while also harassing me on my user talk page for reverting his deletions. Page has been a mess for a long time because of this person but the first dispute about differing sources has been settled as outlined on the talk page. He will not stop until he is locked out. He is uninterested in engaging in dialogue on the talk page and I am tired of engaging with this guy. Please help. Skblole (talk) 22:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Respone to Automated comment: I don't know why this was denied in the first place but alright then. I guess that's another 8 days of edit wars and IP hoppers wishing me dead on my user talk page. Skblole (talk) 23:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of ip vandalism Estnot (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Targeted cross-wiki harassment against me by User: 204.184.47.153, sockpuppet of User:2600:6C40:5400:1D2B:8CBB:F80B:2C2D:4BB0. Requesting two weeks semi-protection. Citrivescence (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous adding of non-reliable sources by IP editors. wizzito | say hello! 03:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment: There's also widespread WP:CANVASSING going on in this article through Twitter. See here and here. wizzito | say hello! 03:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently he made a bad call in a baseball game? In any case, IPs are now attacking this WP:BLP. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 09:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism of the page despite semi-protection. wizzito | say hello! 03:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. Plus, Da Bears spam! El_C 11:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Constant attempts by IP and non-autoconfirmed users to add the suspect's name, which was not agreed on in the talk page at the moment. Love of Corey (talk) 04:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Protection timed out a month ago; since then most edits have been disruptive editing, vandalism, and reversions of such. YttriumShrew (talk) 05:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 12:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP disruptive editing. Blazewing16 (talk) 05:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's Dino-mite! El_C 12:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism, blanking, and/or test editing, such as 1 2 3 4. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Individual is very recently dead and multiple IPs keep adding unsourced info that he died of the COVID-19 vaccine. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Page is well watched to boot. Lectonar (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: a stanger is many time changing the info of android studio Nishantsirmaa (talk) 10:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. @Nishantsirmaa: I suggest you take some time to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: no one change the wiki Nishantsirmaa (talk) 10:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Continued personal attacks shortly after the last semi expired... I think this UTP needs semi permanently. - RichT|C|E-Mail 13:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined IP already blocked with talk-page editing disabled. The vandalism happened before the block. Lectonar (talk) 13:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Just noting that the /16 is separately rangeblocked (a school block). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to the footballer being arrested today. Three IP editors have vandalised the page since the arrest made the news a few hours ago, I expect more if the page is not protected. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jksimonboliver (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. This is English Wikipedia. That target doesn't exist here. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated IP vandalism this morning. Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Please use the AIV board when there vandalism is from a single user or IP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start from here. Less Unless (talk) 18:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – COVID-19 Hubei in china. ImChessFan21 (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – USA lockdown in northern california. ImChessFan21 (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Veneto was a Italian-Venetian speaking region of Italy. ImChessFan21 (talk) 16:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
21 October 2021
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism who consistently target the page with lewd additions. Banning the IP, an action taken when the page was initially reported, won't work. Whoever is vandalizing the page will simply wait for the block to expire or switch to another proxy IP. Suggesting that it be permanently semi-protected. Haleth (talk) 05:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This page has not been previously, let's see if this calms things down. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This might be from a specific IP range but a page protection seems warranted with its recent edits. – The Grid (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked 2409:4062:0:0:0:0:0:0/33; it's a relatively large range, but very few useful edits in last month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP editors edit-warring. One apparrently involved in block evasion. Peaceray (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Robotix (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Brave Little Toaster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Brave Little Toaster (novel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Brave Little Toaster to the Rescue (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from Connecticut IPs Special:Contributions/72.209.38.154 and Special:Contributions/2600:8805:D585:3500:0:0:0:0/64. The same protection is also needed for The Brave Little Toaster, The Brave Little Toaster (novel), The Brave Little Toaster to the Rescue and The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars. Binksternet (talk) 19:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 2600:8805:D585:3500:0:0:0:0/64 and 72.209.38.154. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by a user switching between IPs. Politanvm talk 21:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 22:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an IP is continually changing the infobox image without discussing/reaching a consensus. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 01:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent spike in unsourced additions/changes by new and anonymous accounts. It is the same change (adding a personal estimate of the number of fighters) being made each time and the editors either do not read the edit summaries or do not care. CentreLeftRight ✉ 06:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated block evasion by socks of Sweetindian, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sweetindian. Another WP:SPA pops up to edit war after the protection expired.[68][69][70]. - SUN EYE 1 07:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-running (since May) edit war by IP-hopping editor who persists in changing the lead despite several reliable sources supporting the alternative. They have made no effort to engage on talk, and at one point were blocked for making a legal threat. ninety:one 10:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. TheWikiholic (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant removal of sourced content that has been ongoing since June. Vacant0 (talk) 12:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sinan 2004 (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. An anonymous user who appears to have a conflict of interest is deleting a section about the human rights controversies involving the subject. This has already happened several times -- see anonymous edits on May 23 , June 4, June 28, and August 25. Anonymous user returned after two previous semi-protections expired. Requesting indefinite semi-protection. Nemozen (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Influx of vandalism organized on Twitter 2601:184:4780:6B10:AC1E:98CC:46C:7E21 (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Most editing has been IP disruption and reversion, particularly over the last five days. YttriumShrew (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 06:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See the article talk page, there appears to be a bit of a dispute between editors here which I think just needs a few days for them both to cool off, I have advised both users where to seek content resolution etc. JW 1961 Talk 20:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The infobox addition seems redundant and unconventional, but having the disputants revert a million times is much worse for the page's stability. El_C 07:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Anwegmann (talk) 20:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 222.117.24.148 (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs seem to be edit warring to keep information off of the page. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing NSAandGCHQ (talk) 23:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 03:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent changing of "actor" to "voice actor". Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Few number of disruptive edits as well as adding or changing of source content over last 6 months. Fade258 (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 05:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Few number of disruptive edits and adding or change of sourced content over last 3 weeks. Fade258 (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated block evasion by socks of Sweetindian, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sweetindian. This page was protected before for the same reason and they are back with an WP:SPA after it expired. This time adds the same content with WP:FAKE sources as pointed out by another user in the edit summary along with some other content with likely WP:FAKE sources.[71][72][73][74]. - SUN EYE 1 07:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Ngai Pang Chin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Probably the ip sock or meatsock of 蟲蟲飛 or their cult member, try to vote stacking. Matthew hk (talk) 10:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bbb23. El_C 08:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Beijing China (least covid-19 vaccination). ImChessFan21 (talk) 16:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Equivamp - talk 17:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 88.245.16.126 (talk) 18:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection. Reason: Edit war resumed directly after last protection expired. Newly registered user account making exactly the same disruptive edits as IP hopping user. Removal of content. Antique Rose 18:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Let's hold off on re-protecting just yet... El_C 06:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Mvcg66b3r, let's see if Wcquidditch's explanation in their latest edit summary will be enough. Feel free to relist if the problems persist. El_C 07:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism - this football manager is being linked with a new job. In a few days the club will hire him, or someone else, and then this vandalism won't be as much of a problem. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:C075:2DE5:AD2A:16F4 (talk) 21:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 49.144.37.87 (talk) 22:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some are removing insignia, Vir Chakra ribbon, etc in the name of editing. Arunudoy (talk) 03:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP PR edits deleting criticisms of the organization, see most recent diff. Semi-protection would be helpful. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 08:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 08:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IPs adding unsourced predictions on who might have qualified based on the results of the 2021 tournament. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism who want to add a hint to The Billion Dollar Code either in the "Depiction in Media" section (but the character Brian Anderson is fictional) or by calling the person a thief (however he is legally unblemished from the court decision in 2017) - I think a month should be enough as the Netflix series was first aired two weeks ago, so there are currently many poeple who have seen it first. Guidod (talk) 11:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Agreed. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am requesting page protection as there seems to be transphobic edits to Ruby Guest's page. Trains2050 (talk) 11:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Wrong country information 2001:CE0:2201:834:4DD7:D18:7810:AEA (talk) 11:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not going to lie, I'm a little confused as to why the second ever edit by an IP address is to this page. I am even more confused because page protection means they won't be able to edit. I won't comment on the content but there's definitely been disruptive editing so...they can definitely have their request granted...? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Succession of IPs attempting to state Taiwan is part of China in Wikivoice. FDW777 (talk) 12:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator panyd. See very bizarre request above PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Innapropiate Vandalism 88.245.16.126 (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- :
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated insertion of incorrect website by IP editors. Gab4gab (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term redirect hijacking. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP socking editor keeps adding HUGE photo. Spike 'em (talk) 15:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Based a different request, this seems reasonable; however, I would like to note that patrolling admins will not always know the history of this disruption, and if relevant information isn't in the page history, it should be provided here. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Question: IP seems to be editing in good faith, even though their attempts are not helpful; has any attempt been made to engage with them? Vanamonde (Talk) 15:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP socking following expiry of previous protection expiring. Spike 'em (talk) 15:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Very high level of vandalism and spam by SPAs and IPs. Kbabej (talk) 15:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Pretty clear this has to be long term semi-protected for the immediate future. Fuzheado | Talk 16:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:35, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Edit war and page disruption by two users. Squatch347 (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like user:Widr added protection, thank you! Squatch347 (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated additions by IP's that get reverted constantly. Megaman en m (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 150.135.165.0/26 is blocked from editing the article for a week. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Equine-man (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Already on it; waiting for your reverts. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive content removals resumed as soon as the previous protection expired; I believe we need longer semi-protection, possibly in addition to indefinite pending-changes. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 15:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2402:800:61b1::/48 is blocked for 3 months. Favonian (talk) 17:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Peace TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Peace TV Bangla (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Huda TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – SharifulIslamNaikBD has been adding their name to these articles without supporting sources, and nothing found online to support. They've done some editing logged out as well. Requesting semi-protection to stop (they are not auto-confirmed) and will go to AIV if needed. Ravensfire (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Protection is not warranted for disruption from a single user; that's what WP:AIV is for. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 22:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 22:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
22 October 2021
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This one is getting almost daily LTA visits with nothing constructive going on. Larry Hockett (Talk) 20:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Massive disruptive editing by IP and SPA editors in the section "India" during the last 3 days. Austronesier (talk) 22:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. clpo13(talk) 23:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please semi-protect through the Indians->Guardians name change becoming official; I recommend 2 months with the ability to remove earlier. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 23:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note: the page is also move-protected until July 2022. clpo13(talk) 23:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - IP vandalism after breaking news of his death.BabbaQ (talk) 23:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 23:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't know why they're going at it, but they are. Helen(💬📖) 23:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 23:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Piotr Bart (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked 2 ranges. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Piotr Bart (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked 2 ranges. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinitely semi'd in 2015 due to a disruptive IP, but six years out, I think it's worth seeing if it fares alright without protection. Many editors of higher education pages are newcomers, so unprotecting may help the article develop. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 23:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging the protecting administrator EdJohnston. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotected – EdJohnston (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced voice acting credits. Homechallenge55 (talk) 21:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. clpo13(talk) 23:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection - persistent unsourced edits. Simione001 (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It looks like it's just the one IP user. I've left them a warning. They can be reported if it continues. clpo13(talk) 23:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Moderate level of IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 23:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The most recent vandalism was a couple days ago and the IP was blocked. You can report them at AIV if they continue after the block ends. clpo13(talk) 23:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:47, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism attempts Lily32241 (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Three IPs trying to change the same external link from an old English-language student project into a new and much less useful Turkish-language one. Lord Belbury (talk) 21:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 03:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC) 03:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. clpo13(talk) 04:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- List of analog television stations in the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- DXSS-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Multipoint Broadcasting Network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Continously edited by the sock of Ljlas20. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: SeanJ 2007, well, they edit a lot more related pages than those three, and the SPI is still open, so... Otherwise, this is a difficult request to parse. El_C 08:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: Just protect those using extended confirmed protection, the sock is keeping on editing it and may create a new account if the previous will be blocked. I cant add here what articles that the sock edited because it is many, just look at the sock's contributions and protect it. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 08:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- SeanJ 2007, that doesn't really respond to what I said. Again, wrt confirming the sock, the SPI about them is still open. Also, DXSS-TV, for example, wouldn't require any protection, regardless, due to sparse activity. El_C 08:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: Just protect those using extended confirmed protection, the sock is keeping on editing it and may create a new account if the previous will be blocked. I cant add here what articles that the sock edited because it is many, just look at the sock's contributions and protect it. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 08:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Temporary SP on top of the PC: edit warring/borderline trolling by one IP. @Drmies:. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, I can't really put protection on the article because I'm a party in this ridiculous edit war where the user wouldn't seek consensus. Let's see what happens. Drmies (talk) 04:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent unsourced edits by IP editors, especially to the table of foreign deaths and associated numbers. The edits have a sort of random feel to them, sometimes making the table obviously wrong. It's very hard to believe these are good faith edits. Danstronger (talk) 00:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the stealth vandalism returns afterwards, report to AnI. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuing battling over her name and marriage. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of edit warring between IP addresses and new users without them engaging in a discussion on the article's talk page. Centcom08 (talk) 00:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 01:39, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent multiple IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 23:55, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Looks like a single vandal. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Zhmailik. (CC) Tbhotch™ 01:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Ferien (talk) 11:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 11:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: It says China which is wrong as it’s Mongolia. 94.66.222.129 (talk) 11:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Request your proposed changes on the article talk page using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – what Malcolm says. Favonian (talk) 08:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous a target for sockpuppet for Politialguru (new SPI report). Article targeted with same pattern of trivial edits immediately after temporary protection expired. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – I/P conflict look at criticism section also. Shrike (talk) 07:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism on BLP. David Biddulph (talk) 08:38, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:51, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor keeps putting in not referenced entry,. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:49, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: the person in concern has very less scope of being vandalised, and he is not an extremely prominent figure. the article is not very good, and can be developed if protection is reduced . Thank You 171.61.223.50 (talk) 09:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: there is less scope of vandalism and the person in concern is not a very prominent figure. The article is not developed properly. If protection is reduced, more users can contribute. Kpddg (talk) 09:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – your week rationale combined with your contribution history so far do not add up to a convincing case for unprotecting the article. Favonian (talk) 09:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer needed as no sock recently editted it and dont have any disruptive content. 157.49.185.212 (talk) 09:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – socks have not been editing the article precisely because it's protected. Incidentally, you are the same person who previously disrupted the article using the IP 157.49.158.221, and now you are blocked. Favonian (talk) 09:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Recently deleted BLP. Vitaium (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 13:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, appears to be aimed at the Sikh population. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2a02:c7f:e061:8e00::/64 is blocked from editing the article for 2 weeks. Favonian (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User:Wugapodes removed temporary protection on May 22, 2021 as a trial to see if protection was still needed (WP:TRYUNPROT). Persistent disruptive editing has continued almost on a daily basis, beginning in July and getting worse each month since then. Please consider reinstating temporary protection. - tucoxn\talk 12:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Tucoxn, why "temporary"? It was indef semi'd before. Also, I don't really understand why earlier Wugapodes had lower[ed] move protection to match edit protection [from admin level to semi] in light of the prolific page move vandalism experienced by that page (though in fairness, in 2009). In any case, I also brought move protection back to admin level. Might as well — I want even EC users to use the WP:RM feature in the unlikely event that there's a valid reason to move the page. El_C 13:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Don't make any edits only user edit Siddhant Ghegadmal B (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent removal of sourced content by various ips. Tommi1986 let's talk! 16:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add:
"Talk page protection
Hi, I'm checking some older talk page protections and I'm sorry if I accidentally pinged you some days ago. In your case this is about Talk:Inspire (magazine). There is already a declined request from 2015, but it seems old enough that it may be worth reconsidering. In case you think the protection is still needed, please just let me know that the matter was already considered, here or at User talk:176.247.159.174, where I have a more stable checklist."
at the end of the page. Not sure how signatures should be handled, but anything clear enough should do. 176.247.137.106 (talk) 21:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- This revision should be easier to copy-paste, but was arguing with the bot. 176.247.137.106 (talk) 01:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging Jehochman. Perhaps you might consider undoing your almost seven years old 'Test' semi-protection of your talk page? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- No. Email me if you want to know more. Jehochman Talk 05:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – Jehochman's call. Favonian (talk) 08:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. David Biddulph (talk) 09:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, changing DOB and other biographical info. Kbabej (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Zhmailik. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator TheSandDoctor. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Zhmailik. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Zhmailik. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Zhmailik. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Changing air date without reason. As of original aired in 1995 in the stated source, and the change aired in 1996-1997 which is not given the sourced. Abrilando232 (talk) 03:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Less Unless (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of completely unsourced POV/caste glorification; misinformation; WP:CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 04:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The user wasn't warned enough, there was little effort to talk to them. Less Unless (talk) 15:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent sockpuppetry through IP socks of Yeu aga maj. See [75], [76] Thanks 2402:3A80:6C6:2ACD:C09D:1541:8792:7C44 (talk) 06:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.. Please observe. If the sockpuppetry is proven, you can report the CPI clerks. Less Unless (talk) 15:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 15:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 19:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Consistant Sockpuppetry by IP's, only a few does help but most do not/ MoonlightVectorTalk page 18:39, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Favonian (talk) 19:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA abuse resumed quickly after the end of previous protection. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 19:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP is evading the SP on my talk to post disruptive tit-for-tat nonsense on the archive instead. Please either A) block the IP from my userspace (talk page + any archives) or B) protect the talk page archives. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Warned them; will block if need be. Drmies (talk) 04:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: persistent sockpuppetry through IP socks of Yeu aga maj. 2402:3A80:6C6:2ACD:C09D:1541:8792:7C44 (talk) 06:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. If the sockpuppetry is proven, you can report the CPI clerks. Less Unless (talk) 17:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – redirect that IP-hopper keeps wanting to make a separate page for no real reason. $chnauzer 18:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect this page for a minimum of 3 months. Disruptive editing began again the day the protection ended. United States Man (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple newly-registered editors adding unsource/poorly sourced accusations to BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Multiple newly-registered accounts at least. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment: @ToBeFree: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – extended back-and-forth reversions, no idea what those are intended to accomplish. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
23 October 2021
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Probably until the end of the year (entry lists would most likely be complete by that time). Engr. Smitty Werben 09:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. TheWikiholic (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- @TheWikiholic: It looks they have again added the same information. 42.105.5.53 (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. When the full protection expires, be sure to ask for restoration of the existing semi-protection, which should continue till next April. You can request here at RFPP, or by pinging me or any other admin. MelanieN (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent whitewashing by IP accounts. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2600:100f:b060::/44 was edit warring on several articles and has been given 2 weeks off. Favonian (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of a "Controversies" section which contains factually untrue statements and conspiracy theories about how the show is rigged against the author's (who at one point left a message on my talk page calling me an "apologist for the Big Brother Corporation") favourite contestants. Cwmxii (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing semi-protection appears to be doing the job. An occasional problem edit by an autoconfirmed user can be dealt with through normal page watching. MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Utica greens & related pages
- Utica greens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Utica Devils (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Chicken riggies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The guy from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/10 § Utica, New York and related pages is back. Almost exactly four years, that's weird... It may be sensible to pre-emptively protect Utica, New York as well. Apocheir (talk) 22:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If the problems persist, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users from the same IP range are persistently adding an actor and his character to the cast list even though the actor is already on the cast list. I have explained on the user talk pages and my edit summaries that the actor is already on the cast list and there is no reason for them to be on the list twice but they refuse to understand and are persistently adding the actor again. By looking at the IP addresses they all come from Colombia so the users may not understand English. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 22:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial rangeblocked [77] from editing the article for 1 month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of IP vandalism, looking at revision history you can clearly see it's the same person with this attitude, however their IP address keeps changing & therefore does not warrant blocking the IP address(s). Keeps removing a specific section of Bhuvneshwar's notable Tour of England, describing it as "superfluous", whatever he thinks that means. I have left him a warning already but I do not think he will heed it Obama gaming (talk) 10:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Also recreated under Shakir Subhan (Youtuber) and Mallu Traveler. GPL93 (talk) 03:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Creation protected Both salted. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals. TJRC (talk) 03:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 04:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: He is a very famous person and prominent, respectable figure. There is massive scope for vandalism. There should be more protection. Kpddg (talk) 15:05, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: There's a problem with IPs repeating allegations against a politician without making clear when they are allegations, going beyond what the sources say by stating things as fact. Only problem with IPs, so semi-protection is all that's needed. Rob (talk) 16:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent increase in disruptive edits from IP editors. –WPA (talk) 19:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring over the lead (which I admit I am party to) to promote discussion on the talkpage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated disruptive editing by an IP wanting to interpret the way the series is adapted. --Dr.Margi ✉ 11:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Also, repeated reverting by serial reverters like User:Drmargi who seem to have a vested interest in the maintaining the biased points of view paid for by television studios (looking at this user's edit history), instead of keeping the article neutral. -- (71.172.17.21) 12:00 pm, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Could this page be semi-protected please? High level of IP vandalism by an account connected to an expected candidate. Seems to be the same person who caused a lot of similar vandalism at a previous election article. Bondegezou (talk) 16:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Warn the user and report to the appropriate noticeboard if they persist. Please apply for protection again if disruptive activity becomes excessive. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: To protect from vandalism Elysant (talk) 05:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Elysant:
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. There has been no vandalism. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: I want to add more informations Elysant (talk) 05:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. @Elysant: That is what talk page edit requests are for. I don't see the value in removing protection for the whole world just so one person can edit it. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP editor keeps adding original research and removing reliably sourced content. Has broken 3RR on two separate occasions. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Magic School Bus vandal is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Kinu. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 03:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Kinu. Favonian (talk) 10:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Currently protected indefinitely. As previously proposed, to set a definite end-time to facilitate settlement. Without that there's little incentive among some quarters to work towards some form of actual settlement. Would suggest a 14- or 30-day one, or at most 90-day, counted from the point when it was first protected. 219.76.24.200 (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- That was because when it was last submitted it wasn't clearly specified that the request was submitted for a definite duration, rather than a request to reduce the protection level. 219.76.24.210 (talk) 13:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. List of lighthouses in Macau is a redirect. The target article is not protected and can be edited by anyone. The redirect page is protected, but there has been zero talk page discussion since February. I fail to see how temporary unprotection would accomplish anything. If you have a proposal to make regarding that redirect page, then propose it on the target article's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- It has become a redirect because somebody forcibly merged it with another list and refused to discuss other than simply stating their position. By keeping the redirect protected they simply got no incentive to discuss, despite a clear consensus recently on the corresponding WikiProject's talk page. 219.76.24.204 (talk) 07:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Recurrent IP/new account vandalism (replacing accepted name of stars and planet with unaccepted name "Wolftopia") T. Cadwallader Phloog (talk) 20:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses adding unsourced content / BLP violations (despite an earlier discussion where people agreed to not include it). I am aware that personally I have violated 3RR as well there, but I kept reverting because it involves living people. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jochem van Hees, indeed, you're exempt from 3RR in this matter. You did the right thing. El_C 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Alec Baldwin case means this may be a target for vandals, as it just was. ɯɐɔ 💬 04:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- And so it was.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced edits continue to be added to article lead. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: originally listed as Basílica Menor de la Virgen de Monserrate, but page was moved soon thereafter to the current title, which I have supplanted above (for the bot). @The Eloquent Peasant: courtesy ping.
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a common target for vandalism by IPs. Could use a protect for some time. wizzito | say hello! 22:51, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Common target of vandalism by IPs (also, if preferred strategy is to block in this case, the most recent vandalizing IP switches IPs somewhat, so block the range 216.100.88.128/28). wizzito | say hello! 22:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spike in vandalism by multiple IPs. Politanvm talk 04:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Might also need sanctions as it's related to India and Pakistan. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 04:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A few revdels. El_C 12:26, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion from Lobstobar — DaxServer (talk) 08:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (talk) 10:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – COVID + addition of poorly sourced disinformation coming from places like Project Veritas (ex. [78]). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support But indefinite semi-protection with stronger enforcement. 180.254.162.137 (talk) 06:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Only 138 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 20:28, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Trilletrollet: You posted this and the next proposal in the sub-page to reduce protection. Please remove these and move them into the Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase sub-page. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Anachronist: No, they're both template-protected, which is why they were posted here. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 10:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Only 3 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 20:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotected. El_C 14:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Currently template-protected, despite only having 1351 transclusions. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 11:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 14:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unconstructive IP edits. KyleJoantalk 04:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 12:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comparison of the Community of Christ and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user edit warring using different IPs over multiple days. Politanvm talk 05:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Politanvm, actually, it's all the same /64. El_C 12:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 06:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 12:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Compare HalMorkarn and Aesthetical Beacon... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Upgrading from pc. El_C 15:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: You might also want to take a look at the other pages edited by the latest sock. Some of them could maybe use some protection, like for ex. [79]. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for the duration. El_C 15:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Peruvian IP vandalism 2800:200:E840:20B3:80BC:5EC9:978B:2903 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 179.6.198.114 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 2800:200:E840:20B3:9095:767E:8A17:4BD (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). 125.161.212.55 (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Easternconsigliere (talk · contribs) and Easternconsigliere1 (talk · contribs) are obvious socks of each other, whose username implies a particular POV regarding this article. 2601:43:c202:5ae0:1107:ab23:ef95:a9f9 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) may also be a sock. JBchrch talk 16:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator LuK3. Favonian (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Additional information needs adding such as start times for qualifying and the race and further driver background. MKL123 (talk) 10:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- @MKL123: Well, you can always make edit requests. It just got semi-protected only 10 days ago by El C due to disruption. That's a bit recent to undo, don't you think? ~Anachronist (talk) 06:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- The disruptive editing was someone attempting to create the article with no sources, and only vague detail (effectively WP:TOOSOON), the protection served as a de facto WP:SALTing (of a redirect). As the article has now been created, the need for protection no longer exists - and so I endorse MKL123's request. (If that's worth anything at all) SSSB (talk) 08:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- @MKL123: Well, you can always make edit requests. It just got semi-protected only 10 days ago by El C due to disruption. That's a bit recent to undo, don't you think? ~Anachronist (talk) 06:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging the protecting administrator El C. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Not unprotected. This isn't "de facto salting" — salting is almost always set at WP:ECP (or admin level), whereas this page is only WP:SEMI protected. And the protection expires in three days anyway. What is the point? El_C 14:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Persistent edit expired indefinitely 61.5.115.152 (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined I don’t know what this means. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by multiple IPs, recently expired protection, should be longer... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (talk) 17:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: people won't do any unnecessary things on that and sometimes you editors take a lot of time to edit the page and then people or audience can't get their information on what's happening in the Bigg Boss house . Please reduce the level of protection on the page atleast on the housemates' status , nomination table and weekly summary . Nikita Bhamidipati (talk) 06:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging the protecting administrator Ponyo. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles aren't meant to be updated "as it happens" and having editors who are familiar with sourcing policies on such an article is helpful to maintain the integrity of the article. Regardless, your request doesn't address the actual reason for the protection, which is the persistent
Confirmed socking at that article.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles aren't meant to be updated "as it happens" and having editors who are familiar with sourcing policies on such an article is helpful to maintain the integrity of the article. Regardless, your request doesn't address the actual reason for the protection, which is the persistent
Declined – what Ponyo says. Favonian (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent SEO/spam/advertisement of a third party URL posing as official one since 15 October 2021 by two IP address: 186.32.60.6 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 201.191.254.192 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Not a lot of activity, but I have already reverted four times to the official URL. Roqz (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. 88.245.16.126 (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There haven't been any edits since September, and the last reverted vandalism was in August. Please familiarize yourself with how this board works before posting again. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Maybe three mildly disruptive edits since the beginning of August? OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of vandalism this year by IP editors. Today, an editor with 14 edits has speedy nominated this page for deletion. As this page has been constantly vandalized, I believe it should be protected especially as it is a how-to guide. Thanks! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two vandalism edits since July from a likely soon-to-be-blocked account. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
24 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. The pending changes are being made only to be reverted. An increase might deflect the disruption away — DaxServer (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Twelve months would be nice, to match the existing edit notice, which hasn't been as effective as one had hoped, probably due to WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU). See also (stricken) duplicate request #Faizabad district 2. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Looks more like argument that similar to WP:RM from Faizabad to Ayodhya. Why not discuss the page move with these IPs?. 180.254.162.137 (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --RegentsPark (comment) 22:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. Dynamic ranges, protection expired last Thursday. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DanCherek (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 22:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple new and IP editors vandalizing BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator discospinster. EC protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP disruption, and previous semi-protection was for six months, so I recommend at least a year this time. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 45.168.236.0/24 blocked for 2 weeks. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing from user SCD0392, who is removing movies and shows that have aired on the NickRewind programming block. BrickMaster02 (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 22:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Semi-protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism; this started up again after the last one expired. There's already an edit notice in place (exp: 22 Sep 2022). Not sure what the prot. criteria are, but if it's within guidelines, I'd like to see semi-prot for 12 months, so it would expire a month after the edit notice, giving the notice time to be renewed before the protection expires. A lot of the problem is probably due to web interface users, because WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU, so the edit notice doesn't really help for them. Mathglot (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Duplicate request – see #Faizabad district above. Mathglot (talk) 20:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Already protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Semi for a month. IP making the same change over and over, with no way to reach them for discussion. — kwami (talk) 20:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion from Lobstobar — DaxServer (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Here we go again, in triplets (again). El_C 06:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion from Lobstobar — DaxServer (talk) 15:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. El_C 06:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion from Lobstobar — DaxServer (talk) 15:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User is restoring hoaxes again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection – continued persistent WP:BLP violations from an IP editor. (And not just today – this has been going on for a while.) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- For ongoing issues like this, you're better off going with indefinite semi-protection, and I've never understood why anybody would specifically request for that to be temporary when that just leaves room for more disruption once it expires. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- For the simple reason that most IP editors will not persist after a, say, month-long semi-protection. It is rare that more than that is needed. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Vitaium (talk) 02:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs inexplicably keep changing mayor in infobox [80] [81] [82]. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 03:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by ip hoppers. Atlantic306 (talk) 04:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection has been removed for Semi-protected edit request but never set it back after the edit request was complete. GoldenTaurus (talk) 04:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Three year protection did not produce the desired effect, seeing as disruption resumed the same day the protection expired (Oct 21). El_C 06:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. INDT (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: I recently edited the ratings table on the Abby Hatcher article, so clicking the appropriate season tab redirects you to that section on the episode list. However, it has been reverted which makes the redirect not work, and my edit is more organized with the formatting (2019–20). Plus, the claim for its reversion is that it is a "typo", when it is not. BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: I recently edited the ratings table on the Butterbean's Cafe article, so clicking the appropriate season tab redirects you to that section on the episode list. However, just like the Abby Hatcher episode page, it has been reverted which makes the redirect not work, and my edit is more organized with the formatting (2018–20). Plus, the claim for its reversion is that it is a "typo", when it is not. Also, the end date for season one is changed, when it is only going by airdate order. BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 88.245.16.126 (talk) 17:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see the vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 88.245.16.126 (talk) 19:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit in October and no vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to escalate this as necessary but there isn't too much activity and this will be the first PP. Definitely not a candidate for indef right now. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant wave of vandalism ongoing from different IPs and accounts. Dylan620 (talk) 03:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing, constant vandalism from unregistered or anonymous users. Sabaybayin (talk) 05:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 06:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent attempts to keep the subject alive by way of speculative editing and irrelevant writing by way of Vandalism Rajendarkhanna (talk) 10:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. We thank the OP for drawing attention to themselves and getting blocked. Favonian (talk) 11:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism since the last protection expired. Esiymbro (talk) 09:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Looking at the PP history indef seems like the only option left. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (talk) 10:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – heavily edited because just won MotoGP championship. Engr. Smitty Werben 13:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of poorly sourced content (the given source is, inevitably, despite warnings to find acceptable sources if they exist, Project Veritas) by dynamic IP. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. You say temporary, I say indef. Logged AE action. El_C 13:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor is 1) adding unsourced changes; 2) IP told, i.e "pre- is not capitalized" but continues to readd "Pre" it to article. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 02:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Same ol' Lovato issues. (CC) Tbhotch™ 08:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. name changes just after announcement Venkat TL (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- List of awards and nominations received by Mariah Carey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: A high level of IP vandalism despite the number of awards not being accurate. Maxwell King123321 12:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. At least it isn't a bank, eh DaxServer? El_C 13:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: It has 10 categories, some people are adding extra categories which is making it misleading 2409:4063:4C9E:1926:D64C:C131:85A1:CBBC (talk) 11:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This looks like something that should be discussed on the talk page. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Longterm semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal caused the page to be semi-protected on the 19th of October. Page protection has expired today, and the vandal has immediately resumed its obscene vandalism of the page.--Mr Fink (talk) 13:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 13:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Obsessed user messing standard punctuation up -- FMSky (talk) 14:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked for 3 months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 14:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked for 3 months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism due Manchester United's current impression of being a non-League club. Seasider53 (talk) 16:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 17:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- List of programs broadcast by Discovery Kids (Latin American TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Hydrogenation (talk) 21:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Question: Hydrogenation, can you provide any diffs of edit warring and/or disruption in addition to the STOP DOING WIGGLES! revert? El_C 14:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- El_C looking through the diffs, I can't find any specific instances of edit warring. I think the reason I reported is that there have been a large number of additions and removals recently, and it's unclear who is correct, but I don't know if it warrants protection. Hydrogenation (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Understood. Will mark as
Withdrawn by requestor, then. El_C 16:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Understood. Will mark as
- El_C looking through the diffs, I can't find any specific instances of edit warring. I think the reason I reported is that there have been a large number of additions and removals recently, and it's unclear who is correct, but I don't know if it warrants protection. Hydrogenation (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive, uncooperative edits from IP user -- NYKTNE (talk) 17:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. The last activity was 3 days ago. Less Unless (talk) 19:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: There have been 4 edits in the past 2 years that are not autoconfirmed. No need for pending changed here Floydian τ ¢ 21:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Alternative proposal: wait 9 days for the 1-year protection to expire. ;) Favonian (talk) 21:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
25 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent use by IPs and recently created accounts as a forum about the subject. Politanvm talk 21:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator DMacks. Semi-protected for 1 week. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent bad edits from IPs needing to be reverted for several days now. Crossroads -talk- 22:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Greek anti-royals keep removing "Greece" from the official title of the princess (due to the recent wedding). —Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 22:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – All IP edits since June have intentionally inserted misgendering. It won't stop at this point without semi-protection. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP hopper continues to remove the maintenance tags without explanation. Article has already been protected once due to this. Link20XX (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. Eevee01(talk) 19:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite protection: Persistent page hijacking by sock puppets, this article on an artist from Kosovo keeps getting overwritten by an article on a non-notable musician/entrepreneur. I don't know if it's of interest or if linking it here would constitute WP:OUTING, but a paid editing firm has uploaded a tutorial on YouTube on "how to recreate a deleted Wikipedia article without the new page reviewers noticing" where they hijack this article as an example. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hiraab Imamate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Reason: High level of IP vandalism - Abshir55 (talk) 23:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the past several months, there has been persistent vandalism to this article due to the controversy surrounding actress Amber Heard. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Since 5 October, despite being warned, GrottoVilla has repeatedly greatly expanded the plot section of the article, changed "and" to "&", downcased capitalised character names, and otherwise worsened the writing of the article. Recently the plot information has been moved into a "list of episodes" which does not list episodes but is being used a rationale to lengthen plot information. Since Grotto Villa was confronted there have been many oddly similar edits by an IP editor 27.106.113.42. Please restrict IP editing privileges to protect the page and to prevent puppetry. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 21:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP address sock puppetry. 5 reverts from 4 different IP addresses, all registered under Comcast Cable in Bensalem, Pennsylvania, all but one revert had no edit summary, 4 reverts have been within the last 24 hours. I've posted on article talk page and each IPs talkpage and have not received any attempt at communication. Rockchalk717 22:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Other users are changing the personal information of Stavroula Samara with false information or they tend to delete the content that I create. I am kindly asking you to protect this page. Please let me know if you would like some additional information from me. Thank you Jimtommas (talk) 20:57, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined You appear to have a conflict of interest with regard to this page. Do not change the contests without adding citations. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent disruptive editing by IPs / new users Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abshir55 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The article is already protected and no IP has edited it for at least a month. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I reverted over and over again. ChilisMontrose (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Inclusion of relevant foreign names, specifically Turkish names in the lead, in accordance with WP:NCGN are being reverted by two users without attempt at proper discussion or valid reasons given. Same for Samos and Chios. Requesting reversion to edited version and protection. DriedGrape (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same issues started occuring again after the previous protection expired. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit war over Cahun's pronouns due to being featured in today's Google Doodle. AudiblySilenced|✉️ 05:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors & newly registered editors. Peaceray (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent vandalism through the last 4 days by several IPs (though probably by the same person). Most recent edits were several minutes ago. Lochglasgowstrathyre (talk) 10:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Number 57. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This Good Article is seeing sporadic IP or new user vandalism. As an established page that will likely only be further improved through the work of experienced editors at this point, I believe applying semi-protection against non-auto-confirmed users would be productive. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Iskandar323, that makes sense, but it isn't how the protection policy is currently written. El_C 13:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 4 incidents of vandalism in the 3 days since unprotection, with no constructive changes by non-autoconfirmed users. — Bilorv (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is persistent removal of valid content. Addition of unsourced material. Rickyurs (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP Vandalism. FdfaRinasawayam (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotection: Bryant died in January 2020. ChilisMontrose (talk) 19:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging the protecting administrator Zzuuzz. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- I only added move protection, which I think should probably remain. Semi-protection was applied back in 2007 by East718. I'm unconvinced of the wisdom of unprotecting it, but I've no objections. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn’t spot that. East718 does not seem very active but let’s ping them for their input anyway. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Taking away semi-protection would be asking for trouble. Time of death is irrelevant as once a frequently disrupted page gets unprotected, that just opens up opportunities for that to resume. Not a risk worth taking. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn’t spot that. East718 does not seem very active but let’s ping them for their input anyway. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- I only added move protection, which I think should probably remain. Semi-protection was applied back in 2007 by East718. I'm unconvinced of the wisdom of unprotecting it, but I've no objections. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined And with that I’m going to decline. Sockpuppets have no standing on this wiki. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: many users (both registered and non-registered) who are apparently wow fans/players, insist on entering excessive plot information of the game and has been going on since this edit:
and another example of such vandalism to the plot section (along many others):
most recently, user Br1lled (who has fewer than one page worth of edits) also insists on re-adding excessive plot details that we were challenged and deleted by more experienced editors, and resulting in an edit war. Grandia01 (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined I watch the article myself, and this is a minor edit war over MOS:VG guidelines. Semiprotection would not stop the current slow edit war, and there's no real grounds to ECP for a duration that would matter. Perhaps work with the editor to compact the plot rather than removing it wholesale? -- ferret (talk) 12:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ferret:he has reentered that excessively-long and uncited plot again and i am not going to play this childish game with him forever. he can write his memoirs and actual playing experience on there for all i care. since you have declined this request and are watching this article yourself as you said then you deal with him, and don't ask others to do more work because of your decisions. Grandia01 (talk) 04:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated disruptive removals by a vandalistic registered editor who just returned from a 60-hour block. Ronherry (talk) 07:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. The errant editor has been blocked indefinitely by Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 15:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism following a game. A week should do well. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 15:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New users and IPs adding nonsense to the article. Slywriter (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent joke edits by IPs. —AFreshStart (talk) 15:46, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been plagued by constant ethno-nationalistic disruption for years. Imho it is better off with some kind of permanent or very long protection. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- because of Rgalo10 [83] the Talk:R160 (New York City Subway car) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) talk page already protected by AmandaNP but the R179 talk page is missing please confirmed ECP immediately. 209.140.37.129 (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Looks like that account has been globally locked. El_C 13:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive Editing. QarinahWhiteyy (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in weeks! El_C 14:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. QarinahWhiteyy (talk) 10:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. QarinahWhiteyy, last disruptive edit was a week ago thereby rendering it
Stale. El_C 14:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP Vandalism. QarinahWhiteyy (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Again, no edits in weeks. El_C 14:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: User script protection — DaxServer (talk) 13:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Technically unable to do so (only delete button displays for this page). El_C 14:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. FdfaRinasawayam (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in over a month! El_C 14:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Unwanted Vandalism. FdfaRinasawayam (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 14:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Standard WP:TFA fare. Hog Farm Talk 16:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: she was an irresistible star in the south. Bharat900123 (talk) 14:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – That may well be, but WP:NPOV requires you to control your passion. Favonian (talk) 15:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism from IP editors. Requesting semi-protection. Pyramids09 (talk) 17:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Change passing record Koolyoung (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please make a semi-protected edit request on the article talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: There is a meta analysis for Iverermectin (Dr Tess Lowrie/Dr Andrew Hill) which shows high efficacy of the drug against Covid-19 in Randomised Control Trials (particularly prophylaxis >85%). Ivermectin is undergoing many further clinical trials all over the world (treatment for Covid -19) and has now been approved as a prescribed treatment in many countries including Japan for this purpose. The 'ineffective' comment against the drug is not founded and should be corrected ... (there is already proof of considerable efficacy) 82.17.149.149 (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please propose your change on the article talk page and obtain consensus for it. Ensure that your proposed source complies with our WP:MEDRS guideline. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Not unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
I would like to edit the place of birth for Rumi from Afghanistan to Iran Aliroshansobh (talk) 03:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- We require that information in a Wikipedia article come from a reliable published source so please open a discussion on Talk:Rumi with reliable sources that support this. If you have questions, enquire at the Teahouse. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:12, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – appropriately redirected to the article talk page. Favonian (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive Vandalism FdfaRinasawayam (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: False Links. FdfaRinasawayam (talk) 14:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not enough recent disruptive editing to justify protection. - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 17:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 18:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IPs keep making questionable-at-best changes. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 18:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
26 October 2021
Reason: Multiple editors engaged in edit warring pending article deletion discussion. Equine-man (talk) 16:48, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 17:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- because of Rgalo10 is back with the difference number 60 I told you he's too good at blocked evasion I suggest protect that page obviously that master continued to disruption on Subway page. 63.143.199.206 (talk) 19:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Obviously Rgalo10 with a different number also 68 at the end he is still continued to Global ban evasion. 172.58.225.50 (talk) 23:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP and new account content removals without talk page discussion. Dialectric (talk) 17:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 18:48, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Jayjg: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. Holy smokes, a Jayjg sighting!
El_C 23:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – NPOV issues. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – NPOV issues. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:46, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Increasing level of vandalism and disruptive editing ahead of November 2 election. Woko Sapien (talk) 19:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 23:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from many different IP editors. Hatman31 (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:48, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Very high level of vandalism. Requesting Extended-Confirmed protection. Semi-protection is also fine Pyramids09 (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 23:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated copyvios. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- That article has recently seen a lot of Philippinesfan socks. Even the copyvio-IP might be one, their edit is fairly similar to recent sock Xunbi45: diff comparison. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dirkbb (talk) 21:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 23:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see page history. Account29 (talk) 22:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 23:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This has been happening long-term and most of the unsourced content pertains to the Artists section. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 23:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent deletion and vandalism Mishary94 (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 23:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Helen(💬📖) 23:46, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Football rivalry? Not sure what has triggered this spate of vandalism but let’s give the page a couple of days' respite and hope the miscreants move on. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism right after the last protection expired. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 03:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 106 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hog Farm Talk 05:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is unnecessary. Public debate on issues/ organizations should be transparent 2601:1C2:4E80:D90:0:0:0:5DB1 (talk) 20:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done That title isn't protected; in any case your rationale valid either. Wikipedia is not a public forum. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some one is adding a lot of OR to this page. Account29 (talk) 23:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary protection was removed a week or so ago, but the same edit-warring by unregistered contributors has resumed, insisting on using "terrorist" as a principal descriptor, without concern for WP style conventions on the use of that label. I don't know whether a reinstatement of semi-protection would suffice, or whether permanent protection is warranted. PDGPA (talk) 01:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – still getting sports-related IP vandals... — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hog Farm Talk 05:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism, government manipulation for propaganda Fsd11 (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Fsd11: That page doesn’t exist on the English Wikipedia. Are you on the right Wikipedia? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- It should be an English wikipedia article of it, not Spanish. So you must requesting the Spanish title in Spanish wikipedia. So, declined. 114.125.251.182 (talk) 02:40, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Requested page doesn't exist; this appears to be a eswiki issue. Hog Farm Talk 05:17, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seven IP edits adding a made-up nickname over the last day or so. We just need to dissuade them from keeping on doing so with some temp I think. Blue Square Thing (talk) 07:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 07:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP is persistently adding quite negative content to a BLP sourced to tweets, hopping around to different addresses, and leaving epic edit summaries like "I hope you're planning on guarding this page for the rest of your life. I have 100,000 IP addresses. I wish you well in the wars to come.
". jp×g 08:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Blablubbs (talk) 08:59, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP users from the same IP range. The users insist on adding an actor to the cast list. I tried looking up online to see if the actor was in the series and I could not find anything saying that he was in the series. I warned users but they refuse to read talk page messages. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term sockpuppetry and slow-burning edit wars first carried out by IPs and now multiple sock accounts. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent amount of disruptive editing by newly-created IP addresses (see edit history). PowerStruggle05 (talk) 06:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See history. Crossroads -talk- 05:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
El Clásico (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Please, remove full protection from that page. The editor whose request to fully protect the page was accepted is acting in bad faith. Check the revision he was continually reverting. He is also biased and obsessed with adding Cristiano Ronaldo’s 2017 celebration to the history section, despite the lack of reliable sources confirming it had a lasting impact on the rivalry. Even so, despite my objections I kept his additions with slight modifications and that too was reverted before he complained to admins citing non-existent “vandalism”. Trackfan20 (talk) 06:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. An WP:RFPP/D request, but doesn't matter, I guess. See also: User_talk:El_C#El_Clásico. El_C 09:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Rummskartoffel 11:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Salt - Article deleted via deletion discussion, was recreated as an WP:ATTACK redirect to an unrelated BLP, speedily deleted under G4, then recreated again to redirect to an article that was added from Draftspace despite two rejections. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 11:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | tålk 13:59, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Increase in IP vandalism following on from this story today. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 14:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Recently deleted BLP. Vitaium (talk) 13:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Bishonen | tålk 13:57, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See history of experienced editors reverting IPs. Crossroads -talk- 05:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism recently. Requesting temporary protection until it subsides. Imcdc (talk) 13:06, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP pronoun shenanigans. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked user; report to AIV if they resume after block expires. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Daily sock puppet making disruptive edits. Enough already! Antique Rose 09:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism since September 2021. The page was briefly protected in October but the vandalism has resumed. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. plus two IPs blocked from editing the page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DanCherek (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by various IPs and, on one situation, a new user.
Evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Happy_Tree_Friends_episodes&action=history Minkai(rawr!)(see where I screwed up) 19:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 20:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bestagon ⬡ 19:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 20:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is being constantly used to target a public figure from past few months by multiple IP addresses and autoconfirmed accounts. To protect the original content, the page needs to be protected for infinite period.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite protection is premature at this point. clpo13(talk) 20:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding the same link twice, once as "further reading" and once as "external link". It only needs to be one or the other. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Two IPs given final warnings, one blocked. Report to AIV if the other one adds the link. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: It has very important information, and I want to protect it from vandalism. Khattab Lord (talk) 18:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – You may be on the wrong wiki, referring to ar:الشرطة المجتمعية which you recently created. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: He became a Polish citizen today, which has resulted in a high degree of page vandalism. Short term protection is all that is necessary here--either one day or one week. NorthernFalcon (talk) 21:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Footie stuff. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
27 October 2021
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:31, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked 58.178.68.99 for a few months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After pervious indefinite protection expired the same edits that were removed were reinstated again. I am requesting indefinite semi protection for this article. Perfecnot (talk) 18:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Two tiresome ranges blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:17, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive history of vandalism from an LTA. Prior protections have been proven futile so it's time for an indef, I guess. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. clpo13(talk) 02:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA vandalism. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 02:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive and repeated vandalism by an LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. clpo13(talk) 02:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. JellyMan9001 (talk) 02:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edited on October 23. clpo13(talk) 02:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kingoflettuce (talk) 02:14, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit warring over disputed content. clpo13(talk) 02:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent unsourced contents and hoaxes added by IPs and new users. Clog Wolf Howl 06:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 07:40, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editor keep adding unsourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated, massive, unsourced additions - Arjayay (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bestagon ⬡ 05:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Appears to be high-visibility due to Google Doodle in India. Bestagon ⬡ 05:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: the page has frequently been vandalised over the last couple of months Mylo pinto rizvi (talk) 06:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected, let us try indefinite pending changes, if this still does not work, indefinite semi-protection is the next step given the protection history of the page.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Sneaky vandalism in high-profile article. Just undid some changes usually related to references to Donald Trump being sneakily changed to “Donald Drumpf” (last name in original German spelling) by some unconfirmed users. Semi or pending changes might help. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 05:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High Level of vandalism done by most probably paid editors Chathu69 06:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until end of year. I'm tired of repeatedly requesting protection. Engr. Smitty Werben 13:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 02:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 09:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently unprotected, vandalism began almost immediately. Bestagon ⬡ 03:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 09:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpgjhpjm 09:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for logging this - was just about to do the same. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent sock/meat puppetry and disruption — DaxServer (talk) 09:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please also protect:
- Punjab National Bank (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Oriental Bank of Commerce (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- United Bank of India (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Allahabad Bank (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Canara Bank (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mahanagar Telephone Mauritius Limited (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Department of Telecommunications (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- All the pages are affected by sock/meat puppetry from Lobstobar (talk · contribs). I'll do the cleanups when I find some time.
- El C, just when you thought the bank are done :P — DaxServer (talk) 09:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, all (again), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DaxServer, well, you know how much I love banks and bankers! El_C 11:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Ferien (talk) 11:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: There appears to be a high level of vandalism on the page. The users keep removing factual information and can easily be found with with a few clicks. The subject of the page has been repeatedly edit bombed any time he has made an edit. Some are correct- like editorial comments about the actor in the intro. But this has gone far beyond that. Keyboard warriors seem bent on conflict and not resolution. I would ask that the factual edits be allowed to be reinstated and then the page protected. Thank you Justinbrewer1 (talk) 00:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Reporting editor is currently engaged in an edit war on the page, and has been reported to COIN... possible WP:BOOMERANG... - Adolphus79 (talk) 00:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done BusterD (talk) 09:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection of this page is no longer necessary because Wikipedia is requesting for this article to be improved. In order to improve it via editing, I need access. Wikipedia is requiring sections on this page be cleaned up. I would like an opportunity to have this repsonsibility. Jblake890 (talk) 00:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Your request is too vague. It would be more constructive if you proposed concrete changes on Talk:Food. Remember to supply reliable sources supporting the proposed changes. Favonian (talk) 08:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: In the 'Cast' section, Abbas needs to be changed to Abbas Ali Khan 123.201.52.213 (talk) 10:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- It can be changed as needed 123.201.52.213 (talk) 10:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined however, to request that specific edit please just click here and put in your suggestion. — xaosflux Talk 12:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See recent history - edit warring IPs. Crossroads -talk- 03:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed access protection expired recently, leading to again IP vandalism. Due to the current political climate, it may make sense to readd this with longer duration. -- AtomCrusher 09:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That's a start, if further protection / sanctions are required, report back here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Major BLP violations, heavily viewed article as he's recently come out as gay: [84]. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- The number of homophobic IP/new user edits is increasing in the last hour, could someone look at protecting this? Joseph2302 (talk) 15:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Several instances of IP vandalism in the last couple of days. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing vandalism. Brought this up on Talk page recently but now time to protect it from unnecessary edurs MaskedSinger (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Ymblanter MaskedSinger (talk) 16:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 15:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from multiple previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent addition of material with non-RS citespam — DaxServer (talk) 16:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-Protection: Recent spate of edit warring/dispute started by an IP returning from a recent ban (under another IP), followed by a series of reverts from other editors (both registered and other IPs) Coastie43 (talk) 04:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Coaatie43: More likely persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, not edit war. 36.77.94.37 (talk) 06:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Lard Almighty (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC):
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (talk) 18:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:31, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Increase in IP vandalism and BLP issues Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The same promotional copy keeps being added by new sockpuppets, many have been blocked as shown in the page history. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- The page has been extended confirmed protected since June. Sockpuppetry concerns (with evidence) should go to WP:SPI. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Additionally this is not edit war or content dispute that mostly required full protection. So, declined. 36.77.99.2 (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 15:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Recent disruption from IP/unregistered users due to recent news coverage. KidAd • SPEAK 21:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like the issue is stale. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unexplained formatting changes by two IPs, including replacing semicolons with commas in contexts where this results in comma splices. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:35, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2601:18c:cc00:61a0:ad5d:1795:c655:2363 blocked for 48 hours. Other IP is stale. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes: BLP policy violations – IPs keep trying to call the article subject a murderer. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by zzuuzz for 31 hours. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users are disrupting this page by editing useless information. Princepratap1234 (talk) 08:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Sneed/Chuck vandalism is back on the page after being unprotected. Same with Chris Sneed – I LIKE PIE ™ 17:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Recurrent vandalism/BLP violations by autoconfirmed users: [85] [86] [87] [88] . Currently under autoconfirmed until Feb 2022. Would suggest elevation to ECP. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Per WP:COVIDDS and semi-protection has been insufficient. clpo13(talk) 18:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The Page is being repeatedly vandalized by an IP or Unregistered user who is calling subject an addict of Marijuana and abusing and discussing unverified/unsourced personal life, with intention to malign her reputation. Whatever was edited, it were not found verifiable. It has been done twice or thrice, which I tried to revert and correct in my capacity. So, I would request Wikipedia to protect this page with at least Semi Protection Lock so that unregistered user or new user cannot edit and vandalise the page. Thank you. 2409:4040:E0D:2E73:C1A6:DBC6:3FEF:1167 (talk) 11:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 12:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. indefinitely. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. IPv6/64 blocked for 1 month. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Seriously, don't make me break out the WP:ARBINFOBOX sanctions... Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Coolperson177 (talk) 19:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 19:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps adding entry that there is no consensus for. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (comment) 20:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. The fans keep messing with the budget and earnings. Venkat TL (talk) 16:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article has been disrupted by news users/IPs for too long. Definitely up there in the top of 5 articles I have seen getting most disrupted. Imho it needs a long protection. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm going to be bold and request indefinite semi protection. The pending changes, frankly, isn't doing the job: several times every day there will be attempts to alter the lead against MOS:DEADNAME. The IPs might be well-meaning, but it's also unending and tedious.
If the admin reading this doesn't want to make it indefinite, then I request it until Jan 1st (as Matrix 4 will have been out for a few weeks by then and activity might die down). — Czello 20:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations from IPs again. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- This seems to have calmed down for now, so probably not needed anymore. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor clpo13(talk) 18:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding WP:SPECULATION and removing AFD templates. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- This seems to have calmed down for now, so probably not needed anymore. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor clpo13(talk) 18:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unsourced addition by IPs. DonIago (talk) 21:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 21:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive additions without consensus, controversial article. Vacant0 (talk) 21:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 21:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page suffers from regular editions of original research, vandalism, and unsupported opinions, without regular oversight from more senior editors. Would benefit from protection. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. — Wug·a·po·des 22:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent Disruptive edits by random IPs causing complications in editing and improving the article. shadowwarrior8 (talk) 16:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 22:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Recent removals do not appear to be vandalism. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Nosebagbear: This article is a target of vandalism as it includes content about a "distinct" group of Muslims, which other Muslims may not be pleasant with. These removals, and such edits should be at least discussed before removal. An edit war has been started by this IP and it will continue unless the page is protected. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk
18:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Adigabrek:, while I was eminently aware that it would make a logical target for vandalism, I couldn't immediately identify such in the recent history (that would have led to an RFPP now). The returning of that content was done under a statement that it was unexplained, but the IP editor who removed them did do so - they were uncited, on an inherently controversial topic. As of when I assessed this request it clearly wasn't the vandalism underpinning the request, and the edit war wasn't at a level to warrant protection. As we now do have an edit war, with the follow-up edits, I will apply a 48 hour edit war protection. In theory, that could be argued that it should be full protect, to prevent multiple parties edit warring, since there isn't an in-place consensus etc. You should start the discussion yourself on the talk page and ping the most recent IP address to it. Pinging @2a04:4a43:4d7f:8c08:d15b:3f7c:865b:9a57 and Serols: for awareness Nosebagbear (talk) 18:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Nosebagbear: This article is a target of vandalism as it includes content about a "distinct" group of Muslims, which other Muslims may not be pleasant with. These removals, and such edits should be at least discussed before removal. An edit war has been started by this IP and it will continue unless the page is protected. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk
28 October 2021
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 17:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Why is the addition of a photo of the subject considered disruptive? There's no explanation given. A previous photo was speedy deleted on commons, but this one appears to have proper licensing. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Other editor warned for personal attacks, but may have reason for the edit. If this continues page protection will be warranted. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring vandalism. Germanico5468504 (talk) 20:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edited on October 24. clpo13(talk) 21:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Involved in current event and subject to recent vandalism Spacemace1 (talk) 22:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 23:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors keep on adding/changing unsourced content since Oct 2, 2021. Cassiopeia talk 00:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite BLP issues from 10 years ago, unlikely that the disruptive editing will continue as editing slowed down ever since. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 18:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotected It has indeed been ten years since Rebecca Black's "Friday". The protecting admin is no longer an admin. I'll unprotect this, but will keep a close eye on it for a resumption of vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Date over 117.204.147.194 (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Already unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Despite my message on the edit page, there has been a great deal of edit warring/content dispute an EC user and an IP editor. Consider applying a temporary full protection — DaxServer (talk) 07:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined It doesn't strike me as an edit war. The editors seem to be attaining consensus through editing, and it seems productive if unusual. — Wug·a·po·des 22:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – PC protection is not enough for this article; e.g. recent disruptive edits and BLP violation.[89][90][91]. Mann Mann (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. PC is working as intended. — Wug·a·po·des 22:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This DAB page has several times been overwritten with a copy/paste of Dune (2021 film). If the movie should be at this title (I'm not suggesting that), there needs to be a RM. MB 00:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Perhaps this will calm down after the movie has been out a bit longer. BusterD (talk) 01:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP starts edit war. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk 15:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 88.236.160.0/21 (talk · contribs). — Wug·a·po·des 22:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Again, persistent disruption from IP and unregistered users in response to recent news coverage. KidAd • SPEAK 21:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 01:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is persistently vandalized by IP. Vitaium (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 01:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No IP address ever does anything to improve the page rather they only edit it just to vandalize the page with suicide jokes. They’re not even funny jokes either, they’re the same bland overplayed meme style gags that gets posted on Facebook or Instagram metal pages all the time. Second Skin (talk) 01:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – sockpuppetry by multiple users. Shadow4dark (talk) 21:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Whitewashing attempts by a mostly WP:SPI. Amigao (talk) 23:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD (talk) 00:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Someone may create a page at this title and it will violate the template policies. Protect this page to:
Create: Template editors & administrators
Faster than Thunder (talk) 00:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of erroneous content. (e.g. hockey as official/de jure national sport of India and "None" as unofficial/de facto national sport of India). Repeated explanation in the edit summary has failed to minimize the minimize such distruptive edit, understandably because most editors concerned are IP addresses. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears on today's doodle so vandalism is to be expected, please protect for one day. Muhandes (talk) 08:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:57, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TheWikiholic (talk) 08:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent edit history speaks for itself. AngryHarpytalk 09:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 2607:FEA8:4D61:1800:D99E:41AF:B21C:7A9 (talk) 01:18, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
using the plural form "they" for her/she is grammatically WRONG regardless what this nutcase wants to be refered as.. Please unprotect so "they" can be corrected to "IT"
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Article not identified. And be civil about the subject next time. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Need protection from Raghuvarman ranjith and his socks. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Constant editing warring between IPs. Please also do the same for Fear the Walking Dead for the same reasons. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent IP vandalism, even after blocks. JBL (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked a range for a few months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs (or an IP hopping user) persistently removing sourced information. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: User:Inuyashaki repeatedly adding unsourced personal information to the page (request for a short semi-protection). Prosperosity (talk) 04:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment There's a reliable source available for the assertion here. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Ferien (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:55, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: There's no point to protect to this level a talk page with low traffic for some time (but with all legitimate and reasonable content and no record of vandalism), not to mention it's a talk page of a redirect. Even if such a talk page is to be protected the time length should be short (in the hours or at most days) and affected users should have been allowed to have edits as "pending changes". 219.76.24.196 (talk) 11:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – WP:FORUMSHOP, see snapshot of ongoing ANI discussion. Favonian (talk) 16:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
In the section "which lighthouse?", to add as a reply to MSGJ ":[[File:ACTD003159 - Farolim da Ponta S. da Península.jpg|thumb]] What about the one in this picture? Is it the same lighthouse? 219.76.24.196 (talk) 12:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)" 219.76.24.196 (talk) 12:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – WP:FORUMSHOP, see snapshot of ongoing ANI discussion. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Can you please change the amount of time the plains of Abraham was. I have a source to prove it it was 15 to 30 minutes long. My source is Quebec-cite. 209.15.154.34 (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – Present your evidence, including reliables sources on Talk:Battle of the Plains of Abraham. Don't edit-war; it will get you blocked again. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
29 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption, removal of sourced content. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Many recent BLP violations following recent news story. Bestagon ⬡ 19:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. CodingCyclone please ping/my wreckage 22:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP keeps trying to change Sanskrit spelling to Pali. Skyerise (talk) 15:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2409:4042:2d0a:3059:458f:31a1:52d2:8a7a (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Longterm semi-protection: Same obscene, IP-hopping vandal has returned to resume vandalizing Gaston_(Beauty_and_the_Beast) now that it's no longer semi-protected.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 187.227.0.0/16 for one month; mostly vandalism from the last month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There appears to be IP-related mass deletions of content in the page. It keeps popping up on Huggle, so I figured I'd ask for protection. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Recent disruptions were from a single IP, now blocked. Report to WP:AIV if they resume after the block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Six months of disruptive editing, some of it BLP violations. Apparently his brother, Bob Moran, is an editorial cartoonist with controversial opinions about Covid vaccination. We link to the brother's article, but there have been repeated attempts to add excessive details about Bob to this article, much of it unsourced, and some outright BLP violations [92] [93] [94] [95]. Meters (talk) 00:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial-blocked an IP and a range from editing that page. Ping me if partial-block targets need to be expanded. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We've had three full days of IP users changing this non-binary person's pronouns from their preferred "they" to "she". Largoplazo (talk) 01:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. For months actually (diff). I don't know when misgendering (←Chrome views this word as a spelling error, btw) will cease being so acute, but I wouldn't know what the "temporary" expiration should be for pages of living persons repeatedly subject to it. Will it slow down in a year? Two years? Five? Ten? No idea. So I generally set the protection not to expire in these instances. El_C 04:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The reason I am requesting protection is that people are changing the manager from Bob Melvin to TBD. From my experience, the protocol is to wait until either club officially announces the move or hire in question. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 03:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/WikiProject templates.json (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/WikiProject templates.json/blocklist.json (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/WikiProject templates.json/includelist.json (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Request template protection. Pages are used by sitewide scripts, and require a similar level of technical ability to template editing to avoid breaking the json syntax. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edits from IP socks of Hmkwfrance. Ravensfire (talk) 19:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: WP:DE from 2A00:1370:8131:63B7:94AC:56DC:F95D:60AD/2A00:1370:8131:1FFB:454B:A64:13C2:75C, as he is adding dates, most likely unsourced, for Canada, when the page does not have airdates for that country, just the U.S. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: After the previous temporary protection measure was lifted on 29 September 2021, during the month of October there has been further vandalism and BLP violations. One vandalism edit on 26 October 2021 (UK time) remained in the article for a couple of hours before it was reverted. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 23:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
I really need to add my self to Wikipedia, I want to be known. TimGii (talk) 22:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Then by definition you're asking for the cart to be placed in front of the horse. No. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 01:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined Not how this project works, TimGii. Take some time to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia’s policies and guideline; I’ve left a welcome message on your talk page with some information that you may find useful. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Cristiano Ronaldo
Change His first name to Rapenaldo, it’s his birth name given from his mother B8ight (talk) 00:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Source? —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 01:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. We require that information in a Wikipedia article come from a reliable published source so please open a discussion on Talk:Cristiano Ronaldo with reliable sources that support this. If you have questions, enquire at the Teahouse. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Relentless unsourced addition of same promotional/POV content by socks and IPs, going on for years. [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] A permanent protection may help, as the user shows no interest in editing other pages to build up the edit count in order to be an autoconfirmed user 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:59B1:B59F:80A0:2935 (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: An IP keeps on removing Thomas West as the successor to Zalmay Khalilzad without any explanation or sources to back them up. Even though the US government has itself announced West as the new Special Representative for Afghanistan [104], they keep claiming without any source that the position has been abolished.
I started a discussion on the talk page over a week ago but they haven't responded and are only reverting me. See Talk:Zalmay Khalilzad#Special Representative for Afghanistan position has not been abolished.
They also keep removing the source, so either they are aware or they don't care for what it says.
Please protect the article, so they stop forcing their own version on the article contrary to facts, or at least have to discuss their changes. I can't even leave a personal message to them to discuss since they are unregistered and their IP will keep changing every time. Saynotodrugs12 (talk) 19:18, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Tell us how you really feel, Saynotodrugs12! ;) El_C 04:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Herzegovina uprising (1875–1877) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User talk:Amanuensis Balkanicus (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mihailo Vojislavljević (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Serbian flags (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit warring, but I think 177.206 claims exemption under WP:EW#EX3. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 04:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Added 3 other pages for same reasons. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 04:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month (articles), after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Semi-protected for a period of one week (user talk page), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Who can tell what's happening — not I! El_C 05:06, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: It's apparently been under protection for a long time. There are edits I'd like to make, including strengthening the Pupstruction source 141.157.254.24 (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- If you are interested in making edits, please make an edit request on the talk page. --Ferien (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- In my experience the requests haven't been answered unless I bring someone to look at them--141.157.254.24 (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- This page, along with all other lists of programming on children's channels, are subject to persistent additions of unsourced content, both real and hoaxes, and a huge amount of editor time was being wasted sorting out all those edits. I gave up trying to police them a long time ago, but if anything, the protection level should be increased to pending changes, rather than lowering it. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Not unprotected – Muboshgu (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- So essentially you’re not allowing me to make the edits I want to make and forcing me to pass it off to someone else. That’s pretty messed up--141.157.254.24 (talk) 23:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Your interest in making constructive edits is appreciated. All you have to do is register an account and log in, and then you can edit it!
- Did you not appreciate the point that was made about the trade-off between allowing the occasional unregistered user to make constructive edits and fixing the situation where the page was perpetually swamped by unregistered users making unconstructive edits? If you want to resent somebody, those other users are your proper target. Largoplazo (talk) 02:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- So essentially you’re not allowing me to make the edits I want to make and forcing me to pass it off to someone else. That’s pretty messed up--141.157.254.24 (talk) 23:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Essentially, edit warring or removal of information by IP editors. Peaceray (talk) 23:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Peaceray, that is not so. Everyone, yourself included, need to stop edit warring. The addition was never explained. The removal was never explained. Please use the article talk page to figure out whether Pete Buttigieg should be listed in that passage (he is not mentioned in the source cited, btw). El_C 04:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP keeps removing information. Maybe a rangeblock could also work? Requesting semi-protection for 1 month. Pyramids09 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Seems to be resolved. El_C 04:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep adding deliberately false claims (like Zheng He went to the Americas). — Mikehawk10 (talk) 00:40, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 04:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated IP additions of unsourced information claiming that the voyages went to the Americas, the Arctic, and the Antarctic under Zheng He. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 00:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 04:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: An IP adress (2601:802:8300:A280:0:0:0:B57A) keeps making disruptive and unnecessary edits/changes Christian (talk) 01:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked one year. El_C 04:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: An IP address (2601:802:8300:A280:0:0:0:B57A) keeps making disruptive and unnecessary edits/changes Christian (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked one year. El_C 04:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: An IP address (2601:802:8300:A280:0:0:0:B57A) keeps making disruptive and unnecessary edits/changes Christian (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked one year. El_C 04:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: An IP address (2601:802:8300:A280:0:0:0:B57A) keeps making disruptive and unnecessary edits/changes Christian (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked one year. El_C 04:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: An IP address (2601:802:8300:A280:0:0:0:B57A) keeps making disruptive and unnecessary edits/changes Christian (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked one year. El_C 04:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: An IP address (2601:802:8300:A280:0:0:0:B57A) keeps making disruptive and unnecessary edits/changes Christian (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked one year. El_C 04:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – target of more than likely right-wing trolls. $chnauzer 05:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:24, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 06:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Removal supported sources NSAandGCHQ (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Increase in unsourced additions from new and anonymous users (IPs), the former mostly being single-purpose accounts, due to recent developments in the conflict. CentreLeftRight ✉ 06:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Seems to be resolved. El_C 04:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Protection is no longer necessary, the vandalism that the article suffered warranted temporary protection, not permanent. 2804:248:F6F8:8100:596:A6A4:8559:E3FC (talk) 03:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – You (IP range 2804:248:c000::/34) have been told repeatedly that you need to get consensus on the article talk page. So far, you have not succeeded, and now you want to make your changes to the article anyway, in other words: edit war. Favonian (talk) 06:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Shazzizzz (talk) 03:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – No article, let alone rationale, given. Favonian (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/November 2021/Participants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has seen some disruptive edits by IPs removing users from the list. It is only for new page patrollers so there is no reason for anyone who is not extended confirmed to edit the page. (t · c) buidhe 06:13, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Why not sysop-protected? 36.76.228.24 (talk) 06:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined, this is just one IP, which already has been blocked. If this continues, pls ping me, I will semi-protect the page.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of vandalism following rumours of death. Samudra95 (talk) 08:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Need to be protected soon, I came here to request this. Venkat TL (talk) 08:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. – For the bot. Favonian (talk) 10:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Some recent IP contributions look good faith. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits from an IP range that is probably too large to block without significant collateral damage. Elli (talk | contribs) 07:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Present Vandalism from multiple IP Addresses following a football game. – Swagging (talk) 17:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CASTE GS enforcement: peersistent, if slow-motion, disruption by IPs; which as we can see did not really get trluly affected by the previous PC, so SP would be the next logical step. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 17:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - SUN EYE 1 07:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced and unconstructive edits from IP users TheHotwiki (talk) 07:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Long history of IP vandalism. YttriumShrew (talk) 07:26, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Continous disruption and WP:TENDENTIOUS editing by user CsifoZsombor since September. A report was filed about this person at ANI but it was ignored. Super Ψ Dro 13:24, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
There's every reason to think of it as a separate group of people. They are genetically absent from all ethnic groups, even hungarians. See https://m.nyest.hu/media/a-szekely-minta-genetikai-tavolsaga-a-tobbi-etnikai-csoporttol-es-mas-neessegektol.jpg?large They have their own dialect, folklore, flag, coat of arms, etc. Szekler organizations also list them as separate peoples. Historically, it is not possible to list how much difference there is between them and the Hungarians--CsifoZsombor (talk)CsifoZsombor
User(s) blocked. Partial blocked user for 1 week with a suggestion to seek consensus on the talk page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/A (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/B (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/C (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/D (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/E (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/F (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/G (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/H (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/I (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/J (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/K (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/L (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/M (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/N (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/O (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/P (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/Q (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/R (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/S (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/T (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/U (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/V (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/W (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/X (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/Y (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/Z (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/other (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Request template protection. Pages are used by the the {{High-use}} template and use a syntax that is easily broken. These pages are bot updated and there should be no need for any editor to touch them manually. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Xaosflux (re Special:PermanentLink/1052507487). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)- TE temp added wile this is being discussed below. — xaosflux Talk 16:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Xaosflux (re Special:PermanentLink/1052507487). --Ahecht (TALK
- @Ymblanter: are you sure on these - see the PermaLink that Ahecht posted above, these don't see very high use and are certainly not reader facing. If this bot wants a single-user-private-use update area perhaps they should do a .json page in their own user space? — xaosflux Talk 16:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- I did check that at least some of the templates above are transcluded into some highly used template, but I am not happy with the discussion being at two places. This request must have been accompanied by the above reference before I applied protection, and not after, and certainly should not be used as a reason for the bot to have the flag. I suggest to have this discussion at one place, and if the result is going to be semi-protection just go for semi-protection. (I do think some protection is warranted, and some of these templates have been semi-protected previously).--Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter Sorry for the confusion. I wasn't trying to WP:FORUMSHOP -- I didn't see the request to ping xaosflux until after I had submitted the protection request here, and I also hadn't seen Primefac's objection until after I submitted that reply because I was using WP:REPLYTOOL on a stale version of the page. I was a little uncomfortable having thousands of pages in the template namespace drawing data from a single account's userspace, which is why I didn't locate it there originally, but if the sentiment is that template protection isn't warranted for the data modules, feel free to downgrade it. I did have another bot task in mind that needs TE, but I can always re-request it if that task is approved. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)- @Ymblanter and Ahecht: from WP:PERM I was basically deferring to whatever was necessary - assuming that it would be discussed wherever it needed to be - mostly just along the lines of not adding flags to bots that are not needed. If TPROT is appropriate here, I'm fine adding that to the bot -- if SPROT or EPROT are ok, the bot doesn't need more flags. Agree that at the least SPROT is appropriate. — xaosflux Talk 18:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux and Ahecht: I do not have a strong opinion here. On one hand, the templates are somewhat used, borderline highly used (transcluded), and it is not clear why they should be edited by humans, on the other hand we try not to protect pages unless absolutely needed. I would be fine with both keeping the template editor protection and reducing it to semi. I do not see a good justification for extended confirmed protection (which is supposed to prevent ongoing or imminent disruption, and in most cases should not be applied until semi-protection has proven ineffective).--Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter and Ahecht: from WP:PERM I was basically deferring to whatever was necessary - assuming that it would be discussed wherever it needed to be - mostly just along the lines of not adding flags to bots that are not needed. If TPROT is appropriate here, I'm fine adding that to the bot -- if SPROT or EPROT are ok, the bot doesn't need more flags. Agree that at the least SPROT is appropriate. — xaosflux Talk 18:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter Sorry for the confusion. I wasn't trying to WP:FORUMSHOP -- I didn't see the request to ping xaosflux until after I had submitted the protection request here, and I also hadn't seen Primefac's objection until after I submitted that reply because I was using WP:REPLYTOOL on a stale version of the page. I was a little uncomfortable having thousands of pages in the template namespace drawing data from a single account's userspace, which is why I didn't locate it there originally, but if the sentiment is that template protection isn't warranted for the data modules, feel free to downgrade it. I did have another bot task in mind that needs TE, but I can always re-request it if that task is approved. --Ahecht (TALK
- I did check that at least some of the templates above are transcluded into some highly used template, but I am not happy with the discussion being at two places. This request must have been accompanied by the above reference before I applied protection, and not after, and certainly should not be used as a reason for the bot to have the flag. I suggest to have this discussion at one place, and if the result is going to be semi-protection just go for semi-protection. (I do think some protection is warranted, and some of these templates have been semi-protected previously).--Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's keeping the message page of the IP address busy, it's bothering me. I want my page to be protected on my message page. Lake Van monster (talk) 15:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Trying to communicate and asking Lake Van monster to make responsibility to previous reverting edit is not vandalism! As well he does not able or want to justify, why this was vandalism. It seems the new editor does not understand what vandalism is, and all of his/her contributions are reverting edits based on a patrol tool, while as editor does not have enough experiance to patrol, which can bother good faith editors. 2001:4C4C:20A1:C400:0:0:0:1000 (talk) 16:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Not vandalism, per WP:OWNTALK. Regarding this edit the IP is asking about, that is not vandalism, but it could be construed as non-constructive via WP:NOTBROKEN. User:Lake Van monster, if you're going to revert vandalism, you should be able to point to a policy if someone asks you how an edit constitutes vandalism. User:2001:4C4C:20A1:C400:0:0:0:1000: per WP:OWNTALK, please do not edit-war on a user's talk page. Users are free to remove notices in most cases. If a user refuses to communicate about something and you feel that refusal is violating a Wikipedia policy, you're free to take them to WP:ANI. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, I am not going to make edit-war. 2001:4C4C:20A1:C400:0:0:0:1000 (talk) 16:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content by multiple IPs. Only source states ₹27 crore, constant change to ~₹33 crore. Have left messages on two IP's talk pages w/ no reply. Seems all are same person. Adakiko (talk) 18:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's keeping the message page of the IP address busy, it's bothering me. I want my page to be protected on my message page. Lake Van monster (talk) 15:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Trying to communicate and asking Lake Van monster to make responsibility to previous reverting edit is not vandalism! As well he does not able or want to justify, why this was vandalism. It seems the new editor does not understand what vandalism is, and all of his/her contributions are reverting edits based on a patrol tool, while as editor does not have enough experiance to patrol, which can bother good faith editors. 2001:4C4C:20A1:C400:0:0:0:1000 (talk) 16:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Not vandalism, per WP:OWNTALK. Regarding this edit the IP is asking about, that is not vandalism, but it could be construed as non-constructive via WP:NOTBROKEN. User:Lake Van monster, if you're going to revert vandalism, you should be able to point to a policy if someone asks you how an edit constitutes vandalism. User:2001:4C4C:20A1:C400:0:0:0:1000: per WP:OWNTALK, please do not edit-war on a user's talk page. Users are free to remove notices in most cases. If a user refuses to communicate about something and you feel that refusal is violating a Wikipedia policy, you're free to take them to WP:ANI. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, I am not going to make edit-war. 2001:4C4C:20A1:C400:0:0:0:1000 (talk) 16:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content by multiple IPs. Only source states ₹27 crore, constant change to ~₹33 crore. Have left messages on two IP's talk pages w/ no reply. Seems all are same person. Adakiko (talk) 18:23, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. clpo13(talk) 18:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IPs quickly after autoconfirmed protection expires Jguglielmin (talk) 19:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. (note: the target is simply a redirect to Rooting (Android)). OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism from IP editors. Has only just come out of a protection a few days ago. Longer duration required. Bungle (talk • contribs) 13:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Less Unless (talk) 20:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting Indefinite extended Confirmed Protection due to high levels of IP vandalism Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 16:11, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. We don't indefinitely protect an article because a single IP has made two disruptive edits. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone has edited it randomly which is not related. So, I am protected this page. — Ahp101 To discuss? 17:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Good Winhtutko85 (talk) 17:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Please don't use this board again until you read the instructions above. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing (addition of incorrect information for over a month now, probably by a fan) from what seems to be a wide IP range (and a newly-created userpage now). This page is a featured list. Shahid • Talk2me 11:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. My issue with this one is that the editors were not warned on their talkpages even once. Let's talk to people please. Less Unless (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Less Unless - thank you. Talk to whom? There are no editors, just random anons and not a single user - it's a series of edits with a different IP address everytime. I noted the issue on the talkpage (wouldn't call it a discussion though because there's nothing to discuss). Besides that, the edit summaries, not just by myself, are clear enough and I doubt they didn't notice them (considering they wrote edit summaries themselves) - the change they do is just factually incorrect, so I'm not going to frequent anonymous, red-linked talk pages to explain that changing facts is not proper behaviour. Shahid • Talk2me 21:32, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/A (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/B (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/C (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/D (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/E (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/F (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/G (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/H (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/I (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/J (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/K (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/L (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/M (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/N (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/O (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/P (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/Q (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/R (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/S (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/T (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/U (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/V (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/W (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/X (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/Y (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/Z (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Module:Transclusion count/data/other (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Request template protection. Pages are used by the the {{High-use}} template and use a syntax that is easily broken. These pages are bot updated and there should be no need for any editor to touch them manually. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Xaosflux (re Special:PermanentLink/1052507487). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)- TE temp added wile this is being discussed below. — xaosflux Talk 16:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Xaosflux (re Special:PermanentLink/1052507487). --Ahecht (TALK
- @Ymblanter: are you sure on these - see the PermaLink that Ahecht posted above, these don't see very high use and are certainly not reader facing. If this bot wants a single-user-private-use update area perhaps they should do a .json page in their own user space? — xaosflux Talk 16:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- I did check that at least some of the templates above are transcluded into some highly used template, but I am not happy with the discussion being at two places. This request must have been accompanied by the above reference before I applied protection, and not after, and certainly should not be used as a reason for the bot to have the flag. I suggest to have this discussion at one place, and if the result is going to be semi-protection just go for semi-protection. (I do think some protection is warranted, and some of these templates have been semi-protected previously).--Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter Sorry for the confusion. I wasn't trying to WP:FORUMSHOP -- I didn't see the request to ping xaosflux until after I had submitted the protection request here, and I also hadn't seen Primefac's objection until after I submitted that reply because I was using WP:REPLYTOOL on a stale version of the page. I was a little uncomfortable having thousands of pages in the template namespace drawing data from a single account's userspace, which is why I didn't locate it there originally, but if the sentiment is that template protection isn't warranted for the data modules, feel free to downgrade it. I did have another bot task in mind that needs TE, but I can always re-request it if that task is approved. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)- @Ymblanter and Ahecht: from WP:PERM I was basically deferring to whatever was necessary - assuming that it would be discussed wherever it needed to be - mostly just along the lines of not adding flags to bots that are not needed. If TPROT is appropriate here, I'm fine adding that to the bot -- if SPROT or EPROT are ok, the bot doesn't need more flags. Agree that at the least SPROT is appropriate. — xaosflux Talk 18:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux and Ahecht: I do not have a strong opinion here. On one hand, the templates are somewhat used, borderline highly used (transcluded), and it is not clear why they should be edited by humans, on the other hand we try not to protect pages unless absolutely needed. I would be fine with both keeping the template editor protection and reducing it to semi. I do not see a good justification for extended confirmed protection (which is supposed to prevent ongoing or imminent disruption, and in most cases should not be applied until semi-protection has proven ineffective).--Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Per the PERM page and this discussion, I've dropped it to semiprot. If there is a need to increase this level I see no reason not to increase, but it should go first to ECP before TE. Primefac (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux and Ahecht: I do not have a strong opinion here. On one hand, the templates are somewhat used, borderline highly used (transcluded), and it is not clear why they should be edited by humans, on the other hand we try not to protect pages unless absolutely needed. I would be fine with both keeping the template editor protection and reducing it to semi. I do not see a good justification for extended confirmed protection (which is supposed to prevent ongoing or imminent disruption, and in most cases should not be applied until semi-protection has proven ineffective).--Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter and Ahecht: from WP:PERM I was basically deferring to whatever was necessary - assuming that it would be discussed wherever it needed to be - mostly just along the lines of not adding flags to bots that are not needed. If TPROT is appropriate here, I'm fine adding that to the bot -- if SPROT or EPROT are ok, the bot doesn't need more flags. Agree that at the least SPROT is appropriate. — xaosflux Talk 18:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter Sorry for the confusion. I wasn't trying to WP:FORUMSHOP -- I didn't see the request to ping xaosflux until after I had submitted the protection request here, and I also hadn't seen Primefac's objection until after I submitted that reply because I was using WP:REPLYTOOL on a stale version of the page. I was a little uncomfortable having thousands of pages in the template namespace drawing data from a single account's userspace, which is why I didn't locate it there originally, but if the sentiment is that template protection isn't warranted for the data modules, feel free to downgrade it. I did have another bot task in mind that needs TE, but I can always re-request it if that task is approved. --Ahecht (TALK
- I did check that at least some of the templates above are transcluded into some highly used template, but I am not happy with the discussion being at two places. This request must have been accompanied by the above reference before I applied protection, and not after, and certainly should not be used as a reason for the bot to have the flag. I suggest to have this discussion at one place, and if the result is going to be semi-protection just go for semi-protection. (I do think some protection is warranted, and some of these templates have been semi-protected previously).--Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The only edits I have ever seen from IPs are people challenging the clearly documented and sourced mainstream view that Greene is a right-wing conspiracy theorist peddler. (eg: [105], [106], [107],[108]) or are otherwise disruptive ([109]). I therefore don't think the encyclopedia will be at all harmed by semi-protecting the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
30 October 2021
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. persistent block evasion from Lobstobar/similar meat puppetry — DaxServer (talk) 13:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked two ranges for six months. 223.238.108.0/22,223.187.208.0/21 OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: WP:VAND Vandalism from unregistered IPs, edits deliberately done to deceive the readers or to obstruct the purpose of the article. A semi protection WP:SEMI is suggested for now. Humblemortal (talk) 21:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 21:11, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism BattleshipMan (talk) 22:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article is targeted by several accounts and IPs since September. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. There are several blocks in effect. If disruption resumes, you can report individual IPs/accounts to AIV, or back here if there are numerous disruptive users. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit warring from IPs. Has been occurring since July 2020 (at least) and continues to this day. ili (talk) 23:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 2800:484:6F00:0:0:0:0:0/40 for six months. If they resume when the block expires, ping me and I'll extend it. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – various IPs changing same information without a source. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 02:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit war. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk 13:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: As you might expect, this new page is experiencing some vandalism from IP addresses, from both sides of the political aisle. Request pending changes protection. MarshallKe (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too heavily edited for pending changes. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Robertjamal12 (talk) 23:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive edits from IP users Estnot (talk) 01:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – SPA (incorporating name of article's subject) is doing COI editing to whitewash the article. RobP (talk) 04:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from several IP addresses over the past few days. SounderBruce 05:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various ip users are saying that the actor died without adding a proper source. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 06:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 06:29, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated inclusion of unsourced and potentially hurtful material by IP Mitch Ames (talk) 06:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator BusterD.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Article was heavily vandalized, riddled with incredibly poor grammar and spelling mistakes, honorific titles, was incredibly repetitive with the same claim being said 5-10 times. The article kept repeating that there were approximately 140 million Nanakpanthis, had dozens of sources that either debunked the claim that was being propagated ironically, many of the sources were riddled with poor grammar and spelling, were irrelevant junk article pieces, and did not even mention any population number which the article used as a justification, or were based on the sayings of a politician or a controversial religious organization rather than research articles or journals or objective data Suthasianhistorian8 (talk) 03:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Thank you for improving the article! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits from IP addresses. Isi96 (talk) 07:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpgjhpjm 10:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An unregistered user kept trying to take control of the talk page. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Zzuuzz has taken care of this. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations in recent edit history e.g. 1, 2. Wham2001 (talk) 09:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Wham2001 (talk) 14:09, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant replacement of lead section. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 13:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some weirdness there. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and what seems to be his new account is altering the citations of this GA article, replacing it with non-formatted citations. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Since October 26, an IP is editwarring to insert this into the article. This content is identical to something that was being inserted by sockpuppet who was blocked on October 24. I suspect they are the same person. In any case, I've started a discussion, yet the IP continues to revert instead of discussing. I request semi-protection.VR talk 16:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Dhimmi
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Kafir
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of vandalism (esp. IP), especially on the actual "mischief nights" shown in the article TheXug (talk) 17:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:09, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible Qwerfjkltalk 20:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Qwerfjkltalk 10:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 17:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Within two hours of page protection ending, persistent new account and IP disruptive editing began. There is also some indication of off-wiki attention to this article: Citizen Free Press/Wayback Machine, October 18, 2021 11:47 am. Beccaynr (talk) 14:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 17:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Third sock account in days making same obsessive edit. Semi-protection needed again please. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A ___ from the past! El_C 17:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: this page stood a long time before vandalism noticed .....no need for ip edits. Moxy- 15:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: IP continues to add unsourced information and long paragraphs of incoherent text, despite that edits were undone 3 times and a warning was given. lullabying (talk) 10:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Is revengers even a word? El_C 17:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hoaxer waited out the three week protection and returned the false info less then two hours after protection expired. MrOllie (talk) 12:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP Vandalism going back months Lavalizard101 (talk) 14:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Moderate levels of petty vandalism, fake death dates and reasons Smeedot (talk) 14:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary, but really it should be indefinite. Look at the history of the page -- it's mostly the same edit back and forth. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive editing, despite invisible text and multiple reverts. PedigreeWWEFigz87V2 (talk) 17:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: I think every year during the last few days of October until early November, you should protect this temporary article for obvious reasons. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 17:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. But I already did the thing.
El_C 18:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Some jokers decided to add in false information about the show. Everyone knows Craig McCracken will deny making this show. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. More scary stuff (Guga!). El_C 18:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is not an Islamic Emirate. It is currently being controlled by what is internationally recognised as a terrorist group without legal authority as a government. The current legal government is in exile, reforming. NRF is also now officially recognised internationally by USA, & Tajikistan. NRF is currently in the process of toppling the Taliban in Afghanistan and intends to reassert it as a Republic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvh100 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Protection is applied as arbitration enforcement. Pinging the protecting administrator El C. At first glance, none of this seem to be a reason for removing protection from the article, rather it appears to be a content matter which ought be addressed by starting a discussion on Talk:Afghanistan with reliable sources that support it. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:29, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Not unprotected. Welcome back to Wikipedia, Jvh100. I'm sorry, but that just isn't a coherent unprotection request. It's not even a coherent view according to Wikipedia convention, which nearly always prioritizes a country's de facto rule over de jure claims. El_C 14:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. BLP issues - misinterpretation of sources — DaxServer (talk) 18:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from various accounts over the last day. HeinzMaster (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Curbon7 (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism and disruptive edits on FA. Wretchskull (talk) 13:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits for a week. El_C 17:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from multiple accounts. HeinzMaster (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 19:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator KrakatoaKatie. For the bot. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was protected prior, and had little to no vandalism. After the protection has been lifted, the page has been under much more frequent vandalism and disruptive editing. DrawWikiped(talk) 19:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Same reasons with Mischief Night. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. El_C 18:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- I presume you were asking for an WP:ECP upgrade, SpinnerLaserzthe2nd...? El_C 18:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes. Cast a spell on this article. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- SpinnerLaserzthe2nd, semi (issued 2017) appears to be working as intended — no disruption during last year's spookiness. El_C 19:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes. Cast a spell on this article. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- I presume you were asking for an WP:ECP upgrade, SpinnerLaserzthe2nd...? El_C 18:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Not a protection request, but TPA revoked. El_C 18:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of controversial vandalism TheXug (talk) 18:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. And revdel'd. El_C 18:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
31 October 2021
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Consistent additions of unpublished birth name and birth date. benǝʇᴉɯ 22:40, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been protected twice and ever since it has expired for the second time, all IP edits have been either disruptive or non-constructive. There is no reason that this page should not be at least indefinitely pending changes protected. Jeuno (talk) 23:43, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotection: Requesting unprotection as its not needed given their inactivity for the past couple years. The editor who protected the page back in 2014 hasn't been active in a year. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 23:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Protected by Elockid on 1 August 2010 (Excessive sock puppetry: EunSoo/InkHeart); Elockid has not edited since 2016. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: very few people use it De123abcedx (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. That’s not a reason to remove protection from the page. Discuss any proposals for improving the article on talk:Base64. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done Ends in a few hours, not worth pinging and asking for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. TheXug (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 00:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism/harrassment/abuse by anonymous editors. Anytime any of these editors have been blocked from editing, they come back with a new account to do the same thing again. Corroboration on those details are avaiable from Meters, who suggested I request the page protection' FormalDude, who has recently worked closely with me, and ChristensenMJ, with whom I have worked my entire Wikipedia career. Each of these editors will confirm this as an ongoing problem that keeps recurring to the point where I can't properly focus on other matters here. Recent comments from myself and Meters on this matter can further be found here. I'm happy to provide any additional clarification on my end about any of this. Thanks for your prompt consideration of and resposne to this request. Jgstokes (talk) 21:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jgstokes, they probably do allow service dogs in the movies, but if that movie is, say, A Street Cat Named Bob, that could prove... barky.
El_C 00:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Let the record show that I never have had a service dog, and likely won't ever need one. The nature of the edits in question on my talk page are such that they take just enough factual information from my actual life (most of which is available in the public domain), while embellishing the information in a way that is no longer personally correct of me, and are using cited sources to legitimize the vandalism. That being said, I appreciate the silliness of that part of your response, so thanks for helping me take care of this issue and giving me something to chuckle about. --Jgstokes (talk) 00:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Dissagreement between British/Irish 173.168.100.26 (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- With a single revert, I think it's premature to talk protection. —C.Fred (talk) 22:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Talk Edits 20:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined. Too active for pc, too much collateral for semi. El_C 00:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Bobherry Talk Edits 22:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is an edit warring between an established user and IP user 2600:1012:B05D:7959:89F0:1563:D9B6:E284, so the page cannot be fully protected. I assume the page can just be semi-protected. 36.77.78.40 (talk) 23:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. That dispute seems to be resolved following the TheXug's self revert. TheXug
Warned. El_C 23:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism edits from IPs due to the name of it. Bobherry Talk Edits 01:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalism isn't that heavy (surprisingly); only two bad edits since July that I see. I've added it to my watchlist; if the disruption pace picks up, a few months of pending changes might be called for. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant genre vandalism from IP-hopper. IP blocks have proven ineffectual, and vandalism tends to come back within a day of protection expiring. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/disruption by multiple IPs and non-ACs in past week or so. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has promptly returned to edit war and attack editors after the last protection wore off. Please protect the page for longer or consider blocking the IP. Crossroads -talk- 04:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. LordSnow242 (talk) 01:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2001:4450:8148:A00:359F:612C:5703:BA44 (talk) 03:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Unprotection: I need to tag this to complete an RfD nomination (see: the RfD log). If you could make it WP:ECP then I'd be able to do so, but for now, I have to leave it untagged. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined The edit request process you have already started should suffice here, someone will get to it soon. — xaosflux Talk 05:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent media attention has lead to an uptick in vandalism and violations of the BLP policy. Jack Frost (talk) 07:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. name change enthusiasts Venkat TL (talk) 07:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tushar Prakash Rayate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A bunch of newly created accounts immediately discover this AfD and !vote for keep. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JarvisLoog / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marathi.Wiki.Editor. Jack Frost (talk) 08:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, I'm writing it! Bad bot!
El_C 10:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Extended confirmed protected for the duration. Wow, the spam was way worse than I initially realized. El_C 10:38, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, I'm writing it! Bad bot!
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP range used is used to evade block and edit war to by User:Sweetindian, see SPI. - SUN EYE 1 13:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption and block evasion by User:Sweetindian. Adding WP:SPS and WP:FAKE sources with their IP range. - SUN EYE 1 13:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP, Special:Contributions/5.168.135.95, is persistently changing the photo against consensus at Talk:Hermann_Göring#Main_Photo. Please protect for a few days. K.e.coffman (talk) 14:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There appears to be a recurring pattern of disruption, so the protection is for more than "a few days". Favonian (talk) 14:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive edits from an ip user Estnot (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Extensive edit warring from an ip user Estnot (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
I’m requesting that R.Kelly be removed under spouse. The two were not legally married as she was a minor. As well this was an adult man that sexually abused her and it is quite irresponsible to have that name listed under spouse. Aaliyah was never legally married and that should be documented. She should be respected, especially since it’s been 20 years after her passing. Ninamina1292 (talk) 16:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Done. Ninamina1292, the Illegal marriage was already noted in the lead, but I added it to the infobox as well — I presume that was the point of contention. El_C 11:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep making unconstructive edits in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 15:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry (case open at the moment) and consistent addition of uncited content / changes to existing content facts/figures. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 17:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced / poorly sourced claims of death given reporting on social media. Probably warrants a short semi-prot - either reliable sources will give a clear answer or the hype will dissipate within a few days. firefly ( t · c ) 16:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (was pinged) ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 16:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 17:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 109.180.8.180 (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Rangers fan that referees Rangers games which is against the rules made sfa and fifa.
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined - please format your request correctly by adding the article name you are requesting to be unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socking editor returned as soon as previous protection expired. Spike 'em (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: by RoySmith (talk · contribs). Less Unless (talk) 17:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBIPA, already has an edit with blatant NPOV issue, even though it's only created yesterday. —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 12:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a single disruptive edit. El_C 14:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked the /64 range for 72 hours, as it looks like they've been disruptive across a few articles. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes: BLP policy violations – IP disruptive changes almost once a day. – robertsky (talk) 18:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism after previous protection expired. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 20:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People changing the owner from Mike Brown to Mike White after the Jets defeated the Bengals today. Swagging (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:38, 31 October 2021 (UTC)