Please state what you want out of the review. --Bduke 08:37, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
The user who added this for review staed in reply to my request on his talk page:
- I am a new comer at Wikipedia, so not very confident. I just want experts to validate my work and receive ideas for further improvement. dick 00:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I will add this to the normal WP:PR by transclusion so both debates are in the same place. --Bduke 02:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, there seem to be a lot of good resources being used in this article. However, there is also a plethora of formatting issues:
- Sections should not be created with '''Bold Text''', but instead with hierarchal ===Section Headings===.
- Every sentence should be part of either a decent-sized paragraph or a list. There should be no one-sentence paragraphs.
- The diagram you uploaded must have a licensing tag. It looks like you scanned it from a chemistry handbook. The image page must document the image's source.
- Reference tags should go immediately after punctuation marks without spaces between them, like this.[19]
- Avoid using fragments, such as "Appears to be most abundant in Panax quinquefolius (American Ginseng)".
- Avoid unencyclopedic tone, such as "Rb1 seems to affect..."
I also recommend a thorough reading-through of the Manual of Style and its relevant subpages. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 23:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed a few formatting issues mentioned by Cryptic C62. No idea about content though. - TwoOars 19:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)