February 19, 2006

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus in all cases. All have been closed; please do not vote there any more. Angr/talk 21:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes from DRV

edit

Looking for these? See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 February 19/Userboxes instead. -Splashtalk 00:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 23:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quite similar to the templates deleted last June, this one seems to have been missed. Using templates to cast votes invites vandalism and has never been supported by consensus. Made even worse by the fact that it uses an image. Read the old vote for more verygood arguments against this. -- Netoholic @ 10:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 23:46, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crosswiki redirects haven't worked in forever, which leaves this as an ugly, cryptic, redundant clone of {{wi}}. —Cryptic (talk) 10:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with deleting that thing, but if it's redundant to {{wi}}, why not just redirect it there? -- grm_wnr Esc 14:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Because "Template:R to foo" indicates that it's a redirect-classifying template, which wi is not.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 23:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-NOGov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete this template is not acurate. §9 of Norwegian copyright law states that only "Legal statutes, administrative regulations, court decisions and other decisions by public authorities" and "proposals, reports and other statements which concern the public exercise of authority, and which are made by a public authority, a publicly appointed council or committee, or published by the public authorities." are not subject to copyright. It also spesifies that "Literary, scientific or artistic works" are copyrighted unless they where made explicitly for use in one of the aforementioned official publications. So in order words the text of a report produced by a "public authority" is not subjet to copyright, but an image included in such a report is subject to copyright unless it was made spesificaly for the purpose of beeing included in said report. Guess we could re-write it, but I believe only a few graphs and charts would actualy fit this rather narrow criterea. --Sherool (talk) 03:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 00:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox American Revolutionary War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused, only links to other templates. —Kirill Lokshin 00:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 00:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox American Revolutionary War: Naval (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused, only links to other templates. —Kirill Lokshin 00:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted. - Mailer Diablo 16:35, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Second Congo War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused, empty. —Kirill Lokshin 00:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator, I support this deletion as I cannot for the life of me remember why I created a blank template. - BanyanTree 00:51, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 00:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Seven Years' War: Naval (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused, obsoleted by other campaignboxes on the articles listed. —Kirill Lokshin 00:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 00:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Spanish-American War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused, obsoleted by other campaignboxes on the articles listed. —Kirill Lokshin 00:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 00:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox World War I Naval (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unused, only links to other templates. —Kirill Lokshin 00:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.