Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 November 6

< November 5	November 7 >

November 6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (Radiant) 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Major French Cities

Delete Redundant to {{French commune}}. Also unused. Bob 17:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree - the new {{French commune}} template replaces it quite nicely. THEPROMENADER 01:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for above reasons. Also - though it's less of a problem that with article titles - there's a whiff of POV and arbitrariness about the name. Grutness...wha? 22:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant †he Bread 04:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —MJCdetroit 01:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 15:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (Radiant) 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Horrormovie Icons

Delete. Template is almost an exact copy of Template: Horror Icons, which was created first and continues to maintain a discussion of who should become listed on the template via a survey. I believe the template was created to circumvent the protection on Template: Horror Icons, which resulted after the edit wars on the template, so that user can add his own "horror icons" to the list without a consensus. A lot of people violated the 3RR because of the original template for debating on who was an icon. Just creating another one to avoid protection is not the solution. (FF7SquallStrife7 11:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Delete, per nom.--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 19:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. I have spoken with this editor and his reasoning for creating, as even supplied on the original template's talk page, was that the original was "dumb". I think it is clear that he was only out to bypass the protection and create his own template for his own preferences. Bignole 00:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom and Bignole. -- Mikedk9109 (talk) 01:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom.--CyberGhostface 03:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination †he Bread 04:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unnecessary duplication of existing template in an attempt to circumvent consensus and protection, as described above. Neil916 (Talk) 22:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This template is pretty informative, but I think some characters like the Toxic Avenger and Godzilla should be removed. -- Lord Crayak

Did you note why it was up for deletion? It isn't about it's informativeness, it's about the template being an exact copy of another template that already exists. Bignole 02:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:
It's been 9 days since it was nominated; can we say that a clear consensus has been reached about this template yet? Bignole 04:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Dinobird-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was taken to SfD. Kavadi carrier 07:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This template is redundant with dino- and paleo-bird-stub and nobody wants or uses it except the author. Dysmorodrepanis 04:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is being dealt with at SFD and shouldn't be listed here. Grutness...wha? 05:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the template accordingly. Moved to SFD. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 09:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (Radiant) 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox New York City

Delete. This is a single use template that uses Template:Infobox City outside of the N.Y.C. article and simply redirects back into the NYC article. It looks like this was done to try to cut down the article size. I put the data back into the article and it only increased the size by 1 kb. MJCdetroit 01:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Delete. If this was on the only use of the infobox, it needs to be in the article not in a template. --Durin 14:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Single use template. --Bob 18:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bob †he Bread 04:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete single use template, not used any more. Neil916 (Talk) 22:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.