November 13

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was orphan and delete all templates.--humblefool® 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:England Squad Euro 2004 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In accordance with Template:Romania Squad Euro 2000's deletion, I nominate this template for deletion. At the same time, the similar Template:England Squad Euro 2000 and the residual Template:Romania Squad Euro 1996, which wasn't deleted in the last afd, are nominated. Poulsen 21:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add the recently made, similar Template:Denmark Squad Euro 1992 to this TFD too. Poulsen 10:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --humblefool® 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Huh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Barely used, very vague, unhelpful and unencyclopaedic. The tfd tag is making a bit of a mess of the pages its used on, so someone might want to move it to the talk page, I couldn't decide. Tango 20:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have attempted to find a use for it, in line with Wikipedia:Explain jargon and Wikipedia:Template messages/Disputes#For inline article placement. I welcome further revisions, as a template with this memorable a name could be made excellent use of in some articels. 68.39.174.238 23:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think it would be worthwhile if it said[jargon?]? --ais523 11:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I just linked to jargon, however it might be more useful generally if it was for any confusing text, similar to {{fact}}, and not just "multiphase opamp inverse schematics" or whatever. 68.39.174.238 10:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The new version looks better - might be worth keeping now. --Tango 11:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend people check out Category:Articles with confusing statements, now that they're clearly related. This may become as usefull as {{fact}} for marking of confusing nonsense that needs attention. See for example, Haussman's renovation of Paris, or the Port of SF. 68.39.174.238 10:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --humblefool® 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chilean 2000 Summer Olympics Squad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not World Cup and Club , same function as medaltop. Matthew_hk tc 13:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --humblefool® 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox singer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template was created in August 2006, but remains unused. robwingfield «TC» 10:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --humblefool® 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Football Club3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As far as I can tell, template isn't used, and is redundant with Infobox football club (and the non used Club2 as well). Template is more than two months old, so doesn't seem to be in a testfase or somesuch. Fram 10:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --humblefool® 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RaelianExternalLinks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Seems to be a directory of links under guise of a template. Only being used by three articles. Any single Raelien movement article would not require all these links, only the most pertinent ones. Suggest deletion or merge with three aforementioned articles. Sfacets 03:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transclude and delete. --humblefool® 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:K-LOVE (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

It's an entire article unto itself. Veinor (ヴエノル) 05:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --humblefool® 03:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox film company (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Appears to be a derivative of the company template that someone was trying to create for an article, but then realized it was better to use the company template. Does not appear to be in use. Suggest deletion. --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.